cDNA-derived molecular characteristics and antibodies to a new centrosome-associated and G2/M phase-prevalent protein

1993 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Rothbarth ◽  
C. Petzelt ◽  
X. Lu ◽  
I.T. Todorov ◽  
G. Joswig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Compact Structure ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
New Information ◽  
M Phase ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
General Architecture

Differential screening of a murine RNA-based cDNA library with cell cycle phase-specific transcripts released a cDNA clone (lambda CCD41) to a mRNA (1.349 kb) which, according to the mode of its detection, increases as expected during the cell cycle. The molecular characteristics of the protein (27 × 10(3) M(r)) encoded by this mRNA were deduced from the cDNA sequence and antibodies were prepared against the recombinant protein. Immunofluorescence studies performed with PtK2 cells revealed that the amount of the antigen specified by the CCD41 sequence increases during the cell cycle out of proportion with the DNA content. In G1 phase cells, the antigen is exclusively located at the site of the centrosome. During cell cycle progression the antigen becomes also detectable in perinuclear vesicles that increase in number and size, reaching a maximum in G2 phase cells. The centrosomal location of the CCD41 antigen was investigated in relation to another centrosomal antigen, centrosomin A. Since the latter antigen is detected by a monoclonal antibody reacting specifically and permanently with the centrosomes in PtK2 cells throughout the cell cycle it was possible to investigate the relative positions of the two proteins at the site of the centrosome and to add new information about the general architecture of the organelle and its changes during the cell cycle. While the centrosomin A antibody detects the pronounced cell cycle stage-dependent shape changes of the centrosome, the CCD41-encoded protein appears to be localized as a compact structure inside the centrosome. Its epitopes are exposed throughout the cell cycle except during a brief period immediately after the formation of the daughter centrosome.

A combined in vitro/bioinformatic investigation of redox regulatory mechanisms governing cell cycle progression

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Conour ◽  
W. V. Graham ◽  
H. R. Gaskins
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Nucleotide Metabolism ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Redox Environment ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Intracellular Redox

The intracellular reduction-oxidation (redox) environment influences cell cycle progression; however, underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. To examine potential mechanisms, the intracellular redox environment was characterized per cell cycle phase in Chinese hamster ovary fibroblasts via flow cytometry by measuring reduced glutathione (GSH), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and DNA content with monochlorobimane, 2′,7′-dichlorohydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA), and DRAQ5, respectively. GSH content was significantly greater in G2/M compared with G1phase cells, whereas GSH was intermediate in S phase cells. ROS content was similar among phases. Together, these data demonstrate that G2/M cells are more reduced than G1cells. Conventional approaches to define regulatory mechanisms are subjective in nature and focus on single proteins/pathways. Proteome databases provide a means to overcome these inherent limitations. Therefore, a novel bioinformatic approach was developed to exhaustively identify putative redox-regulated cell cycle proteins containing redox-sensitive protein motifs. Using the InterPro ( http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ ) database, we categorized 536 redox-sensitive motifs as: 1) active/functional-site cysteines, 2) electron transport, 3) heme, 4) iron binding, 5) zinc binding, 6) metal binding (non-Fe/Zn), and 7) disulfides. Comparing this list with 1,634 cell cycle-associated proteins from Swiss-Prot and SpTrEMBL ( http://us.expasy.org/sprot/ ) revealed 92 candidate proteins. Three-fourths (69 of 92) of the candidate proteins function in the central cell cycle processes of transcription, nucleotide metabolism, (de)phosphorylation, and (de)ubiquitinylation. The majority of oxidant-sensitive candidate proteins (68.9%) function during G2/M phase. As the G2/M phase is more reduced than the G1phase, oxidant-sensitive proteins may be temporally regulated by oscillation of the intracellular redox environment. Combined with evidence of intracellular redox compartmentalization, we propose a spatiotemporal mechanism that functionally links an oscillating intracellular redox environment with cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Cell-cycle phase-dependence of drug-induced cycle progression delay.

1979 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 470-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Göhde ◽  
M Meistrich ◽  
R Meyn ◽  
J Schumann ◽  
D Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Cell Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Phase Dependence ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Phase Progression ◽  
Pulse Cytophotometry

The effect of adriamycin on cell cycle phase progression of CHO cells synchronized into the various phases of the cell cycle by elutriation was investigated by high resolution pulse cytophotometry. Cells treated in all phases of the cell cycle showed delay in their subsequent progression. In addition to the wellknown block of cells in the G2-phase, a delay in passage of cells from G1 to S and a decreased rate of transit through the S-phase were observed. A broadening of the DNA distributions of the treated cells was observed after cell division indicating induction of chromosomal abnormalities.

scholarly journals Cdk1-Mediated Phosphorylation of Human ATF7 at Thr-51 and Thr-53 Promotes Cell-Cycle Progression into M Phase

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e116048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitomi Hasegawa ◽  
Kenichi Ishibashi ◽  
Shoichi Kubota ◽  
Chihiro Yamaguchi ◽  
Ryuzaburo Yuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase

scholarly journals Murine Norovirus Replication Induces G0/G1Cell Cycle Arrest in Asynchronously Growing Cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 6057-6066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Davies ◽  
Chris M. Brown ◽  
Dana Westphal ◽  
Joanna M. Ward ◽  
Vernon K. Ward
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Virus Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Murine Norovirus ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Favorable Conditions

ABSTRACTMany viruses replicate most efficiently in specific phases of the cell cycle, establishing or exploiting favorable conditions for viral replication, although little is known about the relationship between caliciviruses and the cell cycle. Microarray and Western blot analysis of murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1)-infected cells showed changes in cyclin transcript and protein levels indicative of a G1phase arrest. Cell cycle analysis confirmed that MNV-1 infection caused a prolonging of the G1phase and an accumulation of cells in the G0/G1phase. The accumulation in G0/G1phase was caused by a reduction in cell cycle progression through the G1/S restriction point, with MNV-1-infected cells released from a G1arrest showing reduced cell cycle progression compared to mock-infected cells. MNV-1 replication was compared in populations of cells synchronized into specific cell cycle phases and in asynchronously growing cells. Cells actively progressing through the G1phase had a 2-fold or higher increase in virus progeny and capsid protein expression over cells in other phases of the cell cycle or in unsynchronized populations. These findings suggest that MNV-1 infection leads to prolonging of the G1phase and a reduction in S phase entry in host cells, establishing favorable conditions for viral protein production and viral replication. There is limited information on the interactions between noroviruses and the cell cycle, and this observation of increased replication in the G1phase may be representative of other members of theCaliciviridae.IMPORTANCENoroviruses have proven recalcitrant to growth in cell culture, limiting our understanding of the interaction between these viruses and the infected cell. In this study, we used the cell-culturable MNV-1 to show that infection of murine macrophages affects the G1/S cell cycle phase transition, leading to an arrest in cell cycle progression and an accumulation of cells in the G0/G1phase. Furthermore, we show that MNV replication is enhanced in the G1phase compared to other stages of the cell cycle. Manipulating the cell cycle or adapting to cell cycle responses of the host cell is a mechanism to enhance virus replication. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a norovirus interacting with the host cell cycle and exploiting the favorable conditions of the G0/G1phase for RNA virus replication.

scholarly journals Loss of MCU prevents mitochondrial fusion in G1-S phase and blocks cell cycle progression and proliferation

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (579) ◽  
pp. eaav1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olha M. Koval ◽  
Emily K. Nguyen ◽  
Velarchana Santhana ◽  
Trevor P. Fidler ◽  
Sara C. Sebag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitochondrial Fission ◽  
Mitochondrial Fusion ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Mitochondrial Fragmentation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Regulatory Circuit

The role of the mitochondrial Ca2+uniporter (MCU) in physiologic cell proliferation remains to be defined. Here, we demonstrated that the MCU was required to match mitochondrial function to metabolic demands during the cell cycle. During the G1-S transition (the cycle phase with the highest mitochondrial ATP output), mitochondrial fusion, oxygen consumption, and Ca2+uptake increased in wild-type cells but not in cells lacking MCU. In proliferating wild-type control cells, the addition of the growth factors promoted the activation of the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) and the phosphorylation of the mitochondrial fission factor Drp1 at Ser616. The lack of the MCU was associated with baseline activation of CaMKII, mitochondrial fragmentation due to increased Drp1 phosphorylation, and impaired mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis. The mitochondrial fission/fusion ratio and proliferation in MCU-deficient cells recovered after MCU restoration or inhibition of mitochondrial fragmentation or of CaMKII in the cytosol. Our data highlight a key function for the MCU in mitochondrial adaptation to the metabolic demands during cell cycle progression. Cytosolic CaMKII and the MCU participate in a regulatory circuit, whereby mitochondrial Ca2+uptake affects cell proliferation through Drp1.

scholarly journals Cubic Membranes Formation in Synchronized Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Reveals a Possible Role as a Structural Antioxidant Defense System in Cell Cycle Progression

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deqin Kong ◽  
Rui Liu ◽  
Jiangzheng Liu ◽  
Qingbiao Zhou ◽  
Jiaxin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Carcinoma Cells ◽  
Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells

Cubic membranes (CMs) represent unique biological membrane structures with highly curved three-dimensional periodic minimal surfaces, which have been observed in a wide range of cell types and organelles under various stress conditions (e. g., starvation, virus-infection, and oxidation). However, there are few reports on the biological roles of CMs, especially their roles in cell cycle. Hence, we established a stable cell population of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) of 100% S phase by thymidine treatment, and determined certain parameters in G2 phase released from S phase. Then we found a close relationship between CMs formation and cell cycle, and an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial function. After the synchronization of HepG2 cells were induced, CMs were observed through transmission electron microscope in G2 phase but not in G1, S and M phase. Moreover, the increased ATP production, mitochondrial and intracellular ROS levels were also present in G2 phase, which demonstrated a positive correlation with CMs formation by Pearson correlation analysis. This study suggests that CMs may act as an antioxidant structure in response to mitochondria-derived ROS during G2 phase and thus participate in cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Growth Factor-Induced Cell Signaling

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3327
Author(s):  
Zhixiang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Growth Factor Signaling ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase

The cell cycle is the series of events that take place in a cell, which drives it to divide and produce two new daughter cells. The typical cell cycle in eukaryotes is composed of the following phases: G1, S, G2, and M phase. Cell cycle progression is mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and their regulatory cyclin subunits. However, the driving force of cell cycle progression is growth factor-initiated signaling pathways that control the activity of various Cdk–cyclin complexes. While the mechanism underlying the role of growth factor signaling in G1 phase of cell cycle progression has been largely revealed due to early extensive research, little is known regarding the function and mechanism of growth factor signaling in regulating other phases of the cell cycle, including S, G2, and M phase. In this review, we briefly discuss the process of cell cycle progression through various phases, and we focus on the role of signaling pathways activated by growth factors and their receptor (mostly receptor tyrosine kinases) in regulating cell cycle progression through various phases.

scholarly journals Akt/Protein Kinase B-Dependent Phosphorylation and Inactivation of WEE1Hu Promote Cell Cycle Progression at G2/M Transition

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 5725-5737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Katayama ◽  
Naoya Fujita ◽  
Takashi Tsuruo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Cytoplasmic Localization ◽  
M Cell ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Promote Cell Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT The serine/threonine kinase Akt is known to promote cell growth by regulating the cell cycle in G1 phase through activation of cyclin/Cdk kinases and inactivation of Cdk inhibitors. However, how the G2/M phase is regulated by Akt remains unclear. Here, we show that Akt counteracts the function of WEE1Hu. Inactivation of Akt by chemotherapeutic drugs or the phosphatidylinositide-3-OH kinase inhibitor LY294002 induced G2/M arrest together with the inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc2. Because the increased Cdc2 phosphorylation was completely suppressed by wee1hu gene silencing, WEE1Hu was associated with G2/M arrest induced by Akt inactivation. Further analyses revealed that Akt directly bound to and phosphorylated WEE1Hu during the S to G2 phase. Serine-642 was identified as an Akt-dependent phosphorylation site. WEE1Hu kinase activity was not affected by serine-642 phosphorylation. We revealed that serine-642 phosphorylation promoted cytoplasmic localization of WEE1Hu. The nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation was mediated by phosphorylation-dependent WEE1Hu binding to 14-3-3θ but not 14-3-3β or -σ. These results indicate that Akt promotes G2/M cell cycle progression by inducing phosphorylation-dependent 14-3-3θ binding and cytoplasmic localization of WEE1Hu.

DNA damage inhibits proteolysis of the B-type cyclin Clb5 in S. cerevisiae

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (15) ◽  
pp. 1813-1820
Author(s):  
D. Germain ◽  
J. Hendley ◽  
B. Futcher
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Tyrosine Phosphorylation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Pathway ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Transition Points ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

Cell cycle progression is mediated by waves of specific cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) in all eukaryotes. Cyclins are degraded by the ubiquitin pathway of proteolysis. The recent identification of several components of the cyclin proteolysis machinery has highlighted both the importance of proteolysis at multiple transition points in the cell cycle and the involvement of other substrates degraded by the same machinery. In this study, we have investigated the effects of DNA damage on the cyclin proteolytic machinery in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that the half-life of the B-type cyclin Clb5 is markedly increased following DNA damage while that of G1 cyclins is not. This effect is independent of cell cycle phase. Clb5 turnover requires p34CDC28 activity. Stabilisation of Clb5 correlates with an increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of p34CDC28, but stabilisation does not require this tyrosine phosphorylation. The stabilisation is independent of the checkpoint genes Mec1 and Rad53. These observations establish a new link between the regulation of proteolysis and DNA damage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document