scholarly journals ASO Author Reflections: The Impact of Residential Segregation on Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Mortality

Author(s):  
Michael R. Poulson ◽  
Barbara Aldana Blanco ◽  
Teviah E. Sachs
Author(s):  
Barbara Aldana Blanco ◽  
Michael Poulson ◽  
Kelly M. Kenzik ◽  
David B. McAneny ◽  
Jennifer F. Tseng ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 239-239
Author(s):  
Nina J. Karlin ◽  
Shailja Amin ◽  
Matthew Buras ◽  
Heidi E. Kosiorek ◽  
Patricia M. Verona ◽  
...  

239 Background: The aim of this case-control study was to determine the impact of DM on survival in pancreatic cancer patients, and to examine the impact of pancreatic cancer on glycemic control in DM. Methods: Ninety-two patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer from 2007 to 2015 with DM were identified from the institutional Cancer Registry and matched to ninety-two pancreatic cancer patients without DM according to age, gender, and year of pancreatic cancer diagnosis. The file was linked to the electronic medical record to obtain information on DM and pancreatic cancer therapies, and laboratory results. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Cox regression analysis. Mixed models were used to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose over time. Results: Mean age of the entire pancreatic cancer cohort was 70 years, most (92%) were white, most common (88%) histology was adenocarcinoma, and majority (41%) were stage IV. No differences in age, race/ethnicity, histology, or tumor stage were detected between patients with and without DM, although DM patients had higher body mass index (P = 0.014). Mean ca 19-9 (U/ml) was 804 for diabetics, and 395 for non-diabetics. Among those with DM the mean HbA1c during the year following cancer diagnosis was 7.3%. Time (days since diagnosis) was significant in DM patients (p = 0.014) as HbA1c decreased over time. Mean glucose during the year following diagnosis among DM patients was significantly higher compared to non-DM patients [160.6 (SD = 38.0) versus 117.2 (SD = 19.0); p < 0.001]. Both groups had a decline in glucose over time (p = 0.008). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (median follow-up time of 11.9 months), 2 year overall survival was estimated at 15% [95% CI: 8-24%] for DM patients versus 26% [95% CI: 17-36%] in non-DM patients. Hazard ratio (for matched pairs) was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.75-1.77; p = 0.51). Conclusions: DM did not adversely impact survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer did not affect glycemic control. Elevated ca 19-9 in diabetic patients may be an unreliable marker for gauging disease progression.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1151-1151
Author(s):  
Vivek Kesari ◽  
Maithili Shethia ◽  
Xiao Zhou ◽  
Michael Overman ◽  
Saroj Vadhan-Raj

Abstract Abstract 1151 Background: Patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer are at high risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and the occurrence of VTE can adversely affect prognosis. However, it is unclear if the type of VTE such as symptomatic vs incidental, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) vs pulmonary embolism (PE), the location of VTE [DVT of extremities vs visceral veins (abdominal/pelvic veins)] or the timing of VTE from diagnosis can influence the survival. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of different types of VTE, the impact of types and timing of VTE (early vs late) on survival. Methods: Medical records of 260 pts with pancreatic cancer, newly referred to MDACC in 2006, were reviewed for cancer diagnosis, patient demographics (age, gender), presence of metastasis, the date of diagnosis of VTE, timing of VTE, type of VTE, the site of VTE, the incidence of VTE during 2 years of follow up from the date of diagnosis. Clinical and laboratory parameters predictive for survival were also reviewed. All VTE episodes, including symptomatic as well as incidental VTEs were confirmed by the radiological studies using CT ANGIO, CT scan, Doppler compression ultrasound or V/Q perfusion scans. The survival time was calculated from the date of cancer diagnosis to the date of last follow up. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. The stepwise selection method was employed to build a multivariate model using variables with p<0.15 in univariate analysis. Results: Of the 260 pts referred, 235 were confirmed to have the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. During the 2-year follow-up, 80 pts (34%) had 109 episodes of VTE, including symptomatic and incidental episodes. The median age of the pts with VTE was 59 years (range: 28–86) and 51% were males. Of the 80 pts with VTE, 21 (26%) had PE, 18 (23%) had DVT of extremities, 28 (35%) had DVT of visceral veins and 13 (16%) had concurrent PE/DVT (diagnosed on the same day). Of the 80 pts, 25 (31%) had 29 recurrent episodes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, as shown in the table below, indicated that the pts who had early VTE (defined as VTE diagnosed within 30 days from the date of diagnosis of pancreatic cancer) vs late VTE (> 30 days) and pts with metastasis vs no metastasis had statistically poor 1 year survival (log-rank test). Conclusions: These findings suggest that timing of VTE is an important indicator of prognosis, regardless of whether symptomatic or incidental. Patients with VTE within 30 days of diagnosis have shorter survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1514
Author(s):  
Michael Poulson ◽  
Andrea M. Madiedo ◽  
Tracey Dechert ◽  
Jason Hall

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Poulson ◽  
Samuel A. Helrich ◽  
Kelly M. Kenzik ◽  
Tracey A. Dechert ◽  
Teviah E. Sachs ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic O’Connor ◽  
Malcolm Brown ◽  
Martin Eatock ◽  
Richard C. Turkington ◽  
Gillian Prue

Abstract Background Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer and is associated with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. Patients eligible for surgery, increasingly receive neo-adjuvant therapy before surgery or adjuvant therapy afterward, inherently exposing them to toxicity. As such, optimizing physical function through exercise during treatment remains imperative to optimize quality of life either before surgery or during rehabilitation. However, current exercise efficacy and prescription in pancreatic cancer is unknown. Therefore, this study aims to summarise the published literature on exercise studies conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing treatment with a focus on determining the current prescription and progression patterns being used in this population. Methods A systematic review of four databases identified studies evaluating the effects of exercise on aerobic fitness, muscle strength, physical function, body composition, fatigue and quality of life in participants with pancreatic cancer undergoing treatment, published up to 24 July 2020. Two reviewers independently reviewed and appraised the methodological quality of each study. Results Twelve studies with a total of 300 participants were included. Heterogeneity of the literature prevented meta-analysis. Exercise was associated with improvements in outcomes; however, study quality was variable with the majority of studies receiving a weak rating. Conclusions High quality evidence regarding the efficacy and prescription of exercise in pancreatic cancer is lacking. Well-designed trials, which have received feedback and input from key stakeholders prior to implementation, are required to examine the impact of exercise in pancreatic cancer on key cancer related health outcomes.


BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yechen Wu ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Duocheng Qian ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Yiping Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A history of prior cancer commonly results in exclusion from cancer clinical trials. However, whether a prior cancer history has an adversely impact on clinical outcomes for patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) remains largely unknown. We therefore aimed to investigate the impact of prior cancer history on these patients. Methods We identified patients with advanced prostate cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2010 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model were utilized for survival analysis. Results A total of 19,772 eligible APC patients were included, of whom 887 (4.5 %) had a history of prior cancer. Urinary bladder (19 %), colon and cecum (16 %), melanoma of the skin (9 %) malignancies, and non-hodgkin lymphoma (9 %) were the most common types of prior cancer. Patients with a history of prior cancer had slightly inferior overall survival (OS) (AHR = 1.13; 95 % CI [1.02–1.26]; P = 0.017) as compared with that of patients without a prior cancer diagnosis. Subgroup analysis further indicated that a history of prior cancer didn’t adversely impact patients’ clinical outcomes, except in patients with a prior cancer diagnosed within 2 years, at advanced stage, or originating from specific sites, including bladder, colon and cecum, or lung and bronchus, or prior chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Conclusions A large proportion of APC patients with a prior cancer history had non-inferior survival to that of patients without a prior cancer diagnosis. These patients may be candidates for relevant cancer trials.


Author(s):  
Paulo L. Pfitzinger ◽  
Laura Fangmann ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Elke Demir ◽  
Engin Gürlevik ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nerve-cancer interactions are increasingly recognized to be of paramount importance for the emergence and progression of pancreatic cancer (PCa). Here, we investigated the role of indirect cholinergic activation on PCa progression through inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) via clinically available AChE-inhibitors, i.e. physostigmine and pyridostigmine. Methods We applied immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, MTT-viability, invasion, flow-cytometric-cell-cycle-assays, phospho-kinase arrays, multiplex ELISA and xenografted mice to assess the impact of AChE inhibition on PCa cell growth and invasiveness, and tumor-associated inflammation. Survival analyses were performed in a novel genetically-induced, surgically-resectable mouse model of PCa under adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine+/−physostigmine/pyridostigmine (n = 30 mice). Human PCa specimens (n = 39) were analyzed for the impact of cancer AChE expression on tumor stage and survival. Results We discovered a strong expression of AChE in cancer cells of human PCa specimens. Inhibition of this cancer-cell-intrinsic AChE via pyridostigmine and physostigmine, or administration of acetylcholine (ACh), diminished PCa cell viability and invasion in vitro and in vivo via suppression of pERK signaling, and reduced tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) infiltration and serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. In the novel genetically-induced, surgically-resectable PCa mouse model, adjuvant co-therapy with AChE blockers had no impact on survival. Accordingly, survival of resected PCa patients did not differ based on tumor AChE expression levels. Patients with higher-stage PCa also exhibited loss of the ACh-synthesizing enzyme, choline-acetyltransferase (ChAT), in their nerves. Conclusion For future clinical trials of PCa, direct cholinergic stimulation of the muscarinic signaling, rather than indirect activation via AChE blockade, may be a more effective strategy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-165
Author(s):  
Ilaria Pergolini ◽  
I. Ekin Demir ◽  
Christian Stöss ◽  
Klaus Emmanuel ◽  
Robert Rosenberg ◽  
...  

Background: This survey aimed to register changes determined by the COVID-19 pandemic on pancreatic surgery in a specific geographic area (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) to evaluate the impact of the pandemic and obtain interesting cues for the future. Methods: An online survey was designed using Google Forms focusing on the local impact of the pandemic on pancreatic surgery. The survey was conducted at 2 different time points, during and after the lockdown. Results: Twenty-five respondents (25/56) completed the survey. Many aspects of oncological care have been affected with restrictions and delays: staging, tumor board, treatment selection, postoperative course, adjuvant treatments, outpatient care, and follow-up. Overall, 60% of respondents have prioritized pancreatic cancer patients according to stage, age, and comorbidities, and 40% opted not to operate high-risk patients. However, for 96% of participants, the standards of care were guaranteed. Discussion/Conclusions: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had an important impact on pancreatic cancer surgery in central Europe. Guidelines for prompt interventions and prevention of the spread of viral infections in the surgical environment are needed to avoid a deterioration of care in cancer patients in the event of a second wave or a new pandemic. High-volume centers for pancreatic surgery should be preferred and their activity maintained. Virtual conferences have proven to be efficient during this pandemic and should be implemented in the near future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document