Book Reviews

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1178-1180

Anthony M. Pagan of the University of Illinois at Chicago reviews “American Railroads: Decline and Renaissance in the Twentieth Century”, by Robert E. Gallamore and John R. Meyer. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the story of the railroad industry that dominated U.S. freight transportation over land at the beginning of the twentieth century, and how it lost its leadership and much of its economic power over the next eighty years, and then was reborn in the last two decades of the century. Discusses the enduring American railroads; the ills of government regulation of rail rates and services; the policy dilemma of competition and consolidation; the impact of rival freight modes on railroads; the decline of railway passenger service, 1900-1970; mergers at midcentury and the Penn Central debacle; two railroad reform and revitalization acts and the Northeast Rail Crisis in the 1970s; the brief, mainly happy life of Conrail, 1976-99; the making of the Staggers Rail Act, and experience under deregulation; how railroads got their final sizes and shapes; the enduring problem of rail passenger service in the Amtrak era; advancing technology for American railroads; the decline and renaissance of American railroads in the twentieth century; and future policies for U.S. railroads. Gallamore retired from the Union Pacific Railroad and Northwestern University, and is Adjunct Professor in the Rail Management Program at Michigan State University. The late Meyer was James W. Harpel Professor of Capital Formation Emeritus in the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.”

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Athena S. McKay ◽  
Adam Paberzs ◽  
Patricia Piechowski ◽  
Donald Vereen ◽  
Susan Woolford

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Examining the impact of the Building Capacity for Research and Action (BCRA) Award created by the Community Engagement (CE) Program at the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research (MICHR)--a Clinical & Translational Science Award (CTSA) site at the University of Michigan--in partnership with Community Based Organization Partners (CBOP). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The BCRA is a funding mechanism that supports new community-engaged research (CEnR) partnerships and projects that address community-identified health needs in Flint, Michigan. BCRA projects are required to be Flint-based and inclusive of both community and academic partners. A study section consisting of 10 MICHR-affiliated faculty and community partners reviewed proposals and made funding decisions. Funded teams were trained on Institutional Review Board (IRB) and reporting requirements by CE staff. MICHR provides support to BCRA-funded teams through monthly email correspondence with the CE Flint connector, budget review, mediation, regulatory assurance of IRB and the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) requirements, coordinating six-month and final reporting, and hosting an annual stakeholder meet and greet. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 2017, the BCRA Award submitted its first request for proposals. It received 20 applications in 2018, and selected eight awardees, providing them with a total of $60,000 in funding. Four received $5,000 for partnership development and another four received $10,000 for their research projects. The BCRA Award received 16 applications in 2019, expanding its academic pool to include the University of Chicago, U-M Flint, Michigan State University, and Michigan State University-Flint in addition to the University of Michigan. Five recipients were selected and received a total of $45,000 in funding. One was awarded $5,000 for partnership development and another four were awarded $10,000 for their research projects. MICHR has invested over $100,000 in Flint through this mechanism, which was renewed in 2019. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Each awardee presented at the annual stakeholder meet and greet. They showcased their projects with a brief overview and spoke about their expectations, lessons learned, partnership strengths and challenges, translational issues, and proposed next steps for subsequent grants, publications.


Author(s):  
Edith Sparks

The experiences of Lewis, Beech and Rudkin reveal that these female business leaders did not behave as champions of employees or women as feminists then and now might have hoped. Instead, they acted in commonplace ways as architects of a “new welfare capitalism” characteristic of American companies starting in the 1930s and made labor-management decisions designed to blunt the impact of unions within their companies like so many business leaders in the middle of the twentieth century. Leveraging the language of family, they built companies that asserted overtly employee-oriented policies that rewarded loyalty and efficiency with strong wages, benefits and noblesse oblige for the workers they wished to retain long term. All of them relied on this approach as a way to maintain control of labor-management relations, as an expedient business strategy and as one ideologically resonant with their beliefs. Lewis, Beech and Rudkin were business leaders of their time, evangelists for the free enterprise system, in favour of less government regulation, and in support of company cultures that treated their employees as resources with a responsibility to increase the company’s profit margin.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gould

The mission of the Institute for the Study of Youth Sports (ISYS) is to provide leadership, scholarship, and outreach that “transforms” the face of youth sports in ways that maximize the beneficial physical, psychological, and social effects of participation for children and youth while minimizing detrimental effects. Since its inception in 1978, ISYS has partnered with numerous organizations to promote healthy youth sports participation. In this article, the general steps ISYS takes to form and facilitate partnerships are addressed. Four long-term partnerships are also described. The services provided to these organizations are described and the advantages and challenges of working with partners, in general, are delineated. How these partnerships are used to facilitate the teaching, outreach-engagement, and scholarship components of the Michigan State University land grant mission are also described. The case of ISYS shows that conducting community outreach and engagement projects greatly enhance the scholarly mission of the university.


2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-119

Theodore Burczak of Denison University reviews “Documents Related to John Maynard Keynes, Institutionalism at Chicago and Frank H. Knight”, by Ross B. Emmett. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Eight papers explore topics related to John Maynard Keynes, institutionalism at the University of Chicago, and Frank H. Knight. Papers discuss the original 1933 “National Self-Sufficiency” lecture by Keynes—its political economic context and purpose (Mark C. Nolan); “National Self-Sufficiency” (Keynes); studying institutional economics at Chicago in the 1930s—the case of Arthur Bloomfield (Pier Francesco Asso and Luca Fiorito); Thorstein Veblen and his analysis of business enterprise (Bloomfield); Knight on institutionalism and economics (Ross B. Emmett); institutional history and the classical economics (Knight); the friendship of Knight and Frederick D. Kershner (Emmett); and the correspondence between Knight and Kershner, 1915-51 (Emmett). Emmett is at James Madison College at Michigan State University.”


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Katherine Corby ◽  
Shellie Jeffries ◽  
Darlene P. Nichols

Formation of the Michigan Research Libraries Triangle consortium in 1991 served to bring the education librarians of Michigan State University, the University of Michigan and Wayne State University into a working relationship. The education programs at each institution have unique histories shaped by demographic, political and economic forces. The evolution of the programs profoundly influenced the physical and philosophical development of the education libraries at each institution and the education librarians have based their cooperation on the historic roles and unique strengths of each library 's collection. The level of activity and opportunityfor cooperation has fluctuated over the years due to institutional changes. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document