Detection of male genital infection with Chlamydia trachom atis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using an automated multiplex PCR system (Cobas AmplicorTM)

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P Higgins ◽  
Paul E Klapper ◽  
J Keith Struthers ◽  
Andrew S Bailey ◽  
Alison P Gough ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
Dot Blot ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Male Genital

Summary: We evaluated Cobas AmplicorTM, a highly automated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system, to test first-void urine (FVU) and urethral swab specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in men attending a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic. Results were compared against an inhouse radioimmune dot blot (DB) test for C. trachomatis and selective culture for N. gonorrhoeae . Three hundred and ninety sets of specimens were obtained from 378 consecutive new and returned-new patients. Gonorrhoea prevalence was 9.49%, with no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity between culture and PCR. Chlamydia prevalence was 15.4%, with sensitivities of: DB 55%, PCR of FVU 86.7%, urethral swab PCR 90%. The specificity of PCR on FVU and urethral swabs was 100%. We have shown that Cobas AmplicorTM PCR is highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of chlamydia and gonorrhoea in men attending an STI clinic. Further economic and scientific studies are needed to determine the costeffectiveness of this technique for screening in primary care settings.

scholarly journals POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION AS A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR SIX SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS - PRELIMINARY RESULTS

2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
Alecsandra Iulia Grad ◽  
Mihaela Laura Vica ◽  
Horea Vladi Matei ◽  
Doru Lucian Grad ◽  
Ioan Coman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Chlamydia Trachomatis ◽  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
Sexually Transmitted Infections ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background and aim. Sexually transmitted infections are a very frequent and under-diagnosed cause of illness worldwide. A high number of detection methods and a large range of specimens in which sexually transmitted infections can be determined are available at the moment. Polymerase chain reaction performed on first void urine offers the advantage of being non-invasive, self-collectable and has high sensitivity and specificity. We looked to determine the frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.Methods. Six sexually transmitted infections were determined in the first void urine of 15 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients by polymerase chain reaction. We used “Epicenter MasterPure™ Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kit” for the DNA purification and “Seeplex® STD6 ACE Detection” for the DNA amplification. The results were examined in UV light.Results. A number of 5 patients had positive results for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sexually transmitted infections are more frequent in men between 27 and 40 years old.Conclusions. Polymerase chain reaction is a good diagnostic tool for sexually transmitted infections because it has a high sensitivity and specificity. Chlamydia trachomatis is the most frequent sexually transmitted infection, followed by Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Sexually transmitted infection

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. McCarty ◽  
Wallace Dinsmore
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Dna Identification ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Rising Incidence ◽  
The Common ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Genitourinary Medicine ◽  
Common Infections

The rising incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) provides a challenge to clinicians in all fields to whom patients may present. This chapter aims to provide an overview of the common infections, particularly those aspects which may be relevant to urologists. There have been many recent changes in diagnostic testing (including use of polymerase chain reaction DNA identification) and treatment for STIs, especially with regard to the increasing resistance of gonorrhoea to many antibiotics. The presence of sexual infection is often overlooked in clinical practice or diagnosed late in the course of investigation of symptoms, resulting in difficulty in treatment and in some cases permanent sequelae. This overview should enable urologists to consider STI when formulating a list of differential diagnoses and aid appropriate testing or prompt referral to specialist genitourinary medicine clinics.

Comparison of tampon and urine as self-administered methods of specimen collection in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis in women

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 347-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sepehr N Tabrizi ◽  
Barbara A Paterson ◽  
Christopher K Fairley ◽  
Francis J Bowden ◽  
Suzanne M Garland
Keyword(s):  
Chlamydia Trachomatis ◽  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
Trichomonas Vaginalis ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Specimen Collection ◽  
Alfred Hospital ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Urine Specimens

1 Department of Microbiology, The Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, 2 Menzies School of Health Research, Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, 3 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria and 4 AIDS/STD Unit, Centre for Disease Control, Territory Health Services, Darwin, Australia Summary: Self-administered sampling techniques for the detection of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are particularly useful due to their ease of collection and better patient compliance. Urine specimens, and recently tampons, have been described as methods of specimen collection for the detection of some STDs in women. In this study, 660 women had both first-void urine (FVU) and tampon specimens analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis . Overall 6.5%, 10.1% and 17.9% of urine samples were positive whereas 7%, 21.2% and 22% of tampon specimens were positive for C. trachomatis , N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis respectively. Tampon-collected specimens tested by PCR were more sensitive than urine specimens for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis ( P 0.001) and equally sensitive for the detection of C. trachomatis ( P =0.45). <

Mycoplasma genitalium infections in Cuba: surveillance of urogenital syndromes, 2014–2015

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 994-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A Mondeja ◽  
Nadia M Rodríguez ◽  
Orestes Blanco ◽  
Carmen Fernández ◽  
Jørgen S Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Reproductive Tract ◽  
Mycoplasma Genitalium ◽  
Reference Laboratory ◽  
Sexually Active ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Mycoplasma genitalium is an emerging sexually transmitted pathogen implicated in urethritis in men and several inflammatory reproductive tract syndromes in women. The prevalence of M. genitalium infections in Cuban patients with urogenital syndromes is unknown. The aim of this study was to analyse the prevalence of M. genitalium infection in sexually-active Cuban men and women with urogenital syndromes as a part of aetiological surveillance of urogenital syndromes in Cuba. Samples from men and women with urogenital syndromes submitted to the Mycoplasma Reference Laboratory for mycoplasma diagnosis from 1 January 2014 to 1 June 2015 were analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of M. genitalium. A total of 971 samples were received and processed. Of the patients tested, 5.7% (47/824) of women and 27.9% (41/147) of men were positive for M. genitalium. This paper presents the largest study of M. genitalium infections among Cuban patients with urogenital syndromes and is Cuba’s first M. genitalium survey. We suggest that M. genitalium should be considered in the Cuban sexually transmitted infection management protocols as an important pathogen, particularly in men.

scholarly journals 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S153-S153
Author(s):  
Zahra Qamar ◽  
Lisa A Spacek ◽  
Dagan Coppock ◽  
Kaya Patel ◽  
Nathan L’Etoile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Sensitive Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background C. difficile (CD) testing is frequently ordered inappropriately. Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can detect CD colonization leading to misdiagnosis. Providers often overlook other causes of diarrhea, notably laxatives. To improve diagnostic stewardship, our hospital introduced an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set (OS). Methods In a 926-bed, teaching hospital, we conducted a 3-step intervention to improve CD diagnostic stewardship. (1) A retrospective analysis of CD orders before and after OS implementation was done to assess its impact on inappropriate orders. The OS included two questions: (a) Did patient have ≥ 3 loose bowel movements in past 24 hours? and (b) No laxatives in past 24 hours? An appropriate order was defined if “yes” to both questions. It was still appropriate if “no” to either question but ≥ 2 unexplained following features: fever &gt; 100.4 F, abdominal pain, megacolon, ileus or leukocytosis &gt; 11,000 cells/mm3 in prior day. (2) After implementation of OS, house staff compliance with OS was surveyed via email. (3) Rationale for inappropriate orders was discussed with providers. Results Of 238 patients in retrospective analysis, 44% were ≥ 65 years and 37% had other potential causes of diarrhea. Common clinical features were leukocytosis (40%) and fever (31%). There was no significant difference in inappropriate testing: pre-OS 27/99 (27%) vs post-OS 44/139 (32%) (p=0.47). Of 43 house officers who participated in the survey, 75% indicated they over rode the OS. When asked to provide rationale of inappropriate CD testing, providers acknowledged inappropriate ordering but did not want to miss a CD diagnosis and frequently overlooked other causes of diarrhea. Conclusion Appropriate CD testing relies on providers’ appreciation of a clinical picture consistent with CD infection, confirmation of clinically significant diarrhea, and consideration of other causes of diarrhea. Providers order inappropriate tests, not due to lack of knowledge, but likely fear of missing diagnosis and overlooking other causes of diarrhea. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Prevalence of urogenital, anal, and pharyngeal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Mycoplasma genitalium: a cross-sectional study in Reunion island

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Calas ◽  
N. Zemali ◽  
G. Camuset ◽  
J. Jaubert ◽  
R. Manaquin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chlamydia Trachomatis ◽  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
Mycoplasma Genitalium ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Urogenital Infection ◽  
High Prevalence

Abstract Background Recommendations for sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening vary significantly across countries. This study evaluated the prevalence of urogenital and extragenital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) in patients visiting a French STI clinic in the Indian Ocean region to determine whether current STI screening practices should be updated. Methods This cross-sectional study examined all patients who visited the STI clinic between 2014 and 2015. Triplex polymerase chain reaction screening for CT, NG, and MG was performed on urine, vaginal, pharyngeal, and anal specimens (FTD Urethritis Basic Kit, Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg). Results Of the 851 patients enrolled in the study, 367 were women (367/851, 43.2%) and 484 were men (484/851, 56.0%). Overall, 826 urogenital specimens (826/851, 97.1%), 606 pharyngeal specimens (606/851, 71.2%), and 127 anal specimens (127/851, 14.9%) were taken from enrolled patients. The prevalence of urogenital CT and MG was high in women ≤25 years (19/186, 10.21%; 5/186, 2.69%) and in men who have sex with women ≤30 years (16/212, 7.54%; 5/212, 2.36%). Among patients with urogenital CT infection, 13.7% (7/51) had urethritis. All patients with urogenital MG infection were asymptomatic. Men who have sex with men had a high prevalence of pharyngeal CT (2/45, 4.44%) and NG (3/44, 6.81%) and a high prevalence of anal CT (2/27, 7.41%), NG (2/27, 7.40%), and MG (1/27, 3.70%). After excluding patients with concomitant urogenital infection, extragenital infections with at least 1 of the 3 pathogens were found in 20 swabs (20/91, 21.9%) taken from 16 patients (16/81, 19.7%), all of them asymptomatic. Conclusions Routine multisite screening for CT, NG, and MG should be performed to mitigate the transmission of STIs in high-risk sexually active populations.

scholarly journals Analysis and validation of a highly sensitive one-step nested quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for specific detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Dai ◽  
Huiyan Wang ◽  
Yong Gao ◽  
Tuantuan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
One Step ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, is posing a serious threat to global public health. Reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. Due to technical limitations, the reported positive rates of qRT-PCR assay of throat swab samples vary from 30 to 60%. Therefore, the evaluation of alternative strategies to overcome the limitations of qRT-PCR is required. A previous study reported that one-step nested (OSN)-qRT-PCR revealed better suitability for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, information on the analytical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR is insufficient. Method In this study, we aimed to analyze OSN-qRT-PCR by comparing it with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and qRT-PCR by using a dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviral RNA and a quality assessment panel. The clinical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR was also validated and compared with ddPCR and qRT-PCR using specimens from COVID-19 patients. Result The limit of detection (copies/ml) of qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and OSN-qRT-PCR were 520.1 (95% CI: 363.23–1145.69) for ORF1ab and 528.1 (95% CI: 347.7–1248.7) for N, 401.8 (95% CI: 284.8–938.3) for ORF1ab and 336.8 (95% CI: 244.6–792.5) for N, and 194.74 (95% CI: 139.7–430.9) for ORF1ab and 189.1 (95% CI: 130.9–433.9) for N, respectively. Of the 34 clinical samples from COVID-19 patients, the positive rates of OSN-qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and qRT-PCR were 82.35% (28/34), 67.65% (23/34), and 58.82% (20/34), respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, the highly sensitive and specific OSN-qRT-PCR assay is superior to ddPCR and qRT-PCR assays, showing great potential as a technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with low viral loads.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document