Exploring the behavioural outcomes of family-based intensive interventions
Conditionality is embedded into many areas of social welfare and has become increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. This chapter explores welfare conditionality in the context of family-based intervention projects that have been a policy mechanism to deal with the longstanding issue of so-called ‘problem’ families since 1997. Programmes, such as Family Intervention Projects and the current Troubled Families Programme are an assertive and joined up approach to challenge the perceived negative behaviours of families. This chapter, drawing on PhD research, questions the concept of behaviour change – and importantly, what counts as successful behaviour change in policy and practice. The research shows that practitioners acknowledge families cannot always change their behaviour or sustain behaviour change in line with policy expectations, especially if their basic needs have not been met. Therefore, this chapter considers the policy implications of non-behaviour change by exploring the concept of ‘good enough’ change, defined by practitioners as enabling enough progress for families to function from day to day without equating to transformative behaviour change. The chapter argues there needs to be a more nuanced conceptualisation of behaviour change that embeds the complexities and nuances of engagement and non-engagement.