scholarly journals Association of accelerometer-derived sleep measures with lifetime psychiatric diagnoses: A cross-sectional study of 89,205 participants from the UK Biobank

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. e1003782
Author(s):  
Michael Wainberg ◽  
Samuel E. Jones ◽  
Lindsay Melhuish Beaupre ◽  
Sean L. Hill ◽  
Daniel Felsky ◽  
...  

Background Sleep problems are both symptoms of and modifiable risk factors for many psychiatric disorders. Wrist-worn accelerometers enable objective measurement of sleep at scale. Here, we aimed to examine the association of accelerometer-derived sleep measures with psychiatric diagnoses and polygenic risk scores in a large community-based cohort. Methods and findings In this post hoc cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank cohort, 10 interpretable sleep measures—bedtime, wake-up time, sleep duration, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, number of awakenings, duration of longest sleep bout, number of naps, and variability in bedtime and sleep duration—were derived from 7-day accelerometry recordings across 89,205 participants (aged 43 to 79, 56% female, 97% self-reported white) taken between 2013 and 2015. These measures were examined for association with lifetime inpatient diagnoses of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder/mania, and schizophrenia spectrum disorders from any time before the date of accelerometry, as well as polygenic risk scores for major depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Covariates consisted of age and season at the time of the accelerometry recording, sex, Townsend deprivation index (an indicator of socioeconomic status), and the top 10 genotype principal components. We found that sleep pattern differences were ubiquitous across diagnoses: each diagnosis was associated with a median of 8.5 of the 10 accelerometer-derived sleep measures, with measures of sleep quality (for instance, sleep efficiency) generally more affected than mere sleep duration. Effect sizes were generally small: for instance, the largest magnitude effect size across the 4 diagnoses was β = −0.11 (95% confidence interval −0.13 to −0.10, p = 3 × 10−56, FDR = 6 × 10−55) for the association between lifetime inpatient major depressive disorder diagnosis and sleep efficiency. Associations largely replicated across ancestries and sexes, and accelerometry-derived measures were concordant with self-reported sleep properties. Limitations include the use of accelerometer-based sleep measurement and the time lag between psychiatric diagnoses and accelerometry. Conclusions In this study, we observed that sleep pattern differences are a transdiagnostic feature of individuals with lifetime mental illness, suggesting that they should be considered regardless of diagnosis. Accelerometry provides a scalable way to objectively measure sleep properties in psychiatric clinical research and practice, even across tens of thousands of individuals.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Michael Wainberg ◽  
Peter Zhukovsky ◽  
Sean L. Hill ◽  
Daniel Felsky ◽  
Aristotle Voineskos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our understanding of major depression is complicated by substantial heterogeneity in disease presentation, which can be disentangled by data-driven analyses of depressive symptom dimensions. We aimed to determine the clinical portrait of such symptom dimensions among individuals in the community. Methods This cross-sectional study consisted of 25 261 self-reported White UK Biobank participants with major depression. Nine questions from the UK Biobank Mental Health Questionnaire encompassing depressive symptoms were decomposed into underlying factors or ‘symptom dimensions’ via factor analysis, which were then tested for association with psychiatric diagnoses and polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Replication was performed among 655 self-reported non-White participants, across sexes, and among 7190 individuals with an ICD-10 code for MDD from linked inpatient or primary care records. Results Four broad symptom dimensions were identified, encompassing negative cognition, functional impairment, insomnia and atypical symptoms. These dimensions replicated across ancestries, sexes and individuals with inpatient or primary care MDD diagnoses, and were also consistent among 43 090 self-reported White participants with undiagnosed self-reported depression. Every dimension was associated with increased risk of nearly every psychiatric diagnosis and polygenic risk score. However, while certain psychiatric diagnoses were disproportionately associated with specific symptom dimensions, the three polygenic risk scores did not show the same specificity of associations. Conclusions An analysis of questionnaire data from a large community-based cohort reveals four replicable symptom dimensions of depression with distinct clinical, but not genetic, correlates.


PLoS Genetics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e1008202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars G. Fritsche ◽  
Lauren J. Beesley ◽  
Peter VandeHaar ◽  
Robert B. Peng ◽  
Maxwell Salvatore ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Paré ◽  
Shihong Mao ◽  
Wei Q. Deng

AbstractMachine-learning techniques have helped solve a broad range of prediction problems, yet are not widely used to build polygenic risk scores for the prediction of complex traits. We propose a novel heuristic based on machine-learning techniques (GraBLD) to boost the predictive performance of polygenic risk scores. Gradient boosted regression trees were first used to optimize the weights of SNPs included in the score, followed by a novel regional adjustment for linkage disequilibrium. A calibration set with sample size of ~200 individuals was sufficient for optimal performance. GraBLD yielded prediction R2 of 0.239 and 0.082 using GIANT summary association statistics for height and BMI in the UK Biobank study (N=130K; 1.98M SNPs), explaining 46.9% and 32.7% of the overall polygenic variance, respectively. For diabetes status, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.602 in the UK Biobank study using summary-level association statistics from the DIAGRAM consortium. GraBLD outperformed other polygenic score heuristics for the prediction of height (p<2.2x10−16) and BMI (p<1.57x10−4), and was equivalent to LDpred for diabetes. Results were independently validated in the Health and Retirement Study (N=8,292; 688,398 SNPs). Our report demonstrates the use of machine-learning techniques, coupled with summary-level data from large genome-wide meta-analyses to improve the prediction of polygenic traits.


Author(s):  
Arianna Di Florio ◽  
Jessica Mei Kay Yang ◽  
Karen Crawford ◽  
Veerle Bergink ◽  
Ganna Leonenko ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Tanigawa ◽  
Junyang Qian ◽  
Guhan Ram Venkataraman ◽  
Johanne M. Justesen ◽  
Ruilin Li ◽  
...  

We present a systematic assessment of polygenic risk score (PRS) prediction across more than 1,600 traits using genetic and phenotype data in the UK Biobank. We report 428 sparse PRS models with significant (p < 2.5e-5) incremental predictive performance when compared against the covariate-only model that considers age, sex, and the genotype principal components. We report a significant correlation between the number of genetic variants selected in the sparse PRS model and the incremental predictive performance in quantitative traits (Spearman's ρ = 0.54, p = 1.4e-15), but not in binary traits (ρ = 0.059, p = 0.35). The sparse PRS model trained on European individuals showed limited transferability when evaluated on individuals from non-European individuals in the UK Biobank. We provide the PRS model weights on the Global Biobank Engine (https://biobankengine.stanford.edu/prs).


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian N Acosta ◽  
Cameron Both ◽  
Natalia Szejko ◽  
Stacy Brown ◽  
Kevin N Sheth ◽  
...  

Introduction: Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic risk variants for stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) in Europeans. However, the limited applicability of these results to non-Europeans due to racial/ethnic differences in the genetic architecture of cardiovascular disease (CVD), coupled with the limited availability of genomic data in non-Europeans, may create significant health disparities now that genomic-based precision medicine is a reality. We tested the hypothesis that the performance of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for CVD differ in Europeans versus non-Europeans. Methods: We conducted a nested study within the UK Biobank, a prospective, population-based study that enrolled ~500,000 participants across the UK. For this study, we identified self-reported black participants and randomly matched them 1:1 by age and sex with white participants. We created a PRS using previously discovered loci for stroke and MI. We then tested whether this PRS representing the aggregate polygenic susceptibility to CVD yielded similar precision in black versus white participants in logistic regression models. Results: Of the 502,536 participants enrolled in the UK Biobank, 8,061 were self-reported blacks, with 7,644 having available data for our analyses. We randomly matched these participants with white individuals, leading to a total sample size of 15,288 (mean age 51.9 [SD 8.1], female 8,722 [57%]). The total number of events was 741 overall, with 363 happening in blacks and 378 happening in whites. In logistic regression models including age, sex, and 5 principal components, the statistical precision (e.g. narrower confidence intervals) for the PRS was substantially higher for whites (OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.08 - 1.37; p<0.0001) compared to blacks (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.05-1.47; p=0.01). Secondary analyses using genetically-determined ancestry yielded similar results. Conclusion: Because CVD-related PRSs are derived mainly using genetic risk factors identified in populations of European ancestry, their statistical performance is lower in non-European populations. This asymmetry can lead to significant health disparities now that these tools are being evaluated in multiple precision medicine approaches.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca E Graff ◽  
Sarah F Ackley ◽  
Monica Ospina Romero ◽  
Scott C Zimmerman ◽  
Fanny M Elahi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document