scholarly journals FUNGSI HUKUM DALAM KEHIDUPAN MASYARAKAT

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Didiek R. Mawardi

The function of law as a means to achieve social justice , the reality in the life of society , there has been a shift in values  and or cultural order , ignorance of the norm of honesty , the degrdation of the feeling of shame , nor loss of trust in the legal and law enforcement , compliance with laws decreased, causing law dysfunction . The problem that arises is why the function of the law has not been fully realized and how to optimize the function of law in society. There is no other option , that the substance of the law and arbitrate should significantly oriented and argue the morality to the formation of a prosperous society ( Indonesia ) through the process of empowerment of the legal system , through a process of dialogue , as well as raise community participation .

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masdar Masdar

Cash waqf in Indonesia has been long enough implemented based on some rules enacted by government and other rules defined by The Waqf Board of Indonesia (BWI). However, the implementation of cash waqf has not reached the level of success. Therefore, this article studies the application of cash waqf law in Indonesia according to Friedman’s legal system theory. The legal system theory of Friedman firstly looks at the substance of the law, which is the rules or regulations; and secondly it examines the structure of the law, encompassing the law enforcement agencies, such as judge, prosecutor, police and legal counselors. And lastly the theory examines the element of legal culture, which is a response from Muslim society. The first two examinations indicate that there is nothing to be a problem. But from the last examination there is a problem regarding the trust from Muslim society. From the legal culture point of view, the implementation of cash waqf by the government, which is performed by BWI, needs attracting society’s credentials in order to improve and maximize the performance of cash waqf in Indonesia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 299
Author(s):  
Mukhlis Abidin

<p><em>Legality is one basic of penal law beside culpability in deciding the punishment. Legality is often perceived similar to law enforcement. According to Article 1 (1) of the Penal Law (KUHP), the law refers to written law. In fact, there is also living law mentioned in the Constitution. This kind of situation often causes the judge decision fails to meet social justice since the decision is merely based on formal law and neglected material law, such as in the case of Minah in Banyumas Court. Thus, progressive approach is necessitated in order to understand legality both in formal and material law in accordance with national legal ideals, Pancasila. </em></p>


2017 ◽  
pp. 109-126
Author(s):  
Siti Merida Hutagalung

AbstractLaw problems are not finished yet until Indonesia entering its reformation era. AlthoughIndonesia actually is the Constitutional State, constitution has failed to provide protectionto the people. Supremacy of Law which is mandated by the Constitution 1945 is failed to beconducted, while law apparatus like public prosecutors, judges, polices and lawyers areinvolved playing the law. And then term as Law Mafia becomes familiar for public. Thegovernment has initiated various efforts to solve the law problems by making the NationalLaw Commission, Corruption Eradication Commission, Judicial Commission, Special TaskForce for Law Mafia, etc but it seems that it’s need a long time to improve the lawenforcement in Indonesia. But, law enforcement is still far from the ideals of rechts idée,and the aim of the State Law (Homeland/NKRI) as contained in the preamble of theConstitution paragraph four: developing the intellectual life of the Indonesian nation;creating more prosperous life or public welfare, and the fourth principle of Pancasila that isrealizing social justice for all the people of Indonesia.Keywords: Rule of law, Law enforcement, Constitution 1945, Law institution


FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dani Amran Hakim

The legal political environment in Indonesia in terms of protection, management and control of environmental pollution in Indonesia and to investigate the implementation of environmental pollution control and law enforcement in Indonesia. the results of the study stated that the renewal law of Environmental management is influenced by a variety of development changes occurring in society, such as the influence of the era of democratization, industrialization, advancement of science and technology and the rise of the welfare demands of various parties. Political aspects contained in the politics of Law Number 32 of 2009 on the protection and management of the environment has not been run in accordance with the legal political objective, because there are natural resources that can not be utilized for the prosperity and welfare of the people. It is also still a lot of water pollution, air pollution, deforestation and other actions of the parties who damage the environment. It is necessary to implement environmental management to preserve the environment and develop skills which are harmonious, consistent and balanced in order to support the implementation of the development of environmentally sustainable. Law enforcement agencies in understanding the perceived environmental legal system are still experiencing difficulties. Lack of understanding of the law enforcement officers will cause rules is formed in one unified national legal system will deviate from the direction of the political objectives of the law. The need for clear law enforcement for the doer / destroyer of the environment in order to create a deterrent effect and between 3 penalties (criminal, civil and administrative) is not overlapping. Law enforcement difficult because of the difficulty of proving and determining the standard criteria of environmental damage. Keywords: Legal Politic, Environment, The Act Number 32 years 2009 on The Protection and Environmental Management


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-136
Author(s):  
S. A. Mosin

The subject. The article is devoted to the study of the trinity of properties of constitutional principles.The purpose of the article is to confirm the hypothesis that constitutional principles, often perceived by researchers and law enforcement officials as abstract norms with declarative content, are in fact full-fledged legal institutions that are endowed with all the necessary properties to achieve constitutional goals. In this regard, the article analyzes the property of axiomaticity, the property of presumptivity and the property of fictitiousness of constitutional principles.The methodology. The systemic-structural, comparative, formal-legal and formal-logical methods made it possible to identify and characterize the properties of constitutional principles, such as axiomaticity, presumptivity and fictitiousness. The use of these methods in their combination predetermined the appeal not only to topical problems of constitutional law, but also to issues of the theory of law, as well as other branches of law, which made it possible to most objectively and comprehensively approach the study of the properties of constitutional principles.The main results of the research. The trinity of the properties of the constitutional principle lies in the fact that the constitutional principle formulates the basic rule and determines the direction of development of the legal system and thereby has the property of axiomaticity. At the same time, the constitutional principle has the property of presumptivity due to the duty of the law enforcement officer to proceed from the assumption of compliance with the provisions of such a principle by all subjects of legal relations. Thereby constitutional principle ensures the necessary stability of the legal system of the state. At the same time, in order to achieve full-fledged stability of the legal system, along with the assumption that the subjects of legal relations comply with the provisions of the constitutional principles, it should be possible to monitor such compliance. In the absence of prior control over compliance with the provisions of the law, the solution is the application of legal presumptions. In this regard, within the framework of the presumptive property of constitutional principles, constitutional presumptions are inextricably linked with the corresponding constitutional principles. In turn, having the property of fictitiousness, the constitutional principle allows to interpret the provisions that make up such a constitutional principle and, as a result, create the necessary regulatory legal framework.Conclusions. Constitutional principles are the driving force of the legal system. They fill all legal relations without exception with legal meaning and content and have a special meaning due to their irreplaceability and the obligation to strictly observe them. In turn, the trinity of properties of the constitutional principles reflects their legal essence as fundamental normative provisions that determine the generally binding basic rules and directions of the development of the legal system, ensure the stability of the legal system of the state, and also have the possibility of timely development and adaptation to the changing legal reality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1908
Author(s):  
Yusi Permatasi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto

In Society, Paranormal practices is considered as common things. Paranormal Practices is used for any good and also for crime, so to cope with the activities, government had regulated the act to control the crime by using paranormal background. The paranormal practices have been included as criminal acts. It has regulated in article 545 and article 546 of the criminal law act and set on as supernatural powers activity. As time passes, there are constraint in the alleviation law it’s law enforcement. This research was done with empirical or law sociological point of view, where Lawrence M. Friedman state that the elements of the legal system consist of Legal Structure, Legal Substance, and Legal Culture. The result of this research is the paranormal practices are differentiate by it used which is good or bad. The bad paranormal practices cause loss for society. This gave rise to uncertainty of law enforcement on the paranormal practices, therefore it need a deep research which is not only from the law enforcement point of view, but also the religious and cultural represented by figure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Ufran Ufran

<p><em>The </em><em>Failure to enforce law and justice will be one of the factors of social dis-integration. If it is responded well and systematically it will be a threat to a country's failure. These initial symptoms can be seen from the emergence of various vigilante acts. The empty spaces filled with violence are caused by the vacuum of law. The law fails to do its job to solve social problems that arise. The explanation in this paper seeks to analyze the root problem of the failure of law enforcement in Indonesia seen in the perspective of the legal system by Friedman. To analyze the solution, the perspective used is an analysis of the style of progressive law as stated by Satjipto Rahardjo. The use of these two perspectives is expected to be able to describe well the real fundamental problem in our current law enforcement</em></p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kingkin Wahyuningdyah

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>This paper aims to examine how the legal ability of the legal system of Commercial Paper in achieving the objectives of the law. The study needs to be undertaken, given the legal system should ideally have the ability to achieve the objectives of the law in support of law enforcement. The conclusion summarizes that overall existing legal system in Commercial Paper trading activities has limited law capability, because it only resolves legal certainty, while other objectives such as justice and expediency has not achieved by all elements of the existing legal system.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: commercial paper, legal ability, legal system</em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak                     </strong></p><p>Tujuan penulisan makalah ini adalah untuk mengkaji bagaimana kemampuan hukum dari sistem hukum <em>Commersial Paper</em> dalam mencapai tujuan hukum. Hal ini perlu untuk dilakukan, mengingat sistem hukum idealnya memiliki kemampuan dalam mencapai tujuan hukum guna mendukung penegakan hukum. Kesimpulan hasil pembahasan terhadap permasalahan yang diajukan tersebut adalah bahwa secara keseluruhan sistem hukum yang ada dalam kegiatan perdagangan CP memiliki keterbatasan kemampuan hukum karena baru dapat mencapai tujuan kepastian hukum saja, sedangkan tujuan hukum lainnya, yakni keadilan dan kemanfaatan  belum dapat dicapai oleh seluruh unsur sistem hukum yang ada.</p><p><strong><em>Kata kunci: sistem hukum, commercial paper,  kemampuan hukum</em></strong><strong><em></em></strong></p><strong><em></em></strong><strong><em></em></strong>


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratna Juwita

AbstractIndonesia ratified the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) through the Law number 7 of 2006. Article 33 of the UNCAC legally obliges the State Parties to provide protection to whistleblowers. The existence of whistleblower is pivotal to uncover the hidden practices of corruption. Anti-corruption strategy encourages whistleblowers to unveil corrupt practices to the law enforcement agencies and public. Due to this task, therefore, whistleblowers must be protected from any kind of retaliation. Indonesia has the Law number 13 of 2006 juncto the Law number 31 of 2014 concerning witness and victim protection which regulates the protection of whistleblower in the Indonesian criminal legal system. This paper analyzes existence of legal protection for whistleblowers in the respective provisions which contained within the Law number 13 of 2006 and the Law number 31 of 2014, specifically on anti-retaliation protection by analyzing the synchronization of the law with Article 33 of the UNCAC. The provisions of national law vis-à-vis with the provisions of UNCAC concerning whistleblower protection, the national law has not provided best protection to whistleblower yet due to the possibility of retaliation be made against the whistleblowers that is not regulated by the national law.Keywords: Indonesia, corruption, whistleblower, United Nations Convention Against Corruption.IntisariIndonesia meratifikasi United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) melalui Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006. Pasal 33 UNCAC memberikan kewajiban hukum bagi Negara Pihak untuk menyediakan perlindungan terhadap para whistleblowers. Eksistensi whistleblower merupakan hal yang sangat penting untuk membuka praktek tersembunyi korupsi. Strategi anti-korupsi memberikan dorongan bagi para whistleblower untuk membuka praktek-praktek korupsi kepada penegak hukum dan masyarakat. Oleh karena tugasnya tersebut, para whistleblower harus dilindungi dari segala bentuk tindakan pembalasan. Indonesia memiliki Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban  yang di dalamnya mengatur perlindungan terhadap whistleblower dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Tulisan ini menganalisis eksistensi perlindungan hukum bagi whistleblower dalam pasal-pasal tentang perlindungan whistleblower dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, secara spesifik pada perlindungan terhadap tindakan pembalasan dengan menganalisis sinkronisasi hukum terhadap Pasal 33 UNCAC. Pasal-pasal dalam hukum nasional vis-à-vis dengan Ppasal UNCAC tentang perlindungan terhadap whistleblower, hukum nasional belum mampu menyediakan perlindungan terbaik bagi whistleblower dikarenakan adanya kemungkinan untuk dilakukannya tindakan pembalasan terhadap whistleblower yang belum diatur dalam hukum nasional.Kata kunci: Indonesia, korupsi, whistleblower, United Nations Convention Against Corruption.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Primus Adiodatus Abi Bartama ◽  
Aloysius Wisnubroto

 Contemporary era with a dynamic information society presents new challenges in various fields of human life, one of them is law enforcement. The failure of law enforcement system in realizing substantial justice in a dynamic society is caused by paradigmatic legal issues. The problems which are going to be studied and answered are how the law enforcement paradigm shift urgency in facing the challenges of contemporary era. Through methods that are doctrinaire (normative-philosophical), it is found the limitations of law enforcement system that resulted in the law, particularly in the settlement through the judiciary, are not able to bring about justice because they are still hampered due to the paradigm of positivistic. Thus the paradigm shift becomes very urgent to overcome the limitations of the legal system is positivistic. The paradigm that is deemed in accordance with the needs of society that is dynamic  information society is a legal paradigm that is non-positivistic.Keyword: Law enforcement, Paradigm, Contemporary era, Justice system.INTISARIEra kontemporer dengan masyarakat informasinya yang dinamis menghadirkan tantangan-tantangan baru dalam berbagai bidang kehidupan manusia, salah satunya adalah masalah penegakan hukum. Kegagalan sistem penegakan hukum dalam mewujudkan keadilan yang substansial dalam masyarakat yang dinamis disebabkan karena permasalahan hukum yang bersifat paradgmatis. Permasalahan yang hendak dikaji dan dijawab adalah bagaimana urgensi perubahan paradigma penegakan hukum dalam menghadapi tantangan era kontemporer. Melalui metode yang bersifat doktriner (normatis-filosofis), diperoleh temuan bahwa keterbatasan sistem penegakan hukum yang mengakibatkan hukum, khususnya dalam penyelesaian perkara melalui lembaga peradilan, tidak mampu mewujudkan keadilan dikarenakan masih terbelenggun dengan paradigma hukum positif. Demikian perubahan paradigma menjadi sangat urgen untuk mengatasi keterbatasan sistem hukum positif. Paradigma yang dipandang sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat informasi yang bersifat dinamis adalah paradigma hukum yang bersifat nonpositivistik.Kata Kunci: Penegakan hukum, Paradigma,Era kontemporer, sistem peradilan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document