Self-Control Scale AS-36: Construction and validation study

Abstract This paper presents a validation study of a new questionnaire of self-control as an individual trait. The questionnaire has two parallel versions, one based on self-reports (AS-36) and another one based on informant reports (AS-36-3). Each version consists of three subscales, called Inhibition (12 items), Switching (12 items), and Goal Monitoring (12 items). Eight samples of participants (N = 935 altogether) took part in the validation study. Both versions obtained satisfactory indices of internal consistency, assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and split-half coefficients. Selfcontrol assessed with this scale proved to be entirely independent of general intelligence. However, AS-36 and AS-36-3 scores tended to correlate with other self-report measures of trait self control, such as Tangney, Baumeister, and Boone’s (2004) self-control scale. We conclude that AS-36 is a valid and reliable tool, suitable for assessment of self-control in both research and diagnostic settings.

Download Full-text

NAS-50 and NAS-40: New scales for the assessment of self-control

Polish Psychological Bulletin ◽

10.1515/ppb-2016-0041 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 47 (3) ◽

pp. 346-355 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Edward Nęcka ◽

Radosław Wujcik ◽

Jarosław Orzechowski ◽

Aleksandra Gruszka ◽

Beata Janik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Validation Study ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Self Control ◽

General Intelligence ◽

Proactive Control ◽

Control Scale ◽

Goal Maintenance ◽

Individual Trait ◽

Self Reports ◽

Highly Correlated

Abstract In this paper, we present a new questionnaire for the assessment of self-control as an individual trait. We describe the process of construction of this assessment tool. We also report the results of relevant validation studies. The questionnaire has two independent versions, one based on self-reports (NAS-50) and another one based on other-reports (NAS-40). The first version consists of five subscales (10 items each), called Initiative and Persistence (IP), Proactive Control (PC), Switching and Flexibility (SF), Inhibition and Adjournment (IA), and Goal Maintenance (GM). Seven samples of participants (N = 934 altogether) took part in the validation study. The second version has not been split into subscales. Both versions obtained satisfactory indices of internal consistency, assessed with Cronbach’s alpha (for NAS- 50 total score a = .861, for the subscales a between .726 and .867; for NAS-40 a = .844). The NAS-50 and NAS-40 scores were highly correlated with other measures of self-control, including Tangney, Baumeister, and Boone’s (2004) self-control scale. They also proved to be entirely independent of general intelligence. In conclusion, both versions can be regarded reliable and valid enough, and therefore suitable for the assessment of trait self-control for research purposes.

Download Full-text

Hubungan antara Pengendalian Diri, Harga Diri, dan Adiksi Game Online pada Pemain Game Online di Indonesia

Journal Psikogenesis ◽

10.24854/jps.v7i2.1133 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 105-115

Author(s):

Defryansyah Amin

Keyword(s):

Internet Addiction ◽

Self Esteem ◽

Self Control ◽

Self Report ◽

Control Scale

Objektif. Studi ini bertujuan untuk melihat gambaran hubungan antara harga diri, pengendalian diri, dan adiksi game online pada pemain game online di Indonesia.Metode. Total dari 230 pengguna game online Total partisipan sebanyak 230 partisipan termasuk 147 laki-laki (63,91%) dan 83 perempuan (36,08%), dengan rata-rata umur 20-24 tahun berpartisipasi dalam penelitian dan diminta untuk mengisi self report menggunakan kuesioner online. Kuesioner yang digunakan terkait data demografi dan karakteristik sampel, alat ukur adiksi game online (dimodifikasi dari alat ukur Internet Addiction dari Young, 1998), alat ukur harga diri (Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale), dan Alat ukur self control (Brief Self Control Scale). Hasil. Penelitian bertujuan untuk melihat gambaran hubungan antara ketiga variabel, yaitu harga diri, pengendalian diri, dan adiksi game online. Berdasarkan hasil analisis yang dilakukan, ditemukan bahwa variabel Self control memiliki hubungan negatif yang signifikan terhadap adiksi game online (r= -.508, p= .00**) Variabel self esteem memiliki hubungan positif yang signifikan terhadap self control (r= 0,488, p= 0,00**). Sedangkan untuk variabel self esteem tidak memiliki hubungan yang signifikan terhadap adiksi game online (r= .320, p=.102*). Jika ditinjau dari persentase pengaruh tiap variabel self esteem dan self control terhadap variabel adiksi game online, didapatkan nilai korelasi kedua variabel self esteem dan self control sebesar R2=0,267, p0,05**. Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa bahwa 26,7% varians dari adiksi game online dapat dijelaskan oleh variabel self esteem dan self control dan 73.3% varians dari adiksi game online dijelaskan oleh faktor lain.

Download Full-text

The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees

Prosthetics and Orthotics International ◽

10.1177/0309364618791620 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 43 (1) ◽

pp. 80-87 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Robert Gailey ◽

Anat Kristal ◽

Jennifer Lucarevic ◽

Shane Harris ◽

Brooks Applegate ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Lower Limb ◽

Self Report ◽

Cronbach’S Alpha ◽

Convenience Sample ◽

Cronbach's Alpha ◽

Prosthetic Socket ◽

Lower Limb Amputee ◽

Report Measure ◽

Lower Limb Amputees

Background: Prosthetic socket fit is an important element associated with successful ambulation and use of a prosthesis. Prosthetists and rehabilitation clinicians would benefit from an assessment tool that discriminates between and quantifies the multiple determinants that influence the lower limb amputee’s performance and satisfaction of a prosthetic socket. Objectives: To determine the internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey, a new self-report measure of prosthetic socket satisfaction that quantifies suspension, stability, comfort, and appearance. Study design: Cross-sectional sample of active amputees. Methods: Interviews were conducted with prosthetists, physical therapists, and lower limb amputees to identify clinical concerns and common activities influencing socket fit. An expert panel of five clinicians reviewed the items and constructed the original version of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey which was then administered to a convenience sample of 47 active lower limb amputees. Item analysis and Cronbach’s alpha were used to determine the final version of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey. Results: Following item raw score-to-total score correlation with Cronbach’s alpha for comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey determinants, internal consistency improved when nine questions were eliminated. Conclusion: The comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey is a self-report measure of prosthetic socket satisfaction with very good internal consistency. Clinical relevance When socket problems occur, the ability to determine the specific cause can reduce modification time, enhance socket fit, and promote patient satisfaction. A standardized multi-dimensional assessment measure of socket satisfaction enables prosthetists to quantify the multiple determinants of socket satisfaction, improve patient communication, and demonstrate the value of socket interventions.

Download Full-text

İlişkide Karar Verme Ölçeğinin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması / The Turkish Adaptation of Relationship Deciding Scale

Journal of History Culture and Art Research ◽

10.7596/taksad.v6i3.942 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (3) ◽

pp. 650

Author(s):

Cansu Tosun ◽

Hikmet Yazıcı ◽

Fatma Altun

Keyword(s):

Factor Analysis ◽

Reliability Analysis ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Self Control ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Control Scale ◽

Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽

Confirmatory Factor ◽

Turkish Culture ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of Relationship Deciding Scale (Vennum & Fincham, 2011) for Turkish culture.The sample of the study consisted of 880 students (EFA=439, CFA=441) studying at Karadeniz Technical University. Criterion-related validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted for the validity of RDS while internal consistency, split half and test-retest techniques were performed to examine the reliability of RDS.Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that the scale had two-factor structures. However, two items were removed from the scale because they didn't have appropriate factor loadings. The scale consisting of 10 items explained 58.97% of the total variance. The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the model was compatible with the data. In the reliability analysis for EFA and CFA samples, Cronbach alpha coefficients were found as .87 and .86 respectively. Internal consistency coefficients of subscales were found as .83 and .80 for “Relationship Confidence”, .82 and .84 for “Directing Relationship”. According to test-retest reliability analysis results, the whole scale’s coefficient was r= .67. In addition, as a result of criterion validity analysis, correlations (r= .33) between Self-Control Scale (Duyan, Gülden & Gelbal, 2012) and Relationship Deciding Scale (RDS) were found to be statistically significant. In conclusion, these findings suggest that RDS, which has two-factor structures with 10 items, can be suggested as a valid and reliable instrument in Turkish culture.ÖzBu araştırmanın amacı, Vennum ve Fincham (2011) tarafından geliştirilen İlişkide Karar Verme Ölçeği’nin (Relationship Deciding Scale) Türk kültürüne uyarlanması ile ilgili geçerlik ve güvenirlik işlemlerini yapmaktır.Araştırma grubu Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi’nde öğrenim gören 880 öğrenciden (AFA=439, DFA=441) oluşmaktadır. İlişkide Karar Verme Ölçeği’nin (İKVÖ) geçerlik işlemlerinde, ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, güvenirlik işlemlerinde ise iç tutarlılık, testi yarıya bölme ve testin tekrarı tekniklerinden yararlanılmıştır.Yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) sonucunda ölçeğin iki faktörlü yapı gösterdiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Uygun faktör yüklerine sahip olmadıkları için iki madde modelden çıkarılmıştır. 10 maddeden oluşan ölçek toplam varyansın %58.97’sini açıklamıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizli sonuçları (DFA) verinin modele iyi uyum sağladığını göstermiştir. AFA ve DFA örneklemleri için yapılan güvenirlik analizlerinde, Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık kat sayıları sırasıyla .87 ve .86 olarak bulunurken alt ölçekler için bulunan iç tutarlılık kat sayıları ise “İlişkide Kendine Güven” için .83 ve .80, “İlişkiyi Yönetme” için .82 ve .84’tür. Ölçeğin test tekrar test güvenirliğinin r= .67 olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca ölçüt geçerliği kapsamında yapılan analizler sonucunda Öz Denetim Ölçeği (Duyan, Gülden ve Gelbal, 2012) ile İKVÖ arasında .33 değerinde beklenen yönde bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda İKVÖ’nün Türk kültüründe geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu değerlendirilmektedir.

Download Full-text

Abstract 10: The PROMIS Physical Function Scale- a Promising Scale for use in Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.10 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Irene Katzan ◽

Sandra Griffith ◽

Youran Fan

Keyword(s):

Functional Status ◽

Physical Function ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Ceiling Effect ◽

Self Report ◽

Measurement Information ◽

Cronbach’S Alpha ◽

Cronbach's Alpha ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Patient Burden

Background: Functional status is a critically important outcome measure after stroke. The ability to electronically capture this through self-report is increasing. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) uses computer adaptive testing (CAT), which can increase score precision and reduce patient burden. The number of questions depends on the patient’s responses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the PROMIS physical function scale (PROMIS PF) compared to the validated Stroke Impact Scale 16 (SIS16) in an ambulatory stroke clinic. Methods: Patient-reported PROMIS PF (CAT version) and SIS16 were electronically collected on patients seen in the stroke clinic using the Knowledge Program platform. Patient completion rates were > 70%. Distribution of scores was compared to assess ceiling/floor effects. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating the SEM for PROMIS PF and Cronbach’s alpha for SIS16. Correlations with NIHSS were performed to assess convergent validity. Results: The PROMIS PF and SIS16 were collected on 5,691 patients from Jan 2010 - May 2014. Mean SIS16 score = 81.4 (SD 21.5), mean PROMIS PF score = 42.8 (SD 11.2). The SIS16 had a22% ceiling effect, <1 % ceiling effect was seen with PROMIS PF (Figure). Patients completed 16 SIS16 items and a median of 4 [IQR 4, 5] PROMIS PF items. Cronbach’s alpha for SIS16 = 0.959, SEM for PROMIS PF = 2.3; both values suggest excellent internal consistency. Test-retest correlation was 0.867 for SIS16 and 0.87 for PROMIS PF. Correlations between NIHS and the 2 scales were -0.461 (p<0.001) for PROMIS PF and -0.559 (p<0.0001) for SIS16. Conclusion: The use of the PROMIS system to obtain electronic patient-reported functional status in ambulatory stroke clinic is feasible. PROMIS PF is an option for measurement of physical function in patients with stroke. It had similar test characteristics as the SIS16 but with lower patient burden and no ceiling effect.

Download Full-text

Assessing potential overlap between self-control and psychopathy: A consideration of the Grasmick self-control scale and the Levenson self-report psychopathy scale

Journal of Criminal Justice ◽

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101725 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 70 ◽

pp. 101725

Author(s):

Todd A. Armstrong ◽

Danielle Boisvert ◽

Jessica Wells ◽

Richard H. Lewis ◽

Eric Cooke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Self Control ◽

Self Report ◽

Control Scale

Download Full-text

A Greek Validation Study of the Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire-23

Healthcare ◽

10.3390/healthcare9070897 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. 897

Author(s):

Christos Bakirtzis ◽

Artemios Artemiadis ◽

Elli Nteli ◽

Marina Kleopatra Boziki ◽

Maria-Valeria Karakasi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Sclerosis ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Goodness Of Fit ◽

Self Report ◽

Full Time ◽

Cognitive Screening ◽

Cronbach’S Alpha ◽

Cronbach's Alpha ◽

Patient Reported

The Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire-23 (MSWDQ-23) is a self-report instrument developed to assess barriers faced by People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) in the workplace. The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the MSWDQ-23. The study sample consisted of 196 PwMS, all currently working in part- or full-time jobs. Participants underwent clinical examination and cognitive screening with the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) and completed self-report measures of fatigue, psychological functioning, and quality of life, along with the MSWDQ-23 questionnaire. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed, and goodness-of-fit measures were used to evaluate construct validity. Convergent validity was checked by correlating MSWDQ-23 scores with study measures. Cronbach’s alpha value was produced to assess internal consistency. CFA yielded a model with a fair fit confirming the three-factor structure of the instrument. Higher work difficulties were associated with higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, poorer cognitive function, more fatigue, stress, anxiety, and depression, and poorer health status, supporting the convergent validity of MSWDQ-23. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.996, 95%, CI = 0.990–0.998) were excellent. The Greek MSWDQ-23 can be considered a valid patient-reported outcome measure and can be used in interventions aiming to improve the vocational status of PwMS.

Download Full-text

Reliability of the Scale of Barriers for Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Colombian Population

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18084351 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (8) ◽

pp. 4351

Author(s):

Adriana Marcela Jácome Hortúa ◽

Adriana Angarita-Fonseca ◽

Carmen Juliana Villamizar Jaimes ◽

Rocio del Pilar Martínez Marín ◽

Hugo Celso Dutra de Souza ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Scientific Evidence ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Correlation Coefficients ◽

Rehabilitation Program ◽

Drop Out ◽

Self Report ◽

Cronbach’S Alpha ◽

Cronbach's Alpha

Cardiac rehabilitation is supported by the highest level of scientific evidence. However, less than 25% of those eligible to participate in a cardiac rehabilitation program initiate it; and of these, 50% drop out prematurely. A modified Spanish Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS) has been translated, culturally adapted and validated in Colombia, however, the reliability remains to be evaluated. This study aimed to determine the internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the CRBS in a Colombian population. In total, 193 patients (67% men, average age = 65 ± 12 years) completed the scale twice, with an average of eight days between applications. Cronbach’s Alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. The internal consistency of the Colombian version of the CRBS was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84). The ICC of the CRBS was 0.69 (95% CI 0.61–0.76); 0.78 (95% CI 0.71–0.84) when the CRBS was completed by interview; and 0.47 (95% CI 0.21–0.67) when the CRBS was self-reported. The reliability of the interview version of the CRBS was substantial in the Colombian population; however, the reliability of the self-report version was lower. The use of this scale will allow developing strategies to increase participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs.

Download Full-text

Trait Self-Control and Self-Discipline: Structure, Validity, and Invariance Across National Groups

10.31234/osf.io/9egbx ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Martin S Hagger ◽

Eva-Maria Kangro ◽

Francis Ries ◽

John C. K. Wang ◽

Brody Heritage ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Binge Drinking ◽

Structural Equation ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Structural Equation Models ◽

Self Control ◽

Self Report ◽

Dimensional Structure ◽

Control Scale ◽

Total N ◽

Two Samples

The aim of the present study was to test the validity of the Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS; Tangney, Baumeister and Boone 2004) including its dimensional structure based on competing one- and two-factor models, discriminant validity from the conceptually-related self-discipline construct, invariance across multiple samples from different national groups, and predictive validity with respect to health-related behaviors. Samples of undergraduate students (total N = 1282) from four national groups completed the brief self-control scale, the self-discipline scale from the NEO-PI-R, and self-report measures of binge drinking, exercise, and healthy eating. Confirmatory factor analytic models supported a two-factor structure of self-control encompassing restraint and non-impulsivity components. The model exhibited good fit in all samples and invariance of factor loadings in multi-sample analysis. The restraint and non-impulsivity components exhibited discriminant validity and were also distinct from self-discipline. Structural equation models revealed that non-impulsivity predicted binge drinking in three of the samples, and restraint predicted exercise in two samples, with no role for self-discipline. Results point to a multi-dimensional structure for trait self-control consistent with previous theory separating impulsive- and control-related components.

Download Full-text

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Adaptation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11-A for Children

Psychological Reports ◽

10.2466/pr0.103.2.336-346 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 103 (2) ◽

pp. 336-346 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Sandra Cosi ◽

Andreu Vigil-Colet ◽

Josepa Canals ◽

Urbano Lorenzo-Seva

Keyword(s):

Factor Analysis ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Factor Structure ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Self Report ◽

Factorial Structure ◽

Initial Questionnaire ◽

Self Reports ◽

Age Range ◽

Three Factor

Given difficulty in having children assess their own behaviour, there are few self reports on child impulsivity. With the exception of Eysenck's 16 questionnaire, there are no self-report measures of impulsivity in children with good psychometric properties. The present study tested the possibility of using the adolescent version of the Barrati Impulsiveness Scale-11 with children. For this purpose the questionnaire was translated and backtranslated and administered to school children (182 boys and 195 girls) ages 8 to 12 years ( M = 10.4, SD = 0.9). The data were analysed by exploratory factor analysis, to evaluate the factorial structure of the questionnaire, the fit of the proposed solution, and internal consistency reliabilities. Results seem to indicate that this questionnaire may be useful in assessing impulsivity in children. The three-factor structure showed slight differences with the initial questionnaire proposed by Barratt and had good or sufficient internal consistency (depending upon the scale) across the 8- to 12-yr.-old age range.

Download Full-text