scholarly journals Hak Merek Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Praktik Pemberian Kredit Oleh Perbankan Di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-152
Author(s):  
Wely Saputra ◽  
Muhammad Yasir
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Bank Loans ◽  
Bank Loan ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Credit Guarantees ◽  
Loan Guarantees

The goal of this study is to develop the legal status of brand rights as collateral for bank credit guarantees and to analyze the risks of applying brand rights as collateral for bank credit guarantees in Indonesia. Brand rights are part of intellectual property rights which, of course, are of commercial significance to be used as collateral for bank loans. This study is a normative legal research using a regulatory methodology or a legislative approach to interpreting the idea of brand rights being used as security for bank loan guarantees, as laid down in statutory regulations, which are meant to try to get closer to the problems examined on the basis of laws, norms and rules. In compliance with the purpose of the analysis. The findings of the research suggest that Brand Rights can potentially be used as collateral for bank credit guarantees in compliance with the relevant legal requirements, but there are no specific laws and regulations that explicitly govern brands used as collateral for bank credit and, as a result, many banks in Indonesia have not been able to consider brands as collateral for bank credit guarantees.

scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL SEBAGAI COLLATERAL (AGUNAN) UNTUK MENDAPATKAN KREDIT PERBANKAN DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Mulyani
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Community Development ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Bank Loan ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Automatic Registration ◽  
Key Words Development ◽  
Commercial Value

Intellectual Property Rights is granted the exclusive rights to creators, inventors or designers for the creation or invention that has commercial value, either directly or through the automatic registration of the relevant agencies as awards, recognition should be given the protection of the rights of the community development law. Globally, the IPR will be used as collateral to obtain a bank loan internasional. In this law is necessary to realize the concept of legislation in each country who are willing to apply that regulate substance loading, binding, and registration of intellectual property as collateral. Key words: development of intellectual property rights, collateral, bank credit in Indonesia 

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA HAK CIPTA SEBAGAI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM TRANSAKSI KREDIT PERBANKAN DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Lidwina Tessa Kurnia Prihantiwi ◽  
, Pujiyono
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Regulatory Constraints ◽  
Deductive Method ◽  
Banking Credit

<p>Abstract<br />This article  has the main  problem  with  the causes  of banks  not allowing  copyright  as a Fiduciary  Guarantee in Banking Credit Transactions in Indonesia. Besides, this article aims to find out the solutions that must be done so that copyright can become a Fiduciary Guarantee. This article is empirical legal research and has a descriptive nature. The types of data used are primary and secondary. Data collection techniques used were interviews  and literature studies, then the technical analysis used was the deductive method . The results showed that several things cause copyright as a fiduciary guarantee  in bank credit transactions  not yet allowed by banks. The first cause is regulatory constraints, intellectual property rights assessment constraints such as copyright, constraints according to banking, constraints according  to the OJK, constraints  on people’s  evaluation  of copyright.  From  the various causes, the authors also describe solutions to overcome these causes so that there is a bright spot on Copyright Problems as a Fiduciary Guarantee in Banking Credit Transactions.<br />Keywords: Copyright; Fiduciary Guarantee; Banking Credit</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini memiliki pokok masalah tentang penyebab perbankan belum memperbolehkan Hak Cipta   sebagai  Jaminan  Fidusia  dalam Transaksi  Kredit  Perbankan  di Indonesia.  Selain itu artikel  ini bertujuan  untuk  mengetahui  solusi  yang  harus  dilakukan  agar Hak  Cipta  dapat menjadi  Jaminan  Fidusia.  Artikel  ini adalah  penelitian  hukum  empiris  dan memiliki  sifat deskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan  yaitu primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan  data yang digunakan  adalah wawancara  dan studi kepustakaan,  selanjutnya  teknis analisis yang digunakan  adalah metode  deduktif.  Hasil penelitian  menunjukkan  bahwa  ada beberapa  hal yang menyebabkan hak cipta sebagai jaminan fidusia dalam transaksi kredit perbankan belum diperbolehkan oleh bank. Penyebab yang pertama adalah kendala regulasi , kendala penilaian hak kekayaan intelektual seperti hak cipta, kendala menurut perbankan, kendala menurut OJK, kendala penilaian  masyarakat  terhadap hak cipta. Dari berbagai   penyebab tersebut, penulis juga memaparkan solusi-solusi mengatasi penyebab tersebut agar ada titik terang atas Problematika Hak Cipta sebagai Jaminan Fidusia dalam Transaksi Kredit Perbankan.<br />Kata Kunci: Hak Cipta; Jaminan Fidusia; Kredit Perbankan</p>

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM PELINDUNGAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DI INDONESIA PASCA DI RATIFIKASINYA TRIPS AGREEMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
East Indies ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Dutch East Indies

<p><em>Intellectual property rights actually not a new thing in Indonesia, since the Dutch East Indies Government, Indonesia has a law on Intellectual Property Rights. The regulation of Intellectual Property Right  enactment of the laws of the Dutch East Indies government , imposed in Indonesia as a Dutch colony based on the concordance principle. At that time regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia had just received three sector; Copyright, Trademarks, and Patents. Expansion of the regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia has only been carried out after the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement. In this study the author will analyze the legal politics of protecting intellectual property rights before the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement. And what is the legal policy of the protection of intellectual property rights after the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement. This legal research is normative legal research. The results showed that with the emergence of a new law replacing the old colonial-made law, the understanding and scope of intellectual property rights protection in Indonesia became wider. The amendment to the Intellectual Property Rights Act in Indonesia cannot be separated from the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement and Indonesia's involvement in world trade.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong><em><em>Legal Politics, Legal Protection, Intellectual Property Rights, TRIPS Agreement</em></em></p>

Intellectual Property Rights and the Politics of Food

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Ravi Srinivas
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Genetic Resources ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Plant Genetic Resources ◽  
Convention On Biological Diversity ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Nation States

The legal status of plant genetic resources has been subject to numerous international agreements and laws over the centuries. The “common heritage of mankind” approach enabled free access but proved unworkable because of conflicts over intellectual property rights. The Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) recognized sovereign rights of nations over genetic resources within their territory. The Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement under auspices of the World Trade Organization mandated intellectual property protection for plant varieties, but synchronizing such rights has proved problematic. Many developing countries have enacted sui generis regimes to comply with TRIPS requirements. The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants Convention provides models that have changed over time. With the advent of agricultural biotechnology and availability of intellectual property rights for plant components, patents relating to plant genetic resources have increased. As plant genetic resources are subject to many overlapping treaties, the regime governing them is becoming more complex, resulting in inconsistencies and disputes. While the rights of plant breeders and the private seed industry are well protected in formal agreements, the rights of farmers, who have nurtured diversity in plant genetic resources, developed varieties of crops with different traits, and contributed to exchange and conservation of plant genetic resources, are left to the discretion of nation-states. Farmers’ rights are mentioned in many international legal instruments, but no binding treaty or convention mandates protecting and promoting the rights of working farmers.

scholarly journals Subjects of Intellectual Property Rights in the Field of Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 133-142
Author(s):  
A. G. Koroleva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
General Rule ◽  
Complex Objects ◽  
Virtual And Augmented Reality ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Multimedia Product

The paper discusses the issues of determining the legal status and circle of subjects that can be recognized as owners of intellectual property rights to virtual and augmented reality technologies and the objects generated by them. Analyzing the circle of subjects in this area, the author notes the need for correlation of subjects and objects of intellectual property rights. Particular attention is given to determination of the rights of users of virtual or augmented reality platforms to virtual objects created by them. It is concluded that the creation of additional content for virtual or augmented reality platforms, as a general rule, gives rise to the creators’ copyright. Considering the circle of subjects on complex objects in the field of virtual and augmented reality technologies, the author concludes that the subject composition of legal relations arising in connection with the creation and use of a multimedia product should be determined based on the variety of this object due to their diversity.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Merek Clothing

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-402
Author(s):  
I Made Agus Angga Kusuma Putra ◽  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Business Ethics ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
One Year ◽  
Legal Consequences

Trademarks are one of the most disputed intellectual property rights. The number of brand counterfeiting events conducted to gain profit by shortcuts, namely by violating business ethics, norms, and laws certainly do not make trade good and worsen the image as a violation of IPR. The purposes of this research are to examine the form of legal protection against registered clothing brand holders and to analyze the legal consequences for businesses that market clothing brands without a license? This research uses normative legal research methods by using statutory approach. Law No. 20 of 2016 and Law No. 5 of 1999 source to know criminal sanctions and also civil sanctions against businesses that use the brand without a permit. The results of this study show a form of legal protection against registered brand holders in the form of exclusive rights granted by the state to registered brand owners. Legal consequences for businesses that market brands without a license can be penalized as follows, in article 382bis criminal code can also be penalized i.e. material acts are threatened with a maximum prison sentence of one year and a fine as high as nine hundred million rupiah.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Karya Cipta Fotografi

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
I Kadek Candra Wisesa ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Digital Cameras ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Republic

The richness in the diversity of arts and cultures can be found in the Republic of Indonesia. Intellectual property rights obtain protection as stipulated in legislation, including Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The advancement in technology and the increasingly developing world of digital photography by means of digital cameras raises the legal issues of copyright in photographic works. The main issues examined in this paper are: the forms of legal protection of the rights of the creators of photographic works and the resolution of disputes of photographic works that are used without permission. The method used to examine this issue is the normative legal research method with a legislative approach. Copyright Protection of photographic works may be done in two ways, namely preventive in which legal protection given to the creator of photography which the creator shall done by registering the copyright, and repressive protection realised by filing a lawsuit in court if there is a violation of copyright in the photographic work. All rights reserved must always be appreciated by not committing violating actions which are arbitrarily committed especially if it relates to providing benefits for violators.

scholarly journals The modern concept of judicial protection of intellectual property rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Yurii BEDRATYI
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
European Integration ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Modern Concept ◽  
High Court ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Property Rights Protection ◽  
Judicial Protection

Introduction. The European integration vector of Ukraine's development has significantly increased the requirements for the quality of legal and regulatory support for the effective protection of human rights, which is one of the main conditions for integration into the European political, legal, economic and cultural space. The analysis of existing works shows that the attention of the scientific community to the judicial protection of intellectual property rights has intensified in connection with the creation of the Supreme Court of Intellectual Property in 2017. However, as of 2019, the court is still in the process of forming a judicial corps. In view of this, it seems appropriate to summarize existing developments in the relevant field. The purpose of the paper is to summarize the conceptual foundations of judicial protection of intellectual property rights. Results. The article presents the results of research into the modern concept of judicial protection of intellectual property rights. Emphasis is placed on the availability of research-related work performed in different jurisdictions. It is emphasized that the bulk of studies on intellectual property rights and certain aspects of their judicial protection are concentrated in the field of civil law, but equally important are studies of economic, criminal and administrative nature. It is noted that the cross-sectoral nature of the institute of intellectual property rights has affected the development of an interdisciplinary judicial and legal approach to solving problems of securing these rights. The importance of scientific understanding of the legal status of the High Court on Intellectual Property is emphasized. The importance of taking into account the European experience of judicial protection of intellectual property rights in the context of the processes of European integration of Ukraine is emphasized. Conclusion. The trends identified are as follows. First, intellectual property rights research is carried out at both general and sectoral levels. Secondly, an important area of development of theoretical and methodological support for the judicial protection of intellectual property rights is the study of the legal status, peculiarities of formation and future functioning of the High Court on intellectual property issues. Thirdly, it is of utmost importance to the factors that enhance the effectiveness of intellectual property rights protection in the context of Ukraine's European integration aspirations.

scholarly journals HUKUM WAKAF BENDA BERGERAK (UANG) MENURUT FATWA ULAMA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 41 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG WAKAF

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Boedi Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Precious Metals ◽  
The Right

Penelitian ini menghasilkan dua temuan. Pertama, para ulama madzhab berbeda pendapat tentang hukum wakaf benda bergerak. Para Ulama Hanafiyah, tidak membolehkan wakaf benda bergerak dalam segala bentuknya. Sebaliknya, para Ulama Malikiyah membolehkan wakaf benda bergerak dalam segala bentuknya. Para Ulama Syafi’iyah dan Hanabilah berada di antara kedua pendapat itu, mem­bolehkan wakaf benda bergerak kecuali yang berbentuk uang. Kedua, pasal 16 ayat 2-3 Undang-Undang RI. Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf yang menyang­kut wakaf benda berberak yang meliputi uang, logam mulia, surat berharga, ken­daraan, hak atas kekayaan intelektual, hak sewa, dan benda bergerak lain sesuai dengan ketentuan Syariah dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku sangat dipengaruhi oleh pendapat para ulama Malikiyah.Kata Kunci : wakaf, benda bergerak, Malikiyah, Hanafiyah, Syafi’iyah, Hanabilah AbstractThis research has found two results. First, Moslem scholars have different opinions about the legal status of endowments on movable assets. The Hanafiyah scholars do not allow endowments of movable assets in all forms. Instead, the scholars of Malikiyah allow the endowments of movable assets in all forms. The Shafi'ites scholars and Hanabilah falls somewhere between the two opinions, they allow the endowments of movable assets except in form of money. Secondly, Article 16, paragraph 2-3 of the Act Number 41 of 2004 on Endowments especially concerning endowments of movable assets which includes money, precious metals, securities, vehicles, intellectual property rights, the right to lease and other movable assets is strongly influenced by the Malikiyah scholars’ opinion.Keywords : endowments, movable assets, Hanafiyah, Malikiah, Syafi’iyah, Hanabilah

scholarly journals Artificial intelligence as a subject of property law

2020 ◽  
pp. 328-332
Author(s):  
Yelizaveta Tymoshenko
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Process Automation ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

The article considers artificial intelligence (AI) as a new and existing subject of legal relations. It is described in detail about hisability to be a full participant in the relationship of intellectual property rights. Artificial intelligence allows computers to learn fromtheir own experience, adapt to given parameters and perform tasks that previously could only be done by humans. In most cases, theuse of artificial intelligence, whether for playing chess or as an unmanned vehicle, is extremely important to be able to learn and processnatural language. That is, the development and awareness of AI is needed. Thanks to information technology, computers can be “taught”to perform certain tasks by processing large amounts of data and identifying patterns in them.Artificial intelligence is not in itself identical to the concept of “process automation”, but the development of AI will lead to thefact that more and more tasks will be under the power of a computer program. Therefore, it is important to start adapting the legislationto future realities now. It is necessary to define the range of rights and responsibilities of AI, to indicate its legal status. Accordingly, itis necessary to determine who will be the legal bearer of all rights and responsibilities that will arise as a result of the creation of a particularcreative object. In the field of intellectual property law, AI is seen as a new source of creativity, a source capable of producingnew results.The article offers consideration of these issues in the field of intellectual property, as for several years there are examples of worksinvented by artificial intelligence. For a long time, programs were just a tool to help the author create a work. However, with the deve -lopment of machine learning and neural networks, artificial intelligence has learned to create a variety of objects: images, videos, music,design. Since the result obtained by artificial intelligence can be potentially protective, the article discusses the question of who shouldrecognize the rights to objects created by AI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document