scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA HAK CIPTA SEBAGAI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM TRANSAKSI KREDIT PERBANKAN DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Lidwina Tessa Kurnia Prihantiwi ◽  
, Pujiyono

<p>Abstract<br />This article  has the main  problem  with  the causes  of banks  not allowing  copyright  as a Fiduciary  Guarantee in Banking Credit Transactions in Indonesia. Besides, this article aims to find out the solutions that must be done so that copyright can become a Fiduciary Guarantee. This article is empirical legal research and has a descriptive nature. The types of data used are primary and secondary. Data collection techniques used were interviews  and literature studies, then the technical analysis used was the deductive method . The results showed that several things cause copyright as a fiduciary guarantee  in bank credit transactions  not yet allowed by banks. The first cause is regulatory constraints, intellectual property rights assessment constraints such as copyright, constraints according to banking, constraints according  to the OJK, constraints  on people’s  evaluation  of copyright.  From  the various causes, the authors also describe solutions to overcome these causes so that there is a bright spot on Copyright Problems as a Fiduciary Guarantee in Banking Credit Transactions.<br />Keywords: Copyright; Fiduciary Guarantee; Banking Credit</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini memiliki pokok masalah tentang penyebab perbankan belum memperbolehkan Hak Cipta   sebagai  Jaminan  Fidusia  dalam Transaksi  Kredit  Perbankan  di Indonesia.  Selain itu artikel  ini bertujuan  untuk  mengetahui  solusi  yang  harus  dilakukan  agar Hak  Cipta  dapat menjadi  Jaminan  Fidusia.  Artikel  ini adalah  penelitian  hukum  empiris  dan memiliki  sifat deskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan  yaitu primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan  data yang digunakan  adalah wawancara  dan studi kepustakaan,  selanjutnya  teknis analisis yang digunakan  adalah metode  deduktif.  Hasil penelitian  menunjukkan  bahwa  ada beberapa  hal yang menyebabkan hak cipta sebagai jaminan fidusia dalam transaksi kredit perbankan belum diperbolehkan oleh bank. Penyebab yang pertama adalah kendala regulasi , kendala penilaian hak kekayaan intelektual seperti hak cipta, kendala menurut perbankan, kendala menurut OJK, kendala penilaian  masyarakat  terhadap hak cipta. Dari berbagai   penyebab tersebut, penulis juga memaparkan solusi-solusi mengatasi penyebab tersebut agar ada titik terang atas Problematika Hak Cipta sebagai Jaminan Fidusia dalam Transaksi Kredit Perbankan.<br />Kata Kunci: Hak Cipta; Jaminan Fidusia; Kredit Perbankan</p>

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-152
Author(s):  
Wely Saputra ◽  
Muhammad Yasir

The goal of this study is to develop the legal status of brand rights as collateral for bank credit guarantees and to analyze the risks of applying brand rights as collateral for bank credit guarantees in Indonesia. Brand rights are part of intellectual property rights which, of course, are of commercial significance to be used as collateral for bank loans. This study is a normative legal research using a regulatory methodology or a legislative approach to interpreting the idea of brand rights being used as security for bank loan guarantees, as laid down in statutory regulations, which are meant to try to get closer to the problems examined on the basis of laws, norms and rules. In compliance with the purpose of the analysis. The findings of the research suggest that Brand Rights can potentially be used as collateral for bank credit guarantees in compliance with the relevant legal requirements, but there are no specific laws and regulations that explicitly govern brands used as collateral for bank credit and, as a result, many banks in Indonesia have not been able to consider brands as collateral for bank credit guarantees.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Ananda Dwinanti Kinasih , ◽  
M. Hudi Asrori S ,

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims for reviewing how the settlement of compensation as the consequences of the tenure <br />of land rights unlawfully in civil law Surakarta state court verdict number 106/pdt.g/2017/PN.SKT and <br />number 103/pdt.G/2006/PN.SKT where the court’s decision has a permanent legal force. This research is <br />a juridical normative legal research. The location of this research at Notary Office and PPAT Adib Sujarwadi <br />and the State Court Surakarta Class 1A Specific. Kinds and the sources of data in this research are <br />consist of primary data and secondary data. The technique of data collection through interview and library <br />study. The analytical technique used by the author is by the method of syllogism that uses the deduction <br />mindset. Regarding the settlement of compensation due to unlawful tenure of land rights is a compensatory <br />damages, in the form of payment to the victim amounting to a loss that is actually experienced. Based on <br />the decision of the Panel of Judges. Regarding the non-granting of immaterial compensation because <br />the Plaintiff does not attach the appropriate evidence. After the verdict is declared incracht, outside the <br />court, the Defendant and the Plaintiff may hold deliberations to determine the amount of the indemnity or <br />the Plaintiff waived the indemnity obligation, but the Defendant must leave the land of the object of the <br />dispute voluntarily. In the case of still occupy it will be executed by the bailiff from the Court.<br />Keywords: Compensation; Tort; Tenure Of Land Rights.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana penyelesaian ganti rugi akibat penguasaan hak atas <br />tanah secara melawan hukum pada perkara perdata Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Nomor 106/<br />Pdt.G/2017/PN SKT dan Nomor 103/Pdt.G/2006/PN SKT, dimana putusan pengadilan tersebut telah <br />berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yuridis. Lokasi penelitian <br />yaitu di Kantor Notaris dan PPAT Adib Sujarwadi dan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Kelas IA Khusus. Jenis <br />dan sumber data penelitian ini meliputi data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui <br />wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah dengan metode <br />silogisme yang menggunakan pola pikir deduksi. Penyelesaian ganti rugi akibat penguasaan hak atas <br />tanah secara melawan hukum yaitu dengan ganti rugi kompensasi, berupa pembayaran kepada korban <br />sebesar kerugian yang benar-benar dialami. Berdasarkan keputusan Majelis Hakim. Mengenai tidak <br />dikabulkannya ganti rugi immateriil dikarenakan Penggugat tidak melampirkan bukti-bukti yang sesuai. <br />Setelah putusan dinyatakan incraht, di luar pengadilan, Tergugat dan Penggugat dapat mengadakan <br />musyawarah untuk menentukan jumlah ganti rugi atau Penggugat membebaskan kewajiban pembayaran <br />ganti rugi, namun Tergugat harus meninggalkan tanah obyek sengketa secara sukarela. Dalam hal masih <br />tetap menempati maka akan dilakukan eksekusi oleh juru sita dari Pengadilan.<br />Kata Kunci : Ganti Kerugian; Perbuatan Melawan Hukum; Penguasaan Hak Atas Tanah.</p>


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
putri indah sari

The problems in this research are: (1) Is the patent in production can be provided to the workers / employees as a inventor? (2) How will the moral rights attached to the inventor to patent the intellectual work produced during the production process? This research uses normative juridical approach. Source of data derived from secondary data that primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results showed that patents in the production process is not given to the discoverer of workers / employees. The government needs to dissemination of the patents and other intellectual property rights so that a producer of intellectual work so that they know that the law protects what they produce. Governments also need to revise the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (1) Patent Law, where the rights of patent holders fixed on the inventor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-35
Author(s):  
Lompoh Egia Nuansa Pinem ◽  
Ni Luh Dwik Suryacahyani Gunadi

In Indonesia, there are two forms of dispute resolution over Intellectual Property Rights. The first is through the litigation channel and the second is through the Non-Litigation route. Regarding trade disputes over trademark rights, the resolution is also through these two channels. This research specifically examines the settlement of trademark disputes between Geprek Bensu and I Am Geprek Bensu based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This research uses research methods of normative law which is carried out through the collection of primary data and secondary data as well as by the literature approach. Data analysis in this study used qualitative data analysis methods.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Edwin Prasetyo , ◽  
Djuwityastuti ,

<p>Abstract<br />This  article  aims  to  explain  how  the  legal  protection  of  property  buyers  on  bankrupted  developer <br />companies based on Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Credits Obligations Postponement. This <br />research is a prescriptive normative legal research that uses the approach of legislation. Types of data <br />used include: secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary <br />legal materials. Data collection techniques conducted are literature research techniques or document <br />studies. The property selling mechanism as well as today’s flats, is familiar with the concept of selling <br />property that can be marketed before the property is completed. At that stage of development, people <br />can order or buy certain desired property and will wait within a certain time to be submitted to the property <br />purchased. The buying and selling mechanism is set forth in the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB). <br />Often the property buyers of PPJB holders are harmed by the actions of the developer companies as <br />well as unable to finish the construction and end up in bankruptcy proceedings. This bankruptcy status <br />given by will enforce the uncertainty on debts payments for the property buyers.<br />Key Words: Bankruptcy; Law Protection; Real Estate Buyer.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel  ini  bertujuan  untuk  menjelaskan  bagaimana  perlindungan  hukum  terhadap  pembeli  properti <br />atas kepailitan perusahaan pengembang berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang <br />Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum <br />normatif  bersifat  preskriptif  yang  menggunakan  pendekatan  perundang-undangan.  Jenis  data  yang <br />digunakan antara lain: data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, <br />dan bahan hukum tersier.Teknik pengumpulan data yang dilakukan adalah teknik penelitian kepustakaan <br />atau studi dokumen. Mekanisme penjualan properti seperti halnya rumah susun, dewasa ini, mengenal <br />konsep penjualan properti yang dapat dipasarkan sebelum properti tersebut selesai dibangun. Pada tahap <br />pembangunan tersebut, masyarakat dapat memesan ataupun membeli produk properti yang diinginkan <br />dan akan menunggu dalam kurun waktu tertentu untuk dilakukan penyerahan terhadap properti yang <br />dibeli. Mekanisme jual-beli tersebut dituangkan dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB). Seringkali <br />pembeli properti pemegang PPJB dirugikan oleh perbuatan perusahaan pengembang seperti halnya tidak <br />dapat selesainya pembangunan dan berakhir pada proses kepailitan. Adanya pernyataan pailit terhadap <br />perusahaan  pengembang  memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap pembeli properti atas piutangnya <br />kepada perusahaan pengembang.<br />Kata Kunci: Kepailitan; Perlindungan Hukum; Pembeli Properti.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ladju Kusmawardi ◽  
Kholis Roisah

<p>The Commercial Court is a special court within the General Courts. This<br />Commercial Court has the authority to accept, examine and adjudicate the case for<br />an application for bankruptcy statements, request for a delay in the obligation to pay<br />debts (PKPU), other claims and intellectual property rights (IPR).This study aims to<br />determine the scope of duties and authority of the Commercial Court, the legal<br />standing of Creditors and Debtors after the dispute has been decided by Hakim<br />Niaga and has permanent legal force and the implementation of the execution at the<br />Commercial Court. The approach method used in this research is sociological<br />juridical with the Semarang City research area, especially the Semarang<br />Commercial Court. The research subjects included those involved in the proceedings<br />at the Semarang Commercial Court. Primary data and secondary data are obtained<br />through field surveys and literature studies.Based on the research and analysis<br />results, it is known that the scope of duties and authority of the Commercial Court is<br />to accept, examine and decide on the case for an application for bankruptcy<br />statements, postponement of the obligation to pay debts (PKPU), other claims and<br />cases included in the field of intellectual property rights (IPR).The legal standing of<br />the parties is that for the Debtor after being declared bankrupt by the Commercial<br />Court Judge, he loses the right to manage the bankrupt assets owned by him, but the<br />Debtor's civil rights as a person (personrechi) is not lost.Regarding the execution of<br />the Commercial Court that is still guided by the provisions of HI R / RBg as the<br />execution of civil cases in the District Court, this is because Law No. 4 of 1998 has<br />not been regulated separately. Especially for the execution of the forged Brand case,<br />the mark of the falsified goods / products is carried out at the Directorate General of<br />Trademark, Copy and Patent of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights in Jakarta</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-102
Author(s):  
Ayup Suran Ningsih ◽  
Hari Sutra Disemadi

This research aims to determine and analyze the implementation of the concept of profit-sharing in Islamic banking credit agreements based on regulations in force in Indonesia and also to find out and analyze defaults undertaken by customers in Islamic banking credit agreements. The method used in this research is normative juridical, which is a method that puts forward secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The secondary data in question such as Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, related books, and legal research journals. This research is based on the high community needs for capital to achieve the objectives of a business into a separate phenomenon. The concept of muamalah on the teachings of Islam that Muslims want to adhere to is one of the reasons for the birth of the concept of Islamic banking in Indonesia. The concept of profit sharing is one of the concepts known in Islamic banking. The risk of breach of contract by the customer is a necessity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Haruli Dwicaksana ◽  
. Pujiyono

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to know the use of cryptocurrency can replace conventional money as a means of  payment in Indonesia. This article belongs to the type of normative legal research that is prescriptive to produce a new concept in resolving the problems faced by supported by a legal approach and a case approach. The data used is secondary data with primary binding and fundamental material. Data collection techniques using library studies. The data analysis technique used by the authors is a silogism analysis. The results showed that cryptocurrencies are difficult to substitute for conventional currency use as a means of payment in Indonesia because there is no centralized authority governing as well as the value of a relatively unstable cryptocurrency from Conventional currency that has been circulating in Indonesia is the rupiah, it is difficult to use cryptocurrency as a means of payment at the least level of Use daily.<br />Keywords: Payment Tools; Paymeny Systems; Conventional Currency; Cryptocurrency.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penggunaan cryptocurrency dapat menggantikan uang  konvensional sebagai alat pembayaran di Indonesia. Artikel ini termasuk ke dalam jenis penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif untuk menghasilkan konsep baru dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan yang dihadapi, didukung dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder dengan bahan hukum primer yang sifatnya mengikat dan mendasar. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan penulis merupakan analisis silogisme. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa cryptocurrency sulit untuk menggantikan kegunaan mata uang konvensional sebagai alat pembayaran di Indonesia karena tidak ada otoritas terpusat yang mengatur serta nilai dari cryptocurrency yang relatif tidak stabil dari mata uang konvensional yang sudah beredar di Indonesia yaitu rupiah, maka sulit untuk menggunakan cryptocurrency sebagai alat pembayaran di tingkat paling kecil yaitu penggunaan sehari-hari.<br />Kata Kunci: Alat Pembayaran; Sistem Pembayaran; Uang Konvensional; Cryptocurrency.</p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Mulyani

Intellectual Property Rights is granted the exclusive rights to creators, inventors or designers for the creation or invention that has commercial value, either directly or through the automatic registration of the relevant agencies as awards, recognition should be given the protection of the rights of the community development law. Globally, the IPR will be used as collateral to obtain a bank loan internasional. In this law is necessary to realize the concept of legislation in each country who are willing to apply that regulate substance loading, binding, and registration of intellectual property as collateral. Key words: development of intellectual property rights, collateral, bank credit in Indonesia 


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (02) ◽  
pp. 139-152
Author(s):  
Khoirotin Nisa' ◽  
Muslih Muslih ◽  
Abu Hapsin

Islam exists in order to uphold justice. Likewise with families, where there are often unfair relationships between husband and wife, there are so many obstacles which can threaten the harmony of marriage. So far the issue of nusyūz is often connected to the wife and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) confirms this. How Islamic law regulates nusyūz and how the perspective of qira'ah mubādalah about this nusyūz is are the main questions of this study. This study uses normative legal research method with descriptive technique. Data collection was carried out by literary study and then they were analyzed qualitatively by the deductive method. The results of this study are as follow: Nusyūz according to Islamic law (KHI) is conceptualized as a wife's disobedience to her husband, such as reluctance to have intercourse, surly in front of her husband, leaving the house without the husband's permission and others which make the husband dislike. If nusyūz occurs then it is resolved by: giving advice, separating beds, and hitting. Mubādalah as a method of interpretation of texts which is reciprocal, in terms of family relations between husband and wife, defines nusyūz as disobedience to household commitments so it applies to husband and wife. Nusyūz settlement by beating is considered as an act of violence so it should not be done. Inviting reconciliation to return to commitment is the best way according to QS. An Nisa': 128.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document