scholarly journals PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: ALTERNATIF PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR DALAM NEGRI

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahmi Dzakky
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Development Agenda ◽  
Private Sector Participation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Business Entities

Sebagai regulator dan fasilitator proyek infrastruktur Indonesia, Pemerintah telah mengundang partisipasi sektor swasta melalui pengaturan Public Private Partnership (PPP) atau yang dikenal juga dengan Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha (KPBU). Kemitraan Pemerintah-Swasta umumnya dicirikan oleh entitas sektor swasta yang mengumpulkan dana untuk membangun aset yang dibutuhkan oleh Pemerintah, dan menyediakan fasilitas atau layanan sebagai imbalan aliran pendapatan kontraktual dari Pemerintah atau pengguna. Hal ini disebabkan PPP dikatakan efektif untuk dijadikan alternatif pembangunan infrastruktur di dalam negeri. Tulisan ini akan menganalisis mengenai eksistensi PPP sebagai unsur alternatif pembangunan infrastruktur di Indonesia, dilihat dari aspek hukum dan implementasinya. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Adapun hasil yang diperoleh adalah Pemerintah harus berupaya untuk dapat meningkatkan kualitas kontrak dan perbaikan skema PPP sehingga dapat menarik investor turut membantu pemerintah pada agenda pembangunan infrastruktur dalam negeri.Kata Kunci: PPP, infrastruktur, pembangunanABSTRACTAs the regulator and facilitator of Indonesian infrastructure projects, the Government has invited private sector participation through the regulation of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) or also known as Government Cooperation with Business Entities (KPBU). Government-Private Partnerships are generally characterized by private sector entities that raise funds to build assets required by the Government and provide facilities or services in exchange for a contractual revenue stream from the Government or users. This is because PPP is said to be effective to be an alternative to infrastructure development in the country. This paper will analyze the existence of PPP as an alternative element of infrastructure development in Indonesia, judging by the legal aspects and its implementation. The method used is normative legal research method using literature study. The result obtained is that the Government should strive to be able to improve the quality of contracts and improve PPP schemes to attract investors to help the government on the domestic infrastructure development agenda. Keyword: PPP, infrastructure, development

Failure Factors of Public-Private Partnership at Tourism Port Development of Tanahampo in Bali

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 279
Author(s):  
Ria A. A. Soemitro ◽  
Ida Bagus Putu Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Road ◽  
The Government ◽  
Social And Cultural Factors

<p>Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Indonesia only succeeded in the road sector and clean water. PPP sector Tourism Port Tanahampo failure, despite the tender held for 2 (two) times. This failure is a failure of government that has targeted the development of Tanahampo Port Tourism as a priority program which is already listed in the list of Bappenas in 2012. This study is a literature study, comparing the determinants of success (Critical Success Factors/CSF) PPP in the literature with the failure of the PPP Harbor Tourism Tanah Ampo Bali. This study concluded that the factors causing the failure of the PPP in the construction of port infrastructure Tanahampo tourism in Bali, among others: (1) Factors aspects procurement, tender failed twice caused no interested participants to submit bids; (2) Factors legal aspects, namely: the seizure of local government authorities (local government) and the Central Government. Local Government area of less agreed to surrender assets to the central government on the grounds of regional autonomy; (3) Factors consortium aspects, namely: lack of clarity about the PPP models that will be implemented, the Government tendered by BOT system, while most of the infrastructure has been built by the government; (4) social and cultural factors, the community asked the percentage of labor up to 30% at the time of operation, which is not necessarily the expertise and there is no clear form of cooperation the transfer of land belonging to local communities in the PPP.</p>

scholarly journals Case Study of Public-Private Partnership on Infrastruc-ture Projects of Tibar Bay Port in Timor-Leste

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Zeferino Soares Lopes ◽  
Fredy Kurniawan ◽  
Julistyana Tistogondo
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
National Development ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Developed Country ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Timor Leste ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Government ◽  
To Come

Public - Private Partnership (PPP) offers many potential benefits for the government in providing infrastructure facilities. However, the implementation of the Public Private Partnership project is not easy. Infrastructure Development is one of the development priorities in developed and developing countries, including Timor-Leste. As one of the priorities of national development, cost limitations are the main problem faced by the government. Therefore, to overcome the lack of funding, the government can involve the private sector in terms of providing funds to finance the construction of infrastructure facilities.The Government of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (RDTL) must have good regulations to achieve the goals of Timor-Leste in the future through cooperation between the government and the private sector. Good regulation is one of the best ways for good cooperation between the government and the private sector.In this study, the chosen location is the Tibar Bay Port in Timor-Leste. Based on the results of research that has been done, infrastructure development efforts do not have to rely on the Timor-Leste government as a single actor, the involvement of other parties such as the private sector is also needed for infrastructure development. The Government of Timor-Leste is fulfilling a big dream for the the future through the development of infrastructure in accordance with the strategic development plan for 2011-2030 to come, because the Government of Timor-Leste prepares a bright future for a country to become a developed country like other countries.

Driving factors for adopting public-private partnership in Ethiopia and comparison with other countries

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Getachew Yilma Debela
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Energy Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Driving Factors ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Government

Purpose The extensive public financing for infrastructure guided by the state-led development policy has crowded out private sector participation for infrastructure development in Ethiopia. Although public-private partnership (PPP) has been used by many countries, the Government of Ethiopia has started to adopt it for major infrastructure development recently. Thus, it is important to investigate the reasons that motivated the government to adopt the PPP model to provide insights to the sector players. This paper aims to explore the driving factors for adopting PPP for infrastructure development focusing on the energy sector of Ethiopia and compared it with other countries. Design/methodology/approach The study used a comprehensive literature review of previous research outcomes and a purposively sampled questionnaire survey of professionals in Ethiopia. Findings The results of the study revealed that the five top driving factors perceived by the experts for adopting PPP in the energy sector of Ethiopia include the private sector has the ability to raise funds for project, facilitate creative and innovative approaches, save time in delivering the project, accelerate project development and private sector possess better mobility. The comparison of the driving factors with other countries also suggests that each county has its own reason and preference for adopting the PPP model. Originality/value The research result contributes to the development of PPP in Ethiopia and other developing countries at the early stage of PPP implementation. It also provides information to policymakers, sponsors, financiers and developers of PPP projects to understand the government's motivations to implement PPP in Ethiopia.

Developing Public-Private Partnership Framework for Managing Adverse Health Effects of Environmental Disaster (A case study of Lake Urmia -Iran)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hojatolah Gharaee ◽  
Ramin Rezapour ◽  
Naser Derakhshani ◽  
Morteza Ghojazadeh ◽  
Saber Azami-Aghdash
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Health Effects ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Lake Urmia ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Adverse Health Effects ◽  
Environmental Disasters ◽  
Adverse Health ◽  
Private Sector Participation

Abstract Background Due to the limited resources of the public sector, the presence of the private sector as an auxiliary to the health sector, to mitigate adverse health effects (AHEs) caused by environmental disasters, seems necessary. Therefore, the present study aimed to develop a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) framework for managing AHE of environmental disasters (case study of Lake Urmia-Iran). Methods This is a qualitative study with grounded theory approach, conducted in 2019. Required data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 experts selected through purposive sampling, and analyzed using Content-Analysis. To formulate the initial framework, an experts’ panel, composed of 12 experts, was formed. Delphi method was used to determine the validity of the framework. Results Most participants found the private sector participation in this field, essential and useful. The most important infrastructure for the private sector participation was designing a legal framework and providing adequate resources and facilities. Pollutant assessment and education of families for disease prevention are among the most important areas that the private sector can participate. To evaluate the performance of the private sector, periodic and short-term reports together with documentation should be used, and the evaluation tool should be the checklists agreed by two sectors. Payments to the private sector should be for periodic objectives, based on performance, and after performance confirmation, in the form of combination of fee for services, per capita and performance-based system. Preventing waste of resources, improving service coverage, greater efficiency and attracting public participation were the most important benefits of the private sector participation. Conclusions PPP can be considered by policy makers as an effective policy for reducing the AHE of environmental disasters (especially drying lakes). To this end, the framework presented in this study can be used as an action guide by national and local authorities and policymakers.

scholarly journals PRINSIP PROPORSIONALITAS DAN GOVERNANCE TERHADAP ALOKASI DAN TRANSFER RISIKO DALAM SKEMA KERJASAMA PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP)

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 541
Author(s):  
Yuniarti Yuniarti ◽  
Fifi Junita
Keyword(s):  
Risk Sharing ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Government Support ◽  
Risk Allocation ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
The Government ◽  
High Level

The high level of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is also supported by the availability of infrastructure to the remote area where the investment will be implemented. However, with limited funds from both APBN and APBD, infrastructure development can not be fully done by the government. Therefore, the government will cooperate with the investor (private) in the implementation of infrastructure development known as public private partnership. The main problem in implementing PPP is the allocation of risk to PPP projects. The different bargaining positions between the government and the private sector resulted in the fact that most of them impose risks on private parties (private). Implementation of PPP is closely related to the emergence of various risks including and not limited to regulatory risks, force majeure, etc. If there is no risk allocation arrangement proportionally based on governance principles, it weakens the pattern of PPP cooperation in Indonesia. PPP as one form of risk sharing in infrastructure investment should not release the role and government support to private parties / investors. Even in practice, PPP implementation in Indonesia only relies on BOT (Build Operate and Transfer) scheme which is expected to minimize government support in project implementation. This will ultimately lead to project failure.

scholarly journals The Loss of Object Promised in Built Operate Transfer Scheme

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 12094-12097
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Points Of Interest ◽  
The Government ◽  
Business Entities

Infrastructure development requires relatively large funds. The limited funding owned by the government encourages the government to cooperate with the private sector. The collaboration scheme is known as the collaboration of business entities (PPPs) or built operate transfer (BOT) schemes both concerning public and private law. Existing regulations encourage renegotiation as an effort to find points of interest for the parties.

scholarly journals Reasons for Implementing Public-Private Partnership in Road Construction: Perspective from State-Owned Agencies and Private Sector in Ghana

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-25
Author(s):  
Simon Ofori Ametepey ◽  
William Gyadu-Asiedu ◽  
Clinton Aigbavboa ◽  
Clinton Aigbavboa
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Road Construction ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Functional Responses ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Road ◽  
Alternative Means ◽  
The Government ◽  
Shared Risk

Presently, there is a request by various stakeholders in the road construction sector to embrace public-private partnership (PPP) as an alternative means of solving the road infrastructure deficit in Ghana. To this end, the study sought to identify the underlying reasons for implementing public-private partnership in road construction in Ghana. It also intends to examine the differences in the perception of these reasons by the State-owned Road Agencies (SRA) (who represent the government) and the Private Sector (PS). A questionnaire survey was used to elicit the perceptions of the SRA and PS on the underlying reasons for implementing PPP in road construction in Ghana. An in-depth interview was also conducted among four PPP “experts” in Ghana. Seventy-six functional responses were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) to rank the importance of the reasons based on the overall responses, as well as the responses from both the SRA and the PS and to examine the differences in the perceptions between the two groups. “Shortage of government funding”, “Political pressure”, “Economic development pressure of demanding more facilities”, “accelerate project development”, “Allowance for shared risk”, “Ability to raise funds for project by private sector”, and “Facilitate creative and innovative approaches” were found to be the seven most important reasons for adopting PPP in road construction in Ghana. In terms of the differences in perception between the SRA and PS groups, the hypothesis test results indicated that significant differences exist for only a few of the reasons.

scholarly journals Ten Years of Public Private Partnership in Jakarta Drinking Water Service (1998-2007): Eastern Jakarta Drinking Water Service by Thames PAM Jaya

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Renalia Iwan
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Capital City ◽  
Cooperation Agreement ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Water Service ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government

<p>Clean water is crucial for survival and economic development. Everyday, people need a sufficient amount and a suitable quality of water for drinking, cleaning and sanitation. However, rapid population growth, pollution and climate change have made water a scarce resource, which everyone competed. The United Nations Development Program's recent report stated that more than 1 billion people, up to this day, are without access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Lack of access to clean water can cause social, economic and health problems. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find solutions to this problem. To solve the problem of water scarcity, International Financial Institutions introduced Public Private Partnership (PPP) in the management of water sector. PPP is a concept which involves private sector participation in the management of drinking water service. In PPP, water is recognized as an economic good which is recognised under the 1992 Dublin Principles. It was hoped that by placing an economic value on water, efficient and equitable use of water can be achieved. It was also hoped that it would encourage conservation and protection of water resources. However, studies show opposite results from the Principle. Jakarta drinking water service is one example of a failed PPP. Jakarta, the Capital City of Indonesia, adopted Public Private Partnership (PPP) in the management of its drinking water service in 1998. The twenty five years concession contract was granted to Thames Water International (TWI) and its local partner, Kekarpola Airindo (KATI), now known as Thames PAM Jaya (TPJ). This company is responsible for the management of Eastern Jakarta drinking water service. This research was aimed to evaluate Thames PAM Jaya (TPJ) performance on water provision in Eastern Jakarta, ten years into the twenty five years concession by undergoing a qualitative research method. A range of semi-structured interviews were used to: gain perceptions and opinions of each stakeholder on the Public Private Partnership (PPP), identify the advantages and/or disadvantages of the water privatization in the capital city and to identify the constraints and limitations facing the private sector. Participants involved in this research include Government officials, Thames PAM Jaya, Jakarta Water Supply Regulatory Body (JWSRB), non governmental organizations (NGOs), and TPJ customers. The analysis concludes that Public Private Partnership (PPP) in Eastern Jakarta does not bring improvement to the region's drinking water service. Thames PAM Jaya (TPJ) had failed in fulfilling targets set in the Cooperation Agreement. Lack of transparency and public tendering in the process of forming the public private partnership may have contributed to this poor performance because the proper search for a competent partner was short circuited. Political interference in the bidding process is a form of corruption in which the company granted the contract was clearly complicit. The water tariff in Jakarta is not only the highest in Indonesia, but it is also the highest in the Southeast Asia region. The quality of its service, however, is still of poor quality. Limited access to water due to its high price and low service has resulted in water hacking and the on-going use of groundwater. The Cooperation Agreement, on the other hand, has locked the Government of Indonesia into a long term partnership which is very disadvantageous for the government and the residents. Private sector involvement should be the last alternative to improve the management of the water supply service in Indonesia.</p>

scholarly journals EARLY TERMINATION COMPENSATION UNDER DEMAND UNCERTAINTY IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinbo Song ◽  
Yanzhu Yu ◽  
Lulu Jin ◽  
Zhuo Feng
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Demand Uncertainty ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Early Termination ◽  
Cumulative Probability ◽  
Compensation Mechanism ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Concession Period ◽  
Core Issue ◽  
The Government

In the early termination of public-private partnership (PPP) projects, compensation is considered a core issue that greatly affects the interests of the government and the private sector. To address the early termination that is frequently caused by government default or voluntary buyback, this paper proposes an ex-ante compensation mechanism using the cumulative probability that a given demand could be realized to determine early termination compensation under demand uncertainty. By splitting the compensation into two parts, the base compensation could be the minimum compensation for the private sector, while the additional compensation is considered a reasonable allocation of future booming demand. The predetermined compensation criterion ensures a smooth transfer of the early terminated project, which not only benefits the government from being overcharged, but also enables the private sector to gain a reasonable compensation for the remaining concession period.

scholarly journals Public–Private Partnership Monitor: Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Energy Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Sector Investment ◽  
Total Investment ◽  
The Government

The Government of Pakistan strongly supports public–private partnership (PPP) initiatives. From 1990 to 2019, Pakistan witnessed 108 financially closed PPP projects, with a total investment of approximately $28.4 billion. About 88% of these projects are in the energy sector, attracting more than $24.7billion, followed by investments in the port sector. In early 2021, Parliament approved the amendments to the 2017 PPP Law, enacting the Public Private Partnership Authority (Amendment) Act 2021. This further strengthens the enabling legal and regulatory framework for developing and implementing PPPs, thereby promoting private sector investment in public infrastructure and related services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document