Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study Comparing l-Epinephrine and Racemic Epinephrine Aerosols in the Treatment of Laryngotracheitis (Croup)

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-306
Author(s):  
Yeheskel Waisman ◽  
Bruce L. Klein ◽  
Douglas A. Boenning ◽  
Grace M. Young ◽  
James M. Chamberlain ◽  
...  

Aerosolized racemic epinephrine, but not l-epinephrine, is commonly used in treating croup. The efficacy and adverse effects of nebulized racemic and l-epinephrine in the treatment of laryngotracheitis were compared. Children 6 months to 6 years of age with a croup score of 6 or above were assigned in a randomized double-blind fashion to receive either racemic (n = 16) or l-epinephrine (n = 15) aerosols. Croup score, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, fraction of inspired oxygen, and oxygen saturation were recorded before treatment and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after the aerosol. Patients in both groups showed significant transient reduction of the croup score and respiratory rate following the aerosol (P < .001), but there were no differences between treatment groups when croup score, heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate were assessed over time. It is concluded that l-epinephrine is at least as effective as racemic epinephrine in the treatment of laryngotracheitis and does not carry the risk of additional adverse effects. l-Epinephrine is also more readily available worldwide, is less expensive, and can be recommended for this purpose.

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Walach ◽  
Stefan Schmidt ◽  
Yvonne-Michelle Bihr ◽  
Susanne Wiesch

We studied the effect of experimenter expectations and different instructions in a balanced placebo design. 157 subjects were randomized into a 2 × 4 factorial design. Two experimenters were led to expect placebos either to produce physiological effects or not (pro- vs. antiplacebo). All subjects except a control group received a caffeine placebo. They were either made to expect coffee, no coffee, or were in a double-blind condition. Dependent measures were blood pressure, heart rate, well-being, and a cognitive task. There was one main effect on the instruction factor (p = 0.03) with the group “told no caffeine” reporting significantly better well-being. There was one main effect on the experimenter factor with subjects instructed by experimenter “proplacebo” having higher systolic blood pressure (p = 0.008). There was one interaction with subjects instructed by experimenter “proplacebo” to receive coffee doing worse in the cognitive task than the rest. Subjects instructed by experimenter “antiplacebo” were significantly less likely to believe the experimental instruction, and that mostly if they had been instructed to receive coffee. Contrary to the literature we could not show an effect of instruction, but there was an effect of experimenters. It is likely, however, that these experimenter effects were not due to experimental manipulations, but to the difference in personalities.


Pharmacology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Alfredo Costa ◽  
Daniele Bosone ◽  
Matteo Cotta Ramusino ◽  
Giulia Perini ◽  
Natascia Ghiotto ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess the effects of chronic evening oral administration of bromazepam alone or in combination with propranolol on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in mild hypertensive subjects. Methods: Thirty-seven mild hypertensive patients after a 2-week placebo period were randomized to bromazepam 3 mg, propranolol 40 mg, bromazepam 3 mg plus propranolol 40 mg or placebo for 2 weeks according to a double-blind, double dummy, cross-over design. After each treatment period, 24-h BP and HR ambulatory monitoring was performed by using a non-invasive device. Results: Ambulatory monitoring showed that during night-time SBP and DBP values were unaffected by bromazepam as compared to placebo, whereas SBP was significantly reduced by propranolol both when taken alone and in combination with bromazepam. HR nocturnal values were significantly reduced by propranolol, whereas they were significantly increased by bromazepan both when taken alone (+11.5%, p < 0.05 vs. placebo) and in combination with propranolol (+12.8%, p < 0.05 vs. propranolol). No significant difference in day-time values of SBP, DBP and HR was observed among the 4 treatment groups. Conclusions: In mild hypertensive patients, evening consumption of bromazepam for a 2-week period did not affect BP, while it increased nocturnal HR. Such an increase was observed both when bromazepam was taken alone and in combination with propranolol, which suggests that it depends on a bromazepam mediated decrease in vagal tone. Whatever the mechanism, the HR nocturnal increase might be of clinical relevance, due to the role of high HR as cardiovascular risk factor, particularly in already at risk hypertensive subjects.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Marie Chiasson ◽  
Ann Linda Baldwin ◽  
Carrol Mclaughlin ◽  
Paula Cook ◽  
Gulshan Sethi

This study was performed to investigate the effect of live, spontaneous harp music on individual patients in an intensive care unit (ICU), either pre- or postoperatively. The purpose was to determine whether this intervention would serve as a relaxation or healing modality, as evidenced by the effect on patient’s pain, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate variability. Each consenting patient was randomly assigned to receive either a live 10-minute concert of spontaneous music played by an expert harpist or a 10-minute rest period. Spontaneous harp music significantly decreased patient perception of pain by 27% but did not significantly affect heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, or heart rate variability. Trends emerged, although being not statistically significant, that systolic blood pressure increased while heart rate variability decreased. These findings may invoke patient engagement, as opposed to relaxation, as the underlying mechanism of the decrease in the patients’ pain and of the healing benefit that arises from the relationship between healer, healing modality, and patient.


Author(s):  
Vijaya P. Borkar Patil ◽  
Mayuri Ganeshrao Tambakhe ◽  
Sunil Shankarrao Lawhale ◽  
Jayshree J. Upadhye

Background: Magnesium and clonidine both inhibit catecholamine and vasopressin release. They also attenuate hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum.Methods: This randomized double-blind study was designed to assess which agent attenuates hemodynamic stress response to pneumoperitoneum better in 70 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Results: After the administration of drug, heart rate in group M was mean 84.29 while in group C was mean 79.89. Thus, there was more fall in Heart rate in C group. After intubation, heart rate at 1min, 3 min, 5 min was 101.20, 96.69, 93.94 respectively in group M and in C group was 96.37, 85.83, 86.17 respectively with p values (0.12, 0.001, 0.008). After giving drug, there was fall in blood pressure in both groups but in C group, there was significant fall in systolic blood pressure. There was no significant difference in the mean diastolic BP in both the groups immediately at intubation (76.17±10.74 for group M and 78.86±10.48 for group C with p>0.05) as also at 3 min (63.29±8.76 for M group and 65.14±11.705 for clonidine with p>0.05) and 5 min (63.03±7.909 for magnesium sulphate and 67.69±13.588 for clonidine with p>0.05) following intubation. Thus, the rise in mean diastolic BP was statistically similar in both Group M and Group C. There was no significant difference in the mean for MAP in both the groups immediately at intubation (88.86±12.76 for magnesium sulphate and 91.74±11.59 for clonidine) as also at 3 min (73.17±10.019 for M and 75.80±12.849 for C group. But at 5 min (71.71±9.11 for magnesium sulphate and 77.66±13.715 for clonidine) following intubation with p<0.05 which is significant.Conclusions: Administration of magnesium sulfate or clonidine attenuates hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum. Although magnesium sulfate produces hemodynamic stability comparable to clonidine, clonidine blunts the hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum more effectively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-301
Author(s):  
Milon V Mitragotri ◽  
Safiya I Sheikh ◽  
Roopa Sachinananda ◽  
Vikas Joshi

: Fentanyl has evinced its property of being a potent opioid and benumbing stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation (L&I). However respiratory depression and chest wall rigidity limits its utility at high doses. Nalbuphine, reported to have a ceiling effect for respiratory depression, can serve as an alternative. We studied and compared the efficacy of fentanyl and nalbuphine in preventing the rise in heart rate and blood pressure after L&I. A randomized double blind study was conducted in 60 subjects divided in two groups (Group F n=30 and Group N n=30) was done. Group F received 2µg kg fentanyl intravenously while group N received nalbuphine 0.2mg kg intravenously. Hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured at baseline and at intervals of five minutes of administering test drug, each minute up to five minutes after intubation, 10 minutes and 30 minutes after intubation. Complications, if any, were recorded after surgery. Change in HR, SBP, DBP and MAP between the two groups was compared using independent t-test. : The two drugs were equally effective in preventing HR rise at all-time points except after 30 minutes where fentanyl performed better. The change in SBP, DBP and MAP from baseline in both the groups was comparable.: Nalbuphine can serve as an alternative to fentanyl in obtunding stress response when given five minutes before intubation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Suk Kwon ◽  
Ji Su Jang ◽  
Na Rea Lee ◽  
Seong Su Kim ◽  
Young Ki Kim ◽  
...  

Background. Oxycodone, a semisynthetic opioid, has been widely used for acute and chronic pain.Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic and adverse effects of oxycodone and alfentanil on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. A total of 82 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive either oxycodone or alfentanil using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). PCA was administered as a time-scheduled decremental continuous infusion based on lean body mass for 48 hours postoperatively. Patients were assessed for pain with a visual analogue scale (VAS), the cumulative PCA dose, adverse effects, sedation level at 1, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, and satisfaction during the postoperative 48 hours.Results. There were no significant differences (p<0.05) between the two groups in VAS score, cumulative PCA dose, adverse effects, sedation level at 1, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, and satisfaction during the postoperative 48 hours.Conclusions. Our data showed that the analgesic and adverse effects of oxycodone and alfentanil were similar. Therefore, oxycodone may be a good alternative to alfentanil for pain management using intravenous PCA after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when used at a conversion ratio of 10 : 1. This trial is registered withKCT0001962.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Nabin Kumar Regmi ◽  
Grisuna Singh

Background: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation lead to stress response which is characterized by transient rise in blood pressure and heart rate. This response is tolerated well in normal individuals but can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Search for the better drugs to suppress these responses is going on through decades.  Aim of Study: To compare the effects of IV nitroglycerin alone and in combination with IV lignocaine, on attenuation of stress response to end tracheal intubation.  Material and Methods: This is a randomized, double blind study conducted in 60patients admitted for operation at NGMCTH, between June 2018 to November 2018. Patients were of 16- 60 years age groups and belonging to ASA group I and II. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I IV Nitroglycerin 500 mcg+ NS 3 ml. (n=30) and Group IIIV Nitroglycerin 500 mcg+ IV Lignocaine 63 mg (n=30). Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart rate (HR) were measured and Rate Pressure Product (RPP) calculated. Results: Baseline values were comparable in both groups. Post Intubation, there was significant decrease in SBP at 0,1,3 and 5 minutes while DBP and MAP significantly decreased at 1, 3 and 5 minutes, in both groups. Significant tachycardia was noted in both groups at 0,1and 3 minutes, and RPP remained unchanged in both groups. Conclusion: Nitroglycerin significantly decreases blood pressure, prevents rise in RPP but does not attenuate heart rate after end tracheal intubation. There is no benefit of adding IV lignocaine to IV nitroglycerin for attenuation of stress response to end tracheal intubation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 466-470
Author(s):  
IFTIKHAR HUSSIAN ◽  
KHALID ZAEEM

Back ground: Endo-tracheal intubation causes hypertensive stress response and increase in bloodpressure and heart rate. This increase in systolic blood pressure causes myocardial ischemia and dysrythmias invulnerable patient . Different drugs 1 are used intravenously to attenuate this hypertensive response during intubation.I compared glyceryltrinitrate with plain Lignocaine intravenous to obtund this hypertensive stress response. Materialand method. In a randomized, double blind study, 60 patients were selected for this study and divided into two equalgroups of I and II based on receiving intravenous glyceryltrinitate and plain lignocaine respectively. A bolus dose ofGlyceryltrinitrate (Nitronal) 200 μg, 20 seconds before intubation. And then titration at a rate of 2 μgm/kg/minute wasstarted. Group II was given plain lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg body weight. The comparative study was carried out to knowthe effectiveness of each drug to blunt the hypertensive stress response and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) duringintubation. Blood pressure and heart rate variability (HRV) immediately after intubation was assessed. Results: Bloodpressure fall was more marked in patient receiving Glyceryltrinitrate (Nitronal) then those of receiving plain Lignocaine,but heart rate variability (HRV) was greater in patient receiving Glyceryltrinitrate (Nitronal). Conclusion:Glyceryltrinitrate (Nitronal) is more effective than plain lignocaine in blunting the hypertensive stress response ofintubation .


Author(s):  
Thaila Oliveira Zatiti Brasileiro ◽  
Andressa Anunciação de Oliveira Prado ◽  
Bianca Bacelar de Assis ◽  
Denismar Alves Nogueira ◽  
Rogério Silva Lima ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of prayer on blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate in patients with chronic kidney disease and learn their perception of the intervention. METHOD A randomized controlledtrial, double blind with a sample of volunteers, randomized into an intervention group (n=42) and a control group (n=37). Questionnaires addressing socio-demographic, clinical and spiritual characteristics and the Duke University Religious Index were applied. Blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate were measured. The prayer was conducted at three different moments on alternating weeks. The qualitative data were organized and analyzed through Thematic Analysis. RESULTS The sample consisted of 95 randomized volunteers. In the intra-group analysis, a statistically significant reduction (P<0001) of blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate was observed in all evaluations of the people who were prayed for. The qualitative analysis resulted in the themes Prayer in a "Place of Suffering" and Positive Evaluation and in the sub-themes Relief from Suffering, Hope for Improvement, and Coping with Hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONPrayer reduced blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate in patients who suffer from chronic kidney disease, and the volunteers’ evaluation of the intervention was positive.BrazilianClinicalTrials Registry: RBR-2zv39y.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document