Varicella Vaccine

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
STANLEY A. PLOTKIN
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Varicella Vaccine ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gestation Period ◽  
First Report ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

The development and licensing of a vaccine for varicella in the United States has taken an incredible length of time. From the first report by Takahashi et al in 1974 until final American licensure in 1995, extensive studies were conducted by many investigators. Despite this long gestation period, which could have produced an elephant, there is some danger that the result will be a mouse, in that use of the vaccine since licensure has been far from universal. Recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics' Red Book Commitee and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (statement in preparation, June 1995) may change that picture, but judging from conversations I have had, many American pediatricians have reservations concerning the varicella vaccine.

scholarly journals Update From the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean T O′Leary ◽  
Yvonne A Maldonado ◽  
David W Kimberlin
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Vaccine Candidate ◽  
The United States ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics ◽  
Health Experts

Abstract The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of medical and public health experts, normally meets 3 times per year to develop recommendations for vaccine use in the United States. Because of the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, there are several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently in late-stage clinical trials, so the ACIP is now meeting monthly for single day meetings, with plans to continue standard 2- to 3-day meetings as per usual (February, June, and October). Emergency meetings of ACIP may occur if a vaccine candidate receives an Emergency Use Authorization from the food and drug administration (FDA). This Update provides a combined summary of the August 26 and September 22, 2020, meetings, both of which focused completely on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. The representatives from the American Academy of Pediatrics (Y. A. M. and D. W. K.) and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (S. T. O.) are present as liaisons to the ACIP.

The Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule of the United States

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Breese Hall
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Advisory Committee ◽  
The United States ◽  
Routine Immunization ◽  
Immunization Schedule ◽  
Childhood Immunization ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

The complexity of our current schedule for routine immunization of children is expanding and experienced by both physician and parent. Over nearly two decades in the 1970s and 1980s only one new vaccine was added to the routine immunization for children. However, in the last few years since 1989, the schedule routinely recommended for children has been augmented by eight to ten new doses or vaccines. The confusion has been compounded by differences in the schedules developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases and that of the Centers for Disease Control Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Why Accept Stories About China?

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-465
Author(s):  
Robert O. Fisch
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Official Journal ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics ◽  
The People ◽  
Scientific Report

I am always amazed by the fascination of the American public with the "stories" from behind the Bamboo Curtain. The data of Dr. Wray in his article1 are biased, i.e., "I was told," etc. Any other article based upon similarly described data, especially from the United States, would not even be considered for publication by an editor, especially not by the editors of the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Dr. Wray's last sentence, "... Chairman Mao's command: ‘Serve the People!’" sounds more like a Marxist manifesto than the conclusion of a scientific report.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of the Newborn

1990 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Robert A. Sinkin ◽  
Jonathan M. Davis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
Life Support ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Delivery Room ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

Approximately 3.5 million babies are born each year in approximately 5000 hospitals in the United States. Only 15% of these hospitals have neonatal intensive care facilities. Six percent of all newborns require life support in the delivery room or nursery, and this need for resuscitation rises to 80% in neonates weighing less than 1500 g at birth. Personnel who are skilled in neonatal resuscitation and capable of functioning as a team and an appropriately equipped delivery room must always be readily available. At least one person skilled in neonatal resuscitation should be in attendance at every delivery. Currently, a joint effort by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association has resulted in the development of a comprehensive course to train appropriate personnel in neonatal resuscitation throughout the United States. Neonatal resuscitation is also taught as part of a Pediatric Advanced Life Support course offered by the American Heart Association. In concert with the goals of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association, we strongly urge all personnel responsible for care of the newborn in the delivery room to become certified in neonatal resuscitation. The practical approach to neonatal resuscitation is the focus of this article.

Professional Liability Coverage for Residents

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-196
Author(s):  
BRAD COHN
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Professional ◽  
Professional Liability ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

As a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Liability, I have been asked to comment further on professional liability coverage for residents (Pediatrics 1989;83:311). The positions stated are satisfactory. However, the problems encountered by residents who "moonlight" under a professional liability coverage written on a "claims made" form were not addressed. Most medical professional liability individual policies in the United States are now written on a "claims made" form. This classification means that the insured is covered only for claims arising and reported during the policy year for which a premium has been paid.

WELCOMING REMARKS

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 791-792
Author(s):  
Merritt Low
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
One Health ◽  
The United States ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Accident Prevention ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics ◽  
Job Safety ◽  
Developing Area ◽  
Made In

The American Academy of Pediatrics has long been interested in the control of Childhood Injuries; its first formal committee was the Committee on Accident Prevention. The pediatrician is a primary accident preventer and should indeed have a big stake and commitment here. He is basically a "consumer," yet he must be convinced of the product he uses and in turn passes on. Though he has the humility of an amateur, he is allied with the expert and begs for his help. He sees the great strides made by industry, even in the newly developing area of "off-the-job" safety, and the advances made in the therapeutic but not the prophylactic responsibilities of accident prevention as he surveys the situation. Yet, is he truly convinced? If so, he could do more. We exhort ourselves to immunize our children with a safety vaccine, but is this just borrowed jargon? What are the ingredients of the vaccine? Are they dead or alive? Where are the field trials? Where are the proving figures of effectiveness? A hard look shows us that this number one health problem is not being solved. (I scarcely need remind this group of the statistics and facts: 15,000 children under 15, including 5,000 pre-school children, die of accidents in the United States each year; 15 million children go to doctors for care of accidents in a year; all accidents cost the country over 15 billion dollars a year). In our primary reliance on the tool of "education," we fall victims to the fact-of-life fallacy-if we provide facts we automatically get results.

Flexible Residency Programs for Women

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-992
Author(s):  
NAOMI UCHIYAMA
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
The United States ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Pediatric Residency ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

To the Editor.— I am a member of the Committee on Women in Pediatrics of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The Committee recently studied the availability of flexible training and retraining programs in pediatric residency programs in the United States. We sent a questionnaire to the directors of the 292 pediatric training programs listed in the Directory of Residency Training Programs. At present, 200 of the 292 (68.5%) have a flexible training program. However, only two of these programs have this as a written policy; one such program was developed in 1973 and, in practice, this program was individually designed.

In Reply: Use and Misuse of Oral Therapy for Diarrhea

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1073-1074
Author(s):  
JOHN D. SNYDER
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Oral Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Oral Rehydration ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics ◽  
Rehydration Solutions ◽  
The Us ◽  
The World ◽  
Oral Rehydration Salts

As Dr O'Banion points out, most of the oral therapy solutions available in the United States are classified as maintenance solutions by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). However, as mentioned in the paper, these solutions have proven to be very effective treatment for children with dehydration in this country. Solutions conforming to the AAP recommendations as rehydration solutions are not as widely available in this country. The WHO/UNICEF oral rehydration salts formulation, which is supplied as inexpensive packets throughout the world, is not found easily in the US.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document