scholarly journals THE ROLE OF RELIGIOUS COURT IN ISLAMIC LAW REFORM IN INDONESIA

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Amran Suadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
New Formula ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Opinion

Abstract: Law, including Islamic law, will evolve with the changes of time, place, situation and tradition. New social problems grow gradually and pose challenges to Islamic law. Reconstruction and reform are inevitable for Islamic law to respond to the current issues. The Islamic law reforms in Indonesia performed through legal enactment, legal opinion (fatwa), and the Religious Courts decisions. New formula for Islamic law in addressing contemporary issues can be built through three processes: conservation, innovation process, and creation. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia fully supports the development of Islamic law in Indonesia. The reform of Islamic law by the Supreme Court has been carried out through several instruments, such as the issuance of Perma and SEMA, agreement among justices within the Chamber of the Religious Courts, and creation of jurisprudence.Abstrak: Hukum, termasuk hukum Islam, akan berubah seiring dengan perubahan waktu, tempat, situasi dan tradisi. Masalah sosial baru yang tumbuh secara bertahap tumbuh dan menimbulkan tantangan bagi hukum Islam. Rekonstruksi dan reformasi tidak dapat dihindarkan agar hukum Islam merespons masalah saat ini. Ada tiga tipologi reformasi hukum Islam di Indonesia yang dilakukan melalui pengesahan hukum, pendapat hukum (fatwa), dan keputusan pengadilan dari keputusan Pengadilan Agama. Formula baru untuk hukum Islam dalam menangani masalah kontemporer dapat dibangun berdasarkan tiga proses: proses konservasi, proses inovasi, dan proses penciptaan. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia sepenuhnya mendukung pengem­bangan hukum Islam di Indonesia. Reformasi hukum Islam oleh Mahkamah Agung telah dilakukan melalui beberapa instrumen, seperti penerbitan Perma dan SEMA, kesepakatan di antara para hakim di Kamar Pengadilan Agama, dan penciptaan yurisprudensi yang diambil dari kasasi.

scholarly journals MENCIPTAKAN SISTEM PERADILAN EFISIEN DENGAN SISTEM E-COURT PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SE-TANGERANG RAYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Susanto Susanto ◽  
Muhamad Iqbal ◽  
Wawan Supriyatna
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court System ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Effective Role ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Based on the Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 305/SEK/SK/VII/2018, the Supreme Court has chosen 17 District Courts, 6 State Administrative Courts and 9 Religious Courts as the Pilot Project Court for the e-court Application. On this basis, the sample of the court taken by the author is the District Court and Religious Court which is located in Tangerang Raya. The author will focus on the effectiveness and efficiency with regard to the role of the e-court system in the administrative system of the district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya. The large amount of time and files involved are considered far from the principles of fast, simple and low cost trial. It is hoped that time and cost efficiency problems can be resolved with E-court. To prove the test of the effective role of e-court in realizing fast, simple and low cost judiciary from the segmentation of district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya, the E-court system in state and religious courts in the Greater Tangerang area in segmentation creates efficiency in the case administration service process.

scholarly journals Peran Pengadilan Agama dalam Mendukung Perkembangan Industri Keuangan Syariah di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahadil Amin Al Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Financial Industry ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Economic Climate ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum dan ekonomi memiliki hubungan timbal balik dan saling mempengaruhi. Artinya, suatu kegiatan ekonomi yang tidak didukung oleh perangkat hukum yang baik memungkinkan akan mengakibatkan terjadinya kekacauan. Hal ini disebabkan karena para pelaku ekonomi akan melakukan aktivitasnya dengan tanpa standar norma yang pada akhirnya menyebabkan  kerugian di antara salah satu pihak yang melakukan aktivitas ekonomi. Jika dibiarkan begitu saja, hal tersebut akan menyebabkan iklim ekonomi di masa depan menjadi terganggu. Begitupun halnya dengan ekonomi syariah. Jika proses hukum, dalam hal ini penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah dilaksanakan dengan baik, maka pengembangan ekonomi dan keuangan syariah akan semakin baik. Pengadilan Agama sebagai salah salah satu pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman di bawah Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia memiliki peranan yang penting dalam memajukan industri keuangan syariah di Indonesia. Hal ini didasarkan karena Pengadilan Agama merupakan lembaga negara yang memiliki kewenangan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah di Indonesia. Makalah ini mencoba membahas mengenai beberapa aspek penting yang terkait dengan penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama, serta beberapa usaha yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam menguatkan peran Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah. AbstractThe legal relationship with the economy has a reciprocal and mutually influencing relationship. That is, an economic activity that is not supported by a good legal tool will result in chaos, this is because the economic actors will perform its activities without standard norms that caused the loss of one party in conducting economic activities. If left alone, this will cause the economic climate in the future to be disturbed. Likewise with the sharia economy. If the legal process, in this case the sharia economic dispute resolution carried out well, then the development of sharia economic and financial industry will be better. The Religious Courts as one of the judicial authorities under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia plays an important role in advancing the sharia financial industry in Indonesia. This is because the Religious Courts are state institutions that have the authority to resolve the dispute of sharia economy. This paper tries to discuss some important aspects related to the settlement of sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts, as well as some efforts made by the Supreme Court in strengthening the role of Religious Courts in solving the dispute of sharia economy.

scholarly journals MODEL PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN SATU ATAP MELALUI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Regulatory Testing ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Bureaucratic Reform

Post-reform of the role of judicial institution is run by two institutions namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The duties and authorities of the two institutions are regulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 and the act that addresses the three institutions more specifically. Several powers possessed by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, one of them is the authority to judicial review. The Constitutional Court is authorized to review the act on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945, while the Supreme Court is authorized to review under the Act on the above legislation.The unfairness of the regulatory testing function is feared to trigger bureaucratic inefficiency. Based on data released by the Supreme Court Clerk, it was recorded during 2016 that the Supreme Court received 18,514 cases, including the Hak Uji Materi (HUM) subject to legislation under the Act. While the number of cases of judicial review of the Constitutional Court in 2016-2017 amounted to only 332 cases. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a bureaucratic reform and provide new ideas related to the model of one court of judicial review in Indonesia. So that in this paper will be discussed deeply about problematic of judicial review in Indonesia and the authority of the Constitutional Court to review the act under one roof with SIJURI mechanism.

scholarly journals GUIDELINES FOR PRESIDENTING WOMEN FACING THE LAW IN DIVORCE WITH JUSTICE BASED IN KEBUMEN RELIGION COURT (IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMA NO. 3 YEAR 2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trubus Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Gender Perspective ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

An effort to improve the quality of justice with a gender perspective on July 11, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women Against the Law. In line with this study, researchers assume specifically the implementation of Perma Number 3 of 2017 is related to women dealing with law in divorce cases related to the protection of women's rights (ex-wife) along with children's rights due to divorce based on justice. the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in the field of litigation duties in the Religious Courts. In the end, judges in trying women's cases dealing with the law must reveal factors based on principles: Appreciation for human dignity, Non-discrimination, Gender Equality, Equality before the law, Justice, Utilization, for the sake of legal certainty.

scholarly journals Mempertanyakan Legalitas Qanun Aceh: Sesuaikah dengan Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-294
Author(s):  
Andi Muhammad Asrun ◽  
Abdu Rahmat Rosyadi ◽  
Yennie K. Milono
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Formal Method ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Product ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Penelitian ini ingin menjawab kesesuaian Qanun Aceh dengan sistem peraturan perundang-undangan, dengan mengidentifikasi kedudukan qanun dalam sistem peraturan perundang-undangan, dan kewenangan lembaga dalam hak uji materil terhadap qanun sebagai produk hukum. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis-formil melalui kajian pustaka terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan untuk mendeskripsikan kesesuaian qanun Aceh dalam sistem peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Qanun Aceh ada yang berkaitan dengan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dan ada yang berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan syariat Islam kedudukannya dianggap sama dengan peraturan daerah pada umumnya dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Argumentasi yuridis yang menyatakan bahwa qanun sejajar dengan peraturan daerah ini diperkuat oleh Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Produk Hukum Daerah. Namun berkenaan dengan hak menguji untuk membatalkan Qanun Aceh dalam pelaksanaan syariat Islam hanya dapat diuji dan dibatalkan melalui judicial review oleh Mahkamah Agung sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 235 ayat (4) UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2006. Asking for Aceh Qanun Legality: Compatible With Legislation System This study aims to answer the compatibility between the Aceh Qanun and the system of legislation by identifying the position of qanun in the system and the authority of the institution in the rights to materially verify qanun as a legal product. This study uses a juridical-formal method through a literature review of the laws and regulations to describe the suitability of the Aceh qanun in the statutory system. This study found that the Aceh Qanun relating to the administration of government and relating to the implementation of Islamic law, its position is considered the same as local regulations in general in the perspective of Law No. 12/2011 on the Formation of Legislation. The juridical argument that states that the qanun is in line with this regional regulation is reinforced by the Republic of Indonesia Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 53/2011 on the Establishment of Regional Legal Products. However, the right to examine the cancellation of qanun in the implementation of Islamic Shari'a, it can only be examined and canceled through a judicial review by the Supreme Court as stipulated in Article 235 paragraph (4) of Law Number 11/2006.

Analisis Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 331 K/Ag/2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Alip Pamungkas Raharjo ◽  
Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Republic ◽  
A Share

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance. 

scholarly journals The competence of Religious Court in Indonesia and Syahadah Istifadhah (Testimonium De auditu) in Case of Itsbat Waqf

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Legal Force

This paper examines how exactly the absolute competence of the Religious Courts and the application of syahadah istifadhah (testimonium de auditu) in the case of waqf determination submitted to the Religious Court as a judicial institution under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. In the discussion, it is explained how the competence of the Religious Court especially in the case of waqf determination as arranged in Law No. 3 Year 2006 About Religious Courts combined with Law Number 41 Year 2004 About Waqf. In addition, this paper also compares between the concept of syahadah istifadhah and testimonium de auditu also its legal force in the case of verification at the court especially in the case of waqf determination. This paper concludes that the assignment of Waqf is the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. In addition, according to Islamic jursiprudence syahadah istifadhah can be used as a means of proof in waqf determination.

scholarly journals THE DUALISM OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISIONS ON THE POSITION OF NON-MARITAL CHILD

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Nurhadi Nurhadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Unmarried Child

Since the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the legal experts have discussed the positions of marriage children through articles, papers, books and seminars, pros and cons when interpreting the non-marital child, judges also gave birth to many interpretations. The Supreme Court (MA) has two views in adjudicating the marriage case, Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 states that the ratification of an unmarried child is not a jurisdiction of the Religious Courts, whereas in Decision of Supreme Court Number 597 K/AG/2015 states that the non-marital children are legitimate even though the marriage of their parents only carries out marriage under Islamic law. The formulation of the problem is how the criteria of marital legitimacy in Indonesia? How is the outsider interpretation of the two Supreme Court decisions? The research method used is literature study, with the type of normative legal research, which is descriptive analytical. The conclusion is that in Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 considered the marriage to be legitimately religious, but because it is not recorded so that the marriage does not get the certainty and protection of the law, consequently the child born from the marriage is not a legal child, whereas in Decision Number 597 K/AG/2015 The Supreme Court considers that although the marriage is not recorded, the child born from the marriage must still have legal certainty and protection so that the child is considered a legal child.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document