scholarly journals The competence of Religious Court in Indonesia and Syahadah Istifadhah (Testimonium De auditu) in Case of Itsbat Waqf

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman

This paper examines how exactly the absolute competence of the Religious Courts and the application of syahadah istifadhah (testimonium de auditu) in the case of waqf determination submitted to the Religious Court as a judicial institution under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. In the discussion, it is explained how the competence of the Religious Court especially in the case of waqf determination as arranged in Law No. 3 Year 2006 About Religious Courts combined with Law Number 41 Year 2004 About Waqf. In addition, this paper also compares between the concept of syahadah istifadhah and testimonium de auditu also its legal force in the case of verification at the court especially in the case of waqf determination. This paper concludes that the assignment of Waqf is the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. In addition, according to Islamic jursiprudence syahadah istifadhah can be used as a means of proof in waqf determination.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trubus Wahyudi

An effort to improve the quality of justice with a gender perspective on July 11, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women Against the Law. In line with this study, researchers assume specifically the implementation of Perma Number 3 of 2017 is related to women dealing with law in divorce cases related to the protection of women's rights (ex-wife) along with children's rights due to divorce based on justice. the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in the field of litigation duties in the Religious Courts. In the end, judges in trying women's cases dealing with the law must reveal factors based on principles: Appreciation for human dignity, Non-discrimination, Gender Equality, Equality before the law, Justice, Utilization, for the sake of legal certainty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Muh Askaruddin ◽  
Dachran Busthami ◽  
Hasan Kadir

Tujuan penelitian mengungkap efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone. Berdasarkan hasil analisa efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, menunjukan bahwa mediasi belum efektif. Faktor-faktor penyebabnya adalah: Tingkat kepatuhan masyarakat yang menjalani proses mediasi sangat rendah. Fasilitas dan sarana mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone masih kurang memadai baik dari segi ruang mediasi maupun fasilitas penunjang didalamnya. Selain Ketua Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, hakim yang ditunjuk menjadi mediator seluruhnya belum mengikuti pelatihan mediasi yang diselenggrakan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Penempatan pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama tidak tepat atau tidak sesuai dengan apa yang telah digariskan oleh Allah swt., dalam QS al-Nisa>’/4: 35, tentang kedudukan dan kewenangan hakam (mediator) dalam menyelesaikan konflik yang terjadi dalam rumah tangga. The purpose of the study revealed the mediation method in divorce cases in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone. Based on the results of the analysis of mediation in divorce cases in Watampone Class 1A Religious Courts, it shows that mediation has not been effective. The contributing factors are: The level of community participation that supports the mediation process is very low. Mediation facilities and facilities in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone are still inadequate in terms of mediation space and supporting facilities therein. In addition to the Chairperson of Class 1A Religious Court Watampone, the judge appointed to be a mediator had fully received mediation training conducted by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Placement of mediation in the Religious Courts is not right or not in accordance with what has been outlined by God Almighty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Abdul Rasyid ◽  
Tiska Andita Putri

ABSTRAKSejak diamandemennya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006, kompetensi absolut peradilan agama diperluas. Pasal 55 Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah memperkuat kewenangan peradilan agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa perbankan syariah. Polemik muncul ketika Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) juga memberikan kewenangan kepada peradilan umum menyelesaikan sengketa perbankan syariah. Masalah ini lalu diajukan judicial review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Menurut Mahkamah Konstitusi, Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) bertentangan dengan UUD NRI RI 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi masih menimbulkan perdebatan karena hanya menghapus Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2), bukan menghapus pasalnya. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas dalam tulisan ini adalah lembaga peradilan manakah yang berwenang menyelesaikan sengketa perbankan syariah pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012? Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi penelitian yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Putusan Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 terkait kewenangan penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah dianggap sudah tepat, memutuskan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah harus melalui peradilan agama sesuai dengan kompetensi absolutnya. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut telah menghilangkan dualisme penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah.Kata kunci: kompetensi, perbankan syariah, Mahkamah Konstitusi. ABSTRACT Since the amendment of Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts with Law Number 3 of 2006, the absolute competence of religious courts was, expand. Article 55 of Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking strengthens the authority of the religious court in resolving sharia banking disputes. Polemic arises when the elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) also allowed the general court to resolve sharia banking disputes. This issue then submitted by judicial review to the Constitutional Court. According to the Constitutional Court, elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and has no binding legal force. The Constitutional Court Decision still raises debate because it only removes the elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2), instead of deleting the article. The issues that will discuss in this paper are which judicial institution has the authority to settle sharia banking disputes after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012? This research uses a normative juridical research methodology. This research concludes that Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 related to the authority to settle sharia banking disputes considered appropriate decides that the settlement of sharia banking disputes must go through religious courts by its absolute competence. The Constitutional Court's decision has eliminated dualism in the settlement of sharia banking disputes. Keywords: competence, sharia banking, Constitutional Court.


Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Amran Suadi

Abstract: Law, including Islamic law, will evolve with the changes of time, place, situation and tradition. New social problems grow gradually and pose challenges to Islamic law. Reconstruction and reform are inevitable for Islamic law to respond to the current issues. The Islamic law reforms in Indonesia performed through legal enactment, legal opinion (fatwa), and the Religious Courts decisions. New formula for Islamic law in addressing contemporary issues can be built through three processes: conservation, innovation process, and creation. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia fully supports the development of Islamic law in Indonesia. The reform of Islamic law by the Supreme Court has been carried out through several instruments, such as the issuance of Perma and SEMA, agreement among justices within the Chamber of the Religious Courts, and creation of jurisprudence.Abstrak: Hukum, termasuk hukum Islam, akan berubah seiring dengan perubahan waktu, tempat, situasi dan tradisi. Masalah sosial baru yang tumbuh secara bertahap tumbuh dan menimbulkan tantangan bagi hukum Islam. Rekonstruksi dan reformasi tidak dapat dihindarkan agar hukum Islam merespons masalah saat ini. Ada tiga tipologi reformasi hukum Islam di Indonesia yang dilakukan melalui pengesahan hukum, pendapat hukum (fatwa), dan keputusan pengadilan dari keputusan Pengadilan Agama. Formula baru untuk hukum Islam dalam menangani masalah kontemporer dapat dibangun berdasarkan tiga proses: proses konservasi, proses inovasi, dan proses penciptaan. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia sepenuhnya mendukung pengem­bangan hukum Islam di Indonesia. Reformasi hukum Islam oleh Mahkamah Agung telah dilakukan melalui beberapa instrumen, seperti penerbitan Perma dan SEMA, kesepakatan di antara para hakim di Kamar Pengadilan Agama, dan penciptaan yurisprudensi yang diambil dari kasasi.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Mardalena Hanifah

Article 3 (2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures, Case Examining Judges in the consideration of a decision must state that the case has been pursued peace through mediation by mentioning the mediator. The court is not only tasked with examining, trying, and resolving cases it receives but also seeks to reconcile the parties. The court, which has been impressed as a law enforcement and justice institution, now appears as an institution that seeks peaceful solutions for the parties. The implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts can be an eff ort to resolve civil disputes so that the settlement of civil disputes through mediation is the main choice. The research method used is normative legal research which includes research on legal principles which is very basic in guided law. The nature of the research carried out is descriptive, namely research that describes and explains in clear and detailed sentences. The data used are secondary data obtained from literature, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Processing and data analysis used qualitative methods. The defi nition of mediation according to the Religious Courts in Indonesia and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia is the eff ort of the judges and courts to reconcile the parties so that the divorce process does not continue at the next trial. When the mediation process was carried out at the Indonesian Religious Court and the Syari’ah Court in Malaysia, there was a similarity, namely the mediation process was carried out at the fi rst trial and it was an obligation for the disputing parties in a divorce case to take mediation. according to the procedure for the appointment of mediators at the Indonesian Religious Courts and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia and the appointments of these mediators are both made by the judges. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Amiril Lizuardi ◽  
Sudirman Sudirman ◽  
Ahmad Izzuddin

<p class="isi">This article aims to describe the principle of good faith in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation in the Court while at the same time describing the implementation of the principle of good faith in the conduct of mediation in the Malang District Religious Court. This research is included in empirical research using a qualitative approach. The results of the discussion of this article indicate that Mediation is an inseparable part of the procedure in the Religious Courts as stipulated in the Indonesian Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Procedure for Mediation in Courts. In the Republic of Indonesia's Supreme Court Regulation Number, 1 of 2016, the provisions of good faith in the implementation of mediation were added. The mediator has the authority to evaluate the intentions of the parties during the mediation.</p>Artikel ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan asas iktikad baik dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Mediasi di Pengadilan sekaligus mendeskripsikan implementasi asas iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitan empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil pembahasan artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa Mediasi merupakan bagian yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dari prosedur beracara di Pengadilan Agama sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 ditambahkan tentang ketentuan iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi. Mediator memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penilaian terhadap iktikad para pihak selama pelaksanaan mediasi.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Aden Rosadi ◽  
Siti Ropiah

The basic principle of the judge in the decision of the Supreme Court No.16K / AG / 2010 was borrowed which according to some heirs of non-Muslim thinkers of Islam inherited inheritance through borrowed roads. Their opinion as stated by Classical Islamic Scholars. The authorities must exclude part of the legacy of the person who died as proof of him even though he did not inherit it beforehand, based on the premise that the authorities must ensure the rights of people who have not been fulfilled. According to the legal system in Indonesia, the body will include being borrowed into the absolute competence of religious courts based on Law No. 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Courts related to Law No. 3 of 2006 concerning amendments to Law No. 7 1989 concerning the Religious Courts. Judges who refer to the inheritance of Islam in Indonesia are conducted by judges in the religious court environment with the first absolute level of competence as mandated by law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Faradila Hasan ◽  
Yasin - ◽  
Fikri Amiruddin

Abstract: This article discussed mediation as a way of resolving marital disputes. Divorce was one form of marital dispute in the Religious Courts, and in terms of resolving marital disputes, mediation was required. Although the rules of mediation in the judiciary are very clear, the facts show that the disputing parties and the courts have not optimized their use so that the divorce rate every year does not experience a significant decrease; on the contrary, it increases. The theory regarding mediation procedures in the Religious Courts has clearly been stated in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (No. 1 of 2016). This article aims to analyze the implementation of the mediation process at the Gorontalo Religious Court. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more in-depth research on the effectiveness of the Gorontalo Religious Court to resolve marital disputes that lead to divorce, which can be avoided, and the litigants can get back together and foster a ‘sakinah mawaddah wa rahmah’ household. This article used a qualitative with an empirical juridical approach. It could be concluded that the mediation had been carried out at the Gorontalo Religious Court under the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (No. 1 of 2016). Four factors affect successful and unsuccessful mediation, namely the litigation party factor, the mediator factor, the advocate or lawyer factor, and the representative mediation room factor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Susanto Susanto ◽  
Muhamad Iqbal ◽  
Wawan Supriyatna

Based on the Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 305/SEK/SK/VII/2018, the Supreme Court has chosen 17 District Courts, 6 State Administrative Courts and 9 Religious Courts as the Pilot Project Court for the e-court Application. On this basis, the sample of the court taken by the author is the District Court and Religious Court which is located in Tangerang Raya. The author will focus on the effectiveness and efficiency with regard to the role of the e-court system in the administrative system of the district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya. The large amount of time and files involved are considered far from the principles of fast, simple and low cost trial. It is hoped that time and cost efficiency problems can be resolved with E-court. To prove the test of the effective role of e-court in realizing fast, simple and low cost judiciary from the segmentation of district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya, the E-court system in state and religious courts in the Greater Tangerang area in segmentation creates efficiency in the case administration service process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahadil Amin Al Hasan

Hukum dan ekonomi memiliki hubungan timbal balik dan saling mempengaruhi. Artinya, suatu kegiatan ekonomi yang tidak didukung oleh perangkat hukum yang baik memungkinkan akan mengakibatkan terjadinya kekacauan. Hal ini disebabkan karena para pelaku ekonomi akan melakukan aktivitasnya dengan tanpa standar norma yang pada akhirnya menyebabkan  kerugian di antara salah satu pihak yang melakukan aktivitas ekonomi. Jika dibiarkan begitu saja, hal tersebut akan menyebabkan iklim ekonomi di masa depan menjadi terganggu. Begitupun halnya dengan ekonomi syariah. Jika proses hukum, dalam hal ini penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah dilaksanakan dengan baik, maka pengembangan ekonomi dan keuangan syariah akan semakin baik. Pengadilan Agama sebagai salah salah satu pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman di bawah Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia memiliki peranan yang penting dalam memajukan industri keuangan syariah di Indonesia. Hal ini didasarkan karena Pengadilan Agama merupakan lembaga negara yang memiliki kewenangan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah di Indonesia. Makalah ini mencoba membahas mengenai beberapa aspek penting yang terkait dengan penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama, serta beberapa usaha yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam menguatkan peran Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah. AbstractThe legal relationship with the economy has a reciprocal and mutually influencing relationship. That is, an economic activity that is not supported by a good legal tool will result in chaos, this is because the economic actors will perform its activities without standard norms that caused the loss of one party in conducting economic activities. If left alone, this will cause the economic climate in the future to be disturbed. Likewise with the sharia economy. If the legal process, in this case the sharia economic dispute resolution carried out well, then the development of sharia economic and financial industry will be better. The Religious Courts as one of the judicial authorities under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia plays an important role in advancing the sharia financial industry in Indonesia. This is because the Religious Courts are state institutions that have the authority to resolve the dispute of sharia economy. This paper tries to discuss some important aspects related to the settlement of sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts, as well as some efforts made by the Supreme Court in strengthening the role of Religious Courts in solving the dispute of sharia economy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document