scholarly journals Pembunuhan Dengan Mutilasi Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Pidana Islam

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-127
Author(s):  
Adam Suhartono
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Body ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Basis

Abstract: This article discusses the crime of murder with mutilation according to the Criminal Code and the Islamic Criminal Law. Murder with mutilation murder is committed by the purpose to destroy evidence. Article which is often used as a legal basis for the criminal murder with mutilation is Article 340 of the Criminal Code with a maximum penalty of death which is sometime as an alternative to imprisonment. While in the Islamic criminal law, sanction for deliberate murder is qishâsh. Murder with mutilation is a deliberated and planned murder coupled with sadism of the perpetrator (in this case is by cutting up the body of victim into some parts). Criminal sanction of qishâsh or death penalty is worthly imposed for the crime of murder with mutilation. this severe criminal sanction is expected that the crime of murder with mutilation is no longer seen as a simple murder. Keywords: Murder, mutilation, criminal code, Islamic criminal law.                                  Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang tindak pidana pembunuhan dengan cara mutilasi menurut KUHP dan hukum pidana Islam. Pembunuhan dengan mutilasi adalah pembunuhan yang diikuti dengan memotong-motong tubuh korban hingga menjadi beberapa bagian yang dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk menghilangkan bukti. Pasal yang sering dijadikan sebagai dasar hukum pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan secara mutilasi adalah Pasal 340 KUHP dengan sanksi maksimal hukuman mati, yang terkadang hanya merupakan alternatif dari hukuman penjara. Sedangkan dalam hukum pidana Islam sanksi yang dijatuhkan bagi pembunuhan sengaja adalah qishash. Pembunuhan secara mutilasi itu merupakan pembunuhan yang disengaja dan direncanakan ditambah dengan unsur kesadisan dari pelaku dalam menganiaya mayat korban (dalam hal ini memotong-motong mayat korban). Sanksi pidana qishash atau hukuman mati layak dijatuhkan kepada pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan secara mutilasi, dengan adanya sanksi pidana yang berat maka diharapkan kasus tindak pidana pembunuhan secara mutilasi ini tidak lagi dipandang sebagai pembunuhan biasa. Kata kunci: Pembunuhan, mutilasi, KUHP, hukum pidana Islam.

ANALISIS HUKUM PIDANA DENDA PELANGGARAN LALU LINTAS DI KOTA BENGKULU (DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN JALAN)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-33
Author(s):  
Apen Diansyah
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Economic Factors ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
The City

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui penerapan denda terhadap pelanggar berlalu lintas di kota Bengkulu ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009, serta untuk mengetahui faktor penghambat dalam penerapan pidana denda terhadap pelanggar barlalu lintas di Kota Bengkulu. Penelitian dilaksanakan disatuan lalu lintas Polres dan Polda Kota Bengkulu. Adapun data yang didapatkan adalah data primer dan data sekunder melalui penelitian lapangan dan penelitian kepustakaan, kemudian data dianalisis dengan cara deskriptif. Peraturan yang tertera pada undang-undang yang tertera sepenuhnya untuk meningkatkan kesadaran untuk setiap pelanggar yang melakukan pelanggaran, tetapi pada kota Bengkulu undang-undang tersebut tidak sepenuhnya berjalan efektif. Menurut pandangan Undang-undang 22 Tahun 2009, penerapan pidana denda masuk dalam kategori pidana pokok (sesuai Pasal 10 KUHP) sebagai urutan terakhir atau keempat, sesudah pidana mati, pidana penjara dan pidana kurungan. Selain dari itu, faktor penghambat keefektifan Undang-undang seperti faktor ekonomi, faktor kedekatan emosional dan faktor kekebalan institusional.Kata kunci: tindak pidana; hukum pidana; dendaABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the application of violators from cities in Bengkulu in terms of Law Number 22 of 2009, and to find out the inhibiting factors in the application of fines to traffic violators in the city of Bengkulu. The research was carried out in the traffic city of the City Police of the City of Bengkulu. The data obtained are primary data and secondary data used for library research and research, then the data are analyzed descriptively. The regulations stated in the law that are fully stated to increase awareness for every offender who commits an offense, but in the city of Bengkulu the law is not fully effective. According to the view of Law 22 of 2009, the application of criminal fines falls into the main criminal category (according to Article 10 of the Criminal Code) as the last or fourth order, after the death penalty, imprisonment and imprisonment. Apart from that, factors inhibiting the effectiveness of the law such as economic factors, emotional proximity factors and institutional immune factors.Keywords: crime; criminal law; fines

The main types of penalties related to deprivation of liberty and their content under the Qatari Criminal Code (comparative legal analysis with certain norms of Russian legislation)

2020 ◽  
pp. 100-104
Author(s):  
Андрей Петрович Скиба ◽  
Андрей Владимирович Ковш ◽  
Александра Николаевна Мяханова
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Life Imprisonment

В статье проводится сравнительно-правовой анализ ряда норм катарского уголовного законодательства, а также российского уголовного и уголовно-исполнительного законодательства. Рассматриваются виды наказаний, связанных с лишением свободы, и их содержание по Уголовному кодексу Катара. Дополнительно обращается внимание на систему и содержание отдельных наказаний (в виде смертной казни, пожизненного лишения свободы и лишения свободы на определенный срок). Формулируется авторская редакция статей 57-62 Уголовного кодекса Катара, касающихся системы основных видов наказаний и их содержания. The article provides a comparative legal analysis of a number of norms of Qatari criminal law, as well as Russian criminal and penal enforcement legislation. The types of punishments related to deprivation of liberty and their content under the Qatari Criminal code are considered. In addition, attention is drawn to the system of punishments, the content of individual punishments (in the form of the death penalty, life imprisonment and imprisonment for a certain period). The author's version of articles 57-62 of the Criminal Code of Qatar concerning the system of main types of punishments and their content is formulated.

scholarly journals Islamic Law Analysis of Criminal Sanctions for Abortion in the Criminal Code: A Call for Reform

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5398-5407
Author(s):  
Ishaq, Maratun Saadah
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Legal Sanctions

This study aims to contribute to Islamic law regarding the criminal sanction of abortion in the Criminal Code (KUHP) as an effort to reform Indonesian criminal law. The method used is comparison, with data collection carried out by library research, by studying Islamic legal literature, interpretation of the Quran (tafsir), hadith, Criminal Code, and the Draft of Criminal Code. The sanctions for abortion in articles 346, 347, 348 and 349 of the Criminal Code are only imprisonment, not accompanied by fines. According to Islamic law these sanctions are not sufficient, because they tend to make the perpetrators not deterred, as a result the purpose of punishment is not achieved. Therefore, it needs to be updated by including the value of Islamic legal sanctions in the form of fines (diat), so that the purpose of punishment can be achieved.

scholarly journals PARADIGM OF DEATH PENALTY (COMPARATIVE STUDY IN INDONESIA, SAUDI ARABIA AND CHINA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tedy Nopriandi ◽  
Risky Fany Ardhiansyah
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Law System ◽  
The Right

The death penalty is one of old criminal type as the age of human life, and the most controversial crime in of all criminal systems, both in countries that adhere to the Common Law System and in countries that embrace Civil Law, Islamic Law and Socialist Law. There are two main thoughts about the death penalty, namely: first, those who want to keep it based on the force provisions, and second are those who wish to the abolition as a whole. Indonesia includes a country that still maintains capital punishment in a positive legal system. This paper aims to resolve problems of the death penalty concept concerning the controversy purpose of the death penalty and to analyze the regulations, procedures and philosophies regarding the death penalty in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and China. This paper uses normative juridical research and the methods based on the doctrine and developed by the author. The approach used the legal approach, historical approach and comparative approach, then analyzed by the customary method.The result of the study shows that the death penalty can be seen from the philosophical aspects of Indonesian criminal law, as well as the philosophical aspects of Islamic and Chinese criminal law. So that everything can not be separated from the essential legal objectives, namely for the creation of justice. Death penalty in Islamic law turns out the concept of restorative justice specifically for the crime of deliberate killing (al-qatl al-'amd), which the execution highly depends on the victim’s family. The victim’s family, in this case, has the right to choose whether qisas (death penalty) or their apologize for the murder suspect, and diyat payment. While China in the implementation of death penalty applies the concept of rehabilitation, which in the execution of the death penalty is called a death penalty delay for two years and in its implementation, the defendant is given a job and control them. Whereas in Indonesia, capital punishment is a specific criminal offence and threatened with alternatives and is still a draft Criminal Code.

scholarly journals Criminal legal basis for an expedited trial procedure provided by the chapter 40 of the Russian Criminal Procedure Code

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-208
Author(s):  
A. V. Boyarskaya
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Court Proceedings

The subject of study is the criminal-legal basis for an expedited procedure for adopting a court ruling when the accused person agrees with the charge. These issues are relevant, since in July 2020 the substantive legal basis of the expedited procedure in Russia was changed and now this procedure can only be applied in criminal cases of small and medium gravity.The aim of this work is to study the substantive legal basis of an expedited procedure of litigation from the point of view of the changes were made to it. The author expresses the thesis that the legislators did not quite reasonably link criminal-legal grounds of the expedited procedure with the system of categories of crimes.The methodology. The author used general scientific methods (dialectical, historical, methods of formal logic, system analysis) as well as method of formal legal interpretation of Russian Criminal Code and judicial decisions of Russian courts.The main results, scope of application. The criminal and legal basis of certain criminal procedure is a package of criminal law standards, for the implementation of which a certain criminal and procedural form is intended. The parameters of the substantive basis of criminal proceedings are set with the signs that shall be indicated in the Code of Criminal Procedure and may change. It directly refers to the expedited procedure for adopting a court ruling, by Chapter 40 of the Russian Criminal Procedure Code. Initially, it was assumed that the application of this procedure is permissible in criminal cases concerning crimes the punishment for which does not exceed 5 years imprisonment in accordance with the Russian Criminal Code. The expedited court proceedings began to be applied in criminal cases concerning crimes, the punishment for which does not exceed 10 years imprisonment in accordance with the Russian Criminal Code, since 2003. The Russian Supreme Court made an attempt to reduce the application of court proceedings provided by Chapter 40 of the Russian Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. It turned out to be successful. Legislators have changed the basic criterion that determines the substantive basis for an expedited procedure for adopting a court ruling. Now the system of categories of crimes is this basis. The system of categories of crimes presented in Article 15 of the Russian Criminal Code is not stable enough and is based on a set of provisions of this Code, but the sanctions for many crimes are not scientifically and practically grounded in this Code. In addition, the classification of crimes enshrined in Article 15 of the Russian Criminal Code is based on such a criterion as the nature and degree of public danger of the crime. These categories are among the most complex in the science of criminal law.Conclusions. The use of categories of crimes as a criterion for determining the criminal legal basis of the expedited procedure for making a court decision significantly complicates the application of the expedited procedure.

scholarly journals Kebijakan Pencabutan Hak Politik sebagai Pidana Tambahan dalam Perkara Korupsi di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Enha Sorandri Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Made In

Additional criminal to revoking political rights imposed on convicted corruption cases are referred to as extraordinary policy and efforts made in the context of eradicating the criminal act of corruption, in which corruption is categorized as an extra ordinary crime. The basis for additional criminal law deprivation of political rights is contained in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 (UU PTPK). This study aims to examine the additional criminal policy of deprivation of political rights against convicted corruption cases seen from the perspective of the purpose of punishment and the suitability of the legal basis used to apply additional crimes of deprivation of political rights against convicts of corruption. The type of research used in this study is the juridical normative research type. The methods used are the statutory approach method, conceptual approach, and case approach. Meanwhile, for data collection techniques, this study uses legal materials consisting of: a.) Primary legal materials, namely statutory regulations and court decisions; b.) secondary legal materials include legal books, legal journals and other scientific works in the field of law. The results of this study first reveal that the additional punishment for depriving political rights is not against the purpose of punishment. It reveals that the additional criminal legal basis for deprivation of political rights for convicted corruption cases should be more specific in determining the length of time for deprivation of political rights in the PTPK Law. KEYWORDS: Policy, Additional Punishment, Political Rights, Corruption

scholarly journals Long-Term Sentence in the Laws of the Former SFRY and Contemporary European Criminal Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Simović ◽  
Vladimir Simović
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Life Imprisonment ◽  
Conditional Release ◽  
European Criminal Law

Life imprisonment is the term for a prison sentence based on which a convicted person remains in prison for their whole life. After the death penalty, it is the severest criminal sanction. Many countries have introduced it in their legislation as a substitute for the death penalty. On the other hand, many legislations have, along with the long-term sentence, introduced the possibility of the convicts’ release, most often conditional release. From the second half of the 20th century onwards, life imprisonment as well as the death penalty has most often been regarded an inhumane and inefficient sanction, given that people sentenced to life imprisonment are considered permanently excluded from society, that is, losing any kind of interest in rehabilitation. This paper analyses the issues related to long-term sentences - life imprisonment in the countries of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) and in the contemporary European criminal law.

scholarly journals An Analysis of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Criminal Law

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddy Rifai
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Mentally Ill ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Reaction

This research uses normative juridical approach to study on the analysis of the death penalty executions and the legal policy of death executions in Indonesia. There are delays on death executions for the convicted person since they entitled to using rights namely filing a judicial review (PK/Peninjauan Kembali). Furthermore, the legal loophole in the execution of the death penalty by the publication of the Constitutional Court Number 107 / PUU-XIII / 2015 which assert that the Attorney as the executor can ask the convicted person or his family whether to use their rights or not if the convict clearly does not want to use his rights, the executions will be carried out. Legal policy on threats and the implementation of the death penalty in the draft of criminal code was agreed by draftsman of the bill with the solutions. The draftsman of the bill agrees that the death penalty will be an alternative punishment sentenced as a last resort to protect the society. The bill also regulates that the execution among others include that the execution can be delayed by ten years probations. If the public reaction on the convict is not too large or convict has regret and could fix it or the role in the crime is not very important and there is a reason to reduce punishment, the death penalty may be changed. For pregnant women and the mentally ill convicts the execution can only be carried after the birth and the person has recovered from mental illness. The existence of this solutions is still kept putting the death penalty in criminal law, whereas the effectiveness of the death penalty is scientifically still in doubt to solve crimes and to prevent crimes by the death penalty punishment.

scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP NOODWEER SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMBELAAN YANG SAH

Yurispruden ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Dwi Dasa Suryantoro
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Body ◽  
Research Article ◽  
Criminal Defense ◽  
The Law

ABSTRACTOne of the reasons is Criminal Defense removal emergency/Noodweer, in this author's analysis on how to review judicially against Noodweer legitimate defense effort as legally. The analysis in this research article using normative juridical approach to legal materials-based good literature as well as legislation. Noodweer is any act or conduct of a person to conduct the defence in an emergency due to an attack that is immediately or are against the law, where such attacks could threaten the safety of the body, lives, property and honor. It is also set forth in the book of the law of criminal law on article 49 paragraph 1 of the criminal code regulates about deeds/emergency Defense for oneself as well as others, honor, decency, or the property itself or others, due to an attack or the threat of attack is very close. But the emergency Defense must satisfy the elements of a defense emergency and not contrary to the purposes of the law i.e. fairness, certainty and benefit.Key words : Lawful Defense Noodweer.ABSTRAKSalah satu alasan penghapusan pidana adalah Pembelaan secara darurat/noodweer, dalam hal ini penulis melakukan analisa mengenai bagaimana tinjauan yuridis terhadap noodweer sebagai upaya pembelaan yang sah secara hukum. Analisa dalam artikel penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif berbasis bahan hukum baik literatur maupun perundang-undangan. Noodweer adalah segala tindakan atau perbuatan seseorang untuk melakukan pembelaan secara darurat karena adanya serangan yang bersifat seketika atau bersifat melawan hukum, dimana serangan tersebut dapat mengancam keselamatan pada tubuh, nyawa, harta benda dan kehormatan. Hal ini juga diatur dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana pada Pasal 49 ayat 1 KUHP mengatur tentang perbuatan/pembelaan darurat untuk diri sendiri maupun orang lain, kehormatan, kesusilaan, atau harta benda sendiri maupun orang lain, karena adanya serangan atau ancaman serangan yang sangat dekat. Namun pembelaan secara darurat tersebut harus memenuhi unsur-unsur pembelaan darurat dan tidak bertentangan dengan tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan.Kata Kunci : Noodweer Pembelaan yang Sah. 

scholarly journals Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Pembakaran Hutan

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-319
Author(s):  
Sang Bagus Nyoman Wahyuda Putra ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Code ◽  
Regulation Scheme ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Statutory Regulation

The base burning which is getting more and more massive every year in the archipelago because of the large number of land clearing by burning forests. For this reason, the burning of the widening of the plinth can cause natural destruction to disturb the fitness of the residents, to be quietly located, and to obtain a good and fit nature of life, which is the feasibility of such citizens as voiced in Article 28 h paragraph (I) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the legal arrangements for forest burning agents and to know the criminal sanctions for forest fire offenders. The method used in the preparation of this research is a normative legal study using a problem study using a legal basis that applies to laws and regulations contained in the literature. The method used for the following research is juridical normative, analytical descriptive in nature, and using the statutory regulation scheme, the executor of the scorching action of bases and land that continuously carries out scorching grounds should be carried out under criminal law, civil law in the form of penalties and administrative law takes the form of abolishing the business permit management permit. Law Number 41 Year 1999 Law Number 19 Year 2004 regarding Reason, Law Number 32 Year 2009 regarding Environmental Protection and Management, Civil Code, Criminal Code and Legal Code The administration, in fact, is unable to make a sense of the craving for the executors of the crime of burning forests and land who carry out scorching of bases and land because there is still a problem of burning the base.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document