scholarly journals Liability Assessments and Criminal Responsibility in Norwegian Legal History

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Siri Elisabeth Bernssen
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Legal History ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
First Time

The general content of the assessment of intent was explicitly clarified for the first time in a Norwegian criminal code when the 2005 Criminal Code and its §22 came into force on 1 October 2015. Until the Criminal Code of 1902, the subjective requirement for liability was regulated solely in individual regulations, and even though intent pursuant to §40 in this Code was established as a general main rule, it was still up to the courts to report on the content of the judgement. Thus it is clear that development towards a more and more defined and nuanced study of criminal liability took place gradually. This article goes even further back in time and looks at how the discussion of liability and responsibility changed between 1642 and 1799, with particular emphasis on intent and related criteria. This will be achieved by analysing 32 cases of infanticide registered with the Hordaland district court (bygdeting), which at this time was the first instance in the legal system.

scholarly journals The exemption from criminal liability in view of admission by bail: theory and practice

1970 ◽  
pp. 354-358
Author(s):  
Olena Yushchyk
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Negative Side ◽  
Special Place ◽  
Or Organization ◽  
First Time ◽  
Probationary Period

The article investigates the grounds and conditions of application of exemption from criminal liability in connection with the transfer of a person on bail. It is established that the specified type of release allows the person who has committed a crime under certain grounds and conditions not to incur criminal responsibility, and to admit the guilt and to be corrected within labor collective and to show that it is capable to live in society as worthy its member and not to break norms of the law. Further release of a person from criminal liability in connection with the transfer of her bail depends on her behavior during the probationary period. A person must inspire the trust of the labor collective, not to evade educational measures and not to violate public order. Accordingly, the positive flow of the probation period depends on the court or will decide on the final exemption from criminal liability from the committed crime. To the grounds which authorize the application of article 47 of the criminal code of Ukraine and the ability to release a person from criminal liability with bail include: the person has committed a crime for the first time; the act is a crime of small or average gravity; the person who committed the crime sincerely repented; the collective of enterprise, institution or organization has applied for the bail of the person; the person who committed the crime has no objection to the closing of the criminal rim according to non-rehabilitating grounds. Exemption from criminal liability in connection with the transfer of a person on bail occupies a special place among other types of this institution. The peculiarity is that this type of exemption has a conditional nature of application. Therefore, for further exemption from criminal liability, a person must show his way of correction within a certain period of time by showing confidence in the labor collective, not by evading educational measures and not by violating public order. It is in this way that a person can show himself as a positive and negative side, which will be the basis for the subsequent release of his criminal responsibility for the committed socially dangerous act.

Exemption from Criminal Responsibility by Virtue of Reconciliation with Injured Party in Case of Neonaticide Committed by a Mother

10.12737/7632 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Денис Гарбатович ◽  
Denis Garbatovich
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Face ◽  
Newborn Child ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
First Time

The article deals with the grounds on which a person may be relieved of criminal responsibility in connection with reconciliation with the victim. In accordance with Article 76 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation that is based on the simultaneous implementation of the following conditions: 1) for the first time a crime of small or average gravity; 2) reconciliation with the victim; 3) compensation of harm caused to the victim. The face in the presence of the above conditions are not necessarily subject to unconditional exemption from criminal liability, this right depends on the discretion of a law enforcement official. Through an analysis of the norms of criminal law, judicial practice addresses the question whether it is permissible to exempt from criminal responsibility in connection with reconciliation with the victim´s mother, who killed her newborn child. Victims can be considered the closest relatives of the murdered child (father, grandparents)who are also relatives and friends in relation to the mother-killer. Victims may initially not interested in bringing her to justice and appropriate compensation to victims can be represented as some Convention and formality. Mother release from criminal responsibility for the murder of a newborn child in such circumstances, does not comply with the principle of justice, and not adequately solves the problem of the criminal code of the Russian Federation for the protection of the rights and freedoms against crime. Therefore, in the presented work provides General guidance on when such exemption from criminal liability is possible, and when it is not desirable.

Legal and Actual Characteristics of the Institute Exemption from Criminal Liability

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 83-92
Author(s):  
V. K. Andrianov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
First Time

Analysis of judicial practice shows that the greatest difficulties and errors in the courts and the prosecutors and investigators in the application of exemption from criminal liability, related to the issues of legal facts. It is no coincidence that most of the content of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 27 June 2013 No. 19 is devoted to clarifying questions about legal facts provided for by the norms of Chapter 11 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The purpose of this article is the legal and factual analysis of the release of the institute of criminal responsibility, which is in the general theory of law recognized by specific methodological direction in the explanation of legal phenomena In the article we developed a number of questions of legal conditions and facts with which the criminal law links the exemption from criminal liability: on the concept of the person who committed the crime for the first time; on exemption from criminal liability in the event of the commission of an unfinished crime and a crime of complicity; on the types of legal facts serving as the basis for such consequences; the amount of positive post-criminal behavior required for release; competition between the grounds for exemption from criminal liability; on the role of other social circumstances, when making the appropriate decision, etc.

scholarly journals Aspek-Aspek Konstitusional Penodaan Agama Serta Pertanggungjawaban Pidananya di Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 616
Author(s):  
Ajie Ramdan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The North ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Thousand Islands

Penodaan agama dalam konteks penafsiran konstitusi telah dijabarkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dalam Putusan Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009. UU Pencegahan Penodaan Agama tidak menentukan pembatasan kebebasan beragama, akan tetapi pembatasan untuk mengeluarkan perasaan atau melakukan perbuatan yang bersifat permusuhan, penyalahgunaan atau penodaan terhadap suatu agama serta pembatasan untuk melakukan penafsiran atau kegiatan yang menyimpang dari pokok-pokok ajaran agama yang dianut di Indonesia. Pembatasan-pembatasan tersebut hanya dapat dilakukan dengan Undang-Undang dengan maksud semata-mata untuk menjamin pengakuan serta penghormatan atas kebebasan orang lain dan untuk memenuhi tuntutan yang adil sesuai dengan pertimbangan moral, nilai-nilai agama, keamanan, dan ketertiban umum dalam masyarakat yang demokratis [vide Pasal 28J ayat (2) UUD 1945]. Tulisan ini akan menganalisis aspek-aspek konstitusionalitas penodaan agama serta pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam kasus yang dialami oleh Basuki Tjahaja Purnama. Karena pidatonya di kepulauan seribu memenuhi unsur-unsur tindak pidana dalam Pasal 156a KUHPidana berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 1537/Pid.B/2016/PN.JktUtr. Konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana (criminal liability /toerekeningvatsbaarheid) atau sesungguhnya tidak hanya menyangkut soal hukum semata-mata, melainkan juga menyangkut soal nilai-nilai moral atau kesusilaan umum yang dianut oleh suatu masyarakat atau kelompok-kelompok dalam masyarakat. Analisis pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam delik penodaan agama Islam dalam tulisan ini menggunakan teori pertanggungjawaban pidana, putusan MK Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009, Putusan Pengadilan tentang Penodaan Agama dan perbandingan pertanggungjawaban pidana di Belanda dan Inggris.Blasphemy in the context of interpretation of the constitution has been elaborated by the Constitutional Court (MK) in Decision Number 140/PUU-VII/2009 The Prevention of Blasphemy Law does not specify restrictions on religious freedom, but restrictions on issuing feelings or committing acts of hostility, abuse or desecration against a religion as well as restrictions on interpretation or activities that deviate from the principles of the teachings of the religion adopted in Indonesia. These restrictions can only be done by Law with the sole purpose of guaranteeing recognition and respect for the freedom of others and to fulfill just demands in accordance with moral considerations, religious values, security and public order in a democratic society. [vide Article 28J paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution]. This paper will analyze aspects of constitutionality of blasphemy and criminal liability in the case experienced by Basuki Tjahaja Purnama. Because his speech in the thousand islands fulfilled the elements of criminal acts in Article 156a of the Criminal Code based on the North Jakarta District Court Decision Number 1537/Pid.B/2016/PN.JktUtr. The concept of criminal liability (criminal liability/toerekeningvatsbaarheid) or actually does not only involve legal matters, but also concerns the general moral values or morality adopted by a society or groups in society. Analysis of criminal responsibility in the Islamic blasphemy offense in this paper uses the theory of criminal responsibility, Constitutional Court decision No. 140/PUU-VII/2009, Court Decision on Blasphemy and a comparison of criminal liability in the Netherlands and England.

scholarly journals Concept Of Criminal Liability Of Notary Law In Deed Making Based On Perjury

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 675
Author(s):  
Ailina Rahmanita Fauzi ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Element Formulation ◽  
False Information ◽  
Civil Suit

Purpose research These are 1) To analyze the concept of criminal responsibility notary law in the deed that is based on false information. 2) To analyze the legal consequences of the deed notary Based on False Information.The method used by researchers is Empirical Juridical (socio legal research)and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. Even the sources and types of data in this study are primary data obtained from field studies with an interview with a notary in Grobogan. And secondary data obtained from the study of literature. This study uses qualitative data analysis Based on the results of research that 1) Notaries can not be held criminal liability associated with the manufacture of the deed (partijnakten) based on false information, and can not meet the crime of counterfeiting element formulation in Article 266 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. 2) However, the notary can be held criminal liability against relaas deed or deed of officials (ambtelijke akten) if deliberate or careless notary make a fake deed to the detriment others. That made base on notary deed against false information does not in itself result in the deed null and void. The aggrieved party to the existence of the deed as it should file a civil suit to the court to cancel the deed.Keywords : Concept of Law; Criminal Responsibility; Notary; Deed; Specification False

scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG GABUNGAN TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI HAL YANG MEMBERATKAN PIDANA Studi Kasus: Putusan Perkara Nomor:141/Pid.B/2018/PN Mrj (Pencurian)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-226
Author(s):  
Failin Failin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Family ◽  
Sense Of Justice

In criminal law there is no penalty if there is no wrongdoing, this basis is about the accountability of a person for the actions he has done. Therefore, in criminal law there are exceptions to such criminal liability, for example contained in Articles 48, 49, 50 and so forth. In addition, there are burdensome things that will be imposed on the accused for crimes committed, such as samenloop, recidive and so on. In the Muaro Sijunjung District Court there is one case concerning a combination of criminal acts, namely theft crimes accompanied by violence and moreover this theft is carried out among families (theft in the family). In this case the judge has decided the prison sentence for 6 (six) Years. But according to the analysis of the author there is no sense of justice for the victim because this perpetrator is the husband of the victim's child so that there is no deterrent effect for the perpetrator, the reason that there is no more theft in this family because no matter how small the crime committed by a person must be taken action in order to obtain justice and legal certainty. In principle, judges have the freedom to determine the measure of punishment to be imposed on the perpetrators of crimes, as long as it does not exceed the maximum provisions specified in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the sentencing of the accused for a combination of crimes committed by means of pure absorption Stelsel that is If a person commits several acts that are several delik each threatened with a different kind of criminal

scholarly journals Rasisme dan Penerapan Pasal Makar terhadap Kebebasan Ekspresi Politik Papua

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-80
Author(s):  
Herlambang P. Wiratraman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Freedom Of Association ◽  
Political Expression ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
The Republic

Freedom of political expression has not been fully guaranteed in the Indonesian legal system. One of the most prominent in the legal debate is the matter of treason (makar) charges against political expressions of self-determination. In the case of Papua, many Papuans have been detained, criminalised, and even killed because of their political expression. Interestingly, the Constitutional Court, through its decision Number 7/PUU-XV/2017, provided guidance in its ‘ratio decidendi’ argument, specifically the interpretation of treason phrases in the Criminal Code. Interpretation is given by the Constitutional Court after seeing the reality that law enforcement has been arbitrarily abused by the application of the treason article. This is contrary to the freedom of association, opinion and expression, as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article discusses how the application of the phrase treason in law enforcement, especially in connection with the conviction of many Papuans after the Surabaya anti-racism rallies in September 2019. A number of district court decisions on dozens of convicted Papuans show that the legal system that guarantees freedom of political expression has not changed much and law enforcement in fact emphasises the position of racial discrimination and is far below the standard of human rights law. Abstrak Kebebasan ekspresi politik belum sepenuhnya dijamin dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Salah satu yang paling mengemuka dalam perdebatan hukum adalah soal tuduhan makar terhadap ekspresi politik menentukan nasib sendiri. Dalam kasus Papua, tidak sedikit jumlah warga Papua yang ditahan, dikriminalkan, hingga tewas terbunuh karena soal ekspresi politiknya. Menariknya, Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui putusannya Nomor 7/PUU-XV/2017 memberikan panduan dalam argumen ratio decidendinya, khusus interpretasi frasa makar dalam Kitab-Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Penafsiran diberikan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi setelah melihat realitas penegakan hukum telah banyak disalahgunakan penerapan pasal makar. Hal demikian bertentangan dengan kebebasan berkumpul, berpendapat dan berekspresi, sebagaimana dijamin dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Artikel ini membahas bagaimana penerapan frasa makar dalam penegakan hukumnya, khususnya berkaitan dengan dipidananya banyak warga Papua setelah aksi anti rasisme Surabaya pada September 2019. Sejumlah putusan pengadilan negeri atas puluhan warga Papua yang dipidana tersebut memperlihatkan sistem hukum yang menjamin kebebasan ekspresi politik tidak banyak berubah dan penegakan hukum justru menegaskan posisi diskriminasi rasial serta jauh dari standar hukum hak asasi manusia.

scholarly journals Guilt in compositions of crimes against bases of national safety of Ukraine: problem questions of theory and fixing in a law on criminal responsibility

2019 ◽  
pp. 136-150
Author(s):  
R. Chorniy
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Special Part ◽  
Direct Indication ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Law ◽  
Transfer Of Information

The article is devoted to the investigation of forms and types of guilt in the composition of crimes against the basics of national security of Ukraine. The presence of a number of unresolved issues at the theoretical and legal level on this issue actualizes the need for its scientific elaboration and formulation of proposals to improve the provisions of the law on criminal liability. The purpose of the article is to investigate the problematic issues of forms and types of guilt in crimes against the bases of national security of Ukraine, ways of fixing them in the articles of Section I of the Special part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and to develop sound proposals for their solution based on the provisions of the doctrine of criminal law. The article presents the existing approaches of doctrinal interpretation by scientists of the provisions on wine, its forms and types, through which the research of this feature in the crimes under Art. Art. 109 - 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is proved that the most reasonable is the psychological concept of guilt, which promotes the insertion of forms and types of guilt in crimes against the basics of national security with a formal composition, the elucidation of forms of guilt in the warehouses of crimes provided by articles of section I of the Special part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, in which the legislator directly does not say that it is one of the preconditions for the proper qualification of the act committed by the person. It is proved that the basis for the conclusion about the intentional form of guilt is based on: 1) a direct indication of it in the norm of the law (Part 1 of Article 110 and Part 1 of Article 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 2) indication of the specific purpose or motives of the criminal behavior (Part 1 of Article 109, Note 1, Part 1 and Part 2 of Article 110-2, Article 113, Part 1 of Article 114 and Article 112 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) ; 3) combination of the above mentioned features in one norm (Part 1 of Article 110 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 4) interpretation of terms used in the dispositions of certain articles and / or through the description in the law of the features of the crime (Part 1 of Article 110, Part 2 of Article 109, Part 1 of Article 110, Part 1 of Article 111, Article 112, Article 113, Part 1 of Article 114 and Part 1 of Article 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 5) interpretation of terms used in other articles of the Special (espionage as a part of state treason) or articles of the General part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (conspiracy to commit the actions provided for in part 1 of Article 109 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Article 26 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), attempted murder state or public figure (Article 112 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) (part 1 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 6) the orientation of socially dangerous acts. The specifics of constructing all these norms testify to the direct intent of the person who committed the respective crime. On this basis it is substantiated that the lack of specification of intent in part 1 of Art. 111 and Part 1 of Art. 110 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine does not contribute to the clarity of the provisions of the Criminal Code in the specified part, and the direct intent in the composition of these crimes is evidenced by: 1) special purpose (Part 1 of Article 110 of the Criminal Code); 2) the terms used in the dispositions of the said articles (“violation of the order… established by the Constitution of Ukraine” (part 1 of Article 110), “transfer of information…, transition to the enemy's side, rendering… assistance in carrying out subversive activities against Ukraine”) ( Part 1 of Article 111); 3) the focus of socially dangerous action. In order to eliminate the ambiguous interpretation of the provisions of Part 1 of Art. 110 and Part 1 of Art. 111 of the Criminal Code it is proposed to amend them accordingly. The forms and type of guilt in the warehouses of crimes with material composition (Part 3 of Article 110, Part 3 and 4 of Article 110-2, Part 2 of Article 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) were not clearly reflected in the relevant rules of the law. It is substantiated that the subject's attitude to socially dangerous consequences (deaths of people (h. 3 Art. 110, h. 2 Art. 114-1), other grave consequences (h. 3 Art. 110, h. 4 Art. 110- 2, Part 2 of Article 114-1) Causing considerable property damage (Part 3 of Article 110-2) can be intentional or negligent.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 559/PID.B/2017/PN.BYW. PENGADILAN NEGERI BANYUWANGI TENTANG PENYEBARAN AJARAN KOMUNISME/MARXISME-LENINISME SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PASAL 107A KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1108
Author(s):  
Andreas Purba ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Basic Element ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Security ◽  
Individual Accountability

Budi Pego was charged with violating Article 107a of Law Number 27 of 1999 concerning Amendment to the Criminal Law Code relating to crimes against State security, because of. Because of these accusations, Budi Pego was charged with a 10-month prison sentence in the Banyuwangi District Court. The problem faced is how criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code (case study of decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw)? The research method used is normative legal research. The results showed that criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code in Decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw. it is inappropriate if this criminal liability model is applied to criminal liability to individuals. Considering that individual accountability still requires actions and mistakes as a basic element of accountability. That is, without any deeds and mistakes, there is no criminal liability. Regarding the Budi Pego case, the policy of criminalizing the ideology of Communism/Marxism-Leninism was decriminalized. If this cannot be done, then the legislators need to revise Law No. 27 of 1999 with the concept of eliminating articles containing formal offenses and replacing them with the formulation of material offenses and in the formulation of the weight of sanctions.

scholarly journals CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN INDONESIA ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPARISON

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Responsibility System

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document