scholarly journals ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 559/PID.B/2017/PN.BYW. PENGADILAN NEGERI BANYUWANGI TENTANG PENYEBARAN AJARAN KOMUNISME/MARXISME-LENINISME SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PASAL 107A KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1108
Author(s):  
Andreas Purba ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Basic Element ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Security ◽  
Individual Accountability

Budi Pego was charged with violating Article 107a of Law Number 27 of 1999 concerning Amendment to the Criminal Law Code relating to crimes against State security, because of. Because of these accusations, Budi Pego was charged with a 10-month prison sentence in the Banyuwangi District Court. The problem faced is how criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code (case study of decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw)? The research method used is normative legal research. The results showed that criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code in Decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw. it is inappropriate if this criminal liability model is applied to criminal liability to individuals. Considering that individual accountability still requires actions and mistakes as a basic element of accountability. That is, without any deeds and mistakes, there is no criminal liability. Regarding the Budi Pego case, the policy of criminalizing the ideology of Communism/Marxism-Leninism was decriminalized. If this cannot be done, then the legislators need to revise Law No. 27 of 1999 with the concept of eliminating articles containing formal offenses and replacing them with the formulation of material offenses and in the formulation of the weight of sanctions.

scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG GABUNGAN TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI HAL YANG MEMBERATKAN PIDANA Studi Kasus: Putusan Perkara Nomor:141/Pid.B/2018/PN Mrj (Pencurian)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-226
Author(s):  
Failin Failin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Family ◽  
Sense Of Justice

In criminal law there is no penalty if there is no wrongdoing, this basis is about the accountability of a person for the actions he has done. Therefore, in criminal law there are exceptions to such criminal liability, for example contained in Articles 48, 49, 50 and so forth. In addition, there are burdensome things that will be imposed on the accused for crimes committed, such as samenloop, recidive and so on. In the Muaro Sijunjung District Court there is one case concerning a combination of criminal acts, namely theft crimes accompanied by violence and moreover this theft is carried out among families (theft in the family). In this case the judge has decided the prison sentence for 6 (six) Years. But according to the analysis of the author there is no sense of justice for the victim because this perpetrator is the husband of the victim's child so that there is no deterrent effect for the perpetrator, the reason that there is no more theft in this family because no matter how small the crime committed by a person must be taken action in order to obtain justice and legal certainty. In principle, judges have the freedom to determine the measure of punishment to be imposed on the perpetrators of crimes, as long as it does not exceed the maximum provisions specified in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the sentencing of the accused for a combination of crimes committed by means of pure absorption Stelsel that is If a person commits several acts that are several delik each threatened with a different kind of criminal

scholarly journals Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Faisal Faisal ◽  
Muhammad Rustamaji
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Discussion Section ◽  
The Ideal

The basic idea underlying the reform of  the Criminal Code Bill has an impact on reforming the pillars of criminal law. The purpose of this research is to find out the new direction of criminal law policy regarding criminal acts, criminal responsibility and punishment. The research method uses normative legal research. The results of the research study in the discussion section are the reform of the pillars of criminal law, namely criminal acts, criminal liability, and punishment oriented to the basic idea of ??the value of balance. The reform of the pillars of criminal acts is aimed at broadening the meaning of the legality principle which provides space for living law as a source of law and also creates juridical terminology regarding criminal acts. The pillar of criminal responsibility accommodates the principle of no crime without error. The pillar of punishment is that the purpose of punishment is no longer synonymous with retaliation, but there are efforts to improve the behavior of the perpetrators of crime. The changes in the three pillars are influenced by the basic idea of ??balancing the values ??of Pancasila, namely the values ??of Divinity, Humanity, and Society. Recommendations in strengthening the direction of criminal law reform are needed in formulating criminal provisions outside the Draft Criminal Code that must be in accordance with the basic idea of ??balance which is the ideal of criminal law reform law. Ide dasar yang melandasi pembaruan RUU KUHP berdampak pada pembaruan pilar hukum pidana. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui arah baru kebijakan politik hukum pidana mengenai tindak pidana, pertanggungjawaban pidana dan pemidanaan. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil kajian penelitian dalam bagian pembahasan ialah pembaruan pilar hukum pidana yakni tindak pidana, pertanggungjawaban pidana, dan pemidanaan berorientasi pada ide dasar nilai keseimbangan. Pembaruan pilar tindak pidana tertuju pada perluasan makna asas legalitas yang memberikan ruang pada hukum yang hidup sebagai sumber hukum dan melahirkan pula terminologi yuridis mengenai tindak pidana. Pilar pertangungjawaban pidana mengakomodasi asas tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan. Pilar pemidanaan bahwa tujuan pemidanaan tidak lagi identik pembalasan akan tetapi ada upaya memperbaiki perilaku dari pelaku kejahatan. Perubahan ketiga pilar tersebut dipengaruhi oleh ide dasar keseimbangan nilai Pancasila yaitu nilai Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Kemasyarakatan. Rekomendasi dalam memperkuat arah pembaruan hukum pidana diperlukan dalam merumuskan ketentuan pidana di luar RUU KUHP harus sesuai dengan ide dasar keseimbangan yang menjadi cita hukum pembaruan hukum pidana

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Pidana dalam Peristiwa Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Korbanya Meninggal Dunia di Wilayah Hukum Resor Gianyar

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Putu Ratih Mahalia Septiana
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Road Users ◽  
Legal Consequences

The level of discipline and understanding of the rules and the low courtesy of traffic from road users is something that needs special attention in their efforts to solve problems in the field of traffic. The purpose of this study is as follows: to determine the legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents whose victims have died and to find out legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents. The type of research used is empirical juridical legal research. Results of the discussion in this study: The legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents where the victim died was sentenced to a minimum prison sentence of 5 years. In accordance with Article 359 of the Criminal Code. Legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents include unintentional elements (negligence), have never been convicted, there is peace between the parties, giving information is not convoluted, there are witnesses who are mitigating, then the threat of punishment can be lighter. Tingkat disiplin dan pemahaman terhadap peraturan dan sopan santun berlalu lintas yang rendah dari para pemakai jalan merupakan hal yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian khusus dalam upaya pemecahannya untuk mengatasi permasalahan di bidang lalu lintas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini sebagai berikut: untuk mengetahui akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis empiris. Hasil pembahasan dalam penelitian ini: Akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dipidana dengan hukuman penjara minimal 5 tahun. Sesuai Pasal 359 KUHP. Pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas antara lain ada unsur ketidaksengajaan (alpa), belum pernah dihukum, ada perdamaian diantara para pihak, memberikan keterangan tidak berbelit-belit, adanya saksi yang meringankan, maka ancaman hukuman bisa lebih ringan.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Child Kidnapping Victims: Case Study in Gianyar District Court

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 333
Author(s):  
Komang Suartana ◽  
I Made Wirya Darma
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Specific Context ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Special Protection

This article aims to analyze how the crime of child kidnapping is covered in the Indonesian Criminal Code and the type of sanctions that can be imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of child kidnapping. It is a legal research that uses statutory, conceptual, and case approaches in discussing the legal protection of child kidnapping victims. In order to illustrate how the law that protects the victim of child kidnapping is applied by the court, it presents a case study at the Gianyar District Court that investigated a criminal offense of child kidnapping in 2018. The results reveal that the Indonesian Criminal Code classifies child kidnapping as a crime that is punishable as stipulated in Article 330 of the Code. In a more specific context, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 22 of 2003 concerning Child Protection includes child kidnapping as a case that needs to be given special protection  A case study regarding the imposing of sanctions on the perpetrator of child kidnapping can be seen in a criminal case before the District Court of Gianyar in 2018. In the judgment, the panel of judges imposing a sentence against the defendant in the form of imprisonment of 8 (eight) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 60,000,000 (sixty million rupiah) subsidiary 6 (six) months in prison;

scholarly journals Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku yang Melakukan Perbuatan Menyuruh Anak sebagai Pengemis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 646-650
Author(s):  
Ni Nyoman Ayu Ratih Ganitri ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach

Children are not only actively involved as beggars, but toddlers are also passively involved, where children under the age of two are carried in pathetic conditions to make other people feel sad and sorry, thus giving them money. This study aims to explain the qualifications of criminal acts of perpetrators who order children as beggars and examine criminal liability for perpetrators who commit acts of ordering children as beggars. This study used a normative legal research method with a problem and conceptual approach. Sources of data used were primary and secondary legal data. Data collection was done through a literature study by taking notes. The results of the study revealed that the act of begging is categorized as a violation of public order as regulated in Article 504 of the Criminal Code. Doing the act of ordering children as beggars can be classified as a crime and also as an act of violation. Everyone is prohibited from exploiting children in any form as regulated in Article 301 of the Criminal Code junto Article 76I and Article 88 of Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

scholarly journals Proving The Insanity Defense in The Enforcement of Criminal Law in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 670
Author(s):  
Priastami Anggun Puspita Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Insanity Defense ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Psychological Condition ◽  
Criminal Offender ◽  
Made In

Criminal liability is a manifestation of the perpetrator for his or her crime. Article 44 (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) explains that the insanity defense may release a perpetrator from conviction. For this research, the utilized research method was normative legal research, by which legal regulations are examined and the results neither reject nor accept a hypothesis, but give prescriptions for what should be proposed. The results of this research showed that first, insanity defense can release a criminal offender from conviction. This is because the perpetrator is unable to consciously understand that his or her actions are against the law, and that person cannot be held with criminal liability. Second, the construction of a verdict to declare whether or not a person qualifies for the insanity defense must be made in advance of his or her psychological condition, to decide if it is appropriate for the perpetrator to be convicted.Keywords: Proving; Insanity Defense; Enforcment of Crimina Law.

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals MERINTANGI PENGUBURAN JENAZAH COVID-19 DITINJAU BERDASARKAN PASAL 178 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA

LEGALITAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rezky Rinaldy Dan Syamsudin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Body ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The World ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Impact

Indonesia and even the world now feel the impact of the Corona virus outbreak (covid-19), in connection with it hindering the burial of the bodies of victims who died. The phenomenon of corpse rejection of corona virus patients (covid-19) continues to occur in various regions. In fact, the body must be buried immediately no later than 4 hours after being declared dead. The main reason people are reluctant to accept the bodies of patients co-19 because of fear of contracting. While the medical ensure that the body will not transmit the virus. The body in the coffin has been wrapped and declared sterile. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results of the study showed that obstructing officers who will carry out official burials could indeed be convicted. Law enforcement officials can use Article 178 of the Criminal Code. not a complaint offense. Law enforcement officials can immediately take action without anyone complaining. "If the incident fulfills the elements contained in Article 178 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrators can be charged. However, it must look at intentions and actions as a condition for imposing a crime on someone.

scholarly journals PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN BANGUN GUNA SERAH (BUILD OPERATE TRANSFER/BOT) ANTARA PEMERINTAH DAERAH KOTA BOGOR DENGAN PIHAK SWASTA (PT PANCAKARYA GRAHATAMA INDONESIA) DITINJAU DARI SUDUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1638
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Marco ◽  
Gunawan Djajaputra
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Municipal Government ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
City Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Government ◽  
The City ◽  
Binding Agreement

The BOT (Build Operate Transfer) Agreement between Bogor Municipal Government and PT Pancakarya Grahatama Indonesia is an agreement to optimize Baranangsiang terminal assets as stated in the agreement Number: 601 / Perj.418-BPKAD / 2012 / Number: 005 / PGI / DIR / VI / 2012 . Until now, the agreement of both parties has not been able to be considered because of the change of authority of the terminal which formerly the authority of the City Government of Bogor to switch to the Central Government, resulting problems Whether the Government / Mayor Bogor can cancel the unilateral agreement BOT in the construction of Terminal Baranangsiang viewed from the point Civil Code? The research method used is normative legal research method supported by interview and field data. Based on the analysis that the BOT agreement between Bogor City Government and PT Pancakarya Grahatama is a valid and binding agreement between both parties and can not be canceled unilaterally by Bogor City Government, although there are new regulations that change the authority of terminal A Baranangsiang become the authority of Central Government . The Agreement may be canceled if it violates Article 1320 of the Criminal Code or violates the subjective and objective terms of the validity of the agreement. When the agreement is mutually agreed upon by both parties, the agreement must continue and act as a binding law as regulated in Article 1338 of the Criminal Code. Bogor City Government should immediately provide certainty to the PT Pancakarya Grahatama Indonesia for Baranangsiang terminal revitalization project can be immediately realized and need a revision (adedendum) agreement between the Government of Bogor City with PT Pancakarya Grahatama Indonesia related to changes in authority of terminal A Baranangsiang between PT. PGI with the Central Government.

scholarly journals Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu dalam rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Iwan Rois ◽  
Ratna Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
District Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Provincial Level ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
General Elections

This study aims to analyze the need to establish a special election court which has the authority to solve various election law cases in order to realize elections with integrity; and analyzing the formulation of election special justice in order to realize the integrity of the election. The research method used is the method of normative legal research and the implementation of this research collects data from various sources in order to get an answer to the issues that have been formulated. The results of the study shows that  the purpose of the need for the formation of special judicial elections; First, to meet the growing demands of increasingly complex justice in society and more election law enforcement so as to realize the integrity of the elections; Second, To handle the election law cases quickly and simply so as to obey the integrity of the election. Formulation; First, the election special justice to be able to work quickly and simply in handling election law cases, domiciled at the central and provincial level, then entering the District Court or the High Court; Secondly, the Guidelines for the election special judicial law shall be based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2017 on Procedures for the Settlement of Administrative Offenses of the General Elections in the Supreme Court. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlunya membentuk peradilan khusus pemilu yang mempunyai kewenangan menyelesaikan berbagai perkara hukum pemilu agar terwujud pemilu yang berintegritas; dan menganalisis formulasi pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu dalam rangka mewujudkan integritas pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pelaksanaan dari penelitian ini mengumpulkan bahan hukum dari berbagai sumber guna mendapatkan suatu jawaban atas pokok-pokok permasalahan yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan perlunya pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu; Pertama, Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perkembangan akan keadilan yang semakin kompleks dalam masyarakat dan lebih penegakan hukum pemilu sehingga mewujudkan integritas pemilu; Kedua, Untuk menangani perkara hukum pemilu dengan cepat dan sederhana sehingga mewudkan integritas pemilu. Formulasi; Pertama, Peradilan khusus pemilu agar bisa bekerja cepat dan sederhana dalam menangani perkara hukum pemilu, berkedudukan di tingkat pusat dan provinsi, selanjutnya masuk pada Pengadilan Negeri atau Pengadilan Tinggi; Kedua, Pedoman beracara pada peradilan khusus pemilu berdasarkan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum Di Mahkamah Agung.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document