scholarly journals Stakeholder perceptions in the factors constraining the development and implementation of public private partnerships in the Ugandan electricity sector

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Akampurira ◽  
David Root ◽  
Winston Shakantu
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Electricity Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Private Sector Participation ◽  
Power Deficit ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
The Government

Amidst increasingly constrained public budgets and inadequate service delivery, private sector participation through public private partnerships is increasingly being used as a means for delivering physical infrastructure. The government of Uganda, which is currently grappling with a crippling electricity power deficit, has over the years, pursued a number of strategies to encourage private sector participation in the electricity sector, but with limited success. This paper presents the findings of research into the relative importance as perceived by sector stakeholders, of factors that hamstring private sector participation in the development of hydropower generation facilities through public private partnerships in Uganda. The stakeholders considered in this paper are those representing the government and private sector entities in the development of the partnerships. A review of literature and project documents enabled the identification of relevant factors. Data was collected from the respondents by means of a self administered structured questionnaire and quantitative methods used for data analysis. Key findings from the research indicate that the respondents regarded the regulatory and legal frameworks as being attractive for private sector participation and this business environment is further enhanced by their confidence in the government’s commitment to honour its contractual obligations. In contrast, difficulties in structuring and obtaining finance together with issues over the cumbersome approval process and resistance from environmental groups were identified as the most significant constraints to the development and implementation of public private partnerships in the Ugandan electricity sector. Recognizing the importance of an adequate and reliable supply of power in Uganda, as in so many other sub-Saharan countries, it is anticipated that the identification of the relative importance of the constraints as perceived by stakeholders, will inform the process of developing measures and strategies to mitigate the constraints thus facilitating the speedy implementation and deal closure of public private partnership initiatives with the ensuing benefits.

The supply-side of corruption: a review of scenario, causes and prevention measure

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurfarizan Mazhani Mahmud ◽  
Intan Salwani Mohamed ◽  
Roshayani Arshad
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Supply Side ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Theoretical Understanding ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Preventative Measures ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
The Government ◽  
High Level

Purpose This paper aims to provide a proper understanding of corruption in the private sector, also known as the supply-side of corruption. It also presents the causes of corrupt practices and points out the corporations’ actions to mitigate corrupt behaviour in the business environment. Design/methodology/approach This study reviews the prior literature on the phenomenon of corruption in the private sector, its causes and the preventive measures that should be implemented. Findings Corruption in the private sector was associated with a firm’s interaction with the public sector, and the most common corruption in the private sector is grand corruption, which is improper contribution made to high-level public officials and politicians. The causes of corruption in the private sector can be explained from several dimensions: economy, psychosocial and legal and regulation. Preventative measures encompass both internal strategies, which are endogenous to business and external strategies like exogenous legislation and restrictions enforced by the government or outside organizations. Originality/value The efficient strategies in combating corruption need active cooperation and participation from the supply-side of corruption. Thus, this study contributes to the literature on the theoretical understanding of the corruption problem from the supply-side and responsibility play by the private sector in global anti-corruption initiatives.

United Kingdom to strengthen cybersecurity nationally

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Content Type ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
Uk Government ◽  
A Priority ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Naming And Shaming

Subject The United Kingdom's new cybersecurity strategy. Significance The UK government on November 1 published its Cybersecurity Strategy for 2016-21. The new strategy doubles the previous investment in cyber to 1.9 billion pounds (2.4 billion dollars) during a time of government cutbacks, making it clear that the government regards cybersecurity as a priority. Impacts Despite serious investment, the government will still face a challenge in recruiting those with the required cyber skills. Given the expertise in the private sector, public-private partnerships will continue to be vital for protecting UK networks. ‘Naming and shaming’ cyber aggressors may become more prevalent as states seek to deter further cyberattacks. Governments may also increasingly focus on developing offensive cyber tools that can be used to counter-strike.

scholarly journals Will Public-Private Partnerships Solve Nigeria’s Infrastructure Problems?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
George Nwangwu
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
The Public ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government ◽  
As If

Nigeria, like most countries around the world, has turned to Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to finance its infrastructure deficit. However, it appears that the government of Nigeria looks towards PPPs as the major solution to the country’s infrastructure crisis. In a sense PPPs are being sold to the public as if they were free, that the private sector would come in with its funds, provide the desired services and that the problem with the country’s infrastructure would automatically cease. This paper argues that this supposition is a myth and that the role of PPPs in the provision of public infrastructure is more nuanced than is being bandied around. PPPs are not the panacea to all of the country’s infrastructure problems and also are far from being completely free. It is however the case that if appropriately deployed, in most cases PPPs provide some advantages over conventional public sector procurements. This paper explores the different advantages and disadvantages of PPPs and suggests ways in which PPPs may be effectively used to improve the country’s infrastructure with reduced fiscal exposure to government.

scholarly journals Public-Private-People Partnerships (4P) for Improving the Response to COVID-19 in Iran

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Seddighi ◽  
Sadegh Seddighi ◽  
Ibrahim Salmani ◽  
Mehrab Sharifi Sedeh
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Disaster Response ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
The Public ◽  
Governmental Organizations ◽  
Non Governmental Organizations ◽  
The People ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Iranian Government ◽  
The Government

ABSTRACT The Public–Private–People partnership (4P) is a significant element in disaster response. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as a pandemic has been the worst disaster in the last decades in Iran in terms of exposure and magnitude. In order to respond effectively, the Iranian Government needs an extra capacity, which may be provided by the private sector and people. This study aims to collect evidences of 4P pertaining to the COVID-19 response in Iran from February to April 2020. Partnership case studies are classified into 3 categories: (1) Public–private partnerships; (2) public–people partnerships; and (3) private–people partnerships. It was found that the Iranian Government has removed or diminished some of the barriers to cooperation. There was also more cooperation between the people, the private sector, and the public sector than during normal times (vs disasters). People participated in the response procedure through some associations or groups, such as religious and ethnic communities, as well as through non-governmental organizations. It has been shown that 4P is vital in disaster response and, in particular, to epidemics. The government can be more active in partnerships with the private sector and people in emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Enhancing social capital, institutionalization, and developing required infrastructures by the government will improve public–private partnerships.

scholarly journals Public-Private Partnerships in Forestry Management in Sri Lanka: Emergence, Influence and Legitimacy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Mangala De Zoysa
Keyword(s):  
Forest Management ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Forest Resources ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Fuel Wood ◽  
The Government ◽  
Rule Setting ◽  
Agro Forestry

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are considered as “win-win” solutions to both government and market failures in sustainable forest management. PPPs in Sri Lanka are filling a regulatory gap resulting from withdrawal of government from the management of forest resources. The national forest policy has emphasized afforestation, conservation and protection as the main components of emerged government-community, donor–recipient and public–private partnerships with local people, rural communities and other stakeholders. Timber and fuel-wood plantations, and agro-forestry woodlots have been established through partnerships. Eco-tourism has been given special emphasis through partnerships between the government agencies, private sector and communities. Private sector involves in forestry as a business through sustainable agro-forestry, imparting financial gain. The government has identified risk mitigation as an integral part of the government–community partnership planning process. Investments of private sector in forest management are committed to enhance inflow of foreign exchange earnings through the export of value added forest products. The Forest Ordinance has empowered Forest Department for the management, protection and development of forest resources. PPPs are far less frequent in rule-setting and implementation of timber and fuel-wood plantations and agro-forestry woodlots. Work undertaken by community based organizations in PPPs occurs on a minor scale. Private-sector involvement in forest resources management has raised serious concerns by public perception about conflict of interest. The Government needs serious efforts and amendment of forest policies to promote public-private partnerships for the sustainable development of forest resources.

scholarly journals Private Sector Participation and Health System Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa

PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e13243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Yoong ◽  
Nicholas Burger ◽  
Connor Spreng ◽  
Neeraj Sood
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Health System ◽  
System Performance ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Health System Performance ◽  
Private Sector Participation ◽  
Sub Saharan

scholarly journals PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: ALTERNATIF PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR DALAM NEGRI

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahmi Dzakky
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Development Agenda ◽  
Private Sector Participation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Business Entities

Sebagai regulator dan fasilitator proyek infrastruktur Indonesia, Pemerintah telah mengundang partisipasi sektor swasta melalui pengaturan Public Private Partnership (PPP) atau yang dikenal juga dengan Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha (KPBU). Kemitraan Pemerintah-Swasta umumnya dicirikan oleh entitas sektor swasta yang mengumpulkan dana untuk membangun aset yang dibutuhkan oleh Pemerintah, dan menyediakan fasilitas atau layanan sebagai imbalan aliran pendapatan kontraktual dari Pemerintah atau pengguna. Hal ini disebabkan PPP dikatakan efektif untuk dijadikan alternatif pembangunan infrastruktur di dalam negeri. Tulisan ini akan menganalisis mengenai eksistensi PPP sebagai unsur alternatif pembangunan infrastruktur di Indonesia, dilihat dari aspek hukum dan implementasinya. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Adapun hasil yang diperoleh adalah Pemerintah harus berupaya untuk dapat meningkatkan kualitas kontrak dan perbaikan skema PPP sehingga dapat menarik investor turut membantu pemerintah pada agenda pembangunan infrastruktur dalam negeri.Kata Kunci: PPP, infrastruktur, pembangunanABSTRACTAs the regulator and facilitator of Indonesian infrastructure projects, the Government has invited private sector participation through the regulation of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) or also known as Government Cooperation with Business Entities (KPBU). Government-Private Partnerships are generally characterized by private sector entities that raise funds to build assets required by the Government and provide facilities or services in exchange for a contractual revenue stream from the Government or users. This is because PPP is said to be effective to be an alternative to infrastructure development in the country. This paper will analyze the existence of PPP as an alternative element of infrastructure development in Indonesia, judging by the legal aspects and its implementation. The method used is normative legal research method using literature study. The result obtained is that the Government should strive to be able to improve the quality of contracts and improve PPP schemes to attract investors to help the government on the domestic infrastructure development agenda. Keyword: PPP, infrastructure, development

scholarly journals Carbon Fiscal Instruments and Green Finance: An Aid to the Success of SDGs in Nigeria?

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Onanuga Olaronke Toyin ◽  
Abayomi Toyin Onanuga
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Fiscal Policy ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Green Growth ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Green Finance ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
The Government ◽  
Green Investments

The need to improve on the use of Fiscal Instruments and engender an improvement in Green Finance remains a challenge in Nigeria. Using the Metcalf’s Framework, this paper explains why Carbon Fiscal Instruments are enforced on emitters to check emissions and their level of effectiveness. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of Nigeria’s performance with some sub-Saharan African countries using the SDGs Index and Dashboard Indicators Framework was discussed. Finally, after appraising the use of Green Finance as a means of innovative finance, the paper found a dearth of fiscal instruments in Nigeria coupled with a low level of Green Finance opportunities. The paper concludes that Nigeria needs to design and implement an optimal climate change fiscal policy and Green Finance mix for Green growth. We recommend that the government needs to encourage creative and innovative ways of generating funds for Green investments in the private sector.

Implementation of Public-Private Partnerships at Kajiado County, Kenya

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (II) ◽  
pp. 319-332
Author(s):  
Fauziah Y Shani
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Strategic Plan ◽  
Strategy Implementation ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Strategy Formulation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Process Strategy

Strategy formulation has been widely regarded as the most important component of the strategic management process. Strategy implementation, rather than strategy formulation alone, is a key requirement for superior organizational performance. The Government of Kenya (GOK) has been implementing Vision 2030 strategic plan, the country's development blueprint covering the period 2008 to 2030. Recognizing that the required funds to fully support the country's development agenda and to meet the infrastructure deficit will require involvement of the private sector, the government has over the second half of the last decade exhibited a strategic shift towards partnering with the private sector, through a variety of avenues, key among which is the strategic adoption of Public Private Partnerships (PPP). The study thus set out to determine the extent of implementation of Public-Private Partnerships at Kajiado County. The study used a case study research design. The case study design facilitated the in-depth exploration of the extent of implementation of Public-Private Partnerships against the normal strategy implementation process specifically dwelling on Njaa Marufuku Campaign at Kajiado County. This study used both primary and secondary data. The primary data composed of the responses received from personal interviews with ten senior and middle management while the secondary data was from relevant literature review. The present study employed the qualitative type of analysis, specifically the content analysis. Results reveal that Njaa Marufuku Kenya (NMK), the studied form of PPP initiative conforms its intervention to the strategy implementation process, and this has contributed to the established programme success. The three components guiding project selection and activities within the NMK PPP strategy indicated the presence of a well laid down strategic plan. The NMK intervention was also found to observe a critical component in the strategy implementation process; clarity of goals. The tasks and activities were also found to follow a set of predefined guidelines. A large number of the program implementers were found to through training prior to the onset of project implementation. Findings further implied that stakeholder roles in the strategy implementation process within the NMK intervention were clearly cut out hence enabling a well-coordinated implementation process. The intervention of PPP was concluded to observe strategic meetings and stakeholder commitment from the government and private sector sides. As follow up to strategy implementation in various projects, the intervention was concluded to further carry out continuous monitoring and evaluation. Recommendation made was that as a way of government achieving set objectives more efficiently, PPP was an important strategic intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document