scholarly journals Keefektifan Model Problem Based Learning dan Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa dalam Pencapaian Prestasi Belajar Fisika

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-54
Author(s):  
I Made Yuda Suryawan ◽  
I Wayan Santyasa ◽  
I Gede Aris Gunadi

ABSTRAKSI: Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan pengaruh interaktif antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi berprestasi terhadap prestasi belajar Fisika. Penelitian menggunakan kuasi eksperimen dengan desain pre-test dan post-test non-equivalent control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa Kelas X MIPA SMAN (Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri) 1 Kubutambahan di Bali, Indonesia, yang terdiri dari empat kelas atau 130 orang. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan analisis kovarian dua jalur. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa prestasi belajar siswa diakibatkan oleh perbedaan model pembelajaran. Prestasi belajar yang lebih tinggi diraih oleh siswa yang menerima perlakuan model PBL (Problem Based Learning atau Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah). Perbedaan prestasi belajar siswa juga diakibatkan oleh perbedaan motivasi berprestasi. Prestasi belajar yang lebih tinggi diraih oleh siswa yang memiliki MBT (Motivasi Berprestasi Tinggi). Akhirnya, ada pengaruh interaktif antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi berprestrasi terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. KATA KUNCI: Model Pembelajaran; Prestasi Belajar; Motivasi; Matapelajaran Fisika. ABSTRACT: “Effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning Model and Student Achievement Motivation in Gaining the Physics Learning Achievements”. The research describes the interactive influence between model of learning and achievement motivation toward Physics learning achievement. The research used a quasi experimental study with pre-test and post-test non-equivalent control group design. The population of this study were the students of Class X Mathematics and Sciences at the Public Senior High School 1 Kubutambahan in Bali, Indonesia, consisted of four classes or 130 people. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and two-ways analysis of covariance. The results of this study reveal that the student achievement is due to the differences in learning models. Higher learning achievement was achieved by students who received treatment of PBL (Problem Based Learning) model. The differences in student achievement are due to also the differences in achievement motivation. Higher achievement of learning achieved by students who have high achievement motivation. Lastly, there are the interactive influences between learning model and achievement motivation towards the student achievement.KEY WORD: Learning Model; Learning Achievement; Motivation; Physics Subject.    About the Authors: I Made Yuda Suryawan, S.Pd. adalah Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FMIPA UNDIKSHA (Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha) di Singaraja 81116, Bali, Indonesia. Prof. Dr. I Wayan Santyasa dan Dr. I Gede Aris Gunadi adalah Dosen di Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FMIPA UNDIKSHA di Singaraja 81116, Bali, Indonesia. Untuk kepentingan akademik, alamat emel penulis adalah: [email protected], [email protected], dan [email protected] Citation: Suryawan, I Made Yuda, I Wayan Santyasa I Gede Aris Gunadi. (2019). “Keefektifan Model Problem Based Learning dan Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa dalam Pencapaian Prestasi Belajar Fisika” in MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, Volume 4(1), Maret, pp.35-54. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI [Indonesia University of Education] Press, ISSN 2527-3868 (print) and 2503-457X (online). Article Timeline: Accepted (November 10, 2018); Revised (January 15, 2019); and Published (March 30, 2019).

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Deli Januartini ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
I Gede Partha Sindu

 AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) pengaruh signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square dan Think Pair Share terhadap hasil belajar siswa, (2) hasil belajar yang lebih baik antara model pembelajaran Think Pair Square  atau  Think Pair Share, (3) motivasi belajar siswa, (4) respon siswa.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X1 dengan model Think Pair Square, kelas X3 dengan model Think Pair Share dan X5 dengan model Direct Instruction.Data hasil belajar dianalisis melalui uji prasyarat dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen serta uji hipotesis menggunakan Anova Satu Jalur dengan hasil terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Kemudian uji lanjut t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar maka disimpulkan model Think Pair Square lebih baik dengan hasil belajar lebih tinggi. Hasil analisis angket Think Pair Square diketahui respon sangat positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi, Think Pair Share diketahui respon positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi. Kata kunci:  Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, hasil belajar, motivasi belajar, dan respon siswa. AbstractThe purpose of this study were to determine (1) the significant influence of the application of think pair square and think pair share learning model on student’s learning achievement, (2) better learning achievement between think pair square and think pair share learning model, (3) student’s motivation, (4) the student’s responses.The research was a quasi-experimental design experiment with post test only control group design. The population of study was all the students in grade X. The sample were as X1 class with the application of Think Pair Square learning model, X3 class with the application of Think Pair Share learning model, and X5 class with the application of Direct Instruction learning model.The data was collected by cognitive and psychomotor tests. The student’s learning achievement were analyzed by the prerequisite test with the results of the three groups at normal distribution and homogenous, and the hypothesis tested by One Way Anova which means there is a significant effect on the application of think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. Then it was conducted a further test t-Scheffe with the results there are differences in the learning achievement between think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. According to the average result we made a conclusion that Think Pair Square was better learning models with higher student’s learning achievement. The questionnaires results shows that Think Pair Square was very high positiveresponse and very high learning motivation, Think Pair Share was high positive response and very high learning motivation. Keywords :   Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, learning achievement, learning motivation, and student response. 


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Made Dwi Antari ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana

AbstrakPembelajaran TIK hendaknya dapat menyiapkan kondisi yang mendukung agar aktivitas dan kreativitas siswa memperoleh pengetahuan sendiri melalui proses belajar. Pemilihan model pembelajaran yang tepat sesuai karakteristik siswa akan membantu keberhasilan suatu pembelajaran. Penelitian studi komparatif akan membandingkan dua model pembelajaran, untuk mengetahui model manakah yang lebih baik. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui(1) Pengaruh hasil belajar TIK siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 1 Seririt dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Talking Stick dan Snowball Throwing, (2) Hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi antara model pembelajaran Talking Stick atau Snowball Throwing, (3) respon siswa terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran Talking Stick  dan Snowball Throwing.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only With Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Pengumpulan data dilakukandenganmetodetespilihangandauntukmengukurranahkognitifdanujiketerampilanuntukranahPsikomotor. Data hasilbelajardianalisismelaluiujiprasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan homogenitas dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen, dilanjutkan dengan ujihipotesismenggunakan Anova Satu jalur lalu dilanjutkan dengan uji berpasangan t-Scheffe.Hasil uji anova satu jalur menyatakan terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dalam penggunaan model pembelajaran Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing, dan konvensional. Karena terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan maka dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara masing-masing pasangan. Kemudian dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran Talking Stick lebih baik dengan rata-rata hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi. Sedangkanuntukresponmenggunakanmetodeangket. Hasil analisis angket model Talking Stick diketahui 36% respon sangat positif, 61% respon positif dan 3% respon cukup positif. Sedangkan untuk model Snowball Throwing diketahui 25% respon sangat positif, 67% respon positif dan 8% respon cukup positif. Kata kunci:  Studi Komparatif, TIK, Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing,  hasil belajar, dan respon siswa AbstractTIK learning must have to prepared student’s activities and creativities to obtained the own knowledge by means of learning process. An appropriate learning model election agree with students characteristics would help an success learning. The comparative study research would have to compared both of learning model, to know which model was better. This research aimed to know (1) The influenced about the result of students’ TIK study used Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model (2) the highest result of study between Talking stick and Snowball Throwinglearning model (3) the students’ response toward Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model application.Kind of this research was quasi experiment by Post Test Only with Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The data accumulation done by multiple choice tests to measured cognitive domain and skill test to psychomotor domain. The students’ result study analyzed by prerequisite test was normality test and homogeneity by the result of the three group which normal distribution and homogeneous, continued by hypothesis test used a strip Anova then continued by t-SheffeThe result of one way onova exist a significance influenced on the used of Talking Stick leaarning model, Snowball Throwing and conventional. Because of thee was a significance difereences between each partner. Afterwards, seen from the result average of study  can be concluded the Talking Stick learning model better than the higest result average of study. Meanwhile, the respond of used questionnaire method, the result of Talking stick model questionnaire known 36% very positive responses, 61% positive responses and 3% positive sufficient responses. Then, Snowball Throwing model known 25% very positive responses, 67% positive responses, and 8% positive sufficient responses. Keywords : The Comparrative Study, TIK, Talking stick, Snowball Throwing, the                   study result,  students’ respond


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 402-411
Author(s):  
Wisnu Darmawan ◽  
Nyoto Harjono

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan efektivitas penerapan model pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray dan Problem Based Learning terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar Tema 8 Kelas 4 SD Negeri Blotongan 02 dan SD Negeri Sidorejo Lor 05 Gugus Diponegoro, kecamatan Sidorejo, Kota Salatiga. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian eksperimental semu yang menggunakan pendekatan non-equivalent control group design. Dalam menganalisis data dilaksanakan uji beda melalui Independent Sampel T-Test. Hasil uji beda menunjukkan nilai signifikansi (2-tailed) post-test hasil belajar peserta didik sebesar 0,000 lebih kecil dari 0,005 (0,000<0,005) sehingga disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan efektivitas yang signifikan antara model pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray dan Problem Based Learning terhadap pencapain hasil belajar peserta didik pada Tema 8 Kelas 4 SD. Nilai rata-rata post-test hasil belajar kelas eksperimen  lebih besar dibandingkan dengan kelas kontrol sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray lebih efektif dibandingkan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-41
Author(s):  
Iis Prasetyo ◽  
Sutaryat Trisnamansyah

This study aimed to develop a model of problem-based learning to increase the achievement motivation of the participants of life skills education programs and to examine the effectiveness of the learning model in accelerating the achievement motivation. The research conducted in Kemloko, Srimartani village, Piyungan Sub-district, Bantul, in the Province of Yogjakarta, employed research and development approach in an oyster mushroom cultivation training. The try out of the model used experimental design (quasi experiment - a non equivalent control group design), with 20 people for each group. The results showed that there is no difference in achievement motivation scores before and after training (p = 0.385) in the control group after an average of different test score achievement motivation, while there are differences in achievement motivation scores before and after training (p = 0.001). Effectiveness test also showed significant differences between the control and treat-ment groups (p = 0.012) so that the problem-based learning model is effective to increase achievement motivation compared to the conventional models (model control class).


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-93
Author(s):  
Anita Kurniawati Hartina ◽  
Endi Permata ◽  
Mohammad Fatkhurrokhman

Dilakukannya penelitian ini meliputi latar belakang berdasarkan rendahnya hasil belajar siswa untuk mata pelajaran instalasi tenaga listrik kelas XII program keahlian Teknik Ketenagalistrikan di SMK PGRI 1 Kota Serang. Tujuan atas pelaksanaan penelitian ini ialah untuk mengetahui: (1) Bagaimana efektivitas model pembelajaran problem based learning dibandingkan model konvensional pada hasil belajar instalasi tenaga listrik siswa, (2) Bagaimana efektivitas model pembelajaran inquiry dibandingkan model konvensional pada hasil belajar instalasi tenaga listrik siswa, (3) Bagaimana perbedaan efektivitas  model pembelajaran problem based learning, model pembelajaran inquiry dan model konvensional terhadap hasil belajar instalasi tenaga listrik siswa. Pada kegiatan penelitian ini digunakannya metode penelitian quasi eksperiment pada desain penelitian non equivalent control group design. Instrumen pengumpul data untuk digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah soal tes hasil belajar instalasi tenaga listrik (pretest dan posttest). Teknik analisis data pada penelitian ini memakai uji Anova Satu Jalur. Uji beda rata-rata dihasilkan nilai sig.< 0,05 yakni menunjukkan bahwa adanya perbedaan rata-rata dari ketiga kelompok. Efektivitas model pembelajaran Inquiry lebih efektif untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa, diperlihatkan dengan nilai effect size sebesar 0,97 sedangan untuk model Problem Based Learning sebesar 0,33. Berdasarkan pada hasil tersebut bisa disimpulkan untuk model pembelajaran Inquiry lebih efektif dibandingkan model konvensional terhadap hasil belajar instalasi tenaga listrik siswa, model Problem Based Learning lebih efektif dibandingkan model konvensional terhadap hasil belajar instalasi tenaga listrik siswa, dan model Inquiry lebih efektif dibandingkan model Problem Based Learning terhadap hasil belajar instalasi tenaga listrik siswa.   


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Insar Damopolii ◽  
Febilia H. Malatta

The purpose of research to determine that effect of problem-based learning (PBL) model on cognitive student achievement in SMP YPPGI Silo Manokwari in the relation of population density to the environment topic. The study was a quasi-experimental research used nonequivalent control group design. The sample of the study was the students of class VIIA such as experimental class and the total students as many as 23 students and the class VIIB such as the control class and the total students as many as 22 students. That result showed the experimental class to implementation PBL model obtained the average posttest 70,78, while the class control obtained the average posttest 50,05. The significant value was 0,01 &lt; α = 0,05, there were different cognitive student achievement between the experiment class and the control class. Conclusion, there are differences in cognitive students achievement between students taught using PBL model with students taught using a conventional learning model


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-175
Author(s):  
Prangga Assmarqandi ◽  
Laila Hayati ◽  
Hapipi Hapipi

This research aims to determine the effect of problem-based learning model on student’s mathematical logical thinking abilities and the amount of it. To achieve the goals, this research used post-test only control group design. This research was held in class XI-IPA of SMAN 1 Sekotong and consist of 60 students which divided into two classes. By considering the post-test only control group design which requires a control group and the experimental group, used saturated sampling technique that took the whole population as the sample. The members of the population were all students of class XI-IPA of SMAN 1 Sekotong which divided into two classes XI-IPA 1 and XI-IPA 2. The instruments were used to measure the student’s logical thinking ability consist of four description. The measurement of the logical thinking ability was measured after the implementation of problem-based learning for four times. The level of compliance to the learning model was measured by observation of student and teacher activity sheets. The results of data analysis using t-test showed that problem-based learning have a significant influence on the mathematical logical thinking ability. Those results were showed by the increasing of mathematical logical thinking ability in each meeting. The analysis using the effect-size gave the result of the d value of 1,60 which means the application of problem-based learning have a high influence to the student’s mathematical logical thinking ability.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Melkior Wewe

This study aims to find out the difference between the model of problem-based learning and the mathematical-logical intelligence towards mathematics learning achievement. This study is a true experimental with specific design of post-test only control group design. The population of this study are all fourth grade students of primary schools in Bajawa sub district. Meanwhile, the sample in this study is determined through random sampling. The result of analysis, it is gained that the  learning achievement which used  problem based learning  model is higher than the mathematics learning achievement of the students with the conventional learning technique. The calculation from two ways ANAVA results in Fobs 1.793 with sig = 0.184, there is no significant effect of learning interaction model and mathematic-logical intelligence. Since there is no interaction, it also means that there is no significant effect of problem based learning collaborated with mathematic-logical intelligence to the students’ learning achievement. 


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Serra Oktafoura Suminar ◽  
Rini Intansari Meilani

Model pembelajaran adalah salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi belajar peserta didik di kelas. Artikel ini membahas hasil penelitian kuasi eksperimen yang ditujukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap prestasi belajar 70 orang peserta didik sebuah SMK, pada Mata Pelajaran Korespondensi, kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasi prosedur pembuatan surat dinas. Dengan menggunakan non-equivalent control group design, hasil analisa data menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran Discovery Learning lebih cocok dalam meningkatkan prestasi belajar peserta didik dalam mempelajari kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasi prosedur pembuatan surat dinas, dibandingkan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Dengan demikian, model pembelajaran Discovery Learning dapat menjadi salah satu alternatif bagi para guru Mata Pelajaran Korespondensi dalam meningkatkan prestasi belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran tersebut.Kata Kunci: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Prestasi Belajar THE INFLUENCE OF DISCOVERY LEARNING AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODELS ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING ACHIEVEMENTTeaching and learning model is one of the factors influencing students’ learning achievements. This article discusses results of a quasi-experimental study which aims to investigate the influence of  discovery learning and problem-based learning models on learning achievements of 70 vocational high school students, in the subject of Correspondence (in the competence of identifying the procedure of writing official letters). Using non-equivalent control group design, results of data analysis show that discovery learning model is more suitable to improve students’ learning achievements in the competence of identifying the procedure of writing official letters, compared to problem based learning model. Thus, discovery learning is worth using by teachers of the subject to improve the learning achievements of their students in this subject. Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Learning Achievement


2022 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Widodo ◽  
Merdieco Rivandi

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to determine student achievement in the manufacturing process subject before giving treatment, to determine student achievement in the manufacturing process course after treatment, to determine whether there was an effect of the inquiry method on student achievement in the manufacturing process course and to find out whether there is a difference in learning achievement after treatment on the use of the inquiry method and the demonstration method. The type of research conducted by the researcher is Quasi Experiment. The research design used is Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The subjects of this study were third semester students (Industrial Engineering) at the Cikarang Industrial META Polytechnic. Data collection techniques were carried out through objective tests, observations of the welding process and assessment of welding results with performance. The results showed that the learning achievement of electric arc welding subjects before being given treatment in the control group and the experimental group had the same initial ability and the data results showed that there were still many students who had not finished. Learning achievement after being given treatment increased in both the control group and the experimental group. After learning with the inquiry method there is an influence on student learning achievement. Besides the effect, there are also differences in learning achievement after being given treatment, namely by comparing the results of the pretest and post-test, after the application of the demonstration method the test results have a significant percentage difference. Keywords: Inquiry Method, Learning Achievement, Electric Arc Welding  ABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui prestasi belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah proses manufaktur sebelum pemberian perlakuan, mengetahui prestasi belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah proses manufaktur setelah pemberian perlakuan, mengetahui ada tidaknya pengaruh metode inquiry terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa pada mata mata kulaih proses manufaktur dan mengetahui ada tidaknya perbedaan prestasi belajar setelah perlakuan pada penggunaan metode inquiry dan metode demonstrasi. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan oleh peneliti adalah Quasi Eksperimen. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa semester III (Teknik Industri) di Politeknik META Industri Cikarang. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui tes objektif, observasi terhadap proses pengelasan dan penilaian hasil las dengan unjuk kerja. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prestasi belajar mata pelajaran las busur listrik sebelum diberikan perlakuan pada kelompok kontrol dan kelompok eksperimen memiliki kemampuan awal yang setara dan hasil data menunjukkan masih banyak mahasiswa yang belum tuntas. Prestasi belajar setelah diberikan perlakuan mengalami kenaikan baik pada kelompok kontrol maupun kelompok eksperimen. Setelah pembelajaran dengan metode inquiry terdapat pengaruh pada prestasi belajar mahasiswa. Selain pengaruh terdapat juga perbedaan prestasi belajar setelah diberikan perlakuan yaitu dengan membandingkan hasil pretest dan post-test, setelah penerapan metode demonstrasi hasil tes memiliki persentase perbedaan yang cukup berarti .Kata kunci: Metode Inquiry, Prestasi Belajar, Las Busur Listrik


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document