scholarly journals Collective and Multi-Subject Dominance in the Market: Problems of Legislation and Law Enforcement

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-145
Author(s):  
I V Bashlakov-Nikolaev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Commodity Market ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Collective Dominance

The article explores the concept of collective dominance, discusses the theory and practice of recognizing collective dominant position in the commodity market and abuse of collective dominant position in the commodity market, as well as the differences between collective dominance and agreements, coordinated actions restricting competition. The analysis of the doctrinal understanding of collective domination is carried out, the most significant judicial positions on issues of abuse of collective dominant position are summarized and studied. Conclusions and theoretical statements that can be used to improve legal regulation are formulated.

Chimera of domestic antitrust: Institute of collective dominance in Russia

2021 ◽  
pp. 68-88
Author(s):  
A. E. Shastitko ◽  
K. A. Ionkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Market Analysis ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Economic Regulation ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Oligopoly Theory ◽  
Russian Version ◽  
Competition Law Enforcement ◽  
Abuse Of Dominant Position ◽  
Collective Dominance

The paper defines the features of the collective dominance institute in Russia as well as the relation between collective dominance and oligopoly in the spheres of law and economic theory. The article evaluates the grounds and consequences of the collective dominance legal norm application; it suggests an approach to examining the relation between effects and expected results of this legal norm application and outlines the potential ways to harmonize the best international practices of the collective dominance norm application with the existing economic standards of product market analysis for the purpose of competition law enforcement. Results of the oligopoly theory and the Russian version of collective dominance institution key elements comparison show: the collective dominance institution concept is inadequately applied to identify individual abuse of dominant position due to possible law enforcement errors. The Russian version of collective dominance institution reflects one fundamental tendency intrinsic to Russian antitrust: examined more closely, law enforcement, which is de jure aimed at protecting competition, appears to be economic regulation, which de facto can lead to competition restriction. One of the possible structural alternatives for the collective dominance institution reforming is based on presumption of the need to analyze the joint impact exerted by a group of undertakings on the market.

scholarly journals Application of the concept of collective dominance in the Russian competition law: challenges and solutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 13030
Author(s):  
Igor Bashlakov-Nikolaev ◽  
Sergey Maximov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Formal Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Collective Dominance

The Russian competition law does not include the definition of the concept of collective dominance, and the notion of this institution itself contains many gaps. The indicated disadvantages of statutory regulation and simplified approaches of the Federal Antimonopoly Service, which became possible due to the formal approach, have led to the formation of controversial law enforcement practice by the antimonopoly authority and courts. The article presents the analysis of legal regulation, as well as the law enforcement practice, and proposition on solutions to the stated problems.

scholarly journals Current problems of the institute of extradition in modern criminal proceedings Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 126-135
Author(s):  
S. V. Matveev ◽  
S. M. Kolotova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
The Russian Federation

The Institute of extradition is one of the most important areas of international cooperation in the fight against crime, since this tool ensures the achievement of the fundamental principles of the criminal process, which include: the restoration of the rights of the victim violated by the crime, the application of fair punishment to the criminal, despite the differences in the legal regulation of this issue in the jurisdiction of different States. However, should the legal regulation currently, this institution does not have, and therefore the activities of law enforcement agencies in this part cause certain difficulties.The article analyzes some features of the legal regulation of the institution of extradition in the criminal process of the Russian Federation, identifies current problems of theory and practice of application. In addition, the author suggests ways to solve the problems of legal regulation of this institution. Attention is focused on the need to make changes not only to the legislative framework, but also to modernize the extradition mechanism itself. In addition, the current issues that arise in the course of the extradition procedure, both at the request of the Russian Federation and foreign States, are considered. 

scholarly journals THE ELIMINATION FROM THE RIGHT TO INHERITANCE: THEORY AND PRACTICE

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
M. Bondareva ◽  
S. Rabovska
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Right

The article deals with the legal regulation for removal from the right to inheritance and law enforcement of the norm of Art. 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. The study aims at developing the theoretical foundations of the application of this legal norm on the basis of analysis of legislation and case law. Such methods and approaches as systematic analysis and competent legal interpretation have been applied. The Civil Code of Ukraine regulates cases and removal of grounds for the right to inheritance. Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine is applied to heirs at law; it distinguishes cases and grounds for exclusion from the right to inheritance by various criteria. However, what is typical for the countries of the continental group, the law needs to be clarified, first of all at the level of law enforcement practice. The highest jurisdiction of Ukraine – the Supreme Court of Ukraine and the Supreme Court, made appropriate clarifications and interpretations of relevant legal norms at the general theoretical level (decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine) and at the level of unification of general practice through expressing a legal position in specific cases. Such interpretation should be considered clearly and sufficiently for further processing. However, judicial interpretation is not competent to correct legislative inaccuracies. And the case law itself is characterized by a tautology and inconsistency, when the departure from the previously adopted legal position is disguised under the difference of legal and factual grounds of the claim. The results of such miscalculations include variability of methods of judicial protection for the heirs of the first turn (paragraph 2, part 3 of Article 1224 and part 5 of Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine) and procedural difficulties in proving claims – proving the testator's helplessness, address need assistance from the defendant, etc. In addition to legal uncertainty, which results in the poor functioning of institutions of exclusion from the right to inherit, this state of affairs creates grounds for abuse of rights. The authors propose measures to solve the problem, which can be divided into several groups. The first concerns amendments to Paragraph 2, Part 3 of Art. 1224 and Part 5 of Art. 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine: in terms of the subject composition, in particular, the permission of the heirs of other than the first turn, the order of inheritance, to sue on the basis of Paragraph 2 of part 3 of Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. The second is aimed at intensifying the institution provided by Paragraph 2 of Part 3 of Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, inter alia, due to the uniformity and consistency of judicial practice. The introduction of the principle of participation in inheritance by bona fide heirs as a reward for their care of the testator, and the relatively easy removal of the right to inherit those who did not show such care, will also contribute to the revival of law enforcement. Finally, the third group of measures is related to the promotion of inheritance through wills, which will limit the number of disputes in inheritance cases (mainly cases of invalidation of the will) and put an end to the issue of exclusion from the right to inherit.

scholarly journals Legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity. Responsibility for violation of antitrust laws.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Vladislav Belyay
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The aim of this legal research is to analyze the legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity. In the course of the study, it was possible to find a number of problems in the use of legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity, as well as in the area of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of antimonopoly legislation. To solve the above problems, the author suggests: 1. For a more effective fight against the abuse of a dominant position, it is necessary to apply tools of risk-oriented control 2. Create a mechanism for coordinating the actions of law enforcement agencies and antimonopoly authorities to identify the most dangerous offenses in the field of antimonopoly regulation. 3. Create a separate procedure for legal regulation of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of antimonopoly legislation, separating these norms from the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation into the current law on the protection of competition.

Alimony Obligations of Family Members in the Family Law of Ukraine: Problematic Issues of Theory and Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 28-47
Author(s):  
Valentina Borisova ◽  
Larysa Krasytska
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Financial Aid ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Minimum Amount ◽  
Pension Income ◽  
The Family ◽  
Structural Parts

The relevance of the study of alimony obligations of family members in the family law of Ukraine is conditioned by both the latest approaches of the legislator to the regulation of alimony relations, and the problems of law enforcement practice in this area. The purpose of the study is to determine the features of alimony obligations of family members in the family law of Ukraine, to identify problems of legal regulation and enforcement of these obligations and to develop recommendations for their elimination. Methodologically, the study of alimony obligations of family members is divided into separate structural parts, which cover the general features of these obligations in the family law of Ukraine and the features of their individual types. The methodological basis for the study of alimony obligations of family members in the family law of Ukraine is developed at the philosophical, general scientific and special scientific levels. The study proves that the alimony obligations of family members are in essence family law monetary obligations that arise on the grounds specified by law or contract, are long-term and personal. It is proposed that one of the spouses be considered in need of financial aid if their monthly income (salary, pension, income from the use of their property, other income) is less than the minimum wage established by law. It is proposed to apply similar provisions to identify parents in need of financial aid in alimony obligations for the maintenance of disabled parents by adult children. It is argued that the change of the minimum amount of alimony to be collected from the alimony payer per child is not a basis for applying Article 192 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, but is a basis for changing the minimum amount of alimony specified in the writ of execution and alimony recovery, and is taken into account when determining the amount of alimony or alimony arrears. Other changes to the Family Code of Ukraine have been proposed to improve the procedure for collecting alimony for family members. The analysis of theoretical provisions of alimony obligations of family members and practical problems of law enforcement in this area and the development of proposals to improve family law is important for further research of family law obligations, will contribute to the development of an effective mechanism for exercising and remedy of the rights of parties in family legal relations and the establishment of the unity of judicial practice

State service of the Russian Federation in the sphere of law enforcement: problems of theory and practice of administrative and legal regulation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Роман Нагорных ◽  
Roman Nagornyh
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation

The monograph presents the characteristics of modern theoretical and methodological approaches to the understanding of the problems of administrative and legal regulation of the public service of the Russian Federation in the field of law enforcement, subjected to a detailed analysis of the current administrative legislation in the field of administrative and legal regulation and organization of public service in law enforcement agencies, justified the direction of further improvement Special attention is paid to the problems of development of the administrative law Institute of public service in law enforcement, the legal status of civil servants of law enforcement agencies in our country. The book is intended for students, postgraduates, teachers and researchers of educational institutions and research institutions, as well as for all those interested in the problems of modern administrative law.

scholarly journals Intersectoral approach to the legal regulation of corporate conflicts in modern Russia: theory and practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 13019
Author(s):  
Anatoly Levushkin ◽  
Antonina Golysheva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Research Topic ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Controversial Issues ◽  
Business Organization ◽  
Missed Opportunities ◽  
Constructive Development ◽  
Significant Damage

Today, any corporate conflict is a phenomenon that disorganizes the company, which leads to increased uncertainty and often hinders constructive development. Because of the disparate interests of the conflicting parties, a corporate conflict can cause significant damage to the company, which is manifested in both direct losses and missed opportunities. The outcome of the fight for corporate control largely depends on the content of the constituent documents and the provisions of the company's internal documents. At all times and in any business organization, there is an obvious or potential (hidden) conflict of interest between individuals whose contributions affect the effectiveness of such an organization. This determines the increased interest in the research topic of this article. The article analyzes the features of cross-industry legal regulation of corporate conflicts in modern Russia. Theoretical and practical problems and controversial issues of law enforcement are identified.

scholarly journals MEDIATION IN BUSINESS: PROBLEMS OF EFFECTIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT

2020 ◽  
pp. 138-145
Author(s):  
A. N. Levushkin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Business Activity ◽  
Alternative Procedure ◽  
Business Law ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Business Entities

The Wide application of mediation in the sphere of business activity is aimed at creating and implementing an effective model for resolving economic disputes. An important aspect in this area is the possibility of using effective non-judicial (so-called alternative) tools provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation. It seems that mediation will become very widespread in the settlement of business disputes during the crisis processes in the Russian economy and socio-medical sphere. The article analyzes some of the features of legal regulation and the possibility of using mediation in business, identifies current problems of the theory and practice of application. It is argued that the potential of mediation in resolving disputes in the field of business is quite large, but there are a number of problems that prevent the wider dissemination of this procedure. Today, business entities rarely make their own decisions to seek mediation to resolve conflicts. The formation in Russia of mediation tools in the field of economic dispute resolution as an alternative procedure for resolving conflicts with the participation of a mediator (media tor) has undoubtedly become a progressive factor in the evolution of business law.

Capital amnesty and law enforcement intelligence operations: implementation of a complete prohibition

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
pp. 152-163
Author(s):  
Dmitriy Kol'cov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Regulation Mechanism ◽  
Search Activity ◽  
Intelligence Operations ◽  
The Mean

The article deals with issues relating to the implementation, in theory and practice, of the “complete prohibition” as the mean of legal regulation used within operational-search activity. The legislator introduced this mechanism in the framework of the Russian President’s initiatives on capital amnesty and relevant solutions aimed to ensure legal protection of private property interests of those who take part in voluntary disclosure of assets, of their confidential information, and to guarantee their exemption from criminal, administrative and tax liabilities. The issues covered by the article are analyzed basing on theoretical surveys on operational-search activity, as well as on their current regulatory framework and related corresponding criminal sciences. The article specifies and classifies provisions of the complete prohibition of operational-search activity in respect of the considered categories of individuals. In conclusion, the practical challenges of this legal regulation mechanism are examined and the ways to tackle them are suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document