scholarly journals The Line in Neo-Modernism Geometrical Abstraction

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 54-63
Author(s):  
Andrey Mikhailovich Burov

The article overviews the development of the line as a pictorial element in Neo-Modernism. It refers to different variants of linear strategy in geometric abstractions and the tendency of the line to become the leading element of the work of art up to pure linear constructions, such as a two-or three- dimensional grid. This grid is the key structure of the new forms of modern art built on repetition.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-430
Author(s):  
Maja Tabea Jerrentrup

Abstract The art of bodypainting that is fairly unknown to a wider public turns the body into a canvas - it is a frequently used phrase in the field of bodypainting that illustrates the challenge it faces: it uses a three-dimensional surface and has to cope with its irregularities, but also with the model’s abilities and characteristics. This paper looks at individuals who are turned into art by bodypainting. Although body painting can be very challenging for them - they have to expose their bodies and to stand still for a long time while getting transformed - models report that they enjoy both the process and the result, even if they are not confident about their own bodies. Among the reasons there are physical aspects like the sensual enjoyment, but also the feeling of being part of something artistic. This is enhanced and preserved through double staging - becoming a threedimentional work of art and then being staged for photography or film clips. This process gives the model the chance to experience their own body in a detached way. On the one hand, bodypainting closely relates to the body and on the other hand, it can help to over-come the body.


Author(s):  
Isabel Wünsche

Faktura, literally "texture," is related to the Russian avant-garde’s preoccupation with the fundamental principles of the creative process. The term, applied to a work of art, addresses the way in which materials are used, the processes, the surrounding environment, and the artistic devices; it characterizes the textural structure of a work of art and the manner by which it was constructed. As a creative principle, it rejects a pictorial space based on perspective and the illusion of three-dimensional space projected onto a flat canvas. The Russian formalist critic Viktor Shklovsky considered faktura to be the single most important quality of an object of art as a constructed object: it was the evidence of its having been made. He applied the term to poetic writing as well as the visual arts; in both cases faktura offered a visual demonstration of the properties inherent in a material or construction: "The whole effort of a poet and a painter is aimed first and foremost at creating a continuous and thoroughly palpable object, an object with a faktura." The term faktura remained a fluid concept during the 1910s, its essential qualities being further defined and developed by members of the avant-garde from 1913 well into the mid-1920s. While faktura, as initially used by members of the early Russian avant-garde, was characterized by the use of natural materials and a holistic–metaphysical approach to art, it was later adapted by the Constructivists to conform to a strictly materialist ideology and utilitarian orientation in artistic production.


Fractals ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 617-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
RHONDA ROLAND SHEARER

Abbott’s 19th century book, Flatland, continues to be popularly interpreted as both a social commentary and a way of visualizing the 4th-dimension by analogy. I attempt here to integrate these two seemingly disparate readings. Flatland is better interpreted as a story with a central theme that social, perceptual, and conceptual innovations are linked to changes in geometry. In such cases as the shift from the two-dimensional world of Flatland to a three-dimensional Spaceland, the taxonomic restructuring of human importance from Linnaeaus to Darwin, or the part/whole proportional shift from Ptolemy’s earth as the center of the universe to Copernicus’s sun, new geometries have changed our thinking, seeing, and social values, and lie at the heart of innovations in both art and science. For example, the two greatest innovations in art — the Renaissance with geometric perspective, and the birth of modern art at the beginning of this century with n-dimensional and non-Euclidean geometries — were developed by artists who were thinking within new geometries. When we view the history of scientific revolutions as new geometries, rather than only as new ideas, we gain direct access to potential manipulations of the structures of human innovation itself. I will discuss the seven historical markers of scientific revolutions (suggested by Kuhn, Cohen, and Popper), and how these seven traits correlate and can now be seen within the new paradigm of fractals and nonlinear sciences.


2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
María del Rosario Acosta López

Abstract This paper traces and examines the different connotations given to the notion of “tragedy” in Paul Klee’s thought. From his early reflections on, Klee relates this notion to an intermediate and conflictive condition that characterizes human existence—an existence that takes place between heaven and earth, between the ethereal and the earthly. This essay focuses on how the connotations Klee gives to tragedy in different moments of his reflections transform the way he conceives the work of art. Hence, I will attempt to show how Klee’s reflections relate the tragedy of human existence not only to the figure of the artist, understood as a tragic figure, but also to an idea of tragedy that the work produces and represents in its own particular way of coming into being. Thus, this paper poses a new approach to Klee’s suggestive proposal on modern art as well as to the meaning given to pictorial representation throughout his thought and artworks.


Author(s):  
LIZA MARZIANA MOHAMMAD NOH ◽  
HAMDZUN HARON ◽  
JASNI DOLAH

Untuk menghayati sesebuah karya seni pokok persoalan yang hendak dikaji bukanlah keindahan sematamata tetapi unsur yang menyebabkan sesuatu simbol itu terjelma. Subjek, bentuk dan makna adalahtiga aspek dalam simbol yang menjadi asas kepada penghayatan sesebuah seni. Ketiga-tiganya salingberhubungan dan tidak boleh di pisahkan kerana daripadanya kesatuan karya terbentuk seterusnyamenjelaskan gagasan seniman. Demikian dalam memaknai karya, unsur seni adalah penting untuk dikajisebagai data fizikal yang bertindak dalam menghubungkan konteks sesuatu karya itu. Kertas kerja inimenerangkan penggunaan unsur-unsur formalistik untuk menganalisa data bagi memaknai simbol budayaMelayu dalam karya seni catan moden Malaysia. Dengan menjadikan Balai Seni Visual Negara sebagailokasi kajian, kertas kerja ini merujuk buku himpunan warisan tampak negara 1958-2003 terbitan BalaiSeni Visual Negara. Sebanyak empat karya di tahun 1970an sehingga 2000 dipilih bagi menyiasat bentukdan maknanya. Sebagai kesimpulan, kertas kerja ini diharapkan dapat mendedahkan kepada masyarakatumum dan peminat seni khususnya mengenai analisis formalistik sebagai satu cara menganalisa karyaseni. In appreciate of a work of art the fundamental question to be examined is not the sheer beauty but anelement that causes a transformed symbol. Subject, form and meaning in symbols are three aspects thatare fundamental to the appreciation of art. All three are interconnected and cannot be separated to formthe whole aert work and subsequently to define the notion of artistism. Thus in defining an art work, artis an important element to be studied as the physical data in relating the context of the piece of artwork.This paper describes the use of formalistic elements to analyze data to interpret the symbol of Malayculture in Malaysian modern art paintings. By making the National Visual Arts Gallery as the locationfor research, this paper refers to the compilation books of national heritage published in 1958-2003 byNational Visual Arts Gallery. A total of four works from 1970s up to 2000 are selected to investigatethe forms and meanings. In conclusion, this paper is expected to disclose to the general public and artenthusiasts in particular on formalistic analysis as a means of analyzing works of art.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-166
Author(s):  
Galina N. Lola ◽  
◽  
Tatiana I. Aleksandrova ◽  

The article explores the influence of the concept of time on modern art practices, as well as the impact of digital media on the ability of art to anticipate the future. The methodology of discourse analysis is used as a tool to reveal temporal characteristics and the communicative potential of relevant art projects. The digital age creates a simultaneous world in which one can perceive the future by being deeply involved in the present moment. Contemporary artists have the ability to grasp changes hidden from the majority, and to formalize them in works of art. The simultaneous perception of time becomes the clue to the development of this ability, while the concept of time becomes the clue to understanding the message contained in the work of art. As a result, the task of the researcher is to discover the temporal dimensions of the relevant art projects and to examine the nature of interaction between the viewer and the work of art. Taking this into consideration, special attention should be given to the method of involving the viewer in the semantic space of the artwork. The subject of analysis is the communicative model of the artwork, which is presented as a flexible, mobile semantic structure that activates the viewer’s imagination and his ability to improvise. The methodological framework for understanding the communicative model was the neo‐pragmatism theory of social action and practice-oriented social semiotics. The interpretation of the work of art as a communicative event actualizes the discourse analysis that allows us to perceive the artwork in its dynamics and to explore its’ temporal dimensions. At the same time, the discourse analysis is represented not only as an effective research tool, but also as a resource that helps the artist, the researcher and the viewer to develop a flexible and conceptual mindset.


Author(s):  
Steven Pantazis

Assemblage is an artistic form that involves the transformation of non-art objects into two-dimensional or three-dimensional artistic compositions. Together with abstraction, it has been considered one of the two most significant innovations of modern art. The term assemblage was first used in 1953 by critic, philosopher and poet Max Loreau in describing French artist Jean Dubuffet’s series of imprint collages of butterflies’ wings. The term was popularized by the Museum of Modern Art’s 1961 exhibition The Art of Assemblage, which showcased the work of early 20th-century European artists, such as Marcel Duchamp, Pablo Picasso, George Braque and Kurt Schwitters, and Americans such as Joseph Cornell, Man Ray and Robert Rauschenberg.


Ikonotheka ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 253-276
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Leśniewska

A selection of exhibitions of sculpture held between the years 1946 and 1957 illustrates the formal transformations and diversity of methods of exhibiting sculpted forms as identifi ed through their manner of cooperating with space. The experiments, which commenced during the First Exhibition of Modern Art (1948) and were later creatively developed at the Krzywe Koło and Zachęta galleries, were based on ideas that had been formulated by K. Kobro and W. Strzemiński in Kompozycja przestrzeni. Obliczenia rytmu-czasoprzestrzennego (1931), produce a diversifi ed picture of intense formal exploration of sculpture, with the category of “space” emerging as a crucial part of the research perspective. The integrated gallery space and the setting for a work of art – which during the Sculpture in the Garden show (1957) included outdoor space – defi ned a trend that was moving towards the concept of an installation. Exhibitions indirectly connected with sculpture, e.g. Studium przestrzeni (1957), were used as research instruments in the process of extending the boundaries of sculptural forms to include their reaching into space.


1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Saler

We often associate visual modernism with cosmopolitan cities on the Continent, with pride of place going to Paris, Vienna, Prague, Berlin, and Munich. English visual modernism has been studied less frequently—the very phrase “English modernism” sounds like a contradiction in terms—but it too is usually linked to the cosmopolitan center of London, as well as to the notorious postimpressionist exhibitions staged there by Roger Fry in 1910 and 1912. Fry coined the term “postimpressionism” to embrace the disparate styles of Cézanne, Van Gogh, Matisse, Picasso, and others that he introduced to a bewildered and skeptical public. Together with his Bloomsbury colleague Clive Bell, Fry defined the new art in formalist terms, arguing that works of visual art do not represent the world or depict a narrative but, rather, consist of “significant forms” that elicit “aesthetic emotions” from sensitive viewers. The two men deliberately sought to redefine art away from the moral and utilitarian aesthetic promoted by Victorian critics such as John Ruskin and William Morris. Fry and Bell intended to establish art as self-sufficient, independent from social utility or moral concerns. Fry at times expressed ambivalence about this formalist enterprise, but Bell had fewer hesitations in defining modern art as absolutely autonomous: as he stated inArt(1914), “To appreciate a work of art we need bring with us nothing from life, no knowledge of its ideas and affairs, no familiarity with its emotions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document