scholarly journals Joaquim Norberto de Souza Silva: palestra brasileira

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-58
Author(s):  
José Américo Miranda

Resumo: O texto aqui apresentado, preparado para publicação por José Américo Miranda, é obra de um dos mais operosos literatos do Romantismo brasileiro: Joaquim Norberto de Sousa Silva. Mais conhecido por sua crítica literária e sua contribuição à história da literatura brasileira, assim como por seus estudos biográficos e pelas edições que preparou dos poetas árcades e românticos brasileiros, Joaquim Norberto foi também historiador, poeta e teatrólogo. Nesta “Palestra Brasileira”, que publicou nas páginas da Revista Popular, no primeiro semestre de 1862, sob o pseudônimo de Fluviano, o autor combina sua vocação poética com a de historiador, num texto em que dados coletados em pesquisas de natureza histórica aparecem humoristicamente emoldurados por uma narrativa de cunho ficcional.Palavras-chave: Literatura Brasileira; História do Brasil; Romantismo.Abstract: The present text, prepared for publication by José Américo Miranda, was written by Joaquim Norberto de Sousa Silva, one of the most laborious men of letters during the Brazilian Romantic period. Better known for his literary criticism and his contribution to the history of Brazilian Literature, as well as for his biographical studies and for his editions of works by Brazilian Arcadians and Romantic writers, Sousa Silva was also an historian, poet, and dramatist. His “Palestra Brasileira” [Brazilian Lecture], published under the pseudonym Fluviano in Revista Popular during the first half of 1962, is a piece in which he joins his poetic aptitude and his endowment as an historian and in which the data gathered through historical research are lightheartedly framed by a fictional narrative.Keywords: Brazilian Literature; Brazilian History; Romanticism.

Author(s):  
Ronaldo Vainfas

The topics of gender and sexuality in Brazilian historiography, though available from colonial chroniclers to the present, were notably absent in 19th-century historiography, which was constrained by the moral taboos and racial prejudices of that age. This was true until the early 20th-century turning point represented by the works of Paulo Prado with regard to language, and of Gilberto Freyre with regard to content, in their pioneering attempts to address the issue, emphasizing how interracial procreation and sexual desires shaped Brazilian history. Historical research at universities began in the 1980s, based on unpublished sources and international scholarship on new topics. This resulted in studies on marital relations, misogynist patriarchalism, accepted models of licit sexuality, and various other transgressions such as adultery, concubinage, male and female homosexuality, sexual imagery, libidinous behavior by members of the clergy, and acts considered deviant behavior or associated with heresy. Recently, sources have come into use from the Ecclesiastical Court and the Portuguese Inquisition, which assumed jurisdiction over accusations of bigamy, sodomy, priests who took advantage of the confessional to molest their parishioners, and declarations that contradicted Catholic moral theology with regard to chastity, celibacy, and fornication or were suspected of being heretical due to their association with Protestant doctrines. Additionally, there are important works inspired by French scholarship on the history of mentalities and the historical and philosophical contributions of Michel Foucault.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Marcio Roberto Pereira

Resumo: Lançada em 1916 e escrita na maior parte da vida literária de José Veríssimo, a História da literatura brasileira: de Bento Teixeira (1602) a Machado de Assis (1908) reúne as diversas atividades do crítico paraense como um intelectual atuante. Com o objetivo de fazer uma reflexão sobre as facetas do crítico e historiador literário, esse artigo analisa seu trabalho de interpretação da nação brasileira por meio da aproximação entre os diversos discursos que compõem a História, em destaque literatura e educação. Ao propor a definição dessas perspectivas, nota-se que a obra final de José Veríssimo possui uma organicidade e um apuramento de seus critérios de análise.Palavras-chave: José Veríssimo; História da literatura brasileira; crítica literária; educação.Abstract: Published in 1916 and written in most of the literary life of José Veríssimo, the History of Brazilian Literature: from Bento Teixeira (1602) to Machado de Assis (1908) gathers the several activities of the critic from Pará as an active intellectual. With the objective of making a reflection on the facets of the critic and literary historian, this essay analyzes his work of interpretation of the Brazilian nation, through the approximation between the various discourses that make up History, especially literature and education. In proposing the definition of these perspectives, it is noted that the final work of José Veríssimo has an organicity and a refinement of his analysis criteria.Keywords: José Veríssimo; History of Brazilian Literature; literary criticism; education.


Author(s):  
Vera V. Serdechnaia ◽  

The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of literary romanticism. The research aims at a refinement of the “romanticism” concept in relation to the history of the literary process. The main research methods include conceptual analysis, textual analysis, comparative historical research. The author analyzes the semantic genesis of the term “romanticism”, various interpretations of the concept, compares the definitions of different periods and cultures. The main results of the study are as follows. The history of the term “romanticism” shows a change in a number of definitions for the same concept in relation to the same literary phenomena. By the end of the 20th century, realizing the existence of significant contradictions in the content of the term “romanticism”, researchers often come to abandon it. At the same time, the steady use of the term “romanticism” testifies to the subject-conceptual component that exists in it, which does not lose its relevance, but just needs a theoretical refinement. Conclusion: one have to revise an approach to romanticism as a theoretical concept, based on the change in the concept of an individual in Europe at the end of the 18th century. It is the newly discovered freedom of an individual predetermines the rethinking for the image of the author as a creator and determines the artistic features of literary romanticism.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Thomas Mikhail

Abstract On the Use of Definitions in Pedagogy and Educational Science. A Historical Journey with Systematic Intent In the academic genre of pedagogy and educational science, definitions were used from the very beginning. The question is if it is possible to differentiate between types of definitions within the history of these sciences. To answer this question the paper revives two different types of traditional definitions in order to generate a typology of definition usage. The typology can be used as a heuristic instrument for further systematic and historical research.


NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Herdlein

The scholarship of student affairs has neglected to carefully review its contextual past and, in the process, failed to fully integrate historical research into practice. The story of Thyrsa Wealtheow Amos and the history of the Dean of Women’s Program at the University of Pittsburgh,1919–41, helps us to reflect on the true reality of our work in higher education. Although seemingly a time in the distant past, Thyrsa Amos embodied the spirit of student personnel administration that shines ever so bright to thisd ay. The purpose of this research is to provide some of thatcontext and remind us of the values that serve as foundations of the profession.


Author(s):  
William H. Galperin

This study is about the emergence of the everyday as both a concept and a material event and about the practices of retrospection in which it came to awareness in the romantic period in “histories” of the missed, the unappreciated, the overlooked. Prior to this moment everyday life was both unchanging and paradoxically unpredictable. By the late eighteenth century, however, as life became more predictable and change on a technological and political scale more rapid, the present came into unprecedented focus, yielding a world answerable to neither precedent nor futurity. This alternative world soon appears in literature of the period: in the double takes by which the poet William Wordsworth disencumbers history of memory in demonstrating what subjective or “poetic” experience typically overlooks; in Jane Austen, whose practice of revision returns her to a milieu that time and progress have erased and that reemerges, by previous documentation, as something different. It is observable in Lord Byron, thanks to the “history” to which marriage and domesticity are consigned not only in the wake of his separation from Lady Byron but during their earlier epistolary courtship, where the conjugal present came to consciousness (and prestige) as foredoomed but an opportunity nonetheless. The everyday world that history focalizes in the romantic period and the conceptual void it exposes in so doing remains a recovery on multiple levels: the present is both “a retrospect of what might have been” (Austen) and a “sense,” as Wordsworth put it, “of something ever more about to be.”


Author(s):  
James Whitehead

The introductory chapter discusses the popular image of the ‘Romantic mad poet’ in television, film, theatre, fiction, the history of literary criticism, and the intellectual history of the twentieth century and its countercultures, including anti-psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Existing literary-historical work on related topics is assessed, before the introduction goes on to suggest why some problems or difficulties in writing about this subject might be productive for further cultural history. The introduction also considers at length the legacy of Michel Foucault’s Folie et Déraison (1961), and the continued viability of Foucauldian methods and concepts for examining literary-cultural representations of madness after the half-century of critiques and controversies following that book’s publication. Methodological discussion both draws on and critiques the models of historical sociology used by George Becker and Sander L. Gilman to discuss genius, madness, deviance, and stereotype in the nineteenth century. A note on terminology concludes the introduction.


Author(s):  
Thomas Keymer

On the lapse of the Licensing Act in 1695, Thomas Macaulay wrote in his History of England, ‘English literature was emancipated, and emancipated for ever, from the control of the government’. It’s certainly true that the system of prior restraint enshrined in this Restoration measure was now at an end, at least for print. Yet the same cannot be said of government control, which came to operate instead by means of post-publication retribution, not pre-publication licensing, notably for the common-law offence of seditious libel. For many of the authors affected, from Defoe to Cobbett, this new regime was a greater constraint on expression than the old, not least for its alarming unpredictability, and for the spectacular punishment—the pillory—that was sometimes entailed. Yet we may also see the constraint as an energizing force. Throughout the eighteenth century and into the Romantic period, writers developed and refined ingenious techniques for communicating dissident or otherwise contentious meanings while rendering the meanings deniable. As a work of both history and criticism, this book traces the rise and fall of seditious libel prosecution, and with it the theatre of the pillory, while arguing that the period’s characteristic forms of literary complexity—ambiguity, ellipsis, indirection, irony—may be traced to the persistence of censorship in the post-licensing world. The argument proceeds through case studies of major poets and prose writers including Dryden, Defoe, Pope, Fielding, Johnson, and Southey, and also calls attention to numerous little-known satires and libels across the extended period.


Author(s):  
Rebecca Skreslet Hernandez

This introduction sets out the scope of the book’s argument and explains why Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī is such an interesting figure in the history of Islamic legal thought. It describes the reception of al-Suyūṭī’s work at home in Cairo and abroad as well as his lasting legacy. It outlines the analytical framework and the importance of interdisciplinary methods, including discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, anthropology, history, religious studies, and literary criticism to the argument of the book. An explanation of how al-Suyūṭī’s life can inform our understanding of the current situation in modern Egypt is followed by a review of the secondary literature and a full outline of each chapter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document