Diabetes a risk for antimicrobial resistance?

Background: Diabetic foot infections can cause substantial morbidity. The role of Diabetes mellitus in the antimicrobial resistance of pathogens in patients with foot infections is not well clarified. So, we compared the profile of antibiotic resistance in diabetic and non-diabetic foot ulcer infections. Objectives were to compare the antimicrobial resistance pattern in diabetic and non-diabetic lower limb infections.Methods: T Pus was isolated in 50 Diabetic and 50 non-diabetic foot ulcer infections. The organisms were isolated on specific media and antibiotic susceptibility was done by using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method.Results: The most frequent causative organism in diabetic and non-diabetics is Pseudomonas 27.5% vs 27.1%, Staphylococcus 24.1% vs 27.1%, Klebsiella 24.1% vs 22.03%, E. coli 10.3% vs 10.16%, Proteus 5.17% vs 5.08%. No significant differences in resistance rates to Amikacin, Penicillin, Ofloxacin, Vancomycin, Piperacillin + Tazobactum were observed between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. There is significant difference in resistance to Ampicillin (p=0.017).Conclusions: Diabetes per se does not seem to influence the susceptibility pattern to antimicrobials in our group of patients with foot ulcer infections.

Download Full-text

DIABETIC FOOT INFECTIONS;

The Professional Medical Journal ◽

10.29309/tpmj/2008.15.01.2718 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 15 (01) ◽

pp. 153-161

Author(s):

MUHAMMAD SAEED AKHTAR ◽

MAQSOOD AHMAD ◽

MUHAMMAD BADAR BASHIR ◽

Muhammad Irfan ◽

Zahid Yasin Hashmie

Keyword(s):

Diabetic Foot ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Surgical Department ◽

Diabetic Foot Infections ◽

Group A ◽

Hospital Stays ◽

Male Patients ◽

Group B

Objective: (1) To evaluate the effects of G-CSF in eliminating infection in diabetic foot wound (2) Tocompare the effects with conventional diabetic foot management. Design: Prospective, open, randomized comparativestudy. Setting: Medical&Surgical Department of Allied, DHQ Hospital & Nawaz Medicare Faisalabad. Period: FromJan 2000 to Nov 2000 Patients & Methods: Fifty diabetic patients with foot infections were included in this study. Themean age was 52 years ranging from 27 to 60 years. They were divided into two equal groups(Group A and Group B).Results: The male patients were 41(82%) and female 9(18%). Forty six percent of patients were on oral hypoglycaemicdrugs, and 54% on insulin. The trauma preceding infection was 20%, Peripheral neuropathy 94% and peripheralvascular disease 34%. Thirty two percent of patients were smoker. Group A were subjected to G-CSF ( Neupogen )therapy (n=25) subcutanously daily for 5days in addition to conventional measures. Whereas patients in Group Breceived only conventional therapy. Both groups received similar antibiotic and insulin treatment. G-CSF therapy wasassociated with earlier eradication of pathogens from the infected ulcer (median 5 [range 2-11] vs11 [6-31] days in thegroup B; (p=<O.000I), quicker resolution of cellulitis (6 vs l4 days; p<O.0001), shorter hospital stay (8 vsl6 days;p<O.000l), and a shorter duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment (7 vs l4 days ;p—0.0001).No G-CSF treatedpatient needed surgery, whereas three patients in group B underwent toe amputation and six had extensivedebridement under anaesthesia (p=0.00 1). G-CSF therapy was generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Granulocytecolony stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be used as a good adjuvant therapy along with conventional measures for themanagement of diabetic foot infection, as it promotes the healing of diabetic foot ulcer/cellulitis and consequentlyprevents many hazardous complications like amputation of limbs, long hospital stays, extensive and prolonged antibioticuse and last but not the least the total misery of the patients.

Download Full-text

Frequency of Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Presenting with Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry ◽

10.36283/pjmd9-1/011 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ghazala Usman

Keyword(s):

Chronic Kidney Disease ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

P Value ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Type 2 Dm ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Recent evidence states that about a quarter of all diabetic patients will experience an ulcer on foot at some point in their lifetime and 15-25% of these will require foot amputation. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients presenting with Diabetic foot ulcer. Methods: The present study was carried out at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC), Sindh from February-August 2017. Over 100 Type 2 - DM patients, aged between 35-60 years who presented with diabetic foot ulcer took part in this study. Data was collected and documented in pre-approved pro-forma, subsequently, entered and analyzed via SPSS version 19. Chi-square was applied to test any significant difference between the categories with a p-value of ≤0.05 considered as significant. Results: The mean serum creatinine (mg/dl) value was reported to be 1.17 ± 0.45. Frequency of CKD in Type 2 - DM patients presenting with diabetic foot ulcer was 31%. Male gender was affected more from CKD. Frequency distribution of chronic kidney disease among duration of DM groups 10-15 years = 35.5% and >15 years = 64.5%. The characteristics of HbA1c (g/dl) of study population was 8.34 ± 0.59. Conclusion: Occurrence of CKD in Type 2 - DM patients presenting with diabetic foot ulcer was much higher as compared to national and international studies. Therefore, special attention should be given on regular screening of diabetic patients with a complaint of a foot ulcer.

Download Full-text

Comparison Pai-1 Level in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with and Without Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Sumatera Medical Journal ◽

10.32734/sumej.v1i1.439 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 1-5

Author(s):

Alfi Dewi Sholat ◽

Dairion Gatot ◽

Savina Handayani ◽

Andri Iskandar Mardia ◽

Santi Syafril

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Pai 1

In type 2 diabetes mellitus, there are changes in hemostasis components, including overexpression of PAI-1. By these facts, the authors are interested in conducting the study of PAI-1 level in diabetic patients with and without foot ulcer. Methods: The sample of this research was collected cross-sectionally on 20 type 2 diabetic patients with foot ulcer and 20 without foot ulcer. Blood samples were taken to measure serum PAI-1 level, complete blood count and hemostasis screening test. Results: Statistical analysis showed there are significant differences in hemoglobin, trombosit, Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels in the ulcer and non-ulcer groups but no significant difference in PAI-1 level. Conclusions: No higher PAI – 1 level were found in diabetic foot ulcer group than those without diabetic foot ulcer. There was no significant difference between PAI-1 level and grade of diabetic foot ulcer.

Download Full-text

Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Guangzhou, Southern China: Focus on the Differences among Different Wagner’s Grades, IDSA/IWGDF Grades, and Ulcer Types

International Journal of Endocrinology ◽

10.1155/2017/8694903 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2017 ◽

pp. 1-12 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Xiaoying Xie ◽

Yunwen Bao ◽

Lijia Ni ◽

Dan Liu ◽

Shaona Niu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibiotic Resistance ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Southern China ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Resistance Pattern ◽

Ischemic Ulcer ◽

Resistance Patterns ◽

Resistance Rates

Objective. To understand the bacterial profile and antibiotic resistance patterns in diabetic foot infection (DFI) in different Wagner’s grades, IDSA/IWGDF grades, and different ulcer types in Guangzhou, in order to provide more detailed suggestion to the clinician about the empirical antibiotic choice. Methods. 207 bacteria were collected from 117 DFIs in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from Jan.1, 2010, to Dec.31, 2015. The clinical data and microbial information were analyzed. Results. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) was higher than Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) (54.1% versus 45.9%), in which Enterobacteriaceae (73.2%) and Staphylococcus (65.2%) were predominant, respectively. With an increasing of Wagner’s grades and IDSA/IWGDF grades, the proportion of GNB bacterial infection, especially Pseudomonas, was increased. Neuro-ischemic ulcer (N-IFU) was more susceptible to GNB infection. Furthermore, with the aggravation of the wound and infection, the antibiotic resistance rates were obviously increased. GPB isolated in ischemic foot ulcer (IFU) showed more resistance than the N-IFU, while GNB isolates were on the opposite. Conclusions. Different bacterial profiles and antibiotic sensitivity were found in different DFU grades and types. Clinician should try to stay updated in antibiotic resistance pattern of common pathogens in their area. This paper provided them the detailed information in this region.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections

10.2310/ps.10119 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shimpo Aoki ◽

Lauren R Bayer ◽

Dennis P Orgill

Keyword(s):

Diabetic Foot ◽

Multidisciplinary Approach ◽

New Technologies ◽

Wound Care ◽

Full Range ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Diabetic Foot Infections ◽

Biomechanical Changes

Thirteen percent of diabetic patients will develop a foot ulcer, often associated with infection, vascular disease and biomechanical changes. Limb salvage offers the potential to restore function but does not correct the underlying metabolic disturbance. We review the surgical approach to diabetic foot infections including debridement, skin grafts, local flaps and a variety of new technologies. A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach is beneficial to optimize outcomes. The full range of reconstructive options available to plastic surgeons may be used in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. This review has 5 figures, 2 tables, and 20 references. Key words: Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI), Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), wound care, foot infection, bacterial infection, surgical management, neuropathy, surgery of the lower extremity, deformities

Download Full-text

Risk factors of amputation in diabetic foot infections

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181118 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 1399 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Quraysh Shabbir Sadriwala ◽

Bapuji S. Gedam ◽

Murtaza A. Akhtar

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Glycemic Control ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Poor Glycemic Control ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Diabetic Foot Infections

Background: Diabetes is the most common underlying cause of foot ulcers, infection, and ischemia, leading to hospitalization and the most frequent cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation. Despite well-defined risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer development, limited data are available as to which factors predict amputation in a diabetic foot ulcer episode. Therefore, to predict lower limb amputation occurrence and to determine the factors associated with the risk of amputation in diabetic patients, we conducted this study.Methods: A hospital based longitudinal study was carried out to assess the risk factors associated with amputation in diabetic foot infection. Patients with foot infections, who were either a diagnosed case of diabetes mellitus or were diagnosed at the institute were included in the study. We excluded patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy or radiotherapy, and infections at or above the ankle joint. Study factors were demographic details, biochemical parameters, Wagner grading, peripheral neuropathy as evaluated by nerve conduction test and vasculopathy as assessed by Ankle brachial index. The primary outcome factor was amputation. The data was presented as descriptive statistics and analyzed by dividing the patients into amputation and non-amputation group, and univariate and multivariate analysis was done.Results: A total of 64 patients were included in the study, out of which the amputation rate was 39.1%. Poor glycemic control, osteomyelitis, vasculopathy, peripheral neuropathy and Wagner grading were statistically significant.Conclusions: In the present study, poor glycemic control, vasculopathy, peripheral neuropathy and higher Wagner grade are significant risk factors for amputation in diabetic foot infections.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Aloe vera/ Plantago Major Gel in Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Current Drug Discovery Technologies ◽

10.2174/1570163815666180115093007 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 16 (2) ◽

pp. 223-231 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Younes Najafian ◽

Zahra M. Khorasani ◽

Mona N. Najafi ◽

Shokouh S. Hamedi ◽

Marjan Mahjour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Aloe Vera ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Control Group ◽

Plantago Major ◽

Double Blind ◽

Significant Difference

Background:Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most common complications of diabetic patients. Mostly, non-healing DFU leads to infection, gangrene, amputation and even death. High costs and poor healing of the wounds need a new treatment such as alternative medicine. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Aloe vera/ Plantago major gel (Plantavera gel) in healing of DFUMethods:Forty patients with DFU enrolled in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. The patients who were randomly assigned into the intervention group (n = 20), received topical Plantavera gel in addition to the routine cares, whereas the patients in the control group (n = 20), received topical Placebo gel in addition to the routine cares. Intervention was done twice a day for 4 weeks in the both groups. Photography and an evaluation of DFU healing were conducted by a checklist and then were scored at baseline and at the end of each week. The collected data was analyzed by SPSS software.Results:At the end of the study, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of total ulcer score (P<0.001) and Plantavera gel significantly reduced the ulcer surface comparing with the control group (P=0.039). However, there was not a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.263) in terms of the ulcer depth. During this study, no side effect was observed for Plantavera gel in the intervention group.Conclusion:Topical Plantavera gel seems to be an effective, cheap and safe treatment. Of course, further studies are required to confirm the properties of the wound healing of this gel.

Download Full-text

The Effects of Silver-Releasing Foam Dressings on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10071495 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (7) ◽

pp. 1495

Author(s):

Yu-Chi Wang ◽

Hsiao-Chen Lee ◽

Chien-Lin Chen ◽

Ming-Chun Kuo ◽

Savitha Ramachandran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Wound Healing ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Healing Rate ◽

Early Period ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Wound Management ◽

Control Group ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

High Morbidity

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication in diabetic patients and lead to high morbidity and mortality. Numerous dressings have been developed to facilitate wound healing of DFUs. This study investigated the wound healing efficacy of silver-releasing foam dressings versus silver-containing cream in managing outpatients with DFUs. Sixty patients with Wagner Grade 1 to 2 DFUs were recruited. The treatment group received silver-releasing foam dressing (Biatain® Ag Non-Adhesive Foam dressing; Coloplast, Humlebaek, Denmark). The control group received 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD) cream. The ulcer area in the silver foam group was significantly reduced compared with that in the SSD group after four weeks of treatment (silver foam group: 76.43 ± 7.41%, SSD group: 27.00 ± 4.95%, p < 0.001). The weekly wound healing rate in the silver foam group was superior to the SSD group during the first three weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). The silver-releasing foam dressing is more effective than SSD in promoting wound healing of DFUs. The effect is more pronounced in the initial three weeks of the treatment. Thus, silver-releasing foam could be an effective wound dressing for DFUs, mainly in the early period of wound management.

Download Full-text

Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from diabetic foot ulcers. Identification of the antibiotic resistant phenotypes

Romanian Journal of Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases ◽

10.2478/rjdnmd-2013-0038 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 20 (4) ◽

pp. 389-393 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Teodora Chiţă ◽

Delia Muntean ◽

Luminiţa Badiţoiu ◽

Bogdan Timar ◽

Roxana Moldovan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Staphylococcus Aureus ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Foot Ulcers ◽

Resistance Pattern ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽

Bacterial Strains ◽

Diabetes Clinic

Abstract Background and aims: Infected foot ulcer is one of the most feared complications of diabetes mellitus. Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequently isolated pathogen in diabetic foot infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of S. aureus strains involved in producing foot infections in diabetic patients and the antibiotic resistance pattern of these strains. Material and methods: The study included 33 S. aureus strains isolated from 55 diabetic foot ulcers. The subjects were selected from the 2465 patients with diabetes mellitus hospitalized in the Timişoara Diabetes Clinic, between 2011 and 2013. Germs’ identification relied on cultural and biochemical characteristics. Final identification and antimicrobial testing were performed using the Vitek 2 (Bio Merieux France) automatic analyzer. Results: All the 55 samples collected from diabetic foot ulcers were positive. We isolated 64 bacterial strains (some samples were positive for 2 microorganisms). The most frequently isolated germ was S. aureus, in 33 samples (51.56%). All these S. aureus strains showed resistance to benzylpenicillin, while only 33.33% were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Conclusions: The most frequently isolated germ in the wound secretions from diabetic foot ulcers was S. aureus. The highest percentage of antimicrobial resistance was recorded to benzylpenicillin and erythromycin.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetic Patients Who Attend the Diabetic Follow-Up Clinic at the University of Gondar Referral Hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2016: Institutional-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Journal of Diabetes Research ◽

10.1155/2017/2879249 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2017 ◽

pp. 1-8 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Tesfamichael G. Mariam ◽

Abebaw Alemayehu ◽

Eleni Tesfaye ◽

Worku Mequannt ◽

Kiber Temesgen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Diabetic Foot ◽

Foot Ulcer ◽

Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Care Practice ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Factors Associated

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder which is characterized by multiple long-term complications that affect almost every system in the body. Foot ulcers are one of the main complications of diabetes mellitus. However, there is limited evidence on the occurrence of foot ulcer and influencing factors in Ethiopia. An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Gondar University Hospital, Ethiopia, to investigate foot ulcer occurrence in diabetic patients. Systematic random sampling was used to select 279 study participants. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with diabetic foot ulcer. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was computed to determine the level of significance. Diabetic foot ulcer was found to be 13.6%. Rural residence [AOR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.42, 5.93], type II diabetes mellitus [AOR = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.22, 6.45], overweight [AOR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.15, 3.10], obesity [AOR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.25, 5.83], poor foot self-care practice [AOR = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.21, 6.53], and neuropathy [AOR = 21.76; 95% CI: 8.43, 57.47] were factors associated with diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetic foot ulcer was found to be high. Provision of special emphasis for rural residence, decreasing excessive weight gain, managing neuropathy, and promoting foot self-care practice would decrease diabetic foot ulcer.

Download Full-text