scholarly journals Red cell distribution width as a prognostic marker in severe sepsis and septic shock

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 750
Author(s):  
Mohammed Aslam Shaikh ◽  
Durga Rao Yadavalli
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Red Cell ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
The Past ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Background: The incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock has increased over the past 30 years, and the annual number of cases is now >700,000 (~3 per 1000 population). There are many markers of sepsis which are being evaluated for its diagnosis among which RDW is emerging as a promising marker. Hence this study is being done to see the correlation between RDW and sepsis.Methods: A total of 162 patients-81 survivors and 81 non-survivors of severe sepsis and septic shock fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria who were admitted to intensive care unit between October 2013 and September 2015 were included in the study. Baseline variables, laboratory parameters, complications, and RDW were compared between the two groups.Results: Majority of patients - 73(45.06%) were in the age group of 61 - 80 years. Mean RDW was 15.20±2.29 in non-survivors and 13.86±2.20 in survivors, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). Mean RDW was higher and statistically significant among non-survivors with respect to duration of stay and requirement of inotropes.Conclusions: RDW levels measured on admission can be used as a prognostic marker in patients in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Red cell distribution width is a predictor of mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 989-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevket Balta ◽  
Sait Demirkol ◽  
Mustafa Hatipoglu, ◽  
Sukru Ardic ◽  
Zekeriya Arslan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Red Cell Distribution Width ◽  
Red Cell ◽  
Cell Distribution ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Red cell distribution width is a prognostic factor in severe sepsis and septic shock

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
You Hwan Jo ◽  
Kyuseok Kim ◽  
Jae Hyuk Lee ◽  
Changwoo Kang ◽  
Taegyun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Red Cell Distribution Width ◽  
Red Cell ◽  
Cell Distribution ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Evaluation of red cell distribution width (RDW) as a septic marker in comparison with clinical scores and C-reactive protein

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ahmed Naga ◽  
Mohammed Ismaeil Abdel Fattah ◽  
Walid Hamed Nofal ◽  
Mohammed Abd-elsalam AlMenshawe
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Clinical Scores ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Abstract Background Challenges of diagnosing and treating sepsis only seem more difficult as incidence increases, patients become older and sicker, and pathogenic organisms evolve. New understanding of inflammatory mediators and pathways, immunity, and genetic variability in this disease state suggests that the current definitions of SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock are oversimplified. Objective The aim of our study is to evaluate the level of RDW, CRP and clinical scores "SOFA and APACHI" as markers in patients with sepsis and their levels on the outcome and resolution of sepsis in ICU. Methodology We conducted a prospective observational controlled study on 90 adult persons of both sex, 45 of them are adult patients and served as the study group (Group I), and the other 45 are healthy adult volunteers and served as the control group (Group II). The study group represented patients admitted to the ICU of Intensive Care Unit at Damanhour Medical National Institute who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock on arrival to ICU according to the SCCM/ ESICM/ ACCP/ ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Results. In the present study we found that CRP measured on admission was not a predictor of mortality, while that measured at day 5 and day 10 predicted mortality, where there was no statistically significant difference in CRP levels between survivors and non-survivors at the day of admission while there were statistically significant differences between survivors and non survivors according to CRP levels at day 5 (p = 0.001*) and at day 10 (p = 0.001*). It was found also that there were statistically significant differences between survivors and non-survivors according to RDW at day 1(p = 0.011*) and at day 5(p = 0.009*), at day 10 was found there was no statistically significant difference between survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.338). Conclusion RDW is a new promising cheap and readily available biomarker that can be able to diagnose patients with sepsis with accuracy comparable to CRP. Also, RDW at admission is able to predict mortality.

Sepsis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P LaRosa ◽  
Steven M. Opal
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Fluid Resuscitation ◽  
Multiorgan Failure ◽  
Sepsis Management ◽  
The Past ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Sepsis, along with the multiorgan failure that often accompanies this condition, is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Although modest improvements in the prognosis have been made over the past two decades and promising new therapies continue to be investigated, innovations in the management of septic shock are still required. This chapter discusses the definitions, epidemiology, and pathogenesis (including microbial factors, host-derived mediators, and organ dysfunction) relating to sepsis. Management of severe sepsis and septic shock is also described.  This review contains 5 figures, 11 tables, and 99 references. Keywords:Organ dysfunction, sepsis, septic shock, infection, bacteremia, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor

Sepsis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P LaRosa ◽  
Steven M. Opal
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Fluid Resuscitation ◽  
Multiorgan Failure ◽  
Sepsis Management ◽  
The Past ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Sepsis, along with the multiorgan failure that often accompanies this condition, is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Although modest improvements in the prognosis have been made over the past two decades and promising new therapies continue to be investigated, innovations in the management of septic shock are still required. This chapter discusses the definitions, epidemiology, and pathogenesis (including microbial factors, host-derived mediators, and organ dysfunction) relating to sepsis. Management of severe sepsis and septic shock is also described.  This review contains 5 figures, 11 tables, and 99 references. Keywords:Organ dysfunction, sepsis, septic shock, infection, bacteremia, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor

A Simple Scoring System Using the Red Blood Cell Distribution Width, Delta Neutrophil Index, and Platelet Count to Predict Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Chan Kim ◽  
Je Eun Song ◽  
Eun Jin Kim ◽  
Heun Choi ◽  
Woo Yong Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Cell Distribution ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽  
New Scoring ◽  
Red Blood Cell Distribution ◽  
Delta Neutrophil Index

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to investigate whether a simple scoring system based on the red blood cell distribution width (RDW), delta neutrophil index (DNI), and platelet count was associated with the prognosis of patients with sepsis, and whether this scoring system was more useful than each individual parameter. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adult patients who received intensive therapy due to severe sepsis and septic shock from January 2010 to December 2015 at a tertiary teaching hospital in South Korea. Results: A total of 730 patients were included in this study. Each patient was rated on a scale of 0 to 3 according to the new scoring system using the platelet count, RDW, and DNI. Point values were assigned based on the following definitions: RDW > 14.5%, DNI > 5.0%, and platelet count < 150 000/mm3. The 28-day mortality rate was 12.6% (92/730). The nonsurvivors had higher scores than the survivors (2.05 ± 0.80 vs 1.06 ± 0.87, P < .001). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the scoring system was an independent predictor of the 28-day mortality. The scoring system was well calibrated ( P = .81 for the goodness-of-fit test) and discriminated (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.785). Conclusion: Our new scoring system using the RDW, DNI, and platelet count was useful for predicting the mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document