scholarly journals ENTRE O SABER E A VERDADE: PARRÉSIA PARA A FÁBRICA-ESCOLA

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
João Vitor Lourenço Batista Nascimento ◽  
Walter Matias Lima

Este artigo aborda o tema da relação entre Saber e Verdade, problematizando-o por meio da seguinte questão: quais as consequências da ausência da Parrésia nos processos de escolarização? São apresentados os resultados de uma pesquisa bibliográfica que objetivou: (a) compreender as relações entre Parrésia, Escolarização e modernidade; (b) discutir como opera o processo de escolarização e as influências que recebe no campo discursivo; (c) discutir, por intermédio da categoria Fábrica-Escola, as consequências da não utilização da Parrésia nos processos de escolarização. Adotou-se a abordagem transdisciplinar tendo em vista a complexidade e a pluralidade dos textos escolhidos. Foram analisados textos dos autores Michel Foucault, Martin Heidegger, Karl Marx, Walter Benjamin, entre outros. Pode-se concluir que as relações entre Parrésia, escolarização e modernidade influenciam nos diferentes processos de escolarização. E que as consequências da ausência de Parrésia nesses processos influência de maneira negativa as relações entre professores e alunos.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (15) ◽  
pp. 5-24
Author(s):  
Ester Jordana Lluch

El presente artículo examina las relaciones entre escritura, técnica y pensamiento. Las reflexiones de Martin Heidegger en torno a porqué la ciencia no piensa nos permiten abordar el problema de la homogenización del pensamiento y de la escritura en las universidades contemporáneas. Afirmar hoy que «la academia no piensa» invita a una reflexión respecto a esos modos de pensamiento y escritura imperantes. Siguiendo los vínculos que Heidegger establece entre el avenimiento de la técnica y la transformación de la escritura analizamos su noción de serenidad para contraponerla al modo en que Friedrich Nietzsche, Walter Benjamin y Michel Foucault se sirven de distintos objetos técnicos para generar nuevas formas de pensamiento y de escritura.


Author(s):  
Nadine Hartmann

Throughout his oeuvre, Giorgio Agamben makes numerous references to Georges Bataille. Already in the 1977 Stanzas, Bataille’s general economy is afforded one of the scholia of the chapter ‘The Appropriation of Unreality’ and scolded for its alleged simplification of Marcel Mauss’s account of the gift. A brief discussion of the letters that Bataille and Alexandre Kojève exchanged in 1937 is contained in Agamben’s 1982 Language and Death and picked up again in 2002’s The Open: Man and Animal. The only text that exclusively deals with Bataille, however, is Agamben’s 1987 essay ‘Bataille e il paradosso della sovranità’. By the time Agamben begins the Homo Sacer project (1995), and in particular in Means Without End (1996), Bataille has been banished into unambiguously dismissive footnotes or ‘thresholds’ in which Agamben distances himself from Bataille’s definitions of the sacred, sacrifice and sovereignty. Thus, unlike Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, Walter Benjamin or Michel Foucault, Bataille not only cannot be considered one of Agamben’s main informants, but receives all but marginal attention from him – and this despite the fact that Bataille is generally held to be one of the crucial thinkers of the sacred and of sovereignty.


Author(s):  
Javier Corona Fernández

Los tres trabajos que integran este dossier se inscriben en la reflexión sobre las maneras de actuar y de conocer propias de la sociedad contemporánea; éste reúne el trabajo de crítica que a partir de autores como Max Weber, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault, Antonio Negri, Michael Hardt, entre otros, nos ha permitido identificar categorías básicas para investigar y comprender la especificidad de nuestra época. En el marco de la sociedad de control y las peculiaridades del biopoder, el análisis de la situación presente nos lleva a pensar en torno a una forma categorial esencialmente incondicionada; esto es, al ser humano y la formación de su identidad, al individuo que vive en condiciones tanto de opresión como de crítica y de resistencia


Author(s):  
Gabriela Cruz

Grand Illusion is a new history of grand opera as an art of illusion facilitated by the introduction of gaslight illumination at the Académie Royale de Musique (Paris) in the 1820s. It contends that gas lighting and the technologies of illusion used in the theater after the 1820s spurred the development of a new lyrical art, attentive to the conditions of darkness and radiance, and inspired by the model of phantasmagoria. Karl Marx, Walter Benjamin, and Theodor Adorno have used the concept of phantasmagoria to arrive at a philosophical understanding of modern life as total spectacle, in which the appearance of things supplants their reality. The book argues that the Académie became an early laboratory for this historical process of commodification, for the transformation of opera into an audio-visual spectacle delivering dream-like images. It shows that this transformation began in Paris and then defined opera after the mid-century. In the hands of Giacomo Meyerbeer (Robert le diable, L’Africaine), Richard Wagner (Der fliegende Holländer, Lohengrin, and Tristan und Isolde), and Giuseppe Verdi (Aida), opera became an expanded form of phantasmagoria.


Author(s):  
Joseph Winters

This chapter engages humanism and its fundamental assumptions by working through critical theory, black feminism, and black studies. It contends that there is a tension at the heart of humanism—while the ideal human appears to be the most widespread and available category, it has been constructed over and against certain qualities, beings, and threats. To elaborate on this tension, this chapter revisits the work of authors like Karl Marx and Michel Foucault. Marx acknowledges that the human is a site of conflict and antagonism even as his thought betrays a lingering commitment to progress and humanism. Foucault goes further than Marx by underscoring the fabricated quality of man and the ways in which racism functions to draw lines between those who must live and those who must die. In response to Marx and Foucault’s tendency to privilege Europe, this chapter engages black feminism and Afro-pessimism—Sylvia Wynter, Hortense Spillers, and Frank Wilderson—who show how the figure of the human within humanism is defined in opposition to blackness.


2015 ◽  
pp. 163-175
Author(s):  
Martín Alomo

<p>Nos proponemos establecer el recorrido teórico que permita reconstruir la noción de letosa, formulada por Jacques Lacan en el seminario El reverso del psicoanálisis. Comenzaremos por situar las condiciones del sujeto que se desprende del cogito cartesiano, y el particular modo en que se imbrica con el surgimiento del capitalismo tecnológico; para ello, recurrimos a elaboraciones de Martin Heidegger. Luego se tomarán algunos pasajes de El capital, de Karl Marx, para situar allí el concepto de plusvalía, en el que Lacan apoya su noción de plus de goce. Por último, se analizará la función de las letosas en relación con la posición del analista.</p>


Author(s):  
Natalja Chestopalova

French philosopher, writer, artist and translator Pierre Klossowski was born in Paris and raised in Switzerland, Germany and France. His education was influenced by Rainer Maria Rilke (1875–1926) and André Gide (1869–1951). A friend of Georges Bataille (1897–1962), Walter Benjamin (1892–1940) and Pierre-Jean Jouve (1887–1976), Klossowski produced French translations of works by Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), Franz Kafka (1883–1924), Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) and Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) from German, and of the works of Suetonius, Virgil, Augustine and Tertullian from Latin.


2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-205
Author(s):  
Charles E. Scott

Abstract This essay is motivated by the question, how might we describe the occurrences of cultural borders? It is organized in three sections with these titles: A. Borders of Concealment and Translation; B. Attunement with Fragmented, Differential Borders; C. Metaphors, Relations of Power, Borderlands. I limit these topics by focusing primarily on cultural borders and transformations within the United States. My aims within the context of these situated accounts are to encourage greater awareness of borders as events that often have shared and describable characteristics, to make evident a group of issues that need further philosophical attention, to develop an enlarged philosophical vocabulary for such thought in comparison to that in standard use, and to bring to the fore questions of cultural sensibility and their transformations. In this process I address and utilize specific works by Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and Gloria Anzaldúa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-141
Author(s):  
Diego Fernando Camelo Perdomo
Keyword(s):  

Resumen: el artículo busca sostener que el uso de la obra de Karl Marx hecho por Michel Foucault obedeció al análisis genealógico a través del cual fue sometida la interpretación hecha por el filósofo alemán en torno a la economía. Sin embargo, aun cuando en el análisis genealógico se utilizaron categorías propuestas por Marx, ello no significó ninguna dependencia de Foucault sobre su obra. Para lograr este objetivo, se comprobará que la historia y el poder fueron dos piezas que se engranaron para hacer posible la comprensión del funcionamiento de la economía. De manera que Foucault demostraría la necesidad de descentralizar al sujeto como constituyente de las relaciones históricas y así aclarar la manera en que el discurso filosófico del marxismo, pretendiendo ser considerado como ciencia, incidió en la emergencia de saberes que permitieron entender los mecanismos de producción y su relación con el sujeto.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document