scholarly journals Formulating World History According to Alexander O. Chubaryan. Oriental Courier’s Digest for the 90th Anniversary of Academician Alexander O. Chubaryan

2021 ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Marina V. Starodubtseva

This article is a digest of ideas and statements of a full member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation, head of the Institute of General History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, President of the State Academic University for the Humanities (GAUGN) and Chairman of the National Committee of Russian Historians Alexander Oganovich Chubaryan, composed in honour of his 90th anniversary.

Author(s):  
Valeriy Ljubin ◽  

The review analyzes the approaches of the well-known Russian historian A.V. Shubin to the coverage of the typology of revolutions and the features and chronology of the Great Russian Revolution of 1917 and the Civil War of 1918-1922. Alexander Vladlenovich Shubin is Doctor of Historical Sciences, Chief Researcher at the Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor at Russian State University for the Humanities, author of more than 20 monographs and about 200 scientific publications on the problems of Soviet history and history of leftist ideas and movements.


Author(s):  
Andrey A. Nepomnyashchy ◽  
◽  

Referring to a corpus of epistolary sources kept in the personal archival fund of academician V. I. Vernadsky in the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences (correspondence sent to him from Crimea) and documents from the St Petersburg branch of the RAS Archive and the Department of Written Sources of the State Historical Museum, the author restores some aspects of the daily life of Crimean local history of the 1920s–1930s. Vernadsky’s attention to people and events on the peninsula are connected with a dramatic period of his biography, i.e. his unexpected tenure as rector of the University of Taurida (October 1920 — January 1921). Thanks to the participation of the university in the activities of the Taurida Scientific Association, the academician formed a social circle of scientists from different fields of knowledge in Crimea. The analysis of Vernadsky’s correspondence helps define his range of interests related to Crimean affairs after his departure from Crimea. Vernadsky, not indifferent to the fate of Taurida University (M. V. Frunze Pedagogical Institute) (during the years in question described as Crimean University), was interested in the fate of the prominent professors who he worked with at the university in 1920. Thanks to the Crimean correspondence of A. I. Markevich, the leader of the local history movement, the author has been able to clarify the fate of individual manuscripts by V. I. and G. V. Vernadsky and the history of transfer of funds of the pioneers of comprehensive exploration of the peninsula P. I. Köppen and H. H. Steven to the Archives of the USSR Academy of Sciences. The epistolary heritage of geologists P. A. Dvoichenko and S. P. Popova, Vernadsky’s former colleagues at Taurida University, makes it possible to recreate the pages of the research of the natural productive forces of Crimea carried out in those years. In his correspondence with professors E. V. Petukhov and N. L. Ernst, Vernadsky discussed individual issues that worried scientists.


2018 ◽  
pp. 578-590
Author(s):  
Simon S. Ilizarov ◽  

The paper reconstructs the biography of a forgotten historian archivist M. N. Butkevich (29.12.1858—23.03.1933). His pre-revolutionary life is described: his social background, studies at the St. Petersburg University and his fascination with the Narodniks’ ideas and deportation to Vologda under overt surveillance in 1879, followed by a successful and typical career of major landed gentry that culminated in his election to the State Council, achievement of the rank of Actual State Councillor, and election as Novgorod Governorate’s Marshal of the Nobility early in 1917. In 1927, after several years of despondency, deprived of his fortune and privileges, M. N. Butkevich became a staff member of the USSR Academy of Sciences’ Commission on the History of Knowledge with the help of Academician V. I. Vernadsky. In his line of duty, Butkevich had performed a number of important historical and archival studies of the documentary legacy of M. V. Lomonosov, P. S. Pallas, and others. Butkevich’s work on sorting out Lomonosov’s papers was highly valued as ‘very meticulous and helpful’ by V. I. Vernadsky, A. I. Andreev, and M. M. Soloviev. His contribution to the archeography of Lomonosov’s works is well worth exploring. Besides his participation in the re-publication of Lomonosov’s works, his description of Lomonosov’s papers in Leningrad is well worth mentioning. This description is typologically similar to description of the Pallas documents, but is probably even more detailed. Butkevich’s description in 14 folio pages offers results of his study of the materials from the Archive of the Conference of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Incunabula Department, the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the State Public Library. Events of the ‘Academic case,’ which resulted in the purge of ‘old-regime’ workers from the Academy, did not affect Butkevich much. Surprisingly, even after Vernadsky had to leave his post of the Commission for the History of Knowledge director, in which he was replaced by N. I. Bukharin, little changed for Butkevich. Moreover, on March 15, 1930 deputy director of the Commission for the History of Science academician I. Yu. Krachkovsky authorized M. N. Butkevich to collect archival materials for special projects. The paper is based on the documentary sources introduced for scientific use for the first time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-312
Author(s):  
SVETLANA LIMANOVA

The article presents the most important stages of Fersman’s biography. Alexander Evgenievich Fersman was a recognized expert in mineralogy, crystallography and geochemistry. In 1919, at the age of 35, Fersman became an academician of the Academy of Sciences. From 1926 to 1929 he was a vice-president of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Fersman’s personal fund is kept in the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Life choices and the fi professional success are shown on the basis of documents from the personal fund. Fersman crossed the path from a youthful interest in gems (morphology, structure, chemical composition) to the realization of his scientifi potential as the head of the major research projects. Fersman was awarded the Lenin Prize (1929), USSR State Prize (1942), Order of the Red Banner of Labour (1943) and Wollaston Medal of the Geological Society of London (1943). Particular attention is paid to the work of A.E. Fersman's assessment and attribution of precious stones from the Diamond Fund. Fersman led a special commission and carried out the mission with great enthusiasm. Having studied physicochemical properties of stones he provided the necessary information and reports. Also, he studied the historical and cultural context of jewelry making. Aft the commission completed its work, Fersman had a variety of documents on the history of gems. A.E. Fersman was pleased to share the results of his work. He was actively engaged in the popularization of scientifi knowledge. His books reveal the amazing world of gems and enable an examination of the evolution of the scientist's views. In addition to biographical information, unique visual documents are presented. Th are papers and photographs from the Fersman’s personal fund.


Istoriya ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11 (109)) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Velikhan Mirzekhanov

The article is dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the eminent Russian historian and science manager, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexander O. Chubaryan. The article provides overview of the scholar’s scientific activities against a broad historical background, reveals the main episodes of his intellectual biography. The article analyzes the main research directions of Alexander Chubaryan, characterizes his activities as a science manager, in particular as a director of the Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Serious attention is paid to the role of Alexander Chubaryan in establishing international relations of the Institute, the development of science diplomacy, strengthening contacts with foreign colleagues and organizations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 638-641
Author(s):  
S. A. Boytsov ◽  
R. I. Stryuk ◽  
A. A. Golikova ◽  
A. G. Evdokimova

The main stages of the creative path of the scientist with a world-famous, professor, the Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexey Petrovich Golikov are presented in the article.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 135-156
Author(s):  
Maria Zavyalova ◽  

The article describes the history of research on Baltic languages in Moscow from the second half of the 19th century, when the Lithuanian language began to be taught at Moscow University. At different times, the Moscow State University, the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the “Baltrušaitis House” at the Embassy of the Republic of Lithuania in the Russian Federation, and the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences were the centers of research on Baltic studies in Moscow. The article describes the main directions in development of Balto-Slavic studies in Moscow, gives the names of prominent scholars in this field and provides a bibliography of the major publications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 242-247
Author(s):  
Sergey Egerev

An excursion through the pages of the book by V. V. Ogryzko “Under the supervision of the Kremlin: a fairly battered, but survived Academy of Sciences” is given. The history of uneasy relations between the government and the Academy of Sciences can be traced from the first post-revolutionary years to the present day. The mostly detailed description relates to the efforts of the Soviet government to tame (“to Sovietize”) the Russian Academy of Sciences in the first post-revolutionary years. In his research, based on unique archival sources, the author operates with a large number of sources and a large number of activehistorical figures, from academics to employees of special services. It is noted that over the past hundred years, not only the Academy has changed, the methods of state influence on the academic community have changed, and the goal setting of the state has also changed. In the first decades, the Soviet government was faced with the task of introducing as many loyal communists as possible into the academic community, and after the collapse of the USSR, the task of “depriving” the Academy from material assets became firmly on the agenda. The author of the book – V. V. Ogryzko – comes to the conclusion that many discoveries andachievements of our scientists were made not thanks to the support of the state, but rather in spite of it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document