scholarly journals Pre-Trial Authority after the Decisions of the Constitutional Court No.21-PUU-XII-2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
Deddi Diliyanto ◽  
Zainal Asikin ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Past ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Subjects

The pre-trial scope has actually been limited by Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, the development of the law for the past 5 (five) years has broken through the boundary and preceded the discussion of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code. The expansion of the pre-trial scope, especially regarding the determination of suspects, was started before the Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 was issued. This research is normative legal research. It utilizes statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Based on the statement that the category of legal issues is a vague norm, the analytical instrument used is historical legal interpretation. The results of this study are to expand the pre-trial authority to examine and decide: 1) whether the determination of the suspect is valid; 2) whether the search is valid; dan 3) whether the seizure is valid. In addition, the pre-trial authority in judicial practice is extended to the inability of investigators to conduct investigations to the suspects (the legal subjects).

scholarly journals Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-103
Author(s):  
Claudia Permata Dinda ◽  
Usman Usman ◽  
Tri Imam Munandar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Status ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

ABSTRAK Praperadilan yang diatur dalam KUHAP menjamin perlindungan HAM dan aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugas dan kewenangannya secara konsekwen. Lembaga praperadilan telah menciptakan mekanisme kontrol sebagai lembaga yang berwenang melakukan pengawasan terhadap kinerja aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugasnya guna tercipta proses peradilan pidana yang baik. Terkait dengan penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan korupsi, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi merupakan lembaga yang diamanatkan oleh undang-undang dengan wewenangnya untuk menetapkan status tersangka guna proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan atas penetapan status tersangka terhadap KUHAP dan mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan terhadap penetapan status tersangka tindak pidana korupsi oleh KPK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sebelumnya, sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka oleh KPK bukan merupakan objek praperadilan, namun melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 praperadilan telah berwenang memeriksa sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka. Hal ini menjadi sebuah pembaharuan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. ABSTRACT Pretrial regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code guarantees the protection of human rights and law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and authorities consistently. The pretrial institution has created a control mechanism as an institution authorized to supervise the performance of law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties in order to create a good criminal justice process.This study aims to determine the effects of the expansion of pretrial objects over the determination of the status of suspects against the Criminal Procedure Code and to determine the consequences of expanding pretrial objects to determine the status of suspected criminal acts of corruption by the KPK. The research method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method through the conceptual approach, the statutory approach and the case approach. Previously, the KPK was not a pretrial object or not, but through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 the pretrial had the authority to examine whether or not the status of the suspect was determined. This has become a renewal in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.

scholarly journals PENETAPAN TERSANGKA SEBAGAI OBYEK PRAPERADILAN

Yuridika ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ely Kusumastuti
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Philosophical Foundation ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
Trial Object

Background of this article is the legal uncertainty after the Constitutional Court (MKRI) verdict No. 2/PUU-XII / 2014 on April 28, 2015 which has added pre-trial object with the determination of suspects, foreclosures and searches. The legal issues of this article are the philosophical foundation of the pre-trial, ratio decidendi of pre-trial verdict related to the determination of suspects and ratio decidendi of Constitutional Court (MKRI) Verdict No. 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 on April 28, 2015. This discussion and analysis of this article are the statutory, conceptual, comparative and case approaches. The conclusions of this article are: First, the pretrial philosophical foundation is to provide human rights protection in the use of forceful efforts by investigators and prosecutors. Second, the ratio decidendi pretrial verdict on behalf of  Budi Gunawan and the Verdict of Constitutional Court (MKRI) No. 21/PUU-XII/2014, April 28, 2015 which has decided determination of suspect as objects of pretrial, has shifted from philosophy of pretrial in the Criminal Code and not  according to the principles of fairness, certainty and expediency. The authority of the Pretrial Institution in the Criminal Procedure Code only examines the procedural truth in this case the investigator’s and prosecutor’s actions, while to examine the material truth related to the suspect’s acts is the absolute authority of the case  trial session. 

scholarly journals Analysis of Review of the Principles of Law and Justice Principles in Indonesia (Study on the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 66 / Pu-XIII / 2015)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewa Ngakan Putu Andi Asmara ◽  
Rodliyah ◽  
Lalu Sabardi
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Fundamental Principle ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Law And Justice

This study aims to find out how the basic idea of ​​the existence of a Reviewing Institution in criminal proceedings in realizing legal certainty and justice; Implications of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 66/PU-XIII / 2015 and the formulation policy on future review of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is normative legal research. The approach used is the law approach; conceptual approach and comparative approach. The results of this study are: In accordance with the nature of the final and binding decision of the constitutional court, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 66 / PU-XIII / 2015 refers to the fundamental principle that justice is the highest legal objective. Citizens' rights as guaranteed by the constitution must not be restricted because they are guaranteed by the constitution. Based on a comparative formulation study in several countries such as in the Chinese Criminal Procedure Code and the Dutch Criminal Procedure Code, the regulatory norms regarding the number of times the Submission of Judicial Review may be submitted are not formulated but the KUHAP of the two countries further regulates in detail the mechanisms and procedures for the Judicial Review. Then the policy formulation of norms for reviewing the KUHAP in the future in addition to referring to the comparison but also must be constitutional in accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 66 / PUU-XIII / 2015.

The Validity of Rector�s Circular Letter on the Covid-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Keyword(s):  
Legal Theory ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
State Universities ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Government

This study aims to analyze the relevance of the �health emergency� status to the existing legal theory and condition as well as to identify the validity of the Circular Letter of the Rector of State Universities. To this end, this study applied the statute and conceptual approach. The study was conducted by inventorying primary and secondary legal materials to obtain a proper and critical review of the legal issues under study. The results showed that the determination of the �health emergency� status by the government was inappropriate due to the uncertainty of the regulations issued by the government to determine the current condition. Thus, the status of the COVID-19 pandemic is a �legal emergency� status. Further, the Rector�s policy through the Circular Letter is valid judicially, sociologically, and philosophically. The determination of the �legal emergency� status can be done by issuing a Perppu without a �state of emergency� from the President. Finally, it is suggested to firstly get an approval from the Ministry of Education and Culture regarding the issuance of the Rector�s Circular Letter. Besides, further study is needed as this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.�Keabsahan Surat Edaran Rektor Perguruan Tinggi dalam Pandemi Covid-19Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa relevansi status �darurat kesehatan� dengan teori hukum dan kondisi yang ada dan keabsahan atas Surat Edaran Rektor Perguruan Tinggi Negeri. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah statute approach dan conseptual approach. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menginventarisasi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, guna mendapatkan kajian yang seyogianya dan telaah kritis terkait isu hukum. Hasil penelitian menyatakan penetapan status darurat kesehatan oleh pemerintah kurang tepat, dikarenakan tidak menentu-nya peraturan yang dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah untuk menetapkan kondisi saat ini. Sehingga, status pandemi COVID-19 merupakan status darurat hukum. Kebijakan rektor melalui Surat Edaran adalah absah secara aspek yuridis, sosiologis, dan filosofis. Penetapan darurat hukum cukup dilakukan dengan menerbitkan Perppu tanpa pernyataan darurat dari Presiden. Saran peneliti adalah di perlukan persetujuan pada Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan terkait terbitnya Surat Edaran Rektor, dan dibutuhkan penelitian lebih lanjut dikarenakan penelitian ini dilakukan pada masa COVID-19 yang bersifat temporal.�

To the Matter of Procedural and Legal Problems of Detaining a Person on Suspicion of Committing a Crime

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.V. Bolshakov ◽  
◽  
I.D. Nazarov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment

The subject of the research within the framework of the article is the criminal procedure institute for the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime. The legal nature of this institution is analyzed, and comments are given on the normative legal acts and judicial practice regulating the issues of detention. The theoretical basis of the research is based on the publications of the last two decades on this problem, in particular, reflecting the discussion of the process scientists S. A. Shafer, S. B. Rossinsky and A. A. Tarasov, the subject of which was the issue of the legal nature of a suspect detention in a criminal case. In the paper, the authors ask the following questions: What is the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation? From what moment does the detained person acquire the status of a suspect? Is it possible to detain a person before initiating a criminal case? The study concludes that a person acquires the actual status of a suspect from the moment of direct detention, that is, before documenting this status and, as a result, before initiating a criminal case. Amendments to the articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are proposed, and the authors` versions of the definitions of the concepts «detention of a suspect», «the moment of actual detention» and «pre-trial proceedings» are given.

scholarly journals TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE CONCEPT «PROCEDURAL COSTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS»

Issues of Law ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
S.M. Darovskikh ◽  
◽  
Z.V Makarova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Procedural Costs ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Article 5

The article is devoted to the issues of formulating the definition of such a criminal procedural concept as «procedural costs». Emphasizing the importance both for science and for law enforcement of clarity and clarity when formulating the definition of criminal procedural concepts, the authors point out that the formulation of this concept present in the current Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation is far from being improved. Having studied the opinions on this issue of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, a number of procedural scholars, the authors propose their own version of the definition of the concept of «criminal procedural costs» with its allocation in a separate paragraph of Article 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Alat Bukti Website dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Terorisme (Studi Putusan Nomor 140/PID.SUS/2018/PN.JKT.SEL)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-134
Author(s):  
Gemaya Wangsa ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya
Keyword(s):  
Digital Media ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Device Classification ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Case Number

The development of information technology and correspondence resulted in a shift in the format of print media to digital media, so that this growth was followed by the continuation of the development of a new criminal class that rode digital media in criminal acts of terrorism. This study aims to determine the regulations for the use of website evidence and the position of using website evidence in handling terrorism crimes in case number 140 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN.Jkt.Sel. This research uses a normative legal exploration method whose data comes from the determination related to the use of website evidence in Article 184 of the Criminal Code. The results of the research show that the determination of the exploitation of website evidence, which when based on Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means that electronic material is not classified as an abash instructional device classification, but if it is based on statutory regulations in a special crime, the electronic evidence media has resistance as a valid evidence, this can be seen in the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law which are reaffirmed in the provisions of Article 44 of the ITE Law. Utilization of electronic evidence in the process of evidence in court is sourced from website evidence in law enforcement for criminal acts of terrorism in the Case Number 140 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN.Jkt.Sel scandal. Criminal Procedure, especially Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but has a judicial guideline that the judge cannot refuse to explore and decide the matters brought against him, provided that the law is unclear or non-existent, then the judges' rules should expose the meaning of continued and continuous law in the consortium, up to the provisions as contained in the ITE Law which regulates electronic instruction instruments as valid instruction devices.

scholarly journals The features of participation of the defender and the legal representative of a juvenile suspect (accused) in the stage of preliminary investigation

2019 ◽  
pp. 196-199
Author(s):  
Анна Кучинская ◽  
Anna Kuchinskaya
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Representative ◽  
Defense Counsel ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation

In the article the theoretical analysis of the provisions of the Russian Federation Criminal Procedure Code, regulating the procedural activities of the defense and the legal representative of a juvenile suspect (accused). The author identified gaps in the current legislation and ways to fill them. Summarizing the materials of judicial practice, the author presents data on the effectiveness of participation of defense counsel and legal representative.

scholarly journals Legality and Validity of Property Seizure in the Investigation of a Criminal Case

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 118-126
Author(s):  
O. A. Malysheva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Institution ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
First Case ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Lawsuits ◽  
The Russian Federation

The importance of the measure of procedural coercion in the form of seizure of property increases against the background of the high amount of damage caused by crimes, namely about 550 billion rubles annually. This measure of procedural coercion has a high security potential in order not only to satisfy claims in civil lawsuits, but also to recover a fine and other property claims provided for in Part 1 of Article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Investigators (interrogators) annually initiate the seizure of property about 40 thousand times. 90% of cases are a success. The application of this measure is accompanied by the restriction of the property rights of both natural and legal persons, including those who are not recognized as a civil defendant in a criminal case, in the first case, and the accused (suspect).The seizure of property in criminal procedure practice is accompanied by the need for the investigator to overcome a number of difficulties, which are caused, firstly, by the intersectoral nature of the regulation of this legal institution; secondly, by the presence of gaps in the regulation of relations arising in connection with the imposition of this arrest; thirdly, by the inconsistency of the objectives of proof to establish the nature and amount of damage caused by a crime and the implementation of security activities in a criminal case. This gives rise to numerous violations of the legality and validity of the seizure of property on the part of not only the investigator, but also the court, despite the expression of a number of positions of the ECHR on this issue, despite the explanations of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.The author concludes that without the release of the investigator as a subject of proof in a criminal case from performing an unusual function — providing compensation for property penalties in a criminal case — it is impossible to achieve the full legality and validity of the seizure of property.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document