scholarly journals Returning the Name of Certificate of Property Right based on Judge Decision in the Regency Indragiri Hulu, Riau Province

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Hendra Roza ◽  
Kurnia Warman ◽  
Muhammad Hasbi
Keyword(s):  
Competent Authority ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Transactions

In order to support land registration in accordance with the rule of law, it is necessary to take legal action that can be useful for people who want to transfer names to land transactions such as buying and selling grants and others, so as to provide legal certainty in society, and the names of people. which has obtained land can be listed in the certificate, one of the changes in the name of the land certificate can occur due to a court decision, where the applicant can request the court to order the Land Office to change the name of the applicant, therefore it is necessary to see how the mechanism of transfer of name is court ruling. In this study, the formulation of the problem is formulated, namely: 1. How is the process of changing the name of the certificate of title to land based on the judge's decision in the Indragiri Hulu district, Riau province, case study number: 42/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Rgt? 2. What is the Mechanism of Registering Land Rights Based on the Judge's Court Decision? The theory used in this research is the theory of legal certainty and the theory of authority. The method used in this thesis is a normative juridical approach, the data sources are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the research obtained are that the procedure for the transfer of title to ownership certificates 42/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Rgt at the Land Agency Office of Indradiri Regency, namely: takes 20 days. The mechanism for registering land rights based on court decisions, in this case district court decisions, is more casuistic in nature and depends on the court's decision itself. The interpretation of the competent authority is needed in making decisions regarding the determination of procedures (Issuance, Transfer and/or cancellation of rights) and the legal basis used (PP No. 24 of 1997 or Regulation of the Head of BPN No. 3 of 2011) to carry out land registration based on the court's decision , while the registration of land rights based on the Decision of the State Administrative Court is simpler and more focused than the registration of land based on the Decision of the District Court (Civil).

scholarly journals Keabsahan Akta PPAT Yang Tidak Ditandatangani Para Saksi (Studi Putusan PN. No.16/Pdt.G/2015/Pn.Krg)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-76
Author(s):  
Valerio Xaverius Tjipto
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Legal Consequence

ABSTRACT             PPAT Deed is an authentic deed in the case of certain legal actions, especially in the case of transfer of land rights from one party to another party. An authentic deed is a deed made by an authorized official for that, in the place where the deed was made and the format is in accordance with the provisions of the legislation in force. The authentic PPAT deed must be read in front of the parties, and signed by the witnesses and PPAT. The legal standing of witness in the PPAT authentic deed is as an instrument witness who witnessed and knew the making of the PPAT deed and also as evidence to strengthen the PPAT deed was made. If there is a legal problem with the PPAT deed, the instrumentair witness who signed the PPAT deed can be asked for information relating to the implementation of the PPAT deed, including information about the presence of the parties who signed the PPAT deed before the PPAT and the witnesses. The problem in this research is how the legal arrangement of witnesses in the PPAT deed, How is the legal effect on the PPAT deed whose signature was carried out in the presence of two witnesses and How is the legal analysis considered by the Panel of Judges in the Karanganyar District Court Decision No. 16 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Krg.             This type of research is empirical juridical research, in which the approach to the problem is carried out by reviewing the implementation of PPAT obligations based on the applicable laws and regulations in this case are Articles 21 and 22, PP No. 24 of 2016 concerning amendments to PP No. 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT position regulations and this research was also supported by conducting direct interviews with 3 PPAT people whose working area was in Medan City.The results of the study stated that the legal arrangements regarding witnesses in the PPAT deed contained in Articles 21 and 22, PP No. 24 of 2016 concerning amendments to PP No. 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT position regulations, Article 18 paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the regulation of the State Minister for Agrarian Affairs / Head of the National Land Agency (BPN) Number 1 of 2006 concerning Provisions for Implementing Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT Position Regulations, Article 1895-1912 Civil Code in the description of the criteria for witnesses recognized in making the PPAT deed and Article 37 PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning land registration, the legal consequence of the PPAT deed which was signed before two witnesses was that the PPAT deed was degraded to a deed under the hand, because it contained a formal legal flaw and the legal analysis of the Judge Panel's consideration in the Karanganyar District Court Decision No. 16 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Krg which states that the PPAT has committed acts against the law and the authentic deed has been degraded to a deed under the hand.Keywords: PPAT Law, PPAT Deed, and the Witness Position

scholarly journals Penyelesaian atas Sertipikat Tanah Ganda Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi Putusan: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1537 K/PDT/2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1214
Author(s):  
Vanesia Hendrika Elvina ◽  
Hasni Hasni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Positive System ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
High Court ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
First Time

The purpose of implementing land registration is to provide legal certainty and legal protection. The Agrarian Law that is used in Indonesia adheres to a negative system that is tied to a positive system. The land registration activity for the first time produced proof of rights, in the form of certificates as a means of proof of land rights. Certificate as a strong proof of rights means that physical data and juridical data in a certificate have the strength of evidence and must be accepted as true information, as long as it is not proven otherwise with other evidence in the form of certificates or other certificates. In Subari’s case, there was a double land certificate in the same plot of land. Subari has the ownership of land rights that is got from his parents and from purchasing with two buffaloes. But, there are other people who dominate the land that is belong to Subari and they also have the certificate to proof their ownership of the land rights. Settlement of multiple land certificates can be done through the Court, to obtain legal certainty that the certificate of ownership of land rights which has stronger evidence is based on evidence. The district court ruled that ownership of land rights belonged to Subari, and this decision was reinforced by high court and a Supreme Court.[F1]  [F1]Paragarf single

scholarly journals The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 133-148
Author(s):  
Sulistiani Adont ◽  
La Syarifuddin ◽  
Rahmawati Al Hidayah
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.

scholarly journals Legal Review Regarding the Cancellation of Authentic Deed Made By Public Official Due to Unlawful Action (Case Study of Court Decision Number: 57/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Pdg)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 443
Author(s):  
Adeyuni Anisah ◽  
Zainul Daulay ◽  
Beatrix Benni
Keyword(s):  
Competent Authority ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Research Problems ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Action Case

Making a testament is bound by the form and method determined by the laws and regulations. When it is ignored, it may result cancellation to the testament. Similarly, grants in any law are basically irrevocable; however, if it does not meet certain conditions, the grant can be canceled. One example is a lawsuit for the cancellation of a will and a deed made before a Notary/ Conveyancer in Padang City. Even though the deed is physically and formally in accordance with the provisions determined by the Law, however, there is an error materially from the contents of the deed due to an unlawful action. Regarding to this, the authors formulated the research problems as follows: 1. What is the legal basis of the plaintiff’s claim to the Padang District Court?, 2. What is the basis for consideration of the Padang District Court judge in deciding the case Number: 57/PDT.G/2012/PN.Pdg?, and 3. How is the implementation of decision Number: 57/PDT.G/2012/PN.Pdg concerning the cancellation of the transfer of the object of dispute at the Padang City National Land Agency? This study applies a normative juridical method. The results of the study include: 1) There is a clause in the grant deed in Article 6, if both parties—in this case with all the consequences—choose a common legal residence at the clerk office of the Padang District Court and do not change that choice. 2) The inherited and granted property violates Article 913 of the Civil Code on the absolute right of the heir (legitieme fortie). 3) In the implementation of decision Number: 57/PDT.G/2012/PN.Pdg, the cancellation of the transfer of the object of the dispute has not yet been processed by the competent authority.

scholarly journals Cancellation of Land Certificate Based on The Court Decision in Indonesian Legal System

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 471
Author(s):  
Panji Utama Silva ◽  
Rene Descartes ◽  
Debby Dwita Sari Daulay
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
The Status ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Legal Force

Judge's decision has many benefits in achieving legal certainty, including in the case of the cancellation of certificate of ownership, but for the cancellation of the certificate must be canceled through the Land Office, because legally formally the cancellation is not enough with a court decision only, based on the Regulation of the National Land Agency Number 11 of 2016 concerning Settlement of Land Cases there are rules on how to revoke certificates of ownership based on court decisions that have permanent legal force. Object of research is how the to cancel the certificates of land based on court decisions that have permanent legal force, then the legal status of certificates of ownership rights that have not been canceled based on decisions that have permanent legal force. The cancellation certificates of land based on court decisions that have legal force must still be carried out based on the qualifications of Article 49 of Law Number 11 of 2016. The legal reason for refusing to cancel the certificate is to be qualified according to Article 49 paragraph 2 and Article 58 of Law Number 11 In 2016. The status of the certificate that has not been canceled, then legally formally it still belongs to the party listed on the certificate so that legally transferring rights can still be carried out on behalf of the parties listed on the certificate. The suggestion in this research is that the process of canceling the certificate is by requesting the determination of the court to cancel the certificate contained in the object of the case so that a formal juridical cancellation can be carried out at the Land Office based on Law No. 11 of 2016.

scholarly journals Problematika Pembatalan 605 Sertifikat Tanah Dalam Kawasan Otorita Batam ( Studi Putusan Ptun Tanjung Pinang No : 15/G/2014/PTUN - TPI )

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-22
Author(s):  
Nur Adhim ◽  
Ana Silviana ◽  
Cinthya Govianda
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Decision Methods ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Research Show

Certificates of land rights provide legal certainty to the holders. However, it is possible to file a claim by the party who feels disadvantaged which can result in the cancellation of the certificate. The purpose of this writing is to find out and analyze the reasons for certificates issued by the Batam City Land Office were prosecuted and canceled by PTUN, legal certainty for holders of land certificates whose certificates were canceled, and follow-up from the Batam City Land Office for cancellation of the certificates with court decisions. The method of approach of this research is socio-legal, the subject is PTUN Decision Number: 15/G/2014/PTUN-TPI and the object is legal certainty for holders of land certificates whose certificate is canceled by the court decision. Methods of collecting data were with primary data and secondary data. The results of the research show that the land certificate issued by the Batam City Land Office was brought to the court and canceled due to the illegal transfer of rights to the land of the Himpunan Pengusaha Kecil Pribumi (HPKP) to the Koperasi Usaha Melayu Raya, there is no legal certainty for holders of land certificates whose certificate was canceled with the court decision, as well as the follow-up to the Batam City Land Office was to carry out a court decision if an application had been made by the party who won, namely HPKP.Keywords: Legal Certainty, Cancellation, Certificate Of Land Rights.ABSTRAKSertifikat hak atas tanah memberikan kepastian hukum kepada para pemegangnya. Namun, terbuka kemungkinan diajukan gugatan oleh pihak yang merasa dirugikan yang dapat berakibat pada pembatalan sertifikat. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis alasan sertifikat yang dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Pertanahan Kota Batam diperkarakan dan dibatalkan oleh PTUN, kepastian hukum bagi pemegang sertifikat tanah yang sertifikatnya dibatalkan, dan tindak lanjut Kantor Pertanahan Kota Batam terhadap pembatalan sertifikat dengan putusan pengadilan. Metode Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah socio-legal, subyeknya Putusan PTUN Nomor: 15/G/2014/PTUN-TPI dan obyeknya kepastian hukum bagi para pemegang sertifikat tanah yang sertifikatnya dibatalkan oleh putusan pengadilan. Metode pengumpulan data dengan data primer dan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menujukkan alasan sertifikat tanah yang dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Pertanahan Kota Batam diperkarakan dan dibatalkan oleh PTUN adalah karena terjadi peralihan hak yang tidak sah atas lahan Himpunan Pengusaha Kecil Pribumi (HPKP) kepada Koperasi Serba Usaha Melayu Raya, tidak ada kepastian hukum bagi pemegang sertifikat tanah yang sertifikatnya dibatalkan dengan putusan pengadilan, serta tindak lanjut Kantor Pertanahan Kota Batam adalah melaksanakan putusan pengadilan bila telah dilakukan permohonan oleh pihak yang dimenangkan yaitu HPKP. Kata Kunci: Kepastian Hukum, Pembatalan, Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah.

JUAL BELI TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA AKTA PPAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Recording Process ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

scholarly journals The Regulation of Ownership of Agricultural Land Rights that Exceeds the Maximum Limit

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Ana Rubiyani
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
And Control ◽  
Maximum Limit

Land is a form of gift given by God, but human has given brain to think the challenges of live like the land problems, so that the government tries to regulate it properly. The problems in this thesis are: 1) How to regulate ownership of agricultural land rights that exceeds the maximum limit based on Act No. 56 (Prp) of 1960 concerning the Determination of Agricultural Land Areas? 2) How is the action taken by the Land Office towards ownership of agricultural land rights that exceeds the maximum limit? The method used is juridical empirical, with descriptive analytical specifications. The method used in this research is an empirical juridical approach. The results of this study are: (1) The regulation of ownership of agricultural land rights that exceeds the maximum limit is based on Act No. 56 (Prp) of 1960, namely that the provisions regarding land restrictions state that the application for ownership rights as referred to in Article 4 paragraph 1 of Act No. 56 (Prp) 1960 was limited to a maximum land area of 2000 m2. 2) The steps of the Land Office in implementing Act No. 56 (Prp) of 1960, namely the need for a concept of supervision and control over control of land rights, given the various problems that often arise such as in land registration activities.

Strategi Penyelesaian Pendaftaran Tanah Hak Komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-69
Author(s):  
Ardi Saputra Sinaga ◽  
Julius Sembiring ◽  
Sukayadi Sukayadi
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Communal Land ◽  
Community Strategy ◽  
Land Control

Abstract: Environment and Forestry Ministry established the reserve incense forest of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community as a customary forest. But in reality, it has not been guaranteed legal certainty regarding the existence and recognition of the rights of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. The objective of this research is to know the le-gal status of Indigenous Peoples forest in Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law at this time, strategy of the land registration of communal right settlement, and constraint and effort done in the land registration of communal right settlement of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. This research uses qualitative research method with empirical juridical research form. Based on the results of the study showed that the legal status of the Indigenous Forests of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Society is currently reserved as customary forest of Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Strategy for resolving communal rights land registration in the incense forest of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community through four stages. First, recognition of the existence of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Secondly, the establishment of customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community by Environment and Forestry Ministry. Third, the Settlement of Land Control in Forest Areas is carried out in accordance with Presidential Regulation Number 88 of 2017 by issuing customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community from forest areas. Fourth, registration of communal land rights of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Custom-ary Law Community.Keywords: strategy, communal rights, customary forestsIntisari: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK) menetapkan pencadangan hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta sebagai hutan adat. Tetapi kenyataannya, keadaan tersebut hingga saat ini dinilai belum menjamin kepastian hukum akan keberadaan dan pengakuan hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan bagaimana strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa status hukum hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta saat ini dicadangkan sebagai hutan adat. Strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta melalui empat tahapan. Pertama, pengakuan keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Kedua, penetapan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta oleh KLHK. Ketiga, dilakukan Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan sesuai dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 88 Tahun 2017dengan cara mengeluarkan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta dari kawasan hutan. Keempat, pendaftaran tanah hak komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta.Kata Kunci : strategi, hak komunal, hutan adat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document