scholarly journals The 100 Top-cited Articles in Main Allergy Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonggang Zhang ◽  
Liuliu Quan ◽  
Liang Du
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Immunology ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Average Citation ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Experimental Allergy ◽  
Number Of Citations

The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of the top 100 cited studies in main allergy journals. The 100 top-cited studies in allergy journals from the Web of Science were enrolled. The key characteristics included citation, year, authors, country, institution and journal were analyzed. The number of citations of the 100 top-cited studies ranged from 409 to 2313. They were published between 1972 and 2014. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology published the largest number of top-cited studies (n=74), followed by Allergy (n=13) and Clinical and Experimental Allergy (n=9). The greatest number of studies were USA (n=45), followed by England (n=10), Canada (n=7), and Sweden (n=7). The institution with the largest number of studies was the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the USA (n=8). The country with the largest number of top institutions was the USA (n=8). The reviews had higher average citation times than articles. Our study can give a historical perspective on the scientific progress of allergy, as well as provide important insights into priorities and trends of allergy and could serve as sources for future studies.

scholarly journals Bibliometric Analysis of 100 Top-Cited Articles in Gastric Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Fangfang Yuan ◽  
Jizhen Cai ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Xiaowei Tang
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Gastric Bypass Surgery ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Gastric Disease ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Royal Perth Hospital

Objectives. The bibliometric analysis uses the citation count of an article to measure its impact in the scientific community, yet there is still no comprehensive summary of gastric disease researches via bibliometric analysis. We aimed to evaluate the situations and trends of the most cited articles in gastric disease via bibliometric analysis and to provide physicians a practical guide in assessing the most influential articles written on this subject. Methods. The 100 top-cited articles in gastric disease were compiled using Web of Science. The articles selected were evaluated for their number of citations, year of publication, country of origin, type of study, and others. Results. The database had 484,281 articles published between 1965 and 2019. The most cited article received 4,017 citations and the least received 604, with a mean of 1,149 citations. We classified the articles into seven categories: gastric cancer (n=53), Helicobacter pylori (n=17), ulcer (n=7), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n=6), gastritis (n=5), gastric bypass surgery (n=2), and others (n=10). Altogether, 69 of the articles were from the USA (n=41), the UK (n=17), and Japan (n=11). Among all the institutions, Royal Perth Hospital led the list with 5 articles. One-quarter of authors owned three or more of these top-cited articles. The 100 papers were published in 33 journals, and most of them were clinical researches (n=47). Conclusions. Our study provides a historical perspective for the scientific progress of gastric disease, and the articles of significant findings that contributed great impact on the prevention and treatment of gastric disease had been identified.

Citation classics in neurointerventional research: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 508-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Soo Kim ◽  
Dae Young Yoon ◽  
Hye Jeong Kim ◽  
Hong Jun Jeon ◽  
Jong Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Clinical Neurology ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
Journal Citation Reports ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Search Tool ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Detailed List ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Citation Classics

Background and purposeThe number of citations that an article has received can be used to evaluate its impact on the scientific community. This study aimed to identify the 100 most cited articles in the field of neurointervention and to analyze their characteristics.Materials and methodsWe selected the 669 journals that were considered potentially to publish neurointervention articles based on the database of Journal Citation Reports. Using the Web of Science citation search tool, we identified the 100 most cited articles relevant to neurointervention within the selected journals. Each article was evaluated for several characteristics including publication year, journal, journal category, impact factor, number of citations, number of citations per year, authorship, department, institution, country, type of article, and topic.ResultsThe number of citations for the top 100 articles ranged from 1912 to 170 (mean 363.4) and citations per year ranged from 271.0 to 4.1 (mean 40.0). The majority of articles were published in clinical neurology journals (63%), were published in 2000–2009 (39%), originated in the USA (45%), were original articles (95%), and dealt with endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysm (42%). The Department of Radiology, University of California School of Medicine (n=12) was the leading institution and Viñuela F (n=11) was the most prolific author.ConclusionsOur study presents a detailed list and analysis of the 100 most cited articles in the field of neurointervention and provides a historical perspective on the scientific progress in this field.

scholarly journals Top-100 Most Cited Publications Concerning Network Pharmacology: A Bibliometric Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuncun Lu ◽  
Zhitong Bing ◽  
Zhijiang Bi ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Tingting Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Drug Research ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Network Pharmacology ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Number Of Citations

Background. Network pharmacology (NP) has become an increasingly important focus in the drug research field over the past decade. However, no study to date has mapped the current status of NP. Therefore, we performed a bibliometric study to evaluate the top 100 cited papers on NP. Methods. We searched the Web of Science Core Collection from its inception to February 25, 2019, using the terms “network pharmacology” and “systems pharmacology.” Key data, including title, publication year, number of citations, authors, countries/regions, organizations, and journals, were retrieved and analyzed using Excel 2016 and VOSviewer 1.6.10. Results. The total number of citations for the 100 cited papers ranged from 21 to 1,238, published in 53 journals, from 2005 to 2017. The top three journals with the most publications on NP were Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (n = 8, IF2017 = 6.544), Journal of Ethnopharmacology (n = 8, IF2017 = 3.115), and PLoS One (n = 7, IF2017 = 2.766). Most published articles were from the USA (n = 41) and China (n = 35). The most active author was Wang Yonghua from the Northwest A&F University, and of the 100 publications, 14 listing his name. The most frequently used substantive terms included “drug discovery,” “traditional Chinese medicine (TCM),” “in-vitro,” “cancer,” and “cardiovascular disease.” Conclusions. The USA and China made the greatest contribution to NP research. The current NP research mainly focused on NP methods (including experimental validation) and using them to explore the molecular mechanisms of TCM for some critical diseases such as cardiovascular diseases and cancers. Furthermore, we believe some guidelines should be developed to regulate NP studies.

scholarly journals A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RHEUMATOLOGY AND COVID-19 RESEARCHES

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Pasin ◽  
Tugce Pasin
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Reference Counts ◽  
General Perspective

Objectives: COVID-19 has had a substantial impact on rheumatology. This study provides a general overview of studies on rheumatology and COVID-19. Methods: Data were taken from the Web of Science (WoS) website. Analysis and network visualization mapping processes were carried out using VOSviewer. A total of 234 publications were analyzed, and the correlations between citation numbers and reference counts, usage counts and page numbers were analyzed with Spearman correlation coefficients. Results: The average number of citations per item was 6.03. The studies were cited 1,411 times in total, and 1,121 times without self-citations. The countries with the highest number of publications on rheumatology and COVID-19 were the USA and England; the countries with the highest number of citations were Italy and the USA, and Jinoos Yazdany was the most cited author. The Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases was the most cited journal, whereas the highest number of articles on rheumatology and COVID-19 were published in Arthritis and Rheumatology. Conclusions: Bibliometric analysis of rheumatology and COVID-19 can be useful to future studies because it provides a general perspective on the studies. This study provides an insight into the development of publications on rheumatology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals Sustainability and Tourism Competitiveness in Protected Areas: State of Art and Future Lines of Research

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 6296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuria Rodríguez-López ◽  
M. Isabel Diéguez-Castrillón ◽  
Ana Gueimonde-Canto
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Intellectual Structure ◽  
Tourist Destinations ◽  
The Usa ◽  
And Control ◽  
Bibliometric Approach ◽  
Dominant Paradigm

The sustainability approach applied to tourism has been taking shape as a dominant paradigm in tourism research, as well as becoming a requirement to achieve tourism competitiveness. This paper focuses specifically on the application of both concepts to protected areas, as tourist destinations. A bibliometric approach is adopted to provide information about the patterns and trends in the accumulation of knowledge related to this field, as well as to map its social, conceptual, and intellectual structure. Both evaluative and relational techniques are used to analyse the papers published until August 2019 and collected in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. The results indicate that the research field has experienced significant growth in the last decade, with institutions of the USA and Australia as stimuli of scientific progress in this field. This study finds eight thematic clusters, although there is subject dispersion within each cluster, linked to the emerging and multidisciplinary nature of the field. Based on the working lines open, the study also identifies possible future approaches, linked to the incorporation of the perspectives and objectives of the different stakeholders, and the development of indicators to monitor and control dimensions of interest.

scholarly journals A Scientometric Analysis of Worldwide Intercropping Research Based on Web of Science Database between 1992 and 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2430
Author(s):  
Wen Lv ◽  
Xining Zhao ◽  
Pute Wu ◽  
Jialong Lv ◽  
Hailong He
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Agroforestry Systems ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Research Status ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
India And China

Intercropping has been practiced worldwide in both traditional and sustainable agriculture to feed the growing population. This study aims to analyze the research status and evolution of intercropping, to identify the influential authors, research centers, and articles, and to reveal the main research topics between 1992 and 2020 based on the Web of Science Core Collection database. The results show that the volume of publications in this field has increased rapidly over the past three decades. The analysis identifies the top three authors (i.e., Meine Van Noordwijk, Wenyu Yang, and Teja Tscharntke), top three contributing organizations (i.e., the World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), the Chinese Academy of Science, and the INRA), and three most productive countries (i.e., the USA, India, and China). Co-occurrence analysis demonstrates that studies on intercropping can be divided into four clusters as centered by keywords of intercropping/maize, biodiversity/conservation, agroforestry, and carbon, respectively. Lal 2004 is the most influential study with the greatest number of citations and Agroforestry Systems is the most utilized journal. Perspectives on future studies were also given. This study helps researchers to clarify the current research status in the field of intercropping and put forward its future research.

scholarly journals The 100 most-cited articles in the field of colorectal diseases from 1955 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengqi LuoLuo ◽  
Chunmei Zhang ◽  
Yutang Ren ◽  
Wei Peng ◽  
Chunyu Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New England ◽  
Science Studies ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Scientific Progress ◽  
The United States ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Colorectal Diseases ◽  
Study Type ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background: The number of times that an article was cited reflected its impact. In this study, we aimed to recognize and analyze the characteristics of the most frequently cited articles in the field of colorectal diseases. Methods: We identified the 100 highest cited articles using the terms ‘colorectal’ or ‘colon’ or ‘rectal’ or ‘IBD’ or ‘ulcerative colitis’ or ‘Crohn disease’ or ‘colonoscopy’ in Web of Science. Articles were analyzed to evaluate the characteristics including number of citations, country of origin, institutions of origin based on the first author affiliation, study type and others. Results: Of the top cited publications, the number of citations ranged from 1479 to 8834 with a mean of 2304.85 citations per article. The journal with the greatest number of most-cited articles was New England Journal of Medicine (n=23), followed by Science (n=13) and Nature (n=12). These papers were published in 14 different countries, of which more than half were from the United States (n=64). The most popular field was colorectal cancer (n=51), followed by colonic tumor (n=21). Most of the papers were basic science studies (n=44) and randomized controlled trials (n=29). Conclusion: Our study could provide a historical perspective on the scientific progress in the field of colorectal diseases, which would lay a firm foundation for future research.

scholarly journals The 100 most-cited articles in the field of colorectal diseases from 1955 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengqi LuoLuo ◽  
Chunmei Zhang ◽  
Yutang Ren ◽  
Wei Peng ◽  
Chunyu Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New England ◽  
Science Studies ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Scientific Progress ◽  
The United States ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Colorectal Diseases ◽  
Study Type ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background: The number of times that an article was cited reflected its impact. In this study, we aimed to recognize and analyze the characteristics of the most frequently cited articles in the field of colorectal diseases. Methods: We identified the 100 highest cited articles using the terms ‘colorectal’ or ‘colon’ or ‘rectal’ or ‘IBD’ or ‘ulcerative colitis’ or ‘Crohn disease’ or ‘colonoscopy’ in Web of Science. Articles were analyzed to evaluate the characteristics including number of citations, country of origin, institutions of origin based on the first author affiliation, study type and others. Results: Of the top cited publications, the number of citations ranged from 1479 to 8834 with a mean of 2304.85 citations per article. The journal with the greatest number of most-cited articles was New England Journal of Medicine (n=23), followed by Science (n=13) and Nature (n=12). These papers were published in 14 different countries, of which more than half were from the United States (n=64). The most popular field was colorectal cancer (n=51), followed by colonic tumor (n=21). Most of the papers were basic science studies (n=44) and randomized controlled trials (n=29). Conclusion: Our study could provide a historical perspective on the scientific progress in the field of colorectal diseases, which would lay a firm foundation for future research.

scholarly journals Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Publications in Achalasia Research from 1995 to 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Huifang Xia ◽  
Shali Tan ◽  
Shu Huang ◽  
Peiling Gan ◽  
Chunyu Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Core Collection ◽  
Historical Perspective ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Pneumatic Dilation ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Number Of Citations

Objective. To identify and evaluate characteristics of the most influential articles in achalasia research during the period 1995-2020. Methods. Articles in Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), and PubMed were scanned from 1995 to 2020 with achalasia as the keyword. We retrieved the articles that met all criteria by descending order after using EndNote to remove the duplicated references. Our bibliometric analysis highlighted publication year, country, journals, and networks of keywords. Results. Fifteen percent of the top 100 most-cited articles were published in Annals of Surgery. They were performed in 15 countries, and most ( n = 55 ) were from the USA. The number of citations of the 482 articles ranged from 30 to 953, 38 of which had been published in American Journal of Gastroenterology. Those articles were from 31 countries, and most of the studies ( n = 217 ) had been performed in the USA. Most of articles ( n = 335 ) were clinical research. Treatments were hotspots in the field of achalasia in the past years. The most influential title words were “achalasia,” “esophagomyotomy,” “pneumatic dilation,” and “lower esophageal sphincter.” Conclusion. Our study offers a historical perspective on the progress of achalasia research and identified the most significant evolution in this field. Results showed treatment was the most influence aspect in achalasia.

scholarly journals The Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Distance Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 796-817
Author(s):  
Mustafa Tevfik Hebebci
Keyword(s):  
Distance Education ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Journal Publication ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Analysis Process ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Publication Language ◽  
The Web

This research determines the trends of academic articles on distance education in the COVID-19 epidemic and provides a roadmap for possible future studies on this topic. In this context, bibliometric and content analysis methods were used. Research data were collected through the Web of Science (WOS) database. As a result of the filtering process on WOS, 767 scientific articles were included in the research. In the data analysis process, the articles were reviewed in terms of the year, country, journal, publication language, citation, co-authorship, co-occurrence, and co-citation. Research results indicate that the articles were published between 2020 and 2021 and generally in English. “Journal of Chemical Education” is the journal with the most publications and the most cited and co-cited journals. The USA draws attention as the country that publishes the most, has the most citations, and cooperates the most. The most cited article was conducted by Chick et al. According to the co-occurrence analysis, it is seen that the terms “COVID-19” and “distance learning” are frequently used by the authors. The findings were discussed within the framework of the literature, and other studies and suggestions were made.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document