scholarly journals The latest practice of urban planning regulation in the context of the "Far Eastern hectare program"

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Eduard N. Sokol-Nomokonov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Town Planning ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
Selection Of

The article examines the features of the application of federal legislation in terms of limiting its action in certain regions of the Russian Federation. The practice of land and town planning regulation under such restrictions is analyzed. Proposals are given for further improvement of the law in terms of creating special conditions for the selection of land plots in the conditions of the "Far Eastern hectare program".

scholarly journals ОСОБЕННОСТИ ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИИ СВОБОДЫ В КОДЕКСЕ КАК ЯДЕРНОМ ЖАНРЕ ДИСКУРСА ПРАВОВОГО ДОКУМЕНТА

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariya Nazemtseva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Discourse ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Document ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Russian Linguistic ◽  
World Image ◽  
Selection Of

Введение. Проведен анализ репрезентации концепта свобода в кодексе как ядерном жанре дискурса правового документа. Цель – выявить специфику реализации концепта свобода, заданную модусно-диктумной организацией правового дискурса и спецификой кодекса как его ядерного жанра. Материал и методы. Материалом исследования являются кодексы РФ, а именно Семейный, Трудовой, Жилищный, Гражданский и Уголовный. Выборка материала обусловлена ядерным статусом кодекса в правовом тексте. Являясь одним из основных документов правового дискурса, кодекс наряду с Конституцией РФ отражает основы права. Свобода как ключевой концепт русской культуры по-особому репрезентируется в правовом дискурсе. Методология представлена дискурс- и концепт-анализом: дискурсивные и жанровые особенности определяются с позиции кодекса в жанровой системе правового дискурса, свобода анализируется через сравнение данного концепта в системе русской языковой картины мира в целом (на материале уже проведенных исследований) с правовым дискурсом в частности. Результаты и обсуждение. Обнаружено, что концепт свобода, в отличие от его обыденного представления в русской языковой картине мира, имеет особую небинарную специфику и трансформируется с помощью закона. В обыденном сознании существует оппозиция свобода (воля) / несвобода, в кодексе свобода реализуется посредством разрешительного (то, что можно делать в рамках закона), запретительного модуса (то, что уголовно наказуемо и предписано через несвободу, т. е. арест), а также модуса долженствования (то, что по закону должно быть совершено). Кроме того, свобода в кодексах определяется их тематической сферой: существует свобода семейных, трудовых, жилищных, гражданских и др. отношений. В оппозиции находится то, что делать запрещено и гарантирует несвободу (представлено Уголовным кодексом). Заключение. Свобода в дискурсе правового документа – официально зафиксированная возможность человека действовать в рамках закона. Кодекс как ядерный жанр правового дискурса осуществляет преобразование концепта посредством его модусно-диктумной модификации. В результате определяющим средством для реализации концепта свобода является закон, а также основные концепты каждого выбранного кодекса – семья, труд, жилище, гражданин, наказание.Introduction. The research explored representation of the concept freedom in the Сode as a nuclear genre of legal document discourse. Aim and objectives of the article are to identify the specifics of implementation of the concept freedom, defined by modus-dictum organization of legal discourse and the specifics of the Code as its nuclear genre. Material and methods. The research material consists of the Codes of the Russian Federation, which are Family, Labour, Housing, Civil, and Criminal Сodes. The selection of material is determined in accordance with the nuclear status of this genre in legal text. Being one of the main documents of legal discourse, the Code as well as the Constitution of the Russian Federation, reflects the foundations of Russian law. Freedom, as a key concept of Russian culture, is specifically represented in legal discourse. The methodology includes discourse and concept analysis: we observe discursive and genre features from the position of the Code in genre system of legal discourse. Freedom is analyzed through comparing this concept in the system of Russian linguistic world-image on the whole (based on material from studies already conducted) with legal discourse in particular. Results and discussion. We found that the concept freedom, in contrast to its common representation in Russian linguistic world-image, has a particular non-binary specificity and is transformed through the law. In everyday language, there is an opposition freedom (will)/unfreedom, and in the Code freedom is realized through a permissive (what can be done within the framework of the law), prohibitive modus (what is criminally punishable and prescribed through unfreedom, i.e. arrest), and a modus of obligation (what is required to be done by law). In addition, freedom in the Codes is influenced by their thematic sphere: there are freedom of family, labour, housing, and civil relationships. In opposition is what is prohibited to do and guarantees unfreedom (represented by the Criminal Code). Conclusion. Freedom in the legal document discourse is an officially recorded ability of a person to operate within the confines of the law. The Code as a nuclear genre of legal discourse transforms the concept through its modus-dictum modification. As a result, pivotal for the implementation of the concept freedom is the law, as well as the basic concepts of each selected Code – family, labour, housing, citizen, and punishment.

scholarly journals Некоторые вопросы совершенствования отечественного законодательства об административной ответственности

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (52) ◽  
pp. 100-104
Author(s):  
А.С. Кошель
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Business Climate ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
First Time ◽  
Development Prospects ◽  
Insufficient Knowledge ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

В статье кратко рассмотрены перспективы реформы отечественного законодательства об административной ответственности, озвученные в докладе на круглом столе «Законодательство об административной ответственности: современное состояние, перспективы развития», состоявшемся в Дальневосточном федеральном университете 9 апреля 2019 г. Кодекс Российской Федерации об административной ответственности претерпел на 2019 г. уже более 3000 изменений (правок), а нормы об административной ответственности на сегодня содержатся в большом количестве федеральных законов, сам Кодекс содержит большое количество бланкетных норм, а правоприменители отличаются слабыми знаниями законодательства, что в совокупности затрудняет правоохранительную функцию законодательства об административной ответственности. Автором на основе материалов судебной и правоприменительной практики предлагается внесение в концепцию реформы законодательства об административной ответственности инициатив по введению специального общественного квалификационного экзамена для правоприменителей законодательства об административной ответственности; установлению строгой категории вины юридического лица и вины должностного лица, учитывающей избежание наказания двух лиц за совершение одного административного проступка; либерализации административной ответственности по административным проступкам, совершённым впервые, вплоть до ограничения такой ответственности замечанием. Автор убеждён, что реформа федерального и регионального законодательства об административной ответственности в Российской Федерации должна носить комплексный характер и должна быть направлена не на карательную функцию норм, а на правоохранительную, с целью избежания злоупотребления правоприменителями своими полномочиями и создания условий для нормализации функционирования коммерческих и некоммерческих организаций в Российской Федерации, повышения уровня защищенности бизнес-климата в стране. The article reviews the prospects of reforming the legislation on administrative responsibility based on the round table report “Legislation on administrative re-sponsibility: modern state, development prospects” in the Far Eastern Federal University on April 9, 2019. As of 2019, over 3000 changes (amendments) had been introduced into the Russian Federation Code on administrative responsibility; administrative responsibility norms can nowadays be found in many federal laws; the Code contains a lot of blanket norms; law enforcers have an insufficient knowledge of the legislation thus hindering the law-enforcing function of the legislation on administrative responsibility. Based on the material of court and law-enforcement practices, it is suggested to introduce the initiatives on implementing a special public qualifying examination of the law-enforcers for the legislation of administrative responsibility, strict categories of the corporate body’s guilt and office holder’s guilt that would avoid punishing two people for committing the same administrative offence, liberalization of administrative responsibility on administrative offences committed first time including reducing this responsibility to admonition. The author of the article is sure that reforming the federal and regional legislations on administrative responsibility in the Russian Federation has to be complex and switch its function from punishment to preventing the law enforcers from misusing their authority; it also has to create the conditions for normalizing the functioning of commercial and noncommercial organizations in the Russian Federation and increase the level of business climate protection in the country.

scholarly journals TECHNICAL AND CADASTRAL REGISTRATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTS OF REAL ESTATE

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-108
Author(s):  
Olga Dudinova
Keyword(s):  
Urban Planning ◽  
Real Estate ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Town Planning ◽  
Accounting System ◽  
The Russian Federation

Starting to consider the issues related to the legal regulation and implementation of the reform of technical and cadastral registration of real estate, it is impossible not to say about its role and importance for the Russian legal system. The accounting system is a certain guarantee of the rights of owners in respect of real estate. The issue of legal regulation of infrastructure facilities is still one of the most difficult in the urban planning and land legislation of the Russian Federation. The lack of effective and versatile regulatory and folding it on the basis of the practice make it very difficult town planning and investment development of territories and improvement. In this article the problems connected with legal regulation of infrastructure objects are revealed, the analysis of the current legislation and practical approaches is carried out, the classification of infrastructure objects is investigated, the essence of this concept is revealed.

scholarly journals The Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Evolution of Legal Properties

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 43-54
Author(s):  
N. E. Taeva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law Making ◽  
Legal Force

The paper, on the basis of the analysis of legislation, the RF Constitutional Court jurisprudence, as well as practice of law-making on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, describes the process of evolution of legal properties of the law under consideration. The paper investigates such legal properties of the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation as legal force, the subject of the legal regulation, the procedure for adoption and entry into force. The author believes that any change of these legal properties has an impact on the legal properties of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and primarily on its stability. The paper draws special attention to the Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation as of MArch 14, 2020, No. 1-FKZ “On improvement of regulation of certain issues of organization and functioning of public power.” According to the author, there was another transformation of the legal properties of the Law on Amendment. This transformation concerns the order of its entry into force. Provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution adopted in 2020 contain both norms that amend the constitutional text and norms not intended for inclusion in the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation that are technical and transitional in nature. In this regard, the author deals with the question whether the Law on Amendement itself may establish additional conditions for its entry into force other than those provided for by the federal legislation.

scholarly journals Legal Mechanisms of Ensuring Environmental Rights in the Implementation of Urban Planning: Theoretical and Practical Aspects

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Romanova
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Urban Planning ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Town Planning ◽  
Environmental Rights ◽  
Territorial Planning ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

Adoption of environmentally unreasonable urban planning decisions leads to significant environmental problems in certain territories causing massive violations of the right of citizens to favorable environment as a result of deterioration of environment or certain natural objects. The author has investigated the legal mechanisms of ensuring environmental rights in the implementation of urban planning activities in the context of their effectiveness. The paper has demonstrated the connection between town-planning and relations regulated under environmental law, analyzed objective and subjective environmental factors of town-planning, elucidated the necessity of taking into account ecological factors at the stage of territorial planning, determined the place and importance of urban planning activities in the mechanism of ensuring environmental rights of the man and citizen.The author has examined constitutional foundations of ensuring environmental human rights in the implementation of urban planning activities, implementation of human rights in the principles of urban planning legislation. The author has determined an environmental component of the legal regulation of urban planning, the correlation between such basic concepts of town-planning and environmental legislation as “the right of citizens to a favorable environment,” “favorable conditions of life,” “sustainable development of territories.” The paper has also analyzed legal mechanisms enshrined in the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation for the consideration of environmental factors and requirements in the process of territorial planning as a fundamental type of urban development at the stage of substantiation and preparation of draft documents of territorial planning of public entities of the Russian Federation and at the stage of coordination of projects between bodies of public administration and local self-government. The paper reveals a declarative and formal nature of the relevant procedures, substantiates the absence of effective legal mechanisms of taking into account environmental factors and requirements in the current town-planning legislation. The author suggests ways of improving the legal regulation of enforcement of environmental rights in the implementation of urban planning.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation and Organization of the Work of Management Subjects Related to the Dismissal of Employees of the Penal System of the Russian Federation due to the Loss of Trust

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-641
Author(s):  
Svetlana V. Zavitova ◽  
Nataliya A. Mel’nikova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Logical System ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Selection Of

Introduction: the article considers problematic issues related to the work of management subjects (managers) and attestation commissions in situations when an employee of the penal system of the Russian Federation is dismissed due to the loss of trust. The aim of this study is to identify gaps in the current legislation on the service that arise when a measure of responsibility such as dismissal due to the loss of trust is applied; another aim consists in formulating proposals for improving legislation in this area. Methods: methodological basis of our study is represented by a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the main place belongs to formal-logical, system-structural, and comparative-legal methods. Results: the study has shown that there are many problematic issues in the law enforcement practice regarding the dismissal of employees due to the loss of trust. The norms of the law do not clearly distinguish the components of corruption offenses for which an employee is subject to dismissal due to the loss of trust or may be brought to another type of liability. The issue regarding the status of the decision of the attestation commission remains unresolved; its decision is of an advisory nature, but at the same time, it is fundamental for making a decision by the employee’s superior. There is an ongoing discussion on the composition of the attestation commission; and options for the selection of independent experts are proposed. Discussion: dismissal due to the loss of trust is a specific type of disciplinary penalty, and its implementation is carried out by authorized management entities within the framework of disciplinary proceedings. The procedure for making a decision on the dismissal of employees of the penal system due to the loss of trust needs further improvement in its legal and organizational aspects, taking into account modern law enforcement and judicial practice.

scholarly journals International Standards of Preventive Measures and Their Implementations in the Legislation of the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-630
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Ivanov ◽  
Michail Kulikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Selection Of

The goal of this research is to identify problems arising during the implementation of international standards for the selection of preventive measures into Russian criminal procedure legislation. The authors specify the concept of international standards of criminal court proceedings, present the specific features of their incorporation into constitutional norms as well as rules in different branches of law. The importance of preventive measures in the general mechanism of legal regulation is shown. The authors prove the necessity of systemic changes in the part of Russian legislation that deals with the legal regulation of preventive measures with the purpose of creating an integrated mechanism of criminal prosecution and protection against it. Key findings of research include: 1) Russian criminal proceedings, including its part regulating the selection of preventive measures, should fully correspond to international standards; 2) international standards are implemented in Russian criminal procedure legislation both indirectly, though constitutional clauses, and directly, through the improvements in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation; 3) preventive measures should only be selected if there are sufficient grounds for them, and these grounds are not the at the discretion of officials involved in criminal proceedings, they are real evidence in the materials of a criminal case that is necessary and sufficient for selecting a specific measure from the measures included in the law; 4) circumstances that are taken into consideration when selecting a preventive measure, if they potentially provide for a stricter measure from their general list, should be explicitly laid down in the law, and contrary to this, the list of circumstances that could improve the position of a person is not exhaustive; 5) to give a person an opportunity to defend their position, the possibility of selecting the preventive measure of detention is only feasible for the accused, and should be excluded for the suspect; 6) since the proper behavior of a person, from the position of the prosecution, is to give testimony that proves their involvement in a crime, the corresponding indication that this is necessary to ensure such behavior should be removed from the law when selecting the preventive measure of recognizance not to leave; 7) the supervision of the command staff of a military base over military personnel should not be substituted with an actual deprivation or limitation of the freedom of movement within the territory of the base; 8) when there are no grounds for selecting detention, the court should have a possibility to select any other preventive measure from those included in the law. From the methodological standpoint, this research is an analysis of international normative legal acts and generally recognized principles and norms of international law regulating preventive measures as well as the problems of their implementation in Russian criminal proceedings. The following methods were used: comparative legal, historic legal, sociological, interpretation of law norms, a number of logical methods. The obtained data was used to formulate key conclusions, which made it possible to correctly use a number of terms, and determine the necessity of a systemic improvement of Russian legislation through the introduction of mechanisms that ensure the rights, liberties and lawful interests of a person when selecting a preventive measure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document