scholarly journals HUBUNGAN ANTARA EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA DENGAN HARMONISASI KONFLIK ANTAR LEMBAGA PENEGAK HUKUM

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
DADIN EKA Saputra

This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the application of the legal principle ofequality before the law in law enforcement in Indonesia with the harmonization of conflict between thestate institutions and the National Police Commission. The method used in this research is normativejuridical, namely research in the review by reference and based on the norms and rules of law, thelegislation in force, theories and doctrines of law, jurisprudence, and materials other literature relevantto the research topic. From the analysis of the data, it can be concluded that there is a recognition of theprinciple of normative and empirical rule of law, namely that all the issues are resolved with the law asthe supreme guidance. Normatively either in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945,and in Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 on Human Rights, the principle of equality of treat-ment before the law has been published in a comprehensive manner, as the rights that must be re-spected, guaranteed, protected and met by the state. Disharmony between institutions or law enforce-ment agency that is now emerging, should be immediately solved by basing the legislation that exists.

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumiaty Adelina Hutabarat

<p>There are two law enforcement agencies combating corruption, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Police, having the same authority, but in implementing authority there are differences, for example in the application of laws that govern the two institutions.The problem that becomes the study of this research is how the problem of the existence of the KPK as an institution to eradicate corruption has the authority regulated in RI Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, whose authority lies with the Police regulated in RI Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia which refers to the Criminal Code The results of the study showed that the resolution of the dispute between the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission in the investigation of corruption was carried out by coordinating the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in Corruption Criminal Investigations. Law number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission regulates the relationship between the performance of the KPK and the Police regarding investigations, investigations and prosecutions.Settlement of authority disputes between the Police and the KPK should be the authority of the Supreme Court, due to judicial review under the Supreme Court Law. The right to test the law is the application of a balanced and balanced government. The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed by the Law 30/2002 whereas the Indonesian Police was formed by the 1945 Constitution, article 30 paragraph 4.</p><p><strong>Keywords : <em>Authority, investigation, KPK</em></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.21) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
M Zamroni ◽  
. .

Hope to have legislation that specifically set while an umbrella in running materialize advocate profession, lawyers are more confident in addition to other law enforcement officials, such as judges, prosecutors and police, as well as respected as an equal partner in the law enforcement process. But the big question is how the existence of the profession of advocate Indonesia before and after the enlawment of Act Number 18 of 2003 concerning the Advocate, as well as any constraints that occur in their implementation. The rule of law relating to the profession of advocate before the enLawment of Act Number 18 of 2003 concerning The Advocate, scattered in various laws, such as Act Number 1 of 1946 on the Law of Criminal Code, Act Number 1 of 1950 on the Supreme Court, Emergency Act Number 1 of 1951 governing temporary measures to organize the unity of the pecking order and civil court events, and Herziene Indlandsch Regalement (HIR). Before the release of Act Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates, advocate the use of the term in prLawice there has been no standard for the profession. In various provisions of the legislation of any inconsistency pr. For example Act Number 14 of 1970, as has been replaced by Act Number 35 of 1999, and was replaced again by Act Number 4 of 2004 as well as the latter is replaced by Act Number 48 of 2009, regarding the power of Justice, to use the term legal aid and lawyers. Birth of the Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2003 concerning The Advocate is the expectation of a long delayed during the 58 years since the independence of the Republic of Indonesia, the laws governing the profession of advocate a free, independent and responsible for the implementation of a judicial honest, fair, and legal certainty for all seekers of justice in upholding the law, truth, justice, and human rights.  


2021 ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
А. Т. Комзюк ◽  
Salmanova O. Yu.

The article defines the relationship between the principles of the rule of law and legality and their importance in the activities of the National Police of Ukraine. Indicated, that the principle of the rule of law is enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine, and in relation to the National Police – also in the Law on it. Attention is drawn to the fact that the definition of the rule of law in the Constitution and the Law of Ukraine «On the National Police» is interpreted differently. Therefore, in a generalized form, the principle of the rule of law is proposed to be interpreted as the idea of the rule of law, which is embodied in the creation of appropriate laws, their proper implementation, prohibition of arbitrariness, human rights, non-discrimination and equality before the law. It was emphasized that it was expedient to define this principle as a general idea in the Law “On the National Police”, as its other components cannot always be fulfilled in the activity of the police. In particular, the authorities and police officers cannot question the compliance of the law with the ideas of social justice, freedom, equality, etc. Nor can they, in the performance of their tasks and functions, be guided by norms of morality, traditions, customs, etc., and not by formally defined norms of law (ie laws). It is in the light of such reservations that it is proposed to define this principle. The police must implement it through certain requirements – legality, prohibition of arbitrariness, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and equality before the law. Therefore, legality is of paramount importance in the activity of the police – the police act exclusively on the basis, within the powers and in the manner determined by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. In this regard, the proposals to improve the legal regulation of the rule of law and legality as principles of the National Police of Ukraine are substantiated.


Author(s):  
St. Nurjannah

AbstractThe form of law enforcement against brand violations in the city of Makassar has been regulated in Law No. 20 of 2016 that has been good and perfect because it has gone through several revisions and in practice, law enforcement against these violations has been carried out well by investigators of the civil service Ministry of Law and Human Rights who work closely with the Republic of Indonesia National Police investigators and Public Prosecutors. But it is needed addition to the number of civil servant investigators in the scope of ministries that specifically deal with violations of brand rights and IPR as a whole so that enforcement and implementation of the Law / 20 of 2016 is more maximal. The stipulation of laws concerning brands which constitute complaint offenses must be changed to the usual offense of enforcement of violations of Brand Rights which can be immediately processed by the authorities without waiting for a complaint.Key Words: Law Enforcement, Brand RightsAbstrakBentuk penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran merek di kota Makassar telah diatur didalam UU No. 20 Tahun 2016 yang telah bagus dan sempurna karena telah melalui beberapakali revisi dan dalam prakteknya, penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran ini telah dijalankan dengan baik oleh penyidik pegawai negeri sipil kementerian Hukum dan Ham yang berkerja sama dengan penyidik Kepolisian Negara republik Indonesia serta Penuntut Umum. Namun, diperlukan penambahan jumlah penyidik pegawai negeri sipil dilingkup kementrian yang khusus menangani pelanggaran hak merek dan HKI secara keseluruhan agar penegakan dan penerapan UU/20 tahun 2016 lebih maksimal. Penetapan UU tentang merek yang merupakan delik aduan harus diubah menjadi delik biasa sehingga penegakan terhadap pelanggaran Hak Merek dapat segera diproses oleh pihak yang berwajib tanpa menunggu adanya aduan.Kata Kunci: Penegakan Hukum, Hak Merek


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Moh Achyar ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Teguh Prasetyo

<em>The Financial Services Authority in practice often face institutional problems that still rely on the position of outside investigators, but on the other hand it must maintain its independence. The purpose of this study is to examine and to analyze the Legal Problems of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in Enforcing Banking Crime. The method used in this study was the constructive paradigm. The research approach used was empirical juridical, namely legal research. The object of study were provisions and enforcement or implementation of legal provisions in action on every legal event that occurs in the community (in concreto). The data analysis used qualitative analysis. The results of the study found that the problem of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in conducting criminal acts against banking crimes was due to legislative factors or legal substance, structure and legal culture. Provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in which Civil Servant Investigators or PPNS are not necessarily able to collect all the evidence specified. The Second factor is the Law Enforcement Officials. In quality, the law enforcement factor that impedes the role of the FSA in investigating banking crimes is the limited professionalism in the field of investigation, so that knowledge and technical skills of investigation need to be improved. FSA in investigating banking crimes must recruit Police Investigators and Prosecutors, FSA must make an agreement with Polri in conducting investigations into banking crimes so that they can immediately arrest suspects who are considered to have committed banking criminal acts. The third is the cultural factors of society. In terms of the cultural factors of the community, the intensity of the community in its involvement in enforcement and supporting the investigation will be hampered by the lack of clarity in the position of the investigative institution.</em>


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rossi Suparman

Secreted as an action or decision that can be used by the state civil service (ASN) under certain conditions, in carrying out the law enforcement duties of civil servants especially the police the authority to use discretion can be applied according to the conditions needed in the context of law enforcement, but after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration requires clarity regarding the position of discretion in law enforcement. The method used is a normative approach using secondary and primary data that is analyzed qualitatively. The results showed (1) That the enactment of the Law on Government Administration is an effort to provide a legal position for discretion within the State Civil Apparatus. Discretion is regulated more clearly, from the definition, the limit according to the law, the limit is issued by the authorized official, the purpose, scope, conditions, use of discretion and approval procedures, and the consequences of discretionary law. (2) POLRI in its position as a law enforcement apparatus has the function of enforcing law in the judicial field both preventive and repressive. So with the discretionary authority in the judicial field as stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2002 in Article 18 paragraph (1) that "In the public interest of the Republic of Indonesia National Police officials in carrying out their duties and authorities can act according to their own judgment". (3) that in the relationship between the implementation of discretion according to the Government Administrative Law and the Police Law of the Republic of Indonesia there is an expansion of the purpose of police discretion in law enforcement, which is not only to create and maintain security and order, but also to launch and overcome obstacles in the process of law enforcement.Keywords : Discretion, State Civil Apparatus, Law Enforcement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Irina A. Aleshkova ◽  
◽  
Anastasia S. Stalnova ◽  

The article is devoted to the comprehension, disclosure and description of the principle of prohibition of retroactivity of the law “Lex ad praeteriam non valet” in a systemic relationship with a number of principles of the rule of law. The authors note the relationship between the principle of prohibition of retroactive force of law and the principles of the rule of law and maintaining citizens’ confidence in the law and actions of the state, as well as such trends in its development as substantive stability and liberalization in law enforcement based on the sphere of legal regulation.


Author(s):  
Mirco Göpfert

This chapter explores how gendarmes in the Republic of Niger, notwithstanding their aspiration for popular legitimacy, try to justify their actions, not to others, but to themselves. Civilians bring the stories of their problems to the gendarmes’ attention in the form of complaints. Whether a complaint turns into a case, and thus whether the gendarmes become active, depends on their appreciation of the complainant’s story and whether their ‘vocational ear’ is attuned to this story; and their vocational ear functions much more in terms of the material and moral gravity of the alleged offence, not in terms of the law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Ermek B. Abdrasulov

This article examines the issues of differentiation of legislative and subordinate regulation of public relations. It is noted that in the process of law-making activities, including the legislative process, practical questions often arise about the competence of various state bodies to establish various legal norms and rules. These issues are related to the need to establish a clear legal meaning of the constitutional norms devoted to the definition of the subject of regulation of laws. In particular, there is a need to clarify the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of the concepts "the most important public relations", "all other relations", "subsidiary legislation", as well as to establish the relationship between these concepts. Interpretation is also required by the provisions of p. 4 of Article 61 of the Constitution in terms of clarifying the question of whether the conclusion follows from mentioned provisions that all possible social relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are subject to legal regulation, including those that are subject to other social and technical regulators (morality, national, business and professional traditions and customs, religion, standards, technical regulations, etc.). Answering the questions raised, the author emphasizes that the law and bylaws, as a rule, constitute a single system of legislation, performing the functions of primary and secondary acts. However, the secondary nature of subsidiary legislation does not mean that they regulate "unimportant" public relations. The law is essentially aimed at regulating all important social relations.


Author(s):  
Komang Ekayana

Corrupted state assets certainly hurt the country narrowly, but also broadly where it harms the country and its people. However, the formal approach through the current criminal procedure law has not been able to recover the losses suffered by the state. In fact, state losses resulting from corruption are state assets that must be saved. Then there needs to be a new breakthrough to recover state losses through the asset recovery model. When looking at the country from the perspective of the victims, the state must obtain protection, in this case recovery from the losses suffered due to corruption. This paper examines the model of returning assets resulting from corruption in the law enforcement process that focuses on the rule of law in the 2003 UNCAC Convention and the mechanism of returning state assets in terms of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document