scholarly journals Legal Problems of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in Enforcing Banking Crimes

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Moh Achyar ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Teguh Prasetyo

<em>The Financial Services Authority in practice often face institutional problems that still rely on the position of outside investigators, but on the other hand it must maintain its independence. The purpose of this study is to examine and to analyze the Legal Problems of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in Enforcing Banking Crime. The method used in this study was the constructive paradigm. The research approach used was empirical juridical, namely legal research. The object of study were provisions and enforcement or implementation of legal provisions in action on every legal event that occurs in the community (in concreto). The data analysis used qualitative analysis. The results of the study found that the problem of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in conducting criminal acts against banking crimes was due to legislative factors or legal substance, structure and legal culture. Provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in which Civil Servant Investigators or PPNS are not necessarily able to collect all the evidence specified. The Second factor is the Law Enforcement Officials. In quality, the law enforcement factor that impedes the role of the FSA in investigating banking crimes is the limited professionalism in the field of investigation, so that knowledge and technical skills of investigation need to be improved. FSA in investigating banking crimes must recruit Police Investigators and Prosecutors, FSA must make an agreement with Polri in conducting investigations into banking crimes so that they can immediately arrest suspects who are considered to have committed banking criminal acts. The third is the cultural factors of society. In terms of the cultural factors of the community, the intensity of the community in its involvement in enforcement and supporting the investigation will be hampered by the lack of clarity in the position of the investigative institution.</em>

Author(s):  
St. Nurjannah

AbstractThe form of law enforcement against brand violations in the city of Makassar has been regulated in Law No. 20 of 2016 that has been good and perfect because it has gone through several revisions and in practice, law enforcement against these violations has been carried out well by investigators of the civil service Ministry of Law and Human Rights who work closely with the Republic of Indonesia National Police investigators and Public Prosecutors. But it is needed addition to the number of civil servant investigators in the scope of ministries that specifically deal with violations of brand rights and IPR as a whole so that enforcement and implementation of the Law / 20 of 2016 is more maximal. The stipulation of laws concerning brands which constitute complaint offenses must be changed to the usual offense of enforcement of violations of Brand Rights which can be immediately processed by the authorities without waiting for a complaint.Key Words: Law Enforcement, Brand RightsAbstrakBentuk penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran merek di kota Makassar telah diatur didalam UU No. 20 Tahun 2016 yang telah bagus dan sempurna karena telah melalui beberapakali revisi dan dalam prakteknya, penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran ini telah dijalankan dengan baik oleh penyidik pegawai negeri sipil kementerian Hukum dan Ham yang berkerja sama dengan penyidik Kepolisian Negara republik Indonesia serta Penuntut Umum. Namun, diperlukan penambahan jumlah penyidik pegawai negeri sipil dilingkup kementrian yang khusus menangani pelanggaran hak merek dan HKI secara keseluruhan agar penegakan dan penerapan UU/20 tahun 2016 lebih maksimal. Penetapan UU tentang merek yang merupakan delik aduan harus diubah menjadi delik biasa sehingga penegakan terhadap pelanggaran Hak Merek dapat segera diproses oleh pihak yang berwajib tanpa menunggu adanya aduan.Kata Kunci: Penegakan Hukum, Hak Merek


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rossi Suparman

Secreted as an action or decision that can be used by the state civil service (ASN) under certain conditions, in carrying out the law enforcement duties of civil servants especially the police the authority to use discretion can be applied according to the conditions needed in the context of law enforcement, but after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration requires clarity regarding the position of discretion in law enforcement. The method used is a normative approach using secondary and primary data that is analyzed qualitatively. The results showed (1) That the enactment of the Law on Government Administration is an effort to provide a legal position for discretion within the State Civil Apparatus. Discretion is regulated more clearly, from the definition, the limit according to the law, the limit is issued by the authorized official, the purpose, scope, conditions, use of discretion and approval procedures, and the consequences of discretionary law. (2) POLRI in its position as a law enforcement apparatus has the function of enforcing law in the judicial field both preventive and repressive. So with the discretionary authority in the judicial field as stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2002 in Article 18 paragraph (1) that "In the public interest of the Republic of Indonesia National Police officials in carrying out their duties and authorities can act according to their own judgment". (3) that in the relationship between the implementation of discretion according to the Government Administrative Law and the Police Law of the Republic of Indonesia there is an expansion of the purpose of police discretion in law enforcement, which is not only to create and maintain security and order, but also to launch and overcome obstacles in the process of law enforcement.Keywords : Discretion, State Civil Apparatus, Law Enforcement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumiaty Adelina Hutabarat

<p>There are two law enforcement agencies combating corruption, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Police, having the same authority, but in implementing authority there are differences, for example in the application of laws that govern the two institutions.The problem that becomes the study of this research is how the problem of the existence of the KPK as an institution to eradicate corruption has the authority regulated in RI Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, whose authority lies with the Police regulated in RI Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia which refers to the Criminal Code The results of the study showed that the resolution of the dispute between the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission in the investigation of corruption was carried out by coordinating the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in Corruption Criminal Investigations. Law number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission regulates the relationship between the performance of the KPK and the Police regarding investigations, investigations and prosecutions.Settlement of authority disputes between the Police and the KPK should be the authority of the Supreme Court, due to judicial review under the Supreme Court Law. The right to test the law is the application of a balanced and balanced government. The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed by the Law 30/2002 whereas the Indonesian Police was formed by the 1945 Constitution, article 30 paragraph 4.</p><p><strong>Keywords : <em>Authority, investigation, KPK</em></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-86
Author(s):  
Masri

The problem examined in this research is how is the implementation of Regulation of the Head of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2015 concerning Community Policing on the main duties and functions and authority of Bhayangkara Community Security and Order in the Tapung Sector Police. This research method is carried out directly in the field according to the type of sociological legal research. The results showed that the implementation of regulations on Community Policing against the Tupoksi and the authority of Bhabinkamtibmas in the Tapung Sector Police has not achieved maximum results. Factors that hinder the implementation of regulations concerning Community Policing of the Tupoksi and the authority of Bhabinkamtibmas in the Tapung Sector Police are: applicable law, law enforcement officials, supporting facilities or facilities, community and cultural factors. Efforts taken are in the form of preventive and repressive measures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
DADIN EKA Saputra

This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the application of the legal principle ofequality before the law in law enforcement in Indonesia with the harmonization of conflict between thestate institutions and the National Police Commission. The method used in this research is normativejuridical, namely research in the review by reference and based on the norms and rules of law, thelegislation in force, theories and doctrines of law, jurisprudence, and materials other literature relevantto the research topic. From the analysis of the data, it can be concluded that there is a recognition of theprinciple of normative and empirical rule of law, namely that all the issues are resolved with the law asthe supreme guidance. Normatively either in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945,and in Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 on Human Rights, the principle of equality of treat-ment before the law has been published in a comprehensive manner, as the rights that must be re-spected, guaranteed, protected and met by the state. Disharmony between institutions or law enforce-ment agency that is now emerging, should be immediately solved by basing the legislation that exists.


Author(s):  
Mirco Göpfert

This chapter explores how gendarmes in the Republic of Niger, notwithstanding their aspiration for popular legitimacy, try to justify their actions, not to others, but to themselves. Civilians bring the stories of their problems to the gendarmes’ attention in the form of complaints. Whether a complaint turns into a case, and thus whether the gendarmes become active, depends on their appreciation of the complainant’s story and whether their ‘vocational ear’ is attuned to this story; and their vocational ear functions much more in terms of the material and moral gravity of the alleged offence, not in terms of the law.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Rita Permanasari ◽  
Akhmad Khisni

ABSTRAKKetentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mewajibkan notaris untuk menjaga kerahasiaan segala sesuatu mengenai akta yang dibuatnya dan segala keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta sesuai dengan sumpah janji jabatan kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain. Kemungkinan terhadap pelanggaran kewajiban tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (11) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, seorang notaris dapat dikenai sanksi berupa teguran lisan sampai dengan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Terlebih lagi dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dengan Nomor: 49/PUU–X/2012 memutuskan telah meniadakan atau mengakhiri kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN membuat notaris seakan-akan tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) harus berusaha menjalankan peranan pembinaan dan perlindungan meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan keterampilan para notaris. Demikian juga menjalin hubungan dengan para penegak hukum lainnya, agar penegak hukum lainnya yang ada hubungan dengan notaris dapat memahami kedudukan notaris sesuai UUJN.Berangkat dari pemikiran inilah kewajiban ingkar notaris masih tetap dipertahankan oleh pembuat undang-undang dalam revisi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tahun 2014 yang merupakan konfigurasi kekuatan perlindungan terhadap profesi dan jabatan notaris dari sisi politik.Kata Kunci : Jabatan Notaris, Hak Ingkar, Perlindungan Hukum.ABSTRACTThe provisions of Article 4 and Article 16 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph f of the Notary's Office Law require a notary to maintain the confidentiality of all matters concerning the deeds it has made and all the information obtained for the deed in accordance with the oath of pledge of office except the law otherwise. The possibility of breach of such obligation under Article 16 paragraph (11) of Notary Law Regulation, a notary public may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral reprimands until dismissal with disrespect. Moreover, with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the number : 49 /PUU-X/2012 deciding to have canceled or terminated the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) listed in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN made a notary as if there was no legal protection for a notary in performing duties. The Indonesian Notary Bond (INI) should endeavor to undertake the role of guidance and protection to increase the knowledge, abilities and skills of the notaries. Likewise establish relationships with other law enforcers, so that other law enforcement who has relationship with the notary can understand the position of notary under the UUJN.Departing from this thought the obligation of notarization is still maintained by the lawmakers in the revision of the Law Regulation of Position Notary on Year 2014 which is the configuration of the strength of the protection of the profession and the notary's position from the political side.Keyword : Position of Notary, Right of Remedy, Legal Protection.


Author(s):  
Ахметкали Шаймуханов

В статье рассматриваются и анализируются некоторые положения действующего оперативно-розыскного законодательства Республики Казахстан. На основе сравнительного анализа и изучения юридической литературы поднимаются проблемы, возникающие в правоприменительной деятельности при реализации отдельных положений закона. Автором вносятся предложения и рекомендации по совершенствованию правовых норм, направленные на решение задач, связанных с профилактикой, предупреждением и пресечением наиболее опасных уголовных преступлений. Мақалада Қазақстан Республикасының қолданыстағы жедел-іздестіру заңнамасының кейбір ережелері талқыланып, талданған. Салыстырмалы талдау және заң әдебиеттерін зерттеу негізінде заңның белгілі бір ережелерін жүзеге асыру кезінде құқық қорғау органдарында туындайтын проблемалар көтеріледі. Автор аса қауіпті қылмыстық құқық бұзушылықтардың алдын алуға, алдын алуға және жолын кесуге байланысты мәселелерді шешуге бағытталған құқықтық нормаларды жетілдіру бойынша ұсыныстар мен ұсыныстар енгізеді. The article discusses and analyzes some of the provisions of the current operational-search legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Based on comparative analysis and study of legal literature, the problems arising in law enforcement activities in the implementation of certain provisions of the law are raised. The author makes suggestions and recommendations for improving legal norms aimed at solving problems related to the prevention, prevention and suppression of the most dangerous criminal offences.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 00003
Author(s):  
Agustining ◽  
Ningrum Natasya Sirait

Purchasing motor vehicles with instalment (credit) is currently becoming favourite choice by many people including people who live in plantation and agriculture area. There are several reasons, such as easy pre-requirements, low down payment and saving time. The financing institutions that generally deal with motor vehicle credit are financing companies and banks. Although, they are different in their operational legal basis, in practice, financing company and bank fall under the category of fiduciary warranty agreements. This study focus on the potential fraud on law in financing of capital goods. This study used the normative and empirical legal research methods. In the end of the study, it found that it used loan financing with fiduciary guarantee not a lease agreement. As a consequence, the use of fiduciary warranty by financing company in a lease does not accord with the law and considered to be illegal. Last but not least the study found that Ministry of Finance and the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/OJK) as supervisory agencies financing business must to ensure law enforcement, certainty and effective oversight. OJK should provides sanctions for financing companies which do not comply in accordance with the legal provisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.21) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
M Zamroni ◽  
. .

Hope to have legislation that specifically set while an umbrella in running materialize advocate profession, lawyers are more confident in addition to other law enforcement officials, such as judges, prosecutors and police, as well as respected as an equal partner in the law enforcement process. But the big question is how the existence of the profession of advocate Indonesia before and after the enlawment of Act Number 18 of 2003 concerning the Advocate, as well as any constraints that occur in their implementation. The rule of law relating to the profession of advocate before the enLawment of Act Number 18 of 2003 concerning The Advocate, scattered in various laws, such as Act Number 1 of 1946 on the Law of Criminal Code, Act Number 1 of 1950 on the Supreme Court, Emergency Act Number 1 of 1951 governing temporary measures to organize the unity of the pecking order and civil court events, and Herziene Indlandsch Regalement (HIR). Before the release of Act Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates, advocate the use of the term in prLawice there has been no standard for the profession. In various provisions of the legislation of any inconsistency pr. For example Act Number 14 of 1970, as has been replaced by Act Number 35 of 1999, and was replaced again by Act Number 4 of 2004 as well as the latter is replaced by Act Number 48 of 2009, regarding the power of Justice, to use the term legal aid and lawyers. Birth of the Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2003 concerning The Advocate is the expectation of a long delayed during the 58 years since the independence of the Republic of Indonesia, the laws governing the profession of advocate a free, independent and responsible for the implementation of a judicial honest, fair, and legal certainty for all seekers of justice in upholding the law, truth, justice, and human rights.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document