scholarly journals Ciência Aberta, da ciência para todos à ciência com todos │ Open Science, from science for everybody to science with everybody

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Hannud Abdo

RESUMO Este artigo descreve e propõe reflexões sobre algumas tendências de Ciência Aberta ligadas ao que se vem chamando ciência cidadã e pesquisas abertas ou cadernos científicos abertos. Esses são projetos que pressupõem um potencial universal de contribuição à produção de conhecimento, e substituem funções e limites de instituições enrijecidas por plataformas on-line e espaços físicos em constante reconfiguração que habilitam, e servem aos interesses de, comunidades de produção de conhecimento.Palavras-chave: Ciência Aberta; Hackerspaces; Colaboração; Cadernos Científicos Abertos; Ciência Cidadã.ABSTRACTThis article describes and suggests reflections upon some tendencies in open science connected to what has been called citizen science and open research or open notebook science. These are projects that assume a universal potential for collaboration in the production of knowledge, and replace functions and limits of rigid institutions by on-line platforms and physical spaces under constant reconfiguration which enable, and serve the interests of, knowledge production communities.Keywords: Open Science; Hackerspaces; Collaboration; Open Notebook Science; Citizen Science.

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (2-3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Orth ◽  
Birgit Schmidt

Open Science ist ein relativ junger Begriff, die zugrunde liegende Idee des Teilens von Wissen, Ergebnissen und Methoden ist jedoch so alt ist wie die Wissenschaft selbst. Open Science umfasst neben Open Access und Open Data – dem offenen Zugang zu Veröffentlichungen und Forschungsdaten – auch radikal neue Bereiche wie Citizen Science und Open Notebook Science. Seitdem die Europäische Kommission und andere Forschungsförderer zunehmend Open Access zu Publikationen und Daten in ihre Förderrichtlinien aufnehmen, ist es für Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler unumgänglich geworden, sich mit diesem Thema auseinanderzusetzen. Die Herausforderung bei der Umsetzung dieser Anforderungen ist nicht so sehr die Existenz und Zugänglichkeit relevanter Informationen, sondern die unübersichtliche Fülle an Material. Das von der Europäischen Kommission geförderte Projekt „Facilitating Open Science Training for European Research“ (FOSTER) führt deshalb eine breite Sammlung von Materialien und Kursen zum Thema Open Science zusammen und schafft so eine Lernressource für die europäische Forschungscommunity. Die Inhalte stehen möglichst über offene Lizenzen zur Verfügung, um die Nachnutzung in weiteren Schulungen zu unterstützen. Die Navigation durch die Fülle an Inhalten erfolgt entlang einer Taxonomie oder anhand von zielgruppenspezifischen Lernzielen, die zum Beispiel Projektmanager oder Multiplikatoren wie Bibliothekare adressieren. Der Artikel stellt die aktuellen Ergebnisse des Projektes vor, beleuchtet die Rolle der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen im Projekt und gibt einen Ausblick auf die Aktivitäten im zweiten Projektjahr.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Oliveira Fagundes

RESUMO Orientação para a aplicação, transdisciplinaridade e relevância social são algumas características do chamado Modo 2 de produção da ciência. Neste modelo, a troca de informações e a transparência são valorizadas, o que inspira experiências de produção do conhecimento baseadas na colaboração. Um exemplo é o caso das “bactérias extraterrestres”, quando uma controvérsia científica foi debatida e ampliada por meio de ferramentas da internet. O acontecimento mostra a convivência de uma ciência tradicional, mais fechada, com uma ciência aberta, marcada pela troca e transparência, levando à reflexão sobre a produção do conhecimento na contemporaneidade, e tensões e desafios para o futuro.Palavras-chave: Ciência Modo 2; Ciência Pós-Acadêmica; Colaboração; Ciência Aberta; Blog.ABSTRACT Application contexts, transdisciplinarity and social relevance are some of the characteristics of the so-called mode 2 of science production. In this model, the exchange of information and transparency are valued, inspiring knowledge production experiences based on collaboration. An example is the case of “alien bacteria”, where a scientific controversy has been discussed and amplified by internet tools. It reveals the coexistence of traditional science with open science, characterized by exchange and transparency, leading to a reflection on the production of knowledge in the contemporary world, its tensions and challenges for the future.Keywords: Mode 2 Science; Post-Academic Science; Collaboration; Open Science; Blog.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Albagli ◽  
Anne Clinio ◽  
Sabryna Raychtock

RESUMO Este artigo apresenta uma sistematização das abordagens e correntes interpretativas sobre ciência aberta, bem como uma categorização e exemplos de iniciativas que ajudam a ilustrar e a clarificar tais abordagens.  Para tanto, foram identificadas e sistematizadas definições, posições em debate e exemplos de iniciativas em cada uma das vertentes apresentadas. Palavras-chave: Ciência Aberta; Acesso Aberto; Educação Aberta; Ciência Cidadã; Cadernos Científicos Abertos; Hardware Aberto.ABSTRACT This article presents a systematization of the approaches and interpretive trends on open science, as well as a categorization and examples of initiatives that help illustrate and clarify such approaches. For this purpose, we identified and systematized definitions, positions under discussion and examples of initiatives in each of the aspects presented.Keywords: Open Science; Open Access; Open Education; Citizen Science; Open Notebook Science; Open Hardware.


2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin Zine

This paper examines the politics of knowledge production as it relates to Muslim women in western literary traditions and con­temporary feminist writing, with a view to understanding the political, ideological, and economic mediations that have histor­ically framed these representations. The meta-narrative of the Muslim woman has shifted from the bold queens of medieval lit­erature to colonial images of the seraglio's veiled, secluded, and oppressed women. Contemporary feminist writing and popular culture have reproduced the colonial motifs of Muslim women, and these have regained currency in the aftermath of9/1 l. Drawing upon the work of Mohja Kahf, this paper begins by mapping the evolution of the Muslim woman archetype in western literary traditions. The paper then examines how some contemporary feminist literature has reproduced in new ways the discursive tropes that have had historical currency in Muslim women's textual representation. The analysis is atten­tive to the ways in which the cultural production of knowledge about Muslim women has been implicated historically by the relations of power between the Muslim world and the West ...


Publications ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Eirini Delikoura ◽  
Dimitrios Kouis

Recently significant initiatives have been launched for the dissemination of Open Access as part of the Open Science movement. Nevertheless, two other major pillars of Open Science such as Open Research Data (ORD) and Open Peer Review (OPR) are still in an early stage of development among the communities of researchers and stakeholders. The present study sought to unveil the perceptions of a medical and health sciences community about these issues. Through the investigation of researchers` attitudes, valuable conclusions can be drawn, especially in the field of medicine and health sciences, where an explosive growth of scientific publishing exists. A quantitative survey was conducted based on a structured questionnaire, with 179 valid responses. The participants in the survey agreed with the Open Peer Review principles. However, they ignored basic terms like FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) and appeared incentivized to permit the exploitation of their data. Regarding Open Peer Review (OPR), participants expressed their agreement, implying their support for a trustworthy evaluation system. Conclusively, researchers need to receive proper training for both Open Research Data principles and Open Peer Review processes which combined with a reformed evaluation system will enable them to take full advantage of the opportunities that arise from the new scholarly publishing and communication landscape.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-45
Author(s):  
Susan Elizabeth Gagliardi ◽  
Constantine Petridis

Abstract Mapping Senufo: Art, Evidence, and the Production of Knowledge – an in-progress, collaborative, born-digital publication – will offer a model for joining theories about the construction of identities and the politics of knowledge production with research and publication practice. In this article, we examine how computational methods have led us to reframe research questions, reevaluate sources, and reimagine the form of a digital monograph. We also demonstrate how our use of digital technologies, attention to iteration, and collaborative mode of working have generated fresh insights into a corpus of arts identified as Senufo, the nature of evidence for art-historical research, and digital publication. We posit that the form of a digital publication itself can bring processes of knowledge construction to the fore and unsettle expectations of a tidy, authoritative narrative.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 3203-3207
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Colón-Ramos

My laboratory is interested in the cell biology of the synapse. Synapses, which are points of cellular communication between neurons, were first described by Santiago Ramón y Cajal as “protoplasmic kisses that appear to constitute the final ecstasy of an epic love story.” Who would not want to work on that?! My lab examines the biological mechanisms neurons use to find and connect to each other. How are synapses formed during development, maintained during growth, and modified during learning? In this essay, I reflect about my scientific journey to the synapse, the cell biological one, but also a metaphorical synapse—my role as a point of contact between the production of knowledge and its dissemination. In particular, I discuss how the architecture of scientific networks propels knowledge production but can also exclude certain groups in science.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Enwald

Open research data is data that is free to access, reuse, and redistribute. This study focuses on the perceptions, opinions and experiences of staff and researchers of research institutes on topics related to open research data. Furthermore, the differences across gender, role in the research organization and research field were investigated. An international questionnaire survey, translated into Finnish and Swedish, was used as the data collection instrument. An online survey was distributed through an open science related network to Finnish research organizations. In the end, 469 responded to all 24 questions of the survey. Findings indicate that many are still unaware or uncertain about issues related to data sharing and long-term data storage. Women as well as staff and researchers of medical and health sciences were most concerned about the possible problems associated with data sharing. Those in the beginning of their scientific careers, hesitated about sharing their data.


Minerva ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aitor Anduaga

AbstractThe why and the how of knowledge production are examined in the case of the transnational cooperation between the directors of observatories in the Far East who drew up unified typhoon-warning codes in the period 1900–1939. The why is prompted by the socioeconomic interests of the local chambers of commerce and international telegraphic companies, although this urge has the favourable wind of Far Eastern meteorologists’ ideology of voluntarist internationalism. The how entails the persistent pursuit of consensus (on ends rather than means) in international meetings where non-binding resolutions on codes and procedures are adopted. The outcome is the co-production of standardised knowledge, that is, the development of a series of processes and practices that co-produce both knowledge and ideas about the social order in a force field characterised by negotiations and power struggles.


2018 ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Hecker ◽  
Muki Haklay ◽  
Anne Bowser ◽  
Zen Makuch ◽  
Johannes Vogel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document