1. In the male Philaenus and Agrion the vasa deferentia terminate on the ninth segment in the early stages. An ectodermal invagination from that segment joins them subsequently and thus the male gonopore is established.
2. The accessory glands develop in Philaenus male from the anterior end of the swollen extremities of the vasa deferentia and the vesiculae seminales from a still more forward region.
3. The accessory glands of the male are mesodermal in origin and not ectodermal as some authors state.
4. There is no evidence as to the existence of a ‘pair of ectodermal ejaculatory’ ducts either in Philaenus orin Agrion, and reasons are adduced to show that they do not exist at all in the higher Insecta.
5. In the female nymph of Philaenus the oviducts terminate on the seventh segment. They are subsequently joined by an ectodermal invagination from the seventh segment. The common oviduct is formed in two parts: the anterior part is derived from the posterior region of the invagination on the seventh and the posterior region is formed as a groove from the ectodermis of the eighth segment and subsequently this groove is converted into a tube. When the second part is completed it is in connexion with the invagination from the seventh and opens to the outside on the eighth segment. The ectodermal invagination from the seventh also gives rise to the spermatheca. A median accessory gland develops as an invagination from the ninth segment between the bases of the inner ovipositor lobes. A pair of accessory glands develop as paired imaginations from the anterior region of the ninth segment.
6. In the female nymph of Agrion the oviducts fuse to form a single duct and terminate in the middle of the eighth segment. Posteriorly an ectodermal invagination from the eighth segment meets this duct and lies in a position dorsal to it. Later on the ectodermal invagination develops a spermatheca dorsally and the mesodermal and the ectodermal ducts unite into one. The accessory glands develop as paired ectodermal invaginations from the anterior region of the ninth segment.
7. The female gonopore is not homologous in the different groups of insects. The vaginal opening in Orthoptera, Hymenoptera, Homoptera, Diptera, and Lepidoptera is homologous. The vaginal opening in Coleoptera is homologous with the oviducal opening of Lepidoptera, with the opening of the accessory gland of Homoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera, Isoptera, and the opening of the spermatheca in some Orthoptera.
8. The common oviduct, being formed differently in the different groups is not homologous. The accessory organs, e. g. spermatheca, are not homologous in the different groups.
9. There is no evidence to show that the common oviduct is of paired origin.
10. The occurrence of a median accessory structure on the ninth segment which develops in the young as an invagination between the bases of the inner ovipositor lobes is very general in the higher Insecta. In some it functions as a gland, in others as a storehouse for spermatozoa.
11. The homology of the paired accessory glands is indicated.
12. The male genital ducts are not strictly homologous with those of the female. The homologue of the ejaculatory duct is the invagination from the ninth segment in the female.
13. The Odonata stand isolated in having a mesodermal region for the common oviduct and in the peculiar development of the two processes between the anterior ovipositor lobes.
14. The probable lines of evolution of the female efferent system in Insecta are indicated. The study of the development of the female efferent system indicates that the groups Orthoptera, Homoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera are very closely allied. Coleoptera seem to have had quite a different line of evolution from the above groups in this respect.
15. The adult Odonatan anatomy of the genital organs in the female as observed by me is in some respects different from that described by Tillyard.
In conclusion I wish to express my deep sense of gratitude towards Professor Balfour-Browne and Dr. J. W. Munroe, both of whom have always been ready to help me. My colleague Mr. R. I. Nel, who is working on similar lines in this department,, has rendered me valuable help, not only in matters connected with the subject proper but also in translating difficult German references. I am also indebted to Mr. Peter Gray who helped me a good deal in translating references in Italian.
INFANTILE HEMANGIOMA OF THE SUBORBITAL AND POSTERIOR REGION. CLINICAL CASE
