scholarly journals Uji Model Keseimbangan Teori Keagenan: Pengaruh Kebijakan Utang dan Kebijakan Dividen Terhadap Kepemilikan Manajerial [Testing a Model of Balance Agency Theory: The Influence of Policy Liabilities and Dividend Policy towards Managerial Ownership]

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiela Liviani ◽  
Putu Anom Mahadwartha ◽  
Liliana Inggrit Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Fixed Effect ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Debt Policy

<p>This study aims to analyze the balancing model of agency theory in the effect of debt policy and dividend policy to managerial ownership in manufacture sector companies, which are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Companies in Indonesia tend to have concentrated ownership structure. This condition is contradictory to the previous studies which mostly done in the widely ownership-dispersed countries. Balancing model argues that there is a trade-off between each monitoring and controlling mechanism, i.e. the effect of debt policy to managerial ownership and dividend policy to managerial ownership. This study uses a quantitative approach with fixed effect logistic regression model to analyze the data. Total sample of this study is 1,060 observations of 106 listed Indonesian manufacture firms during the period of 2004-2014. This study found debt policy to be a significant and negative determinant of the level of managerial ownership, as predicted by balancing model of agency theory. This study also found dividend policy has an insignificant positive effect to the level of managerial ownership, which rejected the balancing model of agency theory in the effect of dividend policy to managerial ownership.</p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji model keseimbangan teori keagenan pada pengaruh kebijakan utang dan kebijakan dividen terhadap kepemilikan manajerial dalam perusahaan sektor manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Struktur kepemilikan dalam perusahaan-perusahaan di Indonesia cenderung terkonsentrasi. Kondisi ini berbeda dengan penelitian terdahulu yang banyak dilakukan di negara yang struktur kepemilikannya cenderung tersebar. Model keseimbangan menyatakan bahwa terdapat <em>trade-off</em> antar suatu mekanisme pengawasan dan pengendalian dengan mekanisme lainnya, yaitu pengaruh kebijakan utang terhadap kepemilikan manajerial dan kebijakan dividen terhadap kepemilikan manajerial. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan <em>fixed effect logistic regression model</em> untuk menganalisis data. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah 1.060 observasi dari 106 perusahaan sektor manufaktur di Indonesia selama periode 2004-2014. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kebijakan utang berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap tingkat kepemilikan manajerial, seperti yang diprediksi oleh model keseimbangan teori keagenan. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa kebijakan dividen memiliki pengaruh positif tidak signifikan terhadap tingkat kepemilikan manajerial, yang mana menolak model keseimbangan teori keagenan dalam pengaruh kebijakan dividen terhadap kepemilikan manajerial.</p>

scholarly journals Trading Volume as a Predictor of Market Movement

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-69
Author(s):  
Edson Kambeu
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Trading Volume ◽  
Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Predictive Analytics ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Stock Market Index ◽  
Trading Volumes ◽  
Popular Language

A logistic regression model is has also become a popular model because of its ability to predict, classify and draw relationships between a dichotomous dependent variable and dependent variables. On the other hand, the R programming language has become a popular language for building and implementing predictive analytics models. In this paper, we apply a logistic regression model in the R environment in order to examine whether daily trading volume at the Botswana Stock Exchange influence daily stock market movement. Specifically, we use a logistic regression model to find the relationship between daily stock movement and the trading volumes experienced in the recent five previous trading days. Our results show that only the trading volume for the third previous day influence current stock market index movement. Overall, trading volumes of the past five days were found not have an impact on today’s stock market movement. The results can be used as a basis for building a predictive model that utilizes trading as a predictor of stock market movement.

scholarly journals PENGARUH FREE CASH FLOW, INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET, MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP TERHADAP DIVIDEN POLICY MELALUI DEBT POLICY SEBAGAI PEMEDIASI

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-59
Author(s):  
Luh Nik Oktarini ◽  
Putu Atim Purwaningrat
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Free Cash Flow ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Investment Opportunity ◽  
Investment Opportunity Set ◽  
Debt Policy ◽  
Program Version

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of free cash flow to debt policy to determine the influence of investment opportunity set against debt policy to determine the effect of managerial ownership on debt policy  to determine the effect of free cash flow to the dividend policy to determine the effect of managerial ownership to dividend policy. This research was conducted on manufaktur companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2015 period. Methods of data collection is done by using the method of documentation. Data analysis with path analysis with AMOS program version 20. The results showed  the effect of variable free cash flow to debt policy is significant, effect of variable investment opportunity set against debt policy is significant, the effect of managerial ownership variable against debt policy is not significantly, the effect of variable free cash flow toward dividend policy is not significant,  the effect of managerial ownership variable to dividend policy is a significant and indirect influence of the variable investment opportunity set against the dividend policy through debt policy is significant.

scholarly journals Free Cash Flows, Management Ownership, Dividend Policy, and Debt Policy

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Ardhya Yudistira Adi Nanggala
Keyword(s):  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Management Ownership ◽  
Free Cash Flows ◽  
Debt Policy

This study aims to identify and examine empirically effect of free cash flows, managerial ownership and dividend policy on debt policy (empirical study on companies listed on Stock Exchange). This study uses secondary data in form of financial statements derived from annual financial statements of companies listed on Stock Exchange and available reporting consecutive years from 2012 to 2017. Samples were taken by purposive sampling with first criteria company's annual financial statement data available for consecutive reporting years from 2012 to 2017. Number of samples in this study 132 firm years. Data analysis methods used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. Results showed that: free cash flows and managerial ownership has a significant positive effect on debt policy. Dividend policy have a significant negative effect on debt policy. Keywords: Free cash Flows, Management Ownership Dividend Policy, Debt Policy

scholarly journals THE SIGNALS OF DIVIDEND

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Novi Swandari Budiarso
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Listed Firms

Dividend decisions is a type of policy that earnings should be distributed to shareholders and sometimes contrast with the interest by insiders whether to retain or reinvest. The objective of this study is to examine the determinants of dividend policy on 230 listed firms in period of 2010 to 2011 and conducts logistic regression for hypothesis testing. This study finds that profitability, firm size, and institutional ownership are significant to dividend policy while managerial ownership is insignificant. This findings indicate that most of listed firms of the sample of this study determine the dividend policy based on profits. This study also finds that more larger the firms or institutional ownership then they tend to increase the dividends. Limited to sample, this study proves that agency theory is not applicable for dividend policy in Indonesia as the managerial ownership have no relationship with the dividend policy.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Kebijakan Dividen, Kebijakan Utang, Profitabilitas, Kepemilikan Manajerial, dan Komite Audit terhadap Nilai Perusahaan

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Siti Siti ◽  
Ahalik Ahalik
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Debt Policy

Abstrak:Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, profitabilitas, kepemilikan manajerial, dan komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan. Teknik pemilihan sampel penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 75 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2013-2017. Data penelitian ini menggunakan data dari laporan keuangan dari setiap perusahaan sampel. Analisis data penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan pemakaian SPSS 24. Nilai perusahaan dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan rasio Tobin’s Q. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, profitabilitas, kepemilikan manajerial dan komite audit secara bersama-sama berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Variabel kebijakan dividen (DPR), kebijakan utang (DER), kepemilikan manajerial (KM) dan komite audit (KA) tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan profitabilitas (ROE) berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.   Kata Kunci:kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, nilai perusahaan, profitabilitas.              Abstract:This research was conducted with the aim to determine the effect of dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, managerial ownership, and audit committee on firm value. The technique of selecting this research sample using purposive sampling. The sample in this study were 75 manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange in the period 2013-2017. This research data uses data from financial statements from each sample company. The data analysis of this study uses multiple regression analysis with the use of SPSS 24. The company value in this study is measured by Tobin’s Q ratio. The results of this study indicate dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, managerial ownership and audit committee jointly influence the firm value. The variable dividend policy (DPR), debt policy (DER), managerial ownership (KM) and audit committee (KA) did not affect the value of the company, while profitability (ROE) had a significant positive effect on firm value.   Keywords:dividend policy, debt policy, firm value, profitability

scholarly journals PENGARUH KEBIJAKAN DIVIDEN, KEBIJAKAN HUTANG, PROFITABILITAS DAN KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2015-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-27
Author(s):  
Desi eka Ardiani ◽  
Sri Hermuningsih ◽  
Ratih Kusumawardani
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Goods ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Insignificant Effect ◽  
Industrial Companies ◽  
Consumer Goods Industry ◽  
Debt Policy

Penelitian dilakukan guna menganalisis pengaruh kebijakan dividen, kebijakan hutang, profitabilitas dan kepemilikan manajerial terhadap nilai perusahaan subsektor industri barang konsumsi yang telah terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015-2019. Populasi terdiri dari seluruh perusahaan industri barang konsumsi tahun 2015 hingga 2019. Sampel penelitian ini yaitu 8 perusahaan subsektor industri barang konsumsi dan seri waktu 5 tahun dari 2015 sampai 2019. Data didapatkan melalui laporan keuangan tahunan di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) memakai metode purposive sampling yakni didasarkan pada kriteria tertentu. Metode analisis memakai analisis regresi berganda, asumsi kalsik dan uji hipotesis dengan tingkat memakai program SPSS. Hasil yang telah diselesaikan kebijakan dividen(DPR) berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kebijakan hutang(DER) berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Profitabilitas(ROA) berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kepemilikan manajerial(KM) berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kemudian bersama-sama kebijakan dividen, kebijakan hutang, profitabilitas dan kepemilikan manajerial berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. AbstractThis study aims to analyze the effect of dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, and managerial ownership on the value of the consumer goods industry sub-sector companies that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. The population used is all consumer goods industrial companies from 2015 to 2019. The sample of this research is 8 companies in the consumer goods industry subsector and a 5-year time series from 2015 to 2019. Data is obtained from annual financial reports on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) using a purposive method. sampling that is based on certain criteria. The analytical method used is multiple regression analysis, calcic assumptions, and hypothesis testing using the SPSS program. The results that have been finalized dividend policy (DPR) have a positive and significant effect on firm value. Debt policy (DER) has a positive and insignificant effect on firm value. Profitability (ROA) has a positive and significant effect on firm value. Managerial ownership (KM) has a positive and insignificant effect on firm value. Meanwhile, collectively, dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, and managerial ownership affect firm value.

scholarly journals The Influence of Ownership Structure, Asset Structure, and Earning Volatility on Debt Policy in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-106
Author(s):  
Saiful Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Stepwise Regression ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Debt Policy

The higher the proportion of debt, the higher the stock price, but at a certain point, the increase in debt will reduce the value of the company because the benefits obtained from the use of debt are smaller than the costs incurred. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of ownership structure – managerial ownership and institutional ownership, asset structure, and earning volatility on debt policy. The data used in this study are secondary data in the form of managerial ownership data, institutional ownership, asset structure, earning volatility and debt policy in pharmaceutical companies that go public on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2013-2017. The statistical method used is the Stepwise Regression, because there is high multicollinearity in managerial ownership variables, institutional ownership, assets structure, earning volatility. Based on the results of the Stepwise Regression shows that the variables entered into the regression model are earning volatility. Other variables such as managerial ownership, institutional ownership, asset structures are not included in the Stepwise Regression so that conclusion is only earning volatility variable that influences the debt policy earning volatility variables that affect debt policy.

scholarly journals FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI NILAI PERUSAHAAN NON KEUANGAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
ANWAR HARSONO
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Capital Expenditure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Final Sample ◽  
Debt Policy

The objective of the research is to obtain empirical evidence on the effect of independent variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, debt policy, return on asset, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership to firm value.The population used in this study are non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013-2016. Intake of data in this research using purposive sampling method. There are 54 non-financial companies that fit the criteria and were selected as the final sample. This study uses multiple regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The value of firms in this study was measured using Tobins'Q.The empirical results of this study indicate that the variables independent debt policy and return on assets have an influence on firm value, while the variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership have no effect on firm value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document