scholarly journals Pertanggungjawaban Ahli Waris Notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum atas Akta Notaris yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Para Pihak

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 322
Author(s):  
Anang Ade Irawan ◽  
A. Rachmad Budiono ◽  
Herlin Wijayanti
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Government

This article discusses the provision of Article 65 of Notary Law (UUJN) which contains the unclear time limit of the notary's responsibility in performing his duties as a public official. The article does not provide explicit explanations to the extent to which the notary no longer holds the responsibility after termination or death to the authentic deeds made. The purpose of this study is to know, identify and analyze the form of accountability of notary heirs as general officials on notarial deeds that cause harm to the parties. By using normative research, there are research results among others. First, based on the theory of fautes personalles, the theory which states that losses to third parties are imposed on officials who because of their actions have caused harm. Second, according to the theory of inheritance that becomes the object of the estate is a wealth in the sense of assets and liabilities. Unlawful acts of civil law are per-artificial wrong done by individuals, so it can not be associated with heirs. The government should make a clearer regulation of the deadline of notary responsibility by adding a separate chapter to the UUJN that regulates notary responsibility. Keywords: Responsibility, Notary Public Notary, Public Official, Notary Deed

scholarly journals Islamic Justice Perspective On Notary The Perpetrators Criminal Action

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Ira Alia Maerani
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Islamic Perspective ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

This study aims to find out to know the form of violations and witnesses to the notary position based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and the perspective of Islamic justice in viewing a notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in connection with an authentic deed he made.            This research uses normative law research or dogmatic law research using the doctrinal method. Normative legal research includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on vertical and horizontal synchronization stages, comparison of law and legal history.            This research concludes that the notary public is a public official who makes an authentic deed and has the authority as regulated in Article 15,16, 17 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. The notary is obliged to act on trust; honest; independent; objective and safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions. Notaries in carrying out their duties and positions if convicted of violations, may be subject to sanctions or sanctions in the form of civil, administrative, and notary code of ethics in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. Even so, the Notary Position Law does not regulate criminal sanctions against Notaries. Whereas in practice there is an opportunity for a legal action or violation by a notary related to an authentic deed he made that can be qualified as a criminal offense. A notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in carrying out his authority as a Public Official, of course, must be a concern of the government and law enforcement because the law must be upheld against anyone who commits indiscriminate violations. This rule is a manifestation of the principle of "equality before the law" (equality before the law) which is a fundamental element in the concept of the rule of law. Honesty values; keep the mandate; fair; and this objective is synergistic with the values of justice in an Islamic perspective that promotes justice and problems. Described in the Qur'an An-Nisa verses 58 and 135 and QS. Al Ma'idah verse 8. Islamic law also regulates justice in recording a deed, for example just in recording accounts receivable debts (Q.S. Al Baqoroh: 282)Keywords: Islamic Perspective; Justice; Notary Public; Perpetrators; Criminal Act

scholarly journals DUALISME KEDUDUKAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM TATANAN SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-170
Author(s):  
Isis Ikhwansyah ◽  
Indra Prayitno
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Profession ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
State Official ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Government

Abstract: Government policies related to notary institutions from the beginning of their emergence until now, it has not been able to provide certainty related to the independence of the Notary Position in the order of the National legal system. Is it purely as a public official like a state official, or is the legal profession, and or is a Public Official combined with a legal profession position because it influences his responsibilities. This study aims to find out how the position and responsibilities of a notary in the current national legal system, this research method uses a juridical normative approach method that is analyzed descriptively analytically on the basis of data that is processed in a juridical way qualitatively, logically and systematically. From the results of the study note that the Notary has a position as a "Public Official" based on “the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code”, UUJN, and other relevant laws. Notary public is also said to be a "professional position" because it has the skills and is done continuously to serve the interests of the community in the sphere of civil (Private). The notary's responsibility as a "Public Official" arises when the notary carries out the authority regulated under the UUJN and is responsible for carrying out his position to the client as well as to the government that has appointed him. The professional responsibility of a notary public arises when applying his skills in serving the community and being responsible to himself and his professional organization.Abstrak: Berbagai kebijakan pemerintah sehubungan dengan lembaga kenotariatan dari awal kemunculannya hingga saat ini, belum dapat memberikan kepastian terkait dengan independensi kedudukan notaris dalam tatanan sistem hukum nasional. Apakah murni sebagai pejabat umum layaknya pejabat negara, ataukah profesi hukum, dan ataukah pejabat umum yang dipadukan dengan jabatan profesi hukum karena hal tersebut berpengaruh terhadap tanggung jawabnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan kedudukan serta tanggung jawab notaris dalam tatanan sistem hukum nasional saat ini, metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode pendekatan yang dilakukan secara yuridis normatif  yang dianalisis secara deskriptif analitis atas dasar data yang diolah secara yuridis kualitatif, logis dan sistematis. Dari hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa notaris mempunyai kedudukan sebagai “pejabat umum” didasarkan pada ketentuan “pasal 1868 kuhperdata”, uujn, serta perundang-undangan terkait lainnya. Notaris juga dikatakan sebagai “jabatan profesi” karena memiliki keterampilan dan dilakukan secara terus menerus untuk melayani kepentingan masyarakat dalam lingkup keperdataan (privat). Tanggung jawab notaris sebagai “pejabat umum” muncul ketika notaris melaksanakan kewenangan yang diatur berdasarkan uujn dan bertang­gung­jawab terhadap pelaksanaan jabatannya kepada klien serta kepada pemerintah yang telah mengangkatnya. Tanggung jawab professional dari seorang notaris muncul ketika menerapkan keterampilannya dalam melakukan pelayanan pada masyarakat dan bertanggungjawab kepada diri sendiri serta organisasi profesinya.

Procuração/power of attorney

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-166
Author(s):  
Tereza Passos e Sousa Marques Afonso ◽  
Maria do Céu Henriques de Bastos
Keyword(s):  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Legal Instrument ◽  
Notary Public

Abstract This paper presents a contrastive legal and corpus-based linguistic and terminological analysis to translate a common legal instrument on a global scale, the power of attorney in English or procuração in Portuguese. This usually takes the shape of a written document, granted before a notary public as required by law, allowing one person to appoint another person to act on his/her behalf. Civil law and common law systems differ considerably with respect to requirements, formalities and range of powers permitted. In cross-border transactions, a translation is required to certify the authority given to third parties who do not speak the language. Bearing this in mind, a comparable corpus of authentic Portuguese and British texts (from England and Wales, and Northern Ireland) pertaining to this legal genre (12 procurações and 24 PoA) is analysed to identify its characteristics at functional, situational, thematic, lexical and grammatical levels.

scholarly journals UPAYA MEMINIMALISIR PERKAWINAN ANAK

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-67
Author(s):  
Susi Susilawati ◽  
Baliana Amir ◽  
Ratu Ratna Korompot ◽  
Marini Citra Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Service Research ◽  
Child Marriage ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Implementation Method ◽  
The Government

This paper is based on the results of community service. Research results and information on social media prove a significant increase in the number of child marriages. The rise of child marriages in Palu City since the Amendment to the Marriage Law (UUP) is the background for holding this activity. With the aim of helping the Government socialize the latest UUUP and as an effort to minimize child marriage. The implementation method is in the form of a seminar with several resource persons, namely the Service Team itself, namely academics from the Faculty of Law, Tadulako University, Civil Law Section. Abstrak Tulisan ini berdasarkan hasil pengabdian pada masyarakat. Hasil penelitian pun dan informasi-informasi di media sosial membuktikan adanya peningkatan yang cukup signifikan jumlah peristiwa perkawinan anak. Maraknya perkawinan anak di Kota Palu sejak Amandemen Undang-Undang Perkawinan (UUP) sebagai latar belakang diadakannya kegiatan ini. Dengan tujuan untuk membantu Pemerintah mensosialisasikan UUP terbaru dan sebagai upaya meminimalisir perkawinan anak. Metode Pelaksanaannya dalam bentuk seminar dengan beberapa Narasumber yaitu Tim Pengabdi sendiri yaitu para akademisi dari Fakultas Hukum Unversitas Tadulako Bagian Hukum Perdata.

scholarly journals Legal Analysis on Status as A Co-Defendant Notary in Dispute of Gather Treasure (Case Study in The Court of Ungaran District No: 105 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Unr)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Rudy Iskandar Ichlas ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Principle Of Legality ◽  
Legal Consequences

Authentic Deed is not solely determined by the law but must also be made before a public official even though the parties have signed. Pernasalahan formulation of this research: 1. How plaintiff legal reasons related to the notary as a co-defendant in the decision number 105 / Rev. G / 2016 / PN. Unr ?, 2. What legal consequences for the Notary as a co-defendant in the decision number 105 / Rev. G / 2016 / PN. Unr. In conclusion: 1). Position Anief Ratnawati, SH, Notary / PPAT in Ungaran as Co-Defendant extremely detrimental due to the lack of legal certainty as Co-Defendant and One goal (error in persona). Hence proved their obscuur libel and Error In Persona judge shall include in its decision to declare the judgment can not receive (NO: Niet ontvankelijk verklaard) lawsuit plaintiffs, 2). Anief Ratnawati, SH. as a Notary Public who is drawn into the dispute be imprecise Co-Defendant not authorized in terms of time (Onbevoegdheid ratione Temporis) and violates the principle of legality and the principles of civil law as private law. On the other hand the plaintiff proved to be an inheritance dispute within the competence of religious courtsKeywords: Legal Analysis; Notary; Co-defendant; Dispute; Gather Treasure.

scholarly journals THE SEVERAL UNLAWFUL ACT AFTER NUPTIAL AGREEMENT IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 328
Author(s):  
Heriyanti Heriyanti ◽  
Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan ◽  
Diana Diana
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Research Results ◽  
The Third ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
The Moment ◽  
The One ◽  
Marital Agreement

The rule of Constitutional Court has eased on the essential interpretation inherent in the prevailing prenuptial agreement. The prenuptial agreement is understood no longer as the one drawn up prior to the marital process but thereafter as well, as long as it is not against the norms of religion, public order, morals, and third parties. Essentially, it is in accordance Act on Marriage and seemingly more comprehensive than the interpretation of marital agreement of inherence at civil law. The approach method used is a normative juridical approach, the research results obtained state that the implication that the marital agreement can be drawn up either after or before the nuptial execution. The nuptial agreement is compulsory to be legalized on the notarial deed before the execution. The nuptial agreement before or at the moment of marital execution process under the terms that it does no harm to the third part

scholarly journals Kontrak Build Operate Transfer (BOT) sebagai Perjanjian Kebijakan antara Pemerintah dengan Pihak Swasta

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30
Author(s):  
Purbowicaksono Purbowicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Equal Footing ◽  
Contractual Relationship ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government

BOT (Build Operate Transfer) as a form of agreement held by the government policy with private parties is a legal act by the agency or the State administration officials who make public policy as the object of the agreement. Although inherent in him as a body or public official, the government in implementing the contractual relationship with another party (private) legal act is not governed by public law, but based on the laws and regulations of civil law (privaat recht), as the case of legislation that underlie civil legal actions carried out a body of citizens and civil law. The research shows that in a contractual relationship, the government as a party to the BOT contracts have no equal footing with their counterparts. This will be discussed in more depth in the study of law with the approach of juridical normative or study in a BOT contract as an agreement policy.

PEMANGGILAN NOTARIS DALAM RANGKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM PASKA PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurensius Arliman S
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Official ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

AbstractNotary is a public official who is authorized to make an authentic act. Law No. 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of Law No. 30 Year 2004 on Notary, explains that, to take a photocopy of a Notary deed minuta and call a Notary in law enforcement, no longer through the Regional Supervisory Council permission. So the question arises, how the basic formation of the Honorary Council of Notaries in Act No. 2 of 2014, and how to call the Notary deed made. Based on research outputs by the author, Honorary Council of Notaries of birth, due to the need of legal protection against a Notary in deed. Notary Honorary Council is indispensable in the implementation of the law enforcement process, where the calling Notary by law enforcement (police, prosecutors, judges) must obtain permission from the Notary Honorary Council. To fill the legal vacuum, because the Honorary Council of Notaries has not been established, the Notary can use the right Dissenters, Indonesian Notary Association urged the government to establish a Notary Honorary Council Implementing Regulation.Keywords: Notary Public; Law Enforcement; Law Notary.IntisariNotaris merupakan seorang Pejabat Publik yang berwenang untuk membuat sebuah akta otentik.Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, menjelaskan bahwa, untuk mengambil fotokopi minuta akta seorang Notaris dan memanggil seorangNotaris dalam penegakan hukum, tidak lagi melalui izin Majelis Pengawas Daerah. Maka timbul pertanyaan, bagaimana dasar pembentukan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014, dan bagaimana memanggil Notaris yang membuatkan akta, Paska Perubahan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Nomor 30 Tahun 2004. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang penulis lakukan, Majelis Kehormatan Notaris lahir, akibat kebutuhan perlindungan hukum terhadap seorang Notaris dalam pembuatan akta. Majelis Kehormatan Notaris sangat diperlukan didalam pelaksanaan proses penegakan hukum, dimana pemanggilan Notaris oleh para penegak hukum (polisi, jaksa, hakim) harus mendapat izin dari Majelis Kehormatan Notaris. Untuk mengisi kekosongan hukum, karena Majelis Kehormatan Notaris belum terbentuk, maka Notaris bisa menggunakan hak Ingkar, Ikatan Notaris Indonesia mendesak pemerintah untuk membentuk Peraturan Pelaksana Majelis Kehormatan Notaris.Kata Kunci: Notaris,penegakan hukum, Undang-Undang.

scholarly journals KONTRAK BUILD OPERATE TRANSFER SEBAGAI PERJANJIAN KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DENGAN PIHAK SWASTA

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalu Hadi Adha
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Equal Footing ◽  
Contractual Relationship ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government

BOT (Build Operate Transfer) as a form of agreement held by the government policy with private parties is a legal act by the agency or the State   administration officials who make public policy as the object of the agreement. Although inherent in him as a body or public official, the government in implementing the contractual relationship with another party (private) legal act is not governed by public law, but based on the laws and regulations of civil law (privaat recht), as the case of legislation that underlie civil legal actions carried out a body of citizens and civil law. The research shows that in a contractual relationship, the government as a party to the BOT contracts have no equal footing with their counterparts. This will be discussed in more depth in the study of law with the approach of juridical normative or study in a BOT contract as an agreement policy. Key words : BOT contract, agreement, policy

scholarly journals Weakness Of Political Law Notice Not Reflecting Justice For Notary

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Rais Firdaus Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
The People ◽  
The Future ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Government

The purpose of this paper is to show the role and authority of the Notary Public profession as a non-ASN official, and the need for a change in notary law politics in the form of changes to the formation of Notary regulations in the future so as to better guarantee justice and welfare for the Notaries. This study uses a normative juridical type of research with the specification of the study conducted analytically descriptive. Normative research uses secondary data types, namely data obtained from library studies. Data collection methods used by conducting Library Research (literature study) and techniques used in deciphering and processing the data collected is a qualitative description.Weaknesses of Notary regulations, both in the Civil Code and statutory regulations, are said by State officials but in practice the Notary independently looks for his own clients, so that it is more appropriate to say a general profession than State officials because they do not receive salary from the State and the role of the Notary from time to time is not doubt. Thanks to the performance of the Notary, economic traffic is particularly related to agreements, commitments, inheritance, etc., legal actions by the people who need and carry out legal actions helped in proving authentic deeds, so that they get legal certainty.This writing concludes that the Notary Public is a public official who is not an ASN official and needs further study by the government in the future in revising the Notary regulations. Also his advice on notary legal politics needs to be changed and the government of the relevant institutions authorized to form legislation should involve senior Notaries in revising Notary regulations.Keywords: Political Law; Notary; Justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document