scholarly journals International Legal Instruments in Responding to Human Trafficking

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 417
Author(s):  
Ridwan Arifin ◽  
Yehezkiel Lemuel ◽  
Ngaboawaji Daniel Nte
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Trafficking ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Legal Instrument ◽  
International Laws

Human trafficking grows and develops rapidly, with various motives and types of crimes. Various obstacles are faced in handling human trafficking cases, ranging from inadequate legal instruments to weak law enforcement. This study overviewed the international legal instrument on human trafficking cases, following the identification of the recent forms and issues in enquiring how international legal instruments deal with human trafficking. This study used legal research method by referring to international laws as the source of law in compiling this human trafficking research. This study found that various instruments and international cooperation have dealt with human trafficking cases. However, in various related studies, these different legal instruments did not have a clear and binding force when the issue occurs in the domestic state. In addition, human trafficking in various legal instruments also had many types, and all of them are interrelated. This study highlighted and concluded that in making various international legal instruments effective in this case, more intensive international cooperation was needed, both regionally and globally. KEYWORDS: Human Trafficking, Labor Human Rights, Criminal Law.

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals Implikasi Konsep Utilitarianisme dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika: Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor 389/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Yyk

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Shinta Rhukmi B.
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

AbstrakSistem peradilan pidana merupakan unsur yang signifikan dalam upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana narkotika. Pengguna narkotika seyogyanya mendapatkan sanksi pidana yang berat, mengingat korban penyalahgunaan narkotika di Indonesia semakin bertambah dari tahun ke tahun. Namun, dari segi penegakan hukum Mahkamah Agung melalui Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor 389/Pid.Sus/2015/PN Yyk hanya memuat formulasi yang tidak didukung dengan teori-teori keilmuan, bahkan putusan tersebut tidak mencantumkan keterangan masa penahanan atau ketentuan Pasal 197 ayat (1) huruf h Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif lebih mengutamakan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kekuatan mengikat Pasal 197 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 adalah  mandatory, imperatif dan limitatif dalam putusan hakim, yang bertujuan untuk memberikan nilai-nilai keadilan dan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak asasi manusia bagi para pihak. Adapun konsekuensi ketentuan tersebut apabila tidak dipenuhi dalam putusan hakim adalah putusan batal demi hukum.AbstractThe criminal justice system is a significant element in efforts to eradicate narcotics crime. Drug users should get severe criminal sanctions, considering that victims of narcotics abuse in Indonesia are increasing from year to year. However, in terms of law enforcement the Supreme Court through the Decision of the Yogyakarta District Court Number 389 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN Yyk only contains formulations that are not supported by scientific theories, even the decision does not include informatio on the period of detention or the provisions of Article 197 paragraph ( 1) letter h of Law Number 8 of 1981. This type of research is normative legal research. Normative legal research prioritizes literature. The results of the study indicate that the binding force of Article 197 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1981 is mandatory, imperative and limited in the judge's decision, which aims to provide values of justice and protection of human rights for the parties. The consequences of these  provisions if not fulfilled in the judge's decision are the verdict null and void.  

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PORNOGRAFI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 44 TAHUN 2008 DI ERA DIGITALISASI

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Andri Winjaya Laksana ◽  
Suratman Suratman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Research Library ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Investigations ◽  
Library Research

Pornography is a crime that is privacy so that enforcement against the eradication of pornography there are many difficulties. One of the factors inhibiting the eradication of pornography among others due to lack of cooperation from the public and the various parties in reporting this crime. Criminal law enforcement have a tendency to be influenced by the structure of society, that is a constraint that allows the criminal law enforcement can be run and can provide barriers that lead to the enforcement of criminal law can’t be started or can't be maximize. As happens to the pros cons on current legislation Law No. 44 Year 2008 concerning the Crime pornography. This research method using normative juridical approach. Normative juridical research also called legal research library research is done by checking library materials or secondary data. The results of the study refers to Article 34 in conjunction with Article 8 of Law No. 44 Year 2008 on Pornography, (1) that the elements of the crime of pornography consists of Subjective elements that error, which means intentionally or consent was committed and objective elements that act ( be) which means that objects or models that contain pornographic content. (2) In the process of criminal investigations conducted pornography remains based on Criminal Procedure unless otherwise provided in the Act No. 44 of 2008

scholarly journals Community Rights Facing Criminal Law in a Human Rights Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Harisman Harisman
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Rights ◽  
The Impact

Legal protection is one form of human rights that must be obtained by everyone, especially with regard to the application of criminal law that can have the impact of violations and restrictions on the freedom of others as a form of human rights. It is not uncommon for people's rights to be questioned or even contested when dealing with criminal law. To answer this problem, a study was conducted using the legal research method through a normative jurudical approach which was intended to collect secondary data obtained from the literature in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The materials collected were analyzed qualitatively descriptive. Based on the analysis conducted, it is clearly seen that people's rights in criminal law are part of human rights that must get respect and protection in order to maintain human dignity through efforts that include: equality before the law, presumption of innocent, non-retroactive and legal assistance, and not tortured, punishment or cruel, inhumane treatment, degrading human dignity and dignity, and not treated arbitrarily.

Concept of Restitution Application as a Form of Corporate Criminal Liability in Law Enforcement towards Human Trafficking Criminal Act

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
H Radea Respati PARAMUDHITA ◽  
H. Sigid SUSENO ◽  
Lies SULISTIANI
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Trafficking ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Vicarious Liability ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Corporate Liability

This research aims to analyze: (1) the corporate liability as a law subject in terms of human trafficking criminal act; and (2) the concept of restitution application as a form of corporate criminal liability in the case of law enforcement towards human trafficking criminal act. This research is categorized as normative legal research through the statue and conceptual approaches. The result of the research found that: (1) in terms of criminal law, both seen from the Law of Human Trafficking or theories of corporate liability, corporate is one of law subject in terms of human trafficking criminal act whose liability can be asked regarding human trafficking criminal act. The corporate liability which conducts human trafficking criminal act can be determined through the fulfillment of general criminal liability terms (subjective terms) including the presence of liability, the presence of guilt both intentionally and negligence, and the absence of reasons to omit the criminal law. The form of liability of corporate criminal in terms of human trafficking criminal act can be decided precisely using vicarious liability; and (2) restitution application concept, as a form of corporate criminal liability in law enforcement towards the human trafficking criminal act so that justice principle, legal certainty and benefit for the victim of human trafficking. Therefore, the concept offered is first, fulfillment of material rights. Second, the availability of legal protection accompanied with its implementing which is a very urgent matter. Third, the availability of structure (in the form of institution/entity) and infrastructure is an essential thing in process managing, deciding and executing the human trafficking criminal act.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pengurangan Masa Pidana (Remisi) terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Nilawati Dwi Cahya ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government

Indonesia is a rule of law which gives relief to prisoners every year, referred to as remission, is a policy of the government in order to reduce criminal penalties for each suspect caught in criminal law. Remission is given to those who during the sentence meet the provisions as people who are entitled to remission as well-behaved, and comply with any applicable regulations at the place of punishment. For someone who during his sentence is always against the rules cannot be given a remission. This study aims to determine the regulation of reducing the criminal period and determine the provision of remissions for narcotics offenders. The research method used is a type of normative legal research conducted by the method of recording and assessment based on legal materials. Researchers study and gather information through legal science books without deviating from positive law in order to conclude a conclusion. The implementation of the remission for narcotics offenders, namely the determination of the remission, is carried out by the decision of the head of the regional office on behalf of the minister, after issuing the stipulation of the head of the regional office must submit a report on the determination of the reduction of the criminal period to the minister of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights cq. Directorate General of Corrections.

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI HUKUM DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP KEJAHATAN MAYANTARA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1202
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Ketut Dewi Yani Putri
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Cyber Space

Tujuan penulisan ini untuk memenuhi dan melengkapi persyaratan untuk memperoleh gelar Magiter Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. Tujuan khusus dari penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui pembuktian serta yurisdiksi kejahatan mayantara dalam persidangan dan konstruksi hukum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan merupakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Teknik yang digunakan melalui studi kepustakaan yang diperoleh langsung dari bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur hukum yang terkait. Hambatan proses pembuktian dan yurisdiksi cyber crime yakni belum diaturnya alat bukti elektronik secara sah dalam KUHAP, masih diperdebatkannya kesaksian de auditu, serta sulit menemukan saksi yang berkompeten dalam menyaksikan kegiatan cyber crime. Mengenai yurisdiksi dalam kegiatan cyber crime juga perlu diatur kembali mengingat sangatlah sukar untuk memastikan dimana kejadiannya, kapan dilakukannya dan bagaimana perbuatan pelakunya, mengingat kejahatan ini merupakan global crime yang tidak jelas yurisdiksinya di samping berkaitan dengan cyber space yang pelakunya tidak kasat mata. Adapun Kebijakan Terhadap Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime) yakni melalui  modernisasi hukum pidana adapun beberapa alternative seperti Menghilangkan beberapa pasal- pasal pada Undang- Undang Cyber Crime yang tidak dipakai lagi (usang), Mengamandemen KUHP, Mengamandemen KUHAP, Mengamandemen Undang-Undang Teknologi Informasi, Dalam Pembuktian cyber crime aparat penegak hukum terutama hakim harus berani melakukan “rechtsvinding”. The purpose of this writing is to fulfill and supplement the requirements for the Magiter degree of legal sciences at the Faculty of Law of Udayana University. The specific purpose of this writing is to know the evidence and the jurisdiction of crime between the law in the trial and the construction of laws in Indonesia's laws and regulations. The method used is a normative legal research method through a statutory approach and a concept approach. Techniques used through literature studies obtained directly from the primary legal material in the form of legislation and related legal literature. The barriers to the proving process of cyber crime and jurisdiction are not in the legitimate electronic proof tool in the criminal CODE, still in the testimony of De Auditu, and difficult to find witnesses who are competent in witnessing cyber crime activities. Regarding the jurisdiction in cyber crime activities also need to be rearranged considering that it is difficult to ensure where the event, when it does and how the perpetration, considering this crime is a global crime that is unclear its jurisdiction in addition to the cyber space that the perpetration of invisible eyes. The policy on Cyber Crime is through the modernization of criminal law as some alternative such as eliminating some of the articles on Cyber Crime laws that are not used anymore (obsolete), amend KUHP, amend KUHAP, amend the Information Technology law, in proving Cyber Crime law enforcement officials, especially the judges must dare to do "rechtsvinding".

scholarly journals Perlindungan Merek sebagai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Studi di Kota Semarang, Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Wizna Gania Balqis
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Civil Servant ◽  
Creative Economy ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Sociological Approach ◽  
Trademark Infringement

The products produced by the creative economy will never be separated from the intellectual property in it, especially brands. However, the problem is that there are still many creative economy actors who do not register their product brands. This study uses a socio-legal research method with a statutory approach and a sociological approach. The results of this study indicate that a new brand will occur after the brand has been registered. Legal protection for creative economy product brands can be in the form of preventive protection and repressive protection. Preventive protection is provided by preventing the occurrence of trademark infringement to encourage trademark owners to register their trademarks to be legally protected. Meanwhile, repressive protection is carried out to deal with violations of trademark rights under applicable laws and regulations through judicial institutions and other law enforcement officers such as the police, Civil Servant Investigators, and the prosecutor's office to take action against violations of trademark rights. In the case of a request for violation of trademark rights, it is filed through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights.

scholarly journals An Analysis of The Imposition of Criminal Sanction to COVID-19 Vaccination Objectors Through the Lens of Criminal Law and Qiyas Shafi’i Mazhab in Indonesia

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaki Priambudi ◽  
Sendy Pratama ◽  
Ramdhan Prawira Mulya Iskandar ◽  
Namira Hilda Papuani ◽  
Natasha Intania Sabila
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Common Interests ◽  
Individual Human

<table width="595" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="387"><p><em>This article aims to answer whether vaccination is a right or an obligation and how criminal law and Qiyas Shafi’i Mazhab views the basic provisions of criminal law against vaccination objectors. By combining doctrinal and socio-legal research method, this article concludes that vaccination is an obligation because a person's personal right to choose health services, especially COVID-19 vaccination has turned into a public right. Vaccination is the government's obligation to protect public health as part of meeting health needs, following the mandate of the constitution and human rights. According to the relative punishment theory, the application of criminal sanctions is an effort made to maintain public order and peace of society, not as a means of repaying the perpetrator's mistakes. Thus, the sanctions imposed on the perpetrator are solely to provide fear so that they do not repeat their actions and other people do not follow them. There are three main objectives of relative theory, namely prevention, prevention, and reform. Whereas Qiyas Shafi'i Mazhab puts forward the application of qiyas as a justification for imposing criminal sanctions against vaccination objectors. Because a person is prohibited from doing something that endangers himself and others, punishment according to the Qiyas Shafi'i Mazhab can be applied. There are similarities between criminal law and Qiyas Shafi'i Mazhab to a view of the obligation to vaccinate, that is, both allow the reduction of individual human rights for the sake of common interests. Ultimately, this article recommends the need to regulate the handling of COVID-19 vaccination objectors through act so that vaccination and law enforcement can run comprehensively, not partially </em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>

scholarly journals PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK KASUS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-170
Author(s):  
Hasuri Hasuri ◽  
Mia Mukaromah
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Study Results

Corruption is considered a great crime and requires special handling. In handling corruption, special handling is needed by using the proof reversed or reversal of the burden of proof but in a balanced manner. The purpose of this study is to explain the reverse evidence of corruption from a human rights perspective. This research uses the empirical normative legal research method, namely the combination of normative legal provisions (laws) with practical elements (legal events in society/social elements). The study results state that the theory of reverse proof of corruption cases based on a human rights perspective does not violate the principles and respect for the rights of the defendants in the general principles of criminal law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document