scholarly journals Kryminalizacja finansowania terroryzmu w świetle przepisu art. 165a kodeksu karnego. Część 1

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-425
Author(s):  
Piotr Ochman
Keyword(s):  
Information Flow ◽  
Social Problem ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Terrorist Activity ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism ◽  
Legislative Measures

Progressing globalization, ease of movement and the pace of information flow undoubtedly have intensified the threat of an important social problem — terrorism. An key instrument of combating terrorist activity is counteracting its financing. This article will analyze the crime of financing terrorism, which has been typified in Art. 165a of the Polish Criminal Code. An attempt will be made to answer the question of whether the legislative measures taken in the above-mentioned scope are purposeful, necessary and justified. The genesis of the current legal regulations in the field of counteracting the financing of terrorism in the Polish penal code will be also presented.

scholarly journals Polemic of Indonesian Criminal Code Bill on Bali’s Tourism Industry

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
I Made Ari Kapela
Keyword(s):  
Group Discussion ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Tourism Industry ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Postponement ◽  
Fairmont Hotel

Indonesian Criminal Code Bill proposal, suddenly became a hot issue after Indonesia commemorate their 74th Independence Day. The executive and legislative accelerated completion of Indonesian Criminal Code Bill (ICCB) at Fairmont Hotel, Jakarta. Many parties have been urging the government to revise some outdated articles since the penal code was a product of Dutch colonialism in the past. Three crucial topics were discussed and added to the draft regarding blasphemy to president, crimes against morality and decency, as well as specific intent crime. Apparently, some parties were unsatisfied with the draft. Waves of uproar sprang up between mid-September and early October 2019. the demonstrators considered that there are ten controversial articles in the ICCB that have vague enforcement parameters. To reduce the public tension, the government agreed to delay the ICCB ratification that, according to public includes multiple problematic articles. President Joko Widodo stated that more input would be conducted before disseminate the latest ICCB information to public. The postponement would be evoked after the new set of parliaments is inaugurated. Albeit being postponed, Tourism practitioner in Bali experiencing significant loss of tourists visit due to the issues. It is expected in future; the government would involve tourism practitioner in group discussion before setting new regulations that may affect the vital industry of Indonesia.

scholarly journals Abortion by Rape Victim: A Dilemma in the Drat of Penal Code and Indonesian Health Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-640
Author(s):  
Fikri Ariyad ◽  
Ali Masyhar
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Women Victims ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Psychological Trauma ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Medical Emergencies ◽  
The Government

In this present time, the debate about abortion in Indonesia is increasingly crowded. Abortion is also carried out by women - victims of rape to reduce the burden they suffered. The regulation on abortion in Indonesia has been regulated in the statutory regulations, namely the Criminal Code, especially in Article 346, Article 347, Article 348, and Article 349. In the RKUHP (Draft of Criminal Code), abortion regulation is regulated in two chapters namely, Chapter XIV Article 501 and Chapter XIX Articles 589, 590, 591, 592. In addition, the government has also issued several regulations governing abortion such as Government Regulation No. 61 of 2014 concerning Reproductive Health and also Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning health. However, the various regulations that exist between the Criminal Code, RKUHP, PP and the Act actually contradict to each other. There is no synchronization between the regulations regarding abortion by women rape victims. The KUHP and RKUHP clearly do not allow abortion in Indonesia and do not legalize it without any exception, including abortion carried out by women victims of rape. Whereas in Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning health, abortion can be carried out on an indication of medical emergencies and pregnancy due to rape that causes psychological trauma, so abortionists cannot be prosecuted as criminal.

scholarly journals URGENSI PEMBARUAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA : ANALISIS KAJIAN PERKARA NOMOR 46/PUU-XIV/2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-86
Author(s):  
Endang Nur Ulfah
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
Colonial Legacy ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
Needle Analysis ◽  
Code Reform

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana atau biasa disebut dengan KUHP adalah warisan kolonial Belanda yang diberlakukan di Indonesia melalui asas konkordasi dan disahkan melalui UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 serta diberlakukan untuk umum melalui UU Nomor 73 Tahun 1958. Artinya, KUHP yang sedang berlaku bukan terbentuk sesuai dengan karakteristik masyarakat Indonesia meskipun ada penyesuaian, itu dianggap tidak cukup. Karena itu, pembaruan KUHP secara universal juga perlu dilaksanakan agar kontras dengan bangsa Indonesia. Pengajuan permohonan uji materiil terhadap pasal dalam KUHP dengan Nomor Perkara 46/PUU-XIV/2016 merupakan gambaran bahwa pembaruan KUHP juga dikehendaki oleh masyarakat banyak. Artikel ini dibuat bertujuan untuk menggambarkan betapa lapuknya KUHP dan memberikan pengetahuan kepada pihak yang berkepentingan untuk menyegerakan pembaruan. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini melalui tiga tahap. Pertama, wawancara dengan ahli yaitu peneliti-peneliti MK RI. Kedua, studi kepustakaan untuk memperkuat jarum analisis betapa urgennya suatu pembaruan. Ketiga, obserasi yang dilakukan selama proses persidangan perkara. Salah satu kewenangan Mahkamah konstitusi adalah menguji Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-undang Dasar. Dalam permohonan tersebut, Pasal 284 ayat (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), Pasal 285, dan Pasal 292 KUHP menggambarkan bahwa betapa pentingnya pembaruan KUHP karena keidaksesuaian ruh yang ada didalamnya. Pasal-pasal tersebut dipandang sudah sangat urgen untuk diubah. Pembaruan KUHP secara universal sangat urgen untuk disegerakan karena ini dapat menjadi faktor kriminogen bagi masyarakat dan dapat mencederai rasa keadilan. Harapannya Mahkamah Konstitusi dapat menjawab kebutuhan masyarakat tentang suatu hukum yang benar-benar hidup dalam masyarakat.The Penal Code or commonly called KUHP is the Dutch colonial legacy that prevailed in Indonesia through the principle of concordance and legalized with The Constitusion No. 1 of 1946 and enacted for the public through The Constitution No. 73 of 1958. Its means, Criminal Code that are applicable not formed by the characteristics of Indonesian society although there was an adjustment, it was not enough. Therefore, the universally Criminal Code reform should be carried out to contrast with the nation of Indonesia. The submission of judicial review of the clause of the Criminal Code with Case No. 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 is a representation that reformation of Criminal Code is also desired by many people. This report aims to describe how old the Criminal Code is and provide the knowledge to interested parties to hasten the reform.The method of collecting data in this report through three stages. First, interviews with experts that researchers in The Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Second, the study of literature to strengthen a needle analysis of how the urgency of reform. Third, observation that committed during court proceedings.The one of authority of the Constitutional Court is reviewing the Constitution. In the petition, Article 284 paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), Article 285 and Article 292 illustrates how important reform the Penal Code because there is unsuittable spirit inside. Such articles deemed to have been very urgent to be changed. Reformation Penal Code universally is very urgent to be expedited because this can be a kriminogen factors for society and can injure the sense of justice. Hopefully the Constitutional Court can answer the necessary of community on a law that actually live in the community.

scholarly journals Alternative Theoretical Foundations of Penal Sentences in Criminal Law with Regard to Iran's Islamic Penal Code 1392

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Ahmad Hamdamiyan ◽  
Ahmad Reza Behniafar
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Social Rehabilitation ◽  
The Social ◽  
Alternative Measures ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
Legislative Measures ◽  
Care Period

<p>The failure of penalties depriving liberty in the social rehabilitation of offenders and to reduce the jail population and prevention of recidivism and reduce the costs of implementing the policy of freedom depriving punishment sentence depriving freedom of recent decades and the United Nations was considering legal systems.In depriving Iran from its initial rounds of legislative measures to restrict the scope of punishment was considered free.since 1370 substitution of alternative measures of punishment now widely spread than ever before converting a penalty in the form of suspension of its operation are available depriving of freedom.</p>Alternatives to punishment of imprisonment in the Penal Code in 1992 was taken into consideration in the new Penal Code in 1392 in addition to the previous alternatives of new cases of alternative punishment of prison is considered that including the daily fine, public services and care period pointed out.

The draft code and reliance upon official statements

Legal Studies ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glanville Williams
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Model Penal Code ◽  
Draft Code ◽  
American Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Political Realities ◽  
Law Commission

Any project to draft a criminal code has to compromise between the desirable and the politically possible. It may be that the draft now produced by the Law Commission, or something like it, is the best that can safely be backed, though the contrast between it and the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code (which also had to take account of political realities, and yet has been adopted in many States) is a painful reflection on our stodginess. It is hard to avoid the impression that the Law Commission have been too cautious in their approach, leaning too much in favour of bare restatement of the existing law and against modifications that experience or reflection show to be necessary.

The significance of resocialization diagnosis in the work of an adult probation officer

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Anna Janus-Dębska
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Probation Officer ◽  
Probation Officers ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Effective Interactions ◽  
Social Rehabilitation ◽  
Trial Phase

In accordance with the legal regulation of the Criminal Code and the Executive Penal Code in force in Poland, both in preparatory and executive proceedings, the court should make decisions based on an individual criminological prediction. In many European countries, reports in trial phase, pre-trial reports, as well as pre-sentence reports are prepared by probation officers. In Poland, the court often uses the help of probation officers during the enforcement phase, sporadically before the judgment is passed. Diagnosis properly prepared by a probation officer allows planning social rehabilitation interactions appropriate to the deficits and resources of the convicted person. It is important to acquire detailed knowledge about the extent of the probationer's problems and their character, which will help in the implementation of proper and effective interactions.

OBLIGATION TO DENOUNCE IN THE CONTEXT OF MEDICAL CONFIDENTIALITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 167-175
Author(s):  
EDYTA MUCHA
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Legal Obligation ◽  
Legal Representative ◽  
Medical Worker ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
The Social ◽  
Social Obligation ◽  
The Subject

The subject of the article is the issue of the obligation to notify about a crime in relation to medical confi dentiality. Medical workers may obtain information indicating the commission of a criminal act while performing medical services. An important issue is whether, in such a situation, they can or should notify law enforcement authorities. In order to resolve these issues, the legislator defi nes the legal and social obligation to denounce. The legal obligation of a medical worker to notify about a crime relates to the offences specifi ed in Art. 240 (1) of the Act of June 6, 1997 — Penal Code. Among the enumerated types of generic acts covered by denunciation, particularly important due to the issues raised, are the crime of murder (Article 148 of the Penal Code) and deprivation of liberty (Article 189 of the Penal Code). A medical worker having obtained reliable information about the commission of a criminal act is obliged to notify law enforcement authorities. It is irrelevant whether they learned about it while carrying out professional activities or without a connection with their performance. The criminal sanction for failure to comply with the obligation under Article 240 (1) of the Criminal Code is a prison sentence of up to 3 years. However, the social obligation to denounce is introduced by Art. 304 (1) of the Act of June 6, 1997 — Code of Criminal Procedure. Failure to fulfi l obligations of this nature does not result in any criminal consequences. The social obligation to denounce does not include offences prosecuted on private accusation or on request of the victim. It is worth noting that this obligation does not repeal any of the laws regulating medical secrets. In this case, a medical worker who has learned of a crime in connection with the exercise of their profession has no obligation to denounce. It should be emphasised that a medical worker may fulfi l the obligation to denounce only if the patient or their legal representative has consented to it, or if there are premises for presuming the consent.

scholarly journals Główne założenia projektów ustaw o odpowiedzialności nieletnich na gruncie prawa karnego, opracowanych w początkach II Rzeczypospolitej

Prawo ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 325 ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Andrzej Pasek
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Offenders ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
The Republic

The main principles of draft legislation concerning juvenile liability under criminal law formulated at the beginning of the Second Polish RepublicThe paper is devoted to the main principles of draft legislation concerning juvenile liability under criminal law formulated in the early days of the Second Polish Republic. The author discusses the most important legal terms and constructs of the drafts formulated by Józef Reinhold and the Codification Commission of the Republic of Poland.He demonstrates that juvenile liability under criminal law was presented in a concise and clear manner in the draft regulations, with the legislators reaching a compromise over the latest views of the proponents of the legal doctrine at the time and making a creative use of the solutions used in other countries as well as these countries’ experiences. The aim of the Polish proposals was, first of all, to reform the juvenile offenders and not to put them in prison. The reform of criminal law applying to juveniles was meant to formulate special legal regulations as well as an autonomous adjudication procedure. It should be emphasised that the suggestions formulated in the Polish legal doctrine and legislation in the inter-war period were taken into account in the Polish Criminal Code of 1932 and still constitute the basis for dealing with juveniles committing criminal offences.Hauptgrundsätze der zu Beginn der Zweiten Polnischen Republik ausgearbeiteten Gesetzesvorschläge betreffend die strafrechtliche Verantwortung MinderjährigerDie Bearbeitung betrifft die Hauptgrundsätze der Projekte betreffend die strafrechtliche Verantwortung von Minderjährigen, die in den Anfängen der Zweiten Polnischen Republik ausgearbeitet wurden. Besprochen wurden die wichtigsten Begriffe und Rechtskonstruktionen des Projektes von Józef Reinhold und der Kodifikationskommission der Republik Polen.Es wurde bewiesen, dass die strafrechtliche Verantwortung von Minderjährigen in den polnischen Entwürfen synthetisch und durchsichtig ausgedrückt wurde. Sie berücksichtigten auch die neusten Meinungen der damaligen Doktrin des Strafrechtes und nutzten kreativ die entsprechenden Lösungen und Erfahrungen anderer Staaten. Das Ziel der in Polen ausgearbeiteten Lösungen war die Besserung der minderjährigen Straftäter und nicht ihre Bestrafung mit dem Freiheitsentzug. Die Reform des Strafrechtes für Minderjährige führte zur Aussonderung spezieller rechtlicher Regulierungen und einer autonomen Entscheidungsart. Zu betonen ist, dass die in der polnischen Rechtslehre und in der Gesetzgebung zu den Anfängen der Zwischenkriegszeit des 20. Jahrhunderts ausgearbeiteten Forderungen in dem polnischen Strafgesetzbuch aus dem Jahre 1932 berücksichtigt wurden und weiterhin eine Verfahrensgrundlage bei straffälligen Minderjährigen darstellen.

scholarly journals Kwestia dopuszczalności stosowania środków zabezpieczających w stosunku do nieletnich sprawców czynów karalnych. Część II

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 31-54
Author(s):  
Piotr Góralski
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Offenders ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Precautionary Measure ◽  
Criminal Penalties ◽  
Precautionary Measures

Admissibility of precautionary measures against juvenile criminals Part IIThis article discusses the admissibility of precautionary measures against juvenile criminals. It refers to both juvenile offenders charged as adults pursuant to Art. 10 § 2 of the Criminal Code and 15–16-year-old offenders charged pursuant to the provisions of the Procedures in Legal Actions against Juveniles Act of 1982. The article presents the legal status concerning this issue in the period from 1997 to 2015 and relevant changes in the legal regulations concerning precautionary measures introduced by the amendment of the Criminal Code of 20th February 2015.A thesis formulated in the paper discussed here is that only one type of precautionary measure, which is confiscation, may be used against juveniles subject to the regulations of the Procedures in Legal Actions against Juveniles Act. In relation to juveniles charged under the Criminal Code only the precautionary measures which do not interfere with the provisions of Article 3 of the Criminal Code providing for the rule of humanitarian use of criminal penalties should be implemented. It refers mainly to these forms of isolation precautionary measures which would apply to juvenile criminals after serving imprisonment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document