EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF  TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN JIGSAW II DITINJAU  DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA

The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw IIlearning model, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement, (2) which students among the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities have a better learning achievement, (3) in each of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning which students among the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities have a better learning achievement, and (4) in each of the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities which learning model of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement .This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 3 . Its population was all of the students of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random samplingtechnique. The samples consisted of 285 students. T he data of the research were gathered through test of spatial ability and test of learning achievement in Mathematics. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the GI type results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model, but results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the Jigsaw II learning model, and the Jigsaw II learning model results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. 2). The students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low spatial ability, but the students with the high spatial ability have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate spatial ability. (3) in each of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning, students with the high spatial ability have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate spatial ability, and both the students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low spatial ability. 4) in each of the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities, the Cooperative learning model of the GI type and the Jigsaw II learning model result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model , but the cooperative learning model of the GI type results in the same good learning achievement as the Jigsaw II learning model.

Download Full-text

Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Division dan Team Assisted Individualization ditinjau dari Kemampuan Spasial Siswa

Al-Jabar Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.24042/ajpm.v8i2.1586 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 135

Author(s):

Arie Purwa Kusuma

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Spatial Ability ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Models ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Student Teams ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Achievement In Mathematics ◽

Better Than

The objectives of this research were to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial ability of the students. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in grade XI of State Senior High Schools of Wonosobo regency in Academic Year 2017/2018. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. They consisted of 326 students. The data of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells.The results of the research are as follows.1) The cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the direct learning model and the cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the conventional learning model.2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate and low spatial abilities, and the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the spatial ability on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.

Download Full-text

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF SISWA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA

JURNAL TATSQIF ◽

10.20414/jtq.v14i2.26 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 121-142

Author(s):

Habib Ratu Perwira Negara ◽

Tri Atmojo K ◽

Imam Sujadi

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Spatial Ability ◽

Mathematics Learning ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Direct Learning ◽

Current Report

The current research intends to find out the different effect of the Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with CTL approach, the Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model without CTL approach, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect regarding student spatial ability which is categorized into high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach results a better affective effect than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. More findings are elaborated further on the discussion and conclusion part of the current report.

Download Full-text

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF SISWA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL

Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education ◽

10.20961/jmme.v4i2.9978 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Habib Ratu Perwira Negara ◽

Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi ◽

Imam Sujadi

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Spatial Ability ◽

Junior High School ◽

Hypothesis Test ◽

Mathematics Learning ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Ability Test ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Direct Learning

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect on the subject of plane geometry viewed from the students spatial ability, and category of spatial ability consisted of high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. The sample of this research consisted of 261 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test, questionnaire of students affective aspect and spatial ability test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. (5) On the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (6) On the cooperative learning models of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw type, students with the high, medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. On the direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspects than students with the medium spatial ability, while students with the high and low spatial ability and students with the medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. (7) On students spatial ability high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (8) On students with the high and medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model gives the same affective aspect. On students with the medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better affective aspect than the direct learning model, while the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw and also the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type and direct learning model gaves the same affective aspect.Keywords: Jigsaw, CTL approach, spatial ability, learning achievement, and affective aspect.

Download Full-text

EFEKTIFITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JIGSAW II PADA MATERI BARISAN DAN DERET DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA KELAS X SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 3 KLATEN UTARA

Intersections ◽

10.47200/intersections.v4i2.581 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 44-51

Author(s):

Aji Permana Putra

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Hypothesis Test ◽

Statistical Tests ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Personality Types ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Significance Level ◽

Learning Group ◽

Direct Learning

The objectives of this research were to find out on the topic of Sequences and Series: (1) which had better learning achievement among cooperative learning Group Jigsaw II or a direct learning; (2) which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students; (3) at each personality types, which had better learning achievement among Jigsaw II or direct learning, and (4) at each learning models, which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 2×4 factorial design. The population was all students of SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Klaten Utara on Academic Years 2019/2020. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 85 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could be concluded as follows: (1) Jigsaw II had better learning achievement than direct learning,; (2) there were no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types; (3) in each personality types, the cooperative learning model Jigsaw II had better than direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types have the same learning achievement.

Download Full-text

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA

JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) ◽

10.36312/jisip.v5i2.2013 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Ahmad Faqihi

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Learning Style ◽

Hypothesis Test ◽

Problem Based Learning ◽

Learning Model ◽

Independent Learning ◽

Learning Models ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Scientific Approach ◽

Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, GI, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X1 higher Secondary School in Lombok East on academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 282 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach. (2) the student with the high, medium, and ow independent learning levels have equal learning achievement. (3) in each of the learning models, the high, medium, and, low independent learning levels, result in the equal learning achievement. (4) in each of the independent learning levels, the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach.

Download Full-text

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN

Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education ◽

10.20961/jmme.v4i2.9976 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽

Budiyono Budiyono ◽

Dewi Retno Sari S

Keyword(s):

Mathematics Achievement ◽

Cooperative Learning ◽

Junior High School ◽

Hypothesis Test ◽

Mathematics Learning ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Significance Level ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Direct Learning

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.Keywords: Jigsaw, NHT, interpersonal intelligence

Download Full-text

HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LESSON STUDY DAN KOOPERATIF TYPE STAD SISWA MAN 1 KONAWE SELATAN

Al-Izzah Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian ◽

10.31332/ai.v12i2.646 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 153

Author(s):

Syafrial Syafrial

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Experimental Research ◽

Lesson Study ◽

Lesson Plan ◽

Learning Model ◽

Average Score ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Model Type ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Quasi Experimental

This study aims to know the students’ learning achievement after studying under Lesson Study learning model at MAN 1 Konawe Selatan, under cooperative learning model type STAD and to investigate the significant difference between Lesson Study learning model and cooperative learning model type STAD. The subject of the study is the students of MAN 1 Konawe Selatan class XI IPA. This study is a quasi experimental research which means that it is not a real experimental research because it included the basic steps of experiment but exclude the control class. The result indicates that there is different students’ physics learning achievement between using Lesson Study learning model and coopertive learning model type STAD. The students learning under lesson study model obtained 87 as their average score, while those with cooperative model type STAD obtained 67.3. In other words, learning by lesson plan model contributes more positively to students’ learning achievement than STAD model. This indicates that there are differences in physiscs learning achievement between lesson study learning model and cooperative learning model type STAD at students class XI-Science MAN 1 South of Konawe

Download Full-text

Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logika Matematika

SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) ◽

10.30998/sap.v3i2.3028 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Desi Tri Utami ◽

Nuning Melianingsih

Keyword(s):

Experimental Study ◽

Mathematics Learning ◽

Learning Model ◽

Junior High Schools ◽

Learning Models ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Analysis Technique ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Good Learning ◽

Better Than

This research aims to prove the effect of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on students' mathematics learning achievement in terms of logical-mathematical intelligence. The research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of the research is all seventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. The data analysis technique used is a two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of the research are: (1) TPS learning model produces learning achievement better than conventional learning model; (2) there is no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with high and average logical-mathematical intelligence, and students with average and low logical-mathematical intelligence; students with high logical-mathematical intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low logical-mathematical intelligence; (3) in the group of students with high, average, and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; (4) in the group of students with high and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; in the group of students with average logical-mathematical intelligence, the TPS learning model produces learning achievements better than conventional learning model

Download Full-text

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP PPKN PADA SISWA KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR

Jurnal Pendidikan ◽

10.33830/jp.v19i2.174.2018 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

pp. 132-144

Author(s):

Nazirin Nazirin

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Control Design ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Motivation ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Anova Test ◽

Post Test ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

The Subject ◽

And Control

The research analyses the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw type and learning motivation on student’s understanding on citizenship subject. The research method uses quasi experimental design with post test only control design. The subject of research was 44 students which constitutes two classes, experiment and control classes. The data collection employs test and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using Two-way Anova test. The results show that cooperative learning model Jigsaw type hasa significant effect on student’s conceptual understanding. The ANOVA test produce significant level below 0.05, which indicates there is significant effect of the Jigsaw model and learning motivation on student achievement. It can be concluded that the cooperative learning model contributes better to learning achievement than conventional learning model, and a high learning motivation contributes better to students learning achievement in citizentship subject than a low learning motivation. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan motivasi terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa sekolah dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan post test only control design. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 44 siswa yang terdiri dari 22 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 22 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Anova 2 jalur. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw yang positif dan signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa berupa pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa. Siswa dengan tingkat motivasi yang tinggi lebih baik dalam hal penggunaan model Jigsaw dan hasil belajar, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi rendah. Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran ceramah untuk mencapai hasil belajar yang lebih baik, dan bahwa siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang rendah dalam penggunaan atau pemanfaatan model pembelajaran Jigsaw dan hasil belajarnya.

Download Full-text