scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logika Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desi Tri Utami ◽  
Nuning Melianingsih
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Junior High Schools ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Good Learning ◽  
Better Than

<p>This research aims to prove the effect of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on students' mathematics learning achievement in terms of logical-mathematical intelligence. The research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of the research is all seventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. The data analysis technique used is a two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of the research are: (1) TPS learning model produces learning achievement better than conventional learning model; (2) there is no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with high and average logical-mathematical intelligence, and students with average and low logical-mathematical intelligence; students with high logical-mathematical intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low logical-mathematical intelligence; (3) in the group of students with high, average, and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; (4) in the group of students with high and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; in the group of students with average logical-mathematical intelligence, the TPS learning model produces learning achievements better than conventional learning model</p>

scholarly journals Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair And Share Melalui Pendekatan Inquiry Ditinjau dari Kemandiriran Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Inquiry Approach ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.

scholarly journals Implementasi Teams Games Tournaments dan Number Head Together ditinjau dari Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Achievement ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this research is to know the influence of Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT) model to the students 'mathematical learning achievement that reviewed students' mathematical reasoning ability. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 3 × 3 factorial design. The researcher uses 2 indicators of learning achievement that is (1) Mathematics achievement test and (2) Test of mathematical communication ability. Analysis of the data used is the analysis of two-way variants with different cells. The results of this research can be summarized as follows. (1) Learning using TGT learning model makes better student's mathematical learning achievement compared to student's mathematical learning achievement with NHT learning model and conventional learning, while NHT model gives a better result of student's mathematical learning achievement from student's learning achievement with conventional learning. (2) Learners with high mathematical reasoning ability have better learning achievement compared with learners with medium ability as well as medium ability better than low ability. (3) Students have high and moderate reasoning abilities with the three learning models giving the same mathematical achievement, whereas students with low mathematical reasoning ability using TGT and NHT models provide the same mathematical achievement, but better than conventional learning models, and conventional learning models and NHT produces the same mathematical achievement. (4) The learning model of TGT and NHT in students with high, medium and low mathematical reasoning ability produce the same mathematical achievement, whereas conventional learning model on students with high and medium mathematical reasoning has the same mathematical achievement but better than students with reasoning low math.

scholarly journals Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Division dan Team Assisted Individualization ditinjau dari Kemampuan Spasial Siswa

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Spatial Ability ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics ◽  
Better Than

The objectives of this research were to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial ability of the students. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in grade XI of State Senior High Schools of Wonosobo regency in Academic Year 2017/2018. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. They consisted of 326 students. The data of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells.The results of the research are as follows.1) The cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the direct learning model and the cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the conventional learning model.2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate and low spatial abilities, and the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the spatial ability on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Sinektik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daswa Daswa
Keyword(s):  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Better Than

ABSTRACT This study aims to solve the problem of lack of creative thinking ability used sinektik learning model. This research is a quasi-experimental design with a control group of non-equivalence. The subjects in this study were students of MTs Husnul Khotimah Kuningan VIII class are divided into two groups: the experimental group as many as 31 students and a control group as many as 33 students. The experimental group get sinektik learning model, while the control group getting conventional learning models. Collecting data using the research results in the form of test instruments of creative thinking ability. Data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Data pretest and posttest of creative thinking ability processed with SPSS 16 for windows. The results showed that an increase in creative thinking abilities of students who study mathematics learning model sinektik better than students who use conventional learning model.                                                                                                          Keywords: sinektik learning model, the ability creative thinking.

scholarly journals PEMBELAJARAN GI DAN GI-PROBLEM POSING (GI-PP) PADA MATA KULIAH KALKULUS LANJUT DITINJAU DARI SIKAP MAHASISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Swasti Maharani
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Students Attitudes ◽  
Good Learning ◽  
Questionnaire Method ◽  
Better Than

<p>The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which learning model of the GI or GI-ProblemPosing results in a better learning achievement; (2) which students’ attitudes of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement; (3) in each students’ attitudes, which learning model of the GI or GI-Problem Posing results in a better learning achievement; and (4) in each learning model, which students’ attitudes of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement.  This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 2x3. Its population was all of the students of Mathematics department of IKIP PGRI Madiun in academic year 2014/2015. The samples were taken by using the random sampling technique. The data were gathered through test and questionnaire method and its were analyzed by using the unbalanced twoway analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results showed that: (1) the GI and GI-ProblemPosing result in the same good learning achievement; (2) the learning achievement with positive was better than that with neutral and negative, that with neutral was better than that with negative; (3) in each students’ attitudes type, the GI and GI-ProblemPosing result in the same good learning achievement; (4) in general, the learning achievement with positive was better than neutral and negative, that neutral was better than negative. However, if viewed from GI with a positive and neutral have the same achievement and better than negative.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Implementation TANDUR Learning Using GeoGebra Towards Student Learning Result Viewed from Independence Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Ni Wayan Suardiati Putri ◽  
I Wayan Gede Wardika
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TANDUR learning model assisted by GeoGebra on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of student learning independence which is a quasi-experimental research. The number of respondents in this study were 71 students. Collecting data on learning independence is collected through a questionnaire, and data on mathematics learning outcomes are collected through tests of mathematics learning outcomes in the cognitive domain. Data analysis was performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANAVA) with the help of SPSS, at a significance level of 5%. The results show that the learning outcomes of students who use the TANDUR learning model assisted by GeoGebra are better than the learning outcomes of students who use conventional learning models, student learning outcomes using the TANDUR learning model assisted by GeoGebra are better than using conventional learning models in students who have learning independence high, and the learning outcomes of students who use conventional learning models are better than students who use the GeoGebra-assisted TANDUR learning model for students who have low learning independence.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) MENGGUNAKAN METODE PEMECAHAN MASALAH DITINJAU DARI SIKAP KREATIF PESERTA DIDIK

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurul Farida
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Quasi Experimental

The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models (STAD by problem solving method, STAD, and conventional) on mathematics achievement viewed from student creative attitude. The type of the research was a quasi experimental research. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in Central Lampung Regency. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional (2) For students who middle and low creative attitude, students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional. 

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Cooperative Integrated Reading and Compositi (CIRC) dan Minat Baca Terhadap Keterampilan Menulis Karangan Deskripsi Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang

GERAM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Fenny Anita
Keyword(s):  
Writing Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Performance Tests ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Factorial Experimental Design ◽  
Essay Writing ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Reading Interest ◽  
Better Than

This research was conducted to explain the effect of the learning model CIRC and reading interest on the results of the descriptive essay writing skills of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. This type of research is a quantitative study using a quasi-experimental method and a 2x2 factorial experimental design. The population of this study was students of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Sampling was done by purposive sampling with a sample size of 60 students. Data collection was carried out using two instruments, namely questionnaires and performance tests. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that four things are as follows. First, the skills of writing essays of descriptions of students taught using the learning model CIRC are better than those taught by conventional learning models of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Second, the writing skills of students who have high reading interest who are taught using the learning model CIRC are higher than students who have high reading interest who are taught using the conventional learning model of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Third, the writing skills of students who have low reading interest who are taught using the learning model CIRC are higher than students who have low reading interest who are taught using the conventional learning model of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Fourth, there is no interaction between reading interest and learning models in influencing the writing skills of descriptive essays of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laila Hidayah ◽  
Satrio Wicaksono Sudarman ◽  
Ira Vahlia
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Reciprocal Teaching ◽  
Teaching Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Better Than

The study aims to find out 1) whether or not there is an effect of the Reciprocal Teaching model on students' mathematics learning outcomes. 2) which ones have good mathematical learning outcomes between those who have high, moderate learning independence. 3) interactions between Reciprocal Teaching and conventional learning models. The data analysis technique uses hypothesis testing of two-way anava with unequal cells. Research conclusions: 1) There is an influence of mathematics learning outcomes between those who learn using the Reciprocal Teaching and conventional learning models. 2) Mathematics learning outcomes that have high learning independence are better than those with moderate learning independence and mathematics learning outcomes that have moderate independence are better than those with low learning independence. 3) There is an interaction between Reciprocal Teaching and conventional learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes in those who have high, medium and low learning independence.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidayat Bahktiar ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Group Technology ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document