Penentuan Setting Prioritas Pengembangan Industri Kopi Biji Di Indonesia: Aplikasi Model Goal Programming

This research aims to determine a priority setting in the development of Indonesian coffee bean industry that can sustain the industry using Goal Programming technique. Based on the number policies, 18 goal programming models formulating some priority setting possibilities had been developed. The validation on the value of decision variables in the model showed that there are six valid models. The result suggested that (1) the development policy has to be prioritized to ensure the supply of plantation inputs, (2) the policy of conversion of Robusta areas to Arabica has to consider the economical and biological aspects, (3) the develop-ment policy has to be directed to export and domestic consumption promotion since the industry is considered as an export maximizing and able to satisfy the domestic consumption, and (4) the development policy has to consider the possibility of target conflicts so that a priority setting will not burden the industry economically.

Download Full-text

Long-term views on chronic kidney disease research priorities among stakeholders engaged in a priority-setting partnership: A qualitative study

Health Expectations ◽

10.1111/hex.12818 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 21 (6) ◽

pp. 1142-1149 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Meghan J. Elliott ◽

Joanna E. M. Sale ◽

Zahra Goodarzi ◽

Linda Wilhelm ◽

Andreas Laupacis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Kidney Disease ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Qualitative Study ◽

Priority Setting ◽

Research Priorities ◽

Disease Research ◽

A Priority ◽

Priority Setting Partnership

Download Full-text

A fuzzy goal programming technique for multi-objective chance constrained programming with normally distributed fuzzy random variables and fuzzy numbers

International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research ◽

10.1504/ijmor.2013.056116 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 5 (5) ◽

pp. 551 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Animesh Biswas ◽

Nilkanta Modak

Keyword(s):

Goal Programming ◽

Fuzzy Numbers ◽

Random Variables ◽

Chance Constrained Programming ◽

Fuzzy Random Variables ◽

Programming Technique ◽

Objective Chance ◽

Fuzzy Goal ◽

Constrained Programming ◽

Fuzzy Random

Download Full-text

Global health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise

Trials ◽

10.1186/s13063-018-2440-y ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Anna Rosala-Hallas ◽

Aneel Bhangu ◽

Jane Blazeby ◽

Louise Bowman ◽

Mike Clarke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Global Health ◽

Priority Setting ◽

Research Agenda ◽

Methodological Research ◽

A Priority ◽

Priority Setting Exercise

Download Full-text

Prioritization of therapy uncertainties in congenital ichthyosis: results from a Priority Setting Partnership

British Journal of Dermatology ◽

10.1111/bjd.13914 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 173 (5) ◽

pp. 1280-1283 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

A. Hernández-Martín ◽

P. Dávila-Seijo ◽

R. de Lucas ◽

E. Baselga ◽

P. Redondo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Priority Setting ◽

Congenital Ichthyosis ◽

A Priority ◽

Priority Setting Partnership

Download Full-text

Implementing accountability for reasonableness – the case of pharmaceutical reimbursement in Sweden

Health Economics Policy and Law ◽

10.1017/s1744133107004082 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 153-171 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

SANDRA JANSSON

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Social Learning ◽

Priority Setting ◽

Relative Importance ◽

Priority Setting Process ◽

Structured Interviews ◽

Accountability For Reasonableness ◽

Setting Process ◽

A Priority

AbstractThis paper aims to describe the priority-setting procedure for new original pharmaceuticals practiced by the Swedish Pharmaceutical Benefits Board (LFN), to analyse the outcome of the procedure in terms of decisions and the relative importance of ethical principles, and to examine the reactions of stakeholders. All the ‘principally important’ decisions made by the LFN during its first 33 months of operation were analysed. The study is theoretically anchored in the theory of fair and legitimate priority-setting procedures by Daniels and Sabin, and is based on public documents, media articles, and semi-structured interviews. Only nine cases resulted in a rejection of a subsidy by the LFN and 15 in a limited or conditional subsidy. Total rejections rather than limitations gave rise to actions by stakeholders. Primarily, the principle of cost-effectiveness was used when limiting/conditioning or totally rejecting a subsidy. This study suggests that implementing a priority-setting process that fulfils the conditions of accountability for reasonableness can result in a priority-setting process which is generally perceived as fair and legitimate by the major stakeholders and may increase social learning in terms of accepting the necessity of priority setting in health care. The principle of cost-effectiveness increased in importance when the demand for openness and transparency increased.

Download Full-text

OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF BY-PRODUCTS IN DISPOSAL UNIT

International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH ◽

10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i4rast.2017.3304 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (4RAST) ◽

pp. 59-63 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jyothi P ◽

Vatsala G A ◽

Radha Gupta

Keyword(s):

Waste Disposal ◽

Goal Programming ◽

Programming Model ◽

Optimal Solution ◽

Optimization Techniques ◽

Programming Technique ◽

Emerging Industries ◽

Goal Programming Model ◽

Net Profit ◽

By Products

In present scenario, Waste disposal unit is one of the emerging industries. The process of collection of wastes, segregation of wastes, recycling the wastes and manufacturing by-products and selling the by-products are the major works are undertaken into consideration. Any business expectation is to get the profit. Our study is to formulate goal programming model which helps in maximizing the profit by identifying the deviation of goals in the disposal unit. Goal Programming technique is one of the optimization techniques. Manager of the disposal unit can takes the better decision using the deviation of goals. Pre emptive Goals of the study are (i) minimizing the expenditure of the unit and recycling cost of the wastes ii) boosting the net profit of the unit iii) Maintaining the supply of by-products to each location within the maximum demand iv) Fulfilling demand of by- products in different locations v) Maintaining the minimum supply of recycled by-products to 5 different locations must be at least one.

Download Full-text

Identifying and prioritising systematic review topics with public health stakeholders: A protocol for a modified Delphi study in Switzerland to inform future research agendas

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015500 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (8) ◽

pp. e015500 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Dyon Hoekstra ◽

Margot Mütsch ◽

Christina Kien ◽

Ansgar Gerhardus ◽

Stefan K Lhachimi

Keyword(s):

Public Health ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Priority Setting ◽

Delphi Study ◽

Future Research ◽

Review Author ◽

Modified Delphi ◽

Delphi Round ◽

A Priority ◽

The University

IntroductionThe Cochrane Collaboration aims to produce relevant and top priority evidence that responds to existing evidence gaps. Hence, research priority setting (RPS) is important to identify which potential research gaps are deemed most important. Moreover, RPS supports future health research to conform both health and health evidence needs. However, studies that are prioritising systematic review topics in public health are surprisingly rare. Therefore, to inform the research agenda of Cochrane Public Health Europe (CPHE), we introduce the protocol of a priority setting study on systematic review topics in several European countries, which is conceptualised as pilot.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a two-round modified Delphi study in Switzerland, incorporating an anonymous web-based questionnaire, to assess which topics should be prioritised for systematic reviews in public health. In the first Delphi round public health stakeholders will suggest relevant assessment criteria and potential priority topics. In the second Delphi round the participants indicate their (dis)agreement to the aggregated results of the first round and rate the potential review topics with the predetermined criteria on a four-point Likert scale. As we invite a wide variety of stakeholders we will compare the results between the different stakeholder groups.Ethics and disseminationWe have received ethical approval from the ethical board of the University of Bremen, Germany (principal investigation is conducted at the University of Bremen) and a certificate of non-objection from the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland (fieldwork will be conducted in Switzerland). The results of this study will be further disseminated through peer reviewed publication and will support systematic review author groups (i.a. CPHE) to improve the relevance of the groups´ future review work. Finally, the proposed priority setting study can be used as a framework by other systematic review groups when conducting a priority setting study in a different context.

Download Full-text