scholarly journals Territory of sustainable development as a tool for investment in the region

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-407
Author(s):  
A. Sh. Subhonberdiev ◽  
E. V. Titova ◽  
D. A. Kustov ◽  
N. N. Lobacheva
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Far East ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Accelerated Depreciation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes the causes of priority development territories (TOR), discussed the benefits provided by the state to residents of the top, highlighted the steps of forming the top. The territory of the advanced social and economic development is understood to be part of the territory of the subject of the Russian Federation, including a closed administrative and territorial formation, in which, in accordance with the decision of the Government of the Russian Federation, a special legal regime for the implementation of entrepreneurial and other activities is established to create favorable conditions for attracting investments, socio-economic development and the creation of comfortable conditions for the provision of livelihoods nosti population. The objectives of the creation of priority development areas are: the development of high-tech sectors of the economy, improving the competitiveness of the economy, creating new jobs and improving the quality of human resources, the alignment of the territorial imbalances, the production of new import-substituting and export-oriented products, and more. The need to attract investment to the territory, not only the problem of the Russian Federation regions and the country as a whole, has become another impetus for the creation of areas of advancing socio-economic development. For residents of the TOP, the following rights are provided: the right to release VAT from the duties of a taxpayer for 10 years from the date of obtaining the status of a TOP resident; establishment of a zero VAT rate in respect of goods (works, services) imported to the TOP for use by TOP residents; use of accelerated depreciation on the objects of depreciable property belonging to them; a lowered rate of corporate income tax. Thanks to the above measures, the cost reduction of business will be from 40%, which will be a huge incentive for business opening in the territories of Eastern Siberia and the Far East.

scholarly journals Once Again about National Program for Socio-Economic Development of Far East Russia

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 165-179
Author(s):  
Arnold Tulokhonov ◽  
◽  
Anna Mikheeva ◽  
Taisiya Bardakhanova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Far East ◽  
High Tech ◽  
National Program ◽  
Public Health Services ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
East Russia ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article critically evaluates the contents of the adopted National Program for Socio-Economic Development of Far East Russia for the period up to 2024 and as far as 2035. Specific examples indicate both inaccuracy in some data and the declarative nature of the tasks set in the absence of mechanisms for their implementation and scientific justification (when determining the priorities for the forest industry, mining, agricultural production, trunk infrastructure and transport accessibility, as well as the development of public health services, education and science). There is shown a lack of detail in sections describing the state of soft infrastructure and the standard of living of the indigenous peoples of the region, the reaction of the region unique in terms of natural environment, to global environmental challenges. It is stressed that the federal government is still orienting the economy of Far East Russia to extraction of mineral resources: under a great number of fields involved in the economic turnover there is even no mention of a need for complete processing of raw materials and launching production in these fields to obtain finished high-tech export products except gas chemistry. The authors conclude that it is necessary to adjust the National Program in terms of the main parameters in accordance with National Strategy of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025, with the realities and effects of the current foreign and domestic policy of the Russian Federation

Population dynamics of priority geostrategic Territories of Russia in 2010-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-142
Author(s):  
Valery V. Patsiorkovsky ◽  
Yury A. Simagin ◽  
Djamila J. Murtuzalieva
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Population Dynamics ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Far East ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Natural Growth ◽  
North Caucasus ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
And Migration

The article presents an analysis of the dynamics of the population of the priority geostrategic territories of the Russian Federation. They are highlighted in the "Strategy for the Spatial Development of the Russian Federation until 2025" as territories that are of particular importance for the development of the country as a whole and are distinguished at the same time by special life conditions and the functioning of the economy due to their geographical location. Population dynamics for such territories is both a factor determining socio-economic development and an indicator of the effectiveness of this development. The components of the population dynamics - natural growth and migration flows - are of particular importance. The article describes all four groups of priority geostrategic territories of Russia - isolated from the main territory of the country (exclaves), located in the North Caucasus and the Far East, in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. For each group, trends in population dynamics have been identified since the 2010 census, taking into account the components of natural growth and migration. The multidirectional aspect of the main demographic processes in the priority geostrategic territories of the country is revealed - natural growth is combined with the migration outflow of the population, and the migration inflow - with natural decline. At the same time, in the exclave and North Caucasian territories, the population is growing, and in the Far Eastern and Arctic territories it is decreasing. The features of both groups of priority geostrategic territories in comparison with Russia as a whole and of individual constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipalities within groups of territories are shown. The latter became possible due to the use of the database "Municipal Russia", that summarises demographic statistics for all urban districts and municipal areas of the country, including those located in priority geostrategic territories. As a result of the analysis of the population dynamics, directions have been identified that can lead to an improvement in the demographic situation in the priority geostrategic territories of the country, and, accordingly, will contribute to the socio-economic development of not only these territories, but the entire Russian Federation

scholarly journals Analysis of socio-economic indicators of the far Eastern Federal district of the Russian Federation

2017 ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
Пономарев ◽  
Maksim Ponomarev ◽  
Феоктистов ◽  
Stanislav Feoktistov ◽  
Кузнецов ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Economic Indicators ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Its Regions ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Far Eastern

The article analyzes the main socio-economic indicators of development of the far Eastern Federal of the Russian Federation and its regions for the period 2000-2015, discusses the problems and prospects of socio-economic development of the far East.

scholarly journals INFLUENCE OF MIGRATION POLICY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAR EAST IN 1990-2000S

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-226
Author(s):  
Alla A Lysenko
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Population Decline ◽  
Far East ◽  
Migration Policy ◽  
Federal District ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article analyzes the Russian migration policy in the Far East Federal District in the period of 1990-2000. The Author researches the evolution of migration policy and its effectiveness in achieving the goals of socio-economic development of the Far East and national security of the Russian Federation. Based on the analysis of statistical data the article concludes that the current level of socio-economic development of the region does not allow to solve of the problems of leveling economic development, increasing the population of border areas and ensuring the growth of labor potential of the Far East Federal District. The author notes the long-term trend of population decline in the Far East Federal district.

scholarly journals Corporation Process Development as the Key Issue of Technical and Economic Breakthrough

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 03019
Author(s):  
Maksim Kuznetsov ◽  
Svetlana Kuznetsova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Process Development ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Strategic Development ◽  
Innovation Potential ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The article is devoted to issues of technical and economic development and the strategy of the Russian Federation entering the position of process breakthrough. The role of Russian corporations in the national strategic development is investigated. The decisive role of corporations under conditions of high-tech functioning and the resulting complexity of breakdown solutions is substantiated. The attention is drawn to the inconsistency of Russian corporations with the breakthrough strategy requirements put forward by the government as the national idea, due to low innovation potential. A proposal is made on the use of a systemic - synergetic approach to solving issues of process development. The process development is placed at the center of issues being solved and is regarded as a critical condition for the organization and implementation of a process breakthrough.

scholarly journals Analysis of the State and Characteristics of the Development Potential of Strategic Planning Tools in the Digital Transformation Conditions of the Economy and Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. M. Pisareva
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Digital Transformation ◽  
The State ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
The Creation

Purpose:the purpose of the study is to determine the main directions and conceptual approaches to modernizing analytical and computer support for the planning of strategic development of socio-economic systems on a national scale in the framework of improving the methodology of strategic planning in a digital transformation of the economy and management.Methods:the issues of improving the tools of strategic planning of socio-economic development are studied in the framework of a system approach to analyzing the construction and functioning of the state management mechanism in the context of active formation of the information society infrastructure and to evaluating of the impact of digital technologies on the content of management tasks in the process of co-evolution of objects and subjects of management in large-scale organizational systems.Results:the article deals with current problems and key tasks of modernization of scientific and methodological, informational and analytical support of state strategic management of socio-economic development. The trends of the evolution of objects and subjects of management in the conditions of the digital transformation of the information society are investigated. The institutional bases for the construction and operation of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation are characterized. A block diagram of a complex of heterogeneous models of strategic planning of socio-economic development is given. Design solutions are proposed for building the architecture and developing a prototype of the computer support system for the scenario modeling technology when developing multi-level strategic decisions for planning socio-economic development in the emerging infrastructure of the digital economy is presented.Conclusions and Relevance:the study showed the importance and relevance of modernization of the methodological and analytical support of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation, which takes into account the main consequences and requirements of the creation and distribution of digital technologies in various areas of society. The most important characteristics of innovative changes in the structure and content of strategic planning tasks, the solution of which is associated with the unification of the format of quantitative and qualitative assessments in the digital development management environment, are identified. Standardization of technologies for collecting, transmitting, storing and processing large amounts of data allows you to build computer software for the multi-level system of state strategic planning based on an open service-oriented architecture. The main direction of further research and development in the creation of an analytical platform to support strategic planning of socio-economic development can be the creation of a mathematical apparatus and software products for processing and analyzing large amounts of personalized information about the functioning of economic and social agents to identify and assess their potentials and priorities. This will allow to increase the degree of justification and consistency of planned decisions and regulatory measures developed by the state in the field of planning socio-economic development and ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation.

A comparative analysis of the approaches to modeling of regional innovation subsystems

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 954-971
Author(s):  
Ekaterina I. MOSKVITINA
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Methodological Framework ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Regional Strategies ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

Subject. This article deals with the issues related to regional innovation subsystems. Objectives. The article aims to develop an organizational and methodological framework to design and implement a regional innovation subsystem model. Methods. For the study, I used the methods of data synthesis and analysis. Results. The article highlights key approaches to classifying models of regional innovation subsystems, it analyzes the advantages and opportunities, disadvantages and risks of different models. The article also presents a passport of a developed model of the regional innovation subsystem. Relevance. The results obtained can be used by the government executive bodies of the Russian Federation constituent entities to design and implement regional strategies of socio-economic development.

THE VALUE OF LOVE IN THE SYSTEM OF FORMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL MATURITY OF THE EDUCATOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10(79)) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
G. Bubyreva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right

The existing legislation determines the education as "an integral and focused process of teaching and upbringing, which represents a socially important value and shall be implemented so as to meet the interests of the individual, the family, the society and the state". However, even in this part, the meaning of the notion ‘socially significant benefit is not specified and allows for a wide range of interpretation [2]. Yet the more inconcrete is the answer to the question – "who and how should determine the interests of the individual, the family and even the state?" The national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation, which determined the goals of teaching and upbringing, the ways to attain them by means of the state policy regulating the field of education, the target achievements of the development of the educational system for the period up to 2025, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 4, 2000 #751, was abrogated by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2014 #245 [7]. The new doctrine has not been developed so far. The RAE Academician A.B. Khutorsky believes that the absence of the national doctrine of education presents a threat to national security and a violation of the right of citizens to quality education. Accordingly, the teacher has to solve the problem of achieving the harmony of interests of the individual, the family, the society and the government on their own, which, however, judging by the officially published results, is the task that exceeds the abilities of the participants of the educational process.  The particular concern about the results of the patriotic upbringing served as a basis for the legislative initiative of the RF President V. V. Putin, who introduced the project of an amendment to the Law of RF "About Education of the Russian Federation" to the State Duma in 2020, regarding the quality of patriotic upbringing [3]. Patriotism, considered by the President of RF V. V. Putin as the only possible idea to unite the nation is "THE FEELING OF LOVE OF THE MOTHERLAND" and the readiness for every sacrifice and heroic deed for the sake of the interests of your Motherland. However, the practicing educators experience shortfalls in efficient methodologies of patriotic upbringing, which should let them bring up citizens, loving their Motherland more than themselves. The article is dedicated to solution to this problem based on the Value-sense paradigm of upbringing educational dynasty of the Kurbatovs [15].

Improving the medium-term forecasting methodology: a model of big challenges

2019 ◽  
pp. 62-68
Author(s):  
I.A. Kirichenko ◽  
R.R. Gumerov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article analyzes some new requirements to the methodology of medium-term forecasting of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation in the framework of the «big challenges» model. The main «big challenges» of the global and Russian economy are identified, the main requirements for the medium-term forecasting of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation in the transition to the model of «big challenges» are considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document