scholarly journals Friction Velocity estimation using a 2D Sonic Anemometer in Coastal Zones

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Figueroa-Espinoza ◽  
Zulia Sánchez-Mejía ◽  
Jorge Maximiliano Uuh-Sonda ◽  
Paulo Salles ◽  
Luis Méndez-Barroso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wind Direction ◽  
Friction Velocity ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Atmospheric Stability ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Simple Expression ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Coastal Zones ◽  
Sea Breezes ◽  
Sonic Anemometers

Friction velocity (u*) is an important velocity scale used in the study of engineering and geophysical flows. The widespread use of 2D sonic anemometers in modern meteorological stations makes the estimation of u* from just the horizontal components of the velocity a very attractive possibility. The presence of different wind regimes (such as sea breezes in or near coastal zones) cause the turbulent parameters to be dependent on the wind direction. Additionally, u* depends on atmospheric stability. This makes the estimation of u* from 2D measurements very difficult. A simple expression is proposed, and then tested with data from six independent experiments located in coastal zones. The results show that it is possible to estimate friction velocity from 2D measurements using the turbulence Intensity as a proxy for u*, reducing substantially the sensitivity to the wind direction or atmospheric stability, with small root mean squared errors (0.06<RMSE<0.097) and high correlation coefficients (0.77< r2<0.95).

The Influence of Wind Direction on Campbell Scientific CSAT3 and Gill R3-50 Sonic Anemometer Measurements

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 2477-2497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Grare ◽  
Luc Lenain ◽  
W. Kendall Melville
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Wind Direction ◽  
Friction Velocity ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Mean Wind Speed ◽  
The Mean

AbstractMeasurements from the Campbell CSAT3 and Gill R3-50 anemometers were conducted in four different experiments, in laboratory and field environments. Consistent differences between these two sonic anemometers were observed. The data have revealed that the differences were strongly correlated with the wind direction. According to the datasets used, the CSAT3 was the anemometer whose measurements were more sensitive to the instrument’s orientation relative to the wind direction. While the mean wind speed and direction remained within the manufacturers’ specifications (a few percent for the wind speed and a few degrees for the wind direction), the estimates of the friction velocity from the CSAT3 differed from the R3-50 by up to 20%.

scholarly journals Note on the application of planar-fit rotation for non-omnidirectional sonic anemometers

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Li ◽  
W. Babel ◽  
K. Tanaka ◽  
T. Foken
Keyword(s):  
Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Friction Velocity ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
The Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Open Part ◽  
Scalar Fluxes ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Wind Velocities

Abstract. For non-omnidirectional sonic anemometers like the Kaijo-Denki DAT 600 TR61A probe, it is shown that separate planar-fit rotations must be used for the undisturbed (open part of the sonic anemometer) and the disturbed sector. This increases the friction velocity while no effect on the scalar fluxes was found. In the disturbed sector, irregular values of − u′w′ < 0 were detected for low wind velocities. Up to a certain extent these results can be transferred to the CSAT3 sonic anemometer (Campbell Scientific Ltd). This study was done for data sets from the Naqu-BJ site on the Tibetan Plateau.

scholarly journals Comparison of turbulence measurements by a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 969-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Mauder ◽  
Michael Eggert ◽  
Christian Gutsmuths ◽  
Stefan Oertel ◽  
Paul Wilhelm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Wind Speed ◽  
Friction Velocity ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Vertical Wind ◽  
Doppler Lidar ◽  
Flow Distortion ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Vertical Wind Speed ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract. Accurate measurements of turbulence statistics in the atmosphere are important for eddy-covariance measurements, wind energy research, and the validation of atmospheric numerical models. Sonic anemometers are widely used for these applications. However, these instruments are prone to probe-induced flow distortion effects, and the magnitude of the resulting errors has been debated due to the lack of an absolute reference instrument under field conditions. Here, we present the results of an intercomparison experiment between a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar, which is inherently free of any flow distortion. This novel remote sensing instrument has otherwise very similar spatial and temporal sampling characteristics to the sonic anemometer and hence served as a reference for this comparison. The presented measurements were carried out over flat homogeneous terrain at a measurement height of 30 m. We provide a comparative statistical analysis of the resulting mean wind velocities, the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed and the friction velocity and investigate the reasons for the observed deviations based on the turbulence spectra and co-spectra. Our results show an agreement of the mean wind velocity measurements and the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed with a comparability of 0.082 and 0.020 m s−1, respectively. Biases for these two quantities were 0.003 and 0.012 m s−1, respectively. Slightly larger differences were observed for friction velocity. Analysis of the corresponding co-spectra showed that the CSAT3B underestimates this quantity systematically by about 3 % on average as a result of co-spectral losses in the frequency range between 0.1 and 5 s−1. We also found that an angle-of-attack-dependent transducer-shadowing correction does not improve the agreement between the CSAT3B and the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) lidar effectively.

scholarly journals Note on the application of planar-fit rotation for non-omnidirectional sonic anemometers

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 7323-7340
Author(s):  
M. Li ◽  
W. Babel ◽  
K. Tanaka ◽  
T. Foken
Keyword(s):  
Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Friction Velocity ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
The Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Open Part ◽  
Scalar Fluxes ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Wind Velocities

Abstract. For non-omnidirectional sonic anenometers like the Kaijo-Denki DAT 600 TR61A probe, it is shown that separate planar fit rotations must be used for the undisturbed (open part of the sonic anemometer) and the disturbed sector. This increases the friction velocity while no effect on the scalar fluxes was found. In the disturbed sector, irregular values of −u′w′ < 0 were detected for low wind velocities. This study was done for data sets from the Naqu-BJ site on the Tibetan Plateau.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Energy Dissipation Rate Observed from the High-Frequency Sonic Anemometer at Boseong, South Korea

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 837
Author(s):  
Jeonghoe Kim ◽  
Jung-Hoon Kim ◽  
Robert D. Sharman
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Dissipation Rate ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Atmospheric Stability ◽  
Turbulence Theory ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
The Third ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Meteorological Observatory

The characteristics of low-level turbulence at Boseong, located on the southern coast of South Korea, were investigated in terms of eddy dissipation rate (EDR) using 1-year (2018) of wind data obtained from the Boseong Meteorological Observatory (BMO), a World Meteorological Organization testbed. At BMO, a 307 m tall tower is installed on which four high-frequency (20 Hz) sonic anemometers are mounted at 60, 140, and 300 m above ground level (AGL). In addition, a sonic anemometer at 2.5 m AGL is located to the south of the tower. EDRs are estimated from the wind measurements based on three different EDR estimation methods. The first two methods use the inertial dissipation method derived from Kolmogorov turbulence theory, and the third uses a maximum likelihood estimation assuming a von Kármán spectral model. Reasonable agreement was obtained between the three methods with various fluctuations, including diurnal variations for all seasons, while the EDR calculated from the third method displayed slightly higher EDR values than the other two methods. The result of the analysis showed that the mean (standard deviations) of logarithms of EDR had larger values as height decreased (increased), and the means were higher in the unstable planetary boundary layer (PBL) than in the stable PBL for this heterogeneous location adjacent to the coastlines. The probability density functions (PDFs) of the EDRs showed that the distribution was well-represented by a lognormal distribution in both the stable and unstable PBL, although the PDFs at the lowest level (2.5 m) deviated from those at other levels due to surface effects. Seasonal variations in the PDFs showed that there was less difference in the shape of the PDFs depending on atmospheric stability in the wintertime. Finally, we calculate the 1-yr statistics of the observed EDR, which will be used for future LLT forecast systems in Korea.

scholarly journals Comparison of turbulence measurements by a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Mauder ◽  
Michael Eggert ◽  
Christian Gutsmuths ◽  
Stefan Oertel ◽  
Paul Wilhelm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Wind Speed ◽  
Friction Velocity ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Vertical Wind ◽  
Doppler Lidar ◽  
Flow Distortion ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Vertical Wind Speed ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract. Accurate measurements of turbulence statistics in the atmosphere are important for eddy-covariance measurements, wind energy research, and the validation of atmospheric numerical models. Sonic anemometers are widely used for these applications. However, these instruments are prone to probe-induced flow distortion effects, and the magnitude of the resulting errors has been debated due to the lack of an absolute reference instrument under field conditions. Here, we present the results of an intercomparison experiment between a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar, which is inherently free of any flow-distortion. This novel remote sensing instrument has otherwise very similar spatial and temporal sampling characteristics as the sonic anemometer and hence served as a reference for this comparison. The presented measurements were carried out over flat homogeneous terrain, at a measurement height of 30 m. We provide a comparative statistical analysis of the resulting mean wind velocities, the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed and the friction velocity and investigate the reasons for the observed deviations based on the turbulence spectra and cospectra. Our results show a very good agreement of the mean wind velocity measurements and the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed, with comparabilities of 0.082 and 0.017 m s−1, respectively. Biases for these two quantities were very low, being smaller than 0.01 m s−1, which corresponds to about 1 % in relative terms. Slightly larger differences were observed for friction velocity. Analysis of the corresponding cospectra showed that the CSAT3B underestimates this quantity systematically by about 3 % on average as a result of too steep a drop-off in the inertial sub-range. We also found that an angle-of-attack dependent transducer-shadowing correction does not improve this agreement effectively because it leads to an artificial correlation between the three wind components and therefore severely distorts the shape of the cospectra.

scholarly journals Wind Estimation in the Lower Atmosphere Using Multirotor Aircraft

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1183-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross T. Palomaki ◽  
Nathan T. Rose ◽  
Michael van den Bossche ◽  
Thomas J. Sherman ◽  
Stephan F. J. De Wekker
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Sonic Anemometer ◽  
Unmanned Aircraft ◽  
Lower Atmosphere ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Atmospheric Structure ◽  
Structure And Dynamics ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Vertical Profiling ◽  
Good Agreement

AbstractUnmanned aerial vehicles are increasingly used to study atmospheric structure and dynamics. While much emphasis has been on the development of fixed-wing unmanned aircraft for atmospheric investigations, the use of multirotor aircraft is relatively unexplored, especially for capturing atmospheric winds. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the efficacy of estimating wind speed and direction with 1) a direct approach using a sonic anemometer mounted on top of a hexacopter and 2) an indirect approach using attitude data from a quadcopter. The data are collected by the multirotor aircraft hovering 10 m above ground adjacent to one or more sonic anemometers. Wind speed and direction show good agreement with sonic anemometer measurements in the initial experiments. Typical errors in wind speed and direction are smaller than 0.5 and 30°, respectively. Multirotor aircraft provide a promising alternative to traditional platforms for vertical profiling in the atmospheric boundary layer, especially in conditions where a tethered balloon system is typically deployed.

scholarly journals Valid and Reliable Barbell Velocity Estimation Using an Inertial Measurement Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 9170
Author(s):  
Steffen Held ◽  
Ludwig Rappelt ◽  
Jan-Philip Deutsch ◽  
Lars Donath
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Reliability Indicators

The accurate assessment of the mean concentric barbell velocity (MCV) and its displacement are crucial aspects of resistance training. Therefore, the validity and reliability indicators of an easy-to-use inertial measurement unit (VmaxPro®) were examined. Nineteen trained males (23.1 ± 3.2 years, 1.78 ± 0.08 m, 75.8 ± 9.8 kg; Squat 1-Repetition maximum (1RM): 114.8 ± 24.5 kg) performed squats and hip thrusts (3–5 sets, 30 repetitions total, 75% 1RM) on two separate days. The MCV and displacement were simultaneously measured using VmaxPro® and a linear position transducer (Speed4Lift®). Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (0.91 < ICC < 0.96) with a small systematic bias (p < 0.001; ηp2 < 0.50) for squats (0.01 ± 0.04 m·s−1) and hip thrusts (0.01 ± 0.05 m·s−1) and a low limit of agreement (LoA < 0.12 m·s−1) indicated an acceptable validity. The within- and between-day reliability of the MCV revealed good ICCs (0.55 < ICC < 0.91) and a low LoA (<0.16 m·s−1). Although the displacement revealed a systematic bias during squats (p < 0.001; ηp2 < 0.10; 3.4 ± 3.4 cm), no bias was detectable during hip thrusts (p = 0.784; ηp2 < 0.001; 0.3 ± 3.3 cm). The displacement showed moderate to good ICCs (0.43 to 0.95) but a high LoA (7.8 to 10.7 cm) for the validity and (within- and between-day) reliability of squats and hip thrusts. The VmaxPro® is considered to be a valid and reliable tool for the MCV assessment.

scholarly journals Correlation between sonic anemometers at three heights within a mixed temperate forest

SURG Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-51
Author(s):  
Mark Halliday
Keyword(s):  
Temperate Forest ◽  
Vertical Structure ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Horizontal Motion ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Vertical Height

Correlation coefficients were determined for the horizontal and vertical components from three sonic anemometers in a mixed temperate forest. It was found that the vertical structure of the canopy is important for two point correlations within the canopy. This was especially noticed for horizontal motion due to differences in structure between the upper and lower parts of the canopy, which effected the correlations between these parts. This suggests that there is a decoupling trend between these parts of the canopy. Typically the anemometers with smaller vertical height separations were shown to have stronger correlations than the larger height separations.

scholarly journals Can Wind Lidars Measure Turbulence?

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 853-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sathe ◽  
J. Mann ◽  
J. Gottschall ◽  
M. S. Courtney
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Wave ◽  
Atmospheric Stability ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Systematic Errors ◽  
Stability Conditions ◽  
Pass Filter ◽  
Low Pass Filter ◽  
Wind Speeds ◽  
Sonic Anemometers ◽  
Velocity Variance

Abstract Modeling of the systematic errors in the second-order moments of wind speeds measured by continuous-wave (ZephIR) and pulsed (WindCube) lidars is presented. These lidars use the conical scanning technique to measure the velocity field. The model captures the effect of volume illumination and conical scanning. The predictions are compared with the measurements from the ZephIR, WindCube, and sonic anemometers at a flat terrain test site under different atmospheric stability conditions. The sonic measurements are used at several heights on a meteorological mast in combination with lidars that are placed on the ground. Results show that the systematic errors are up to 90% for the vertical velocity variance, whereas they are up to 70% for the horizontal velocity variance. For the ZephIR, the systematic errors increase with height, whereas for the WindCube, they decrease with height. The systematic errors also vary with atmospheric stability and are low for unstable conditions. In general, for both lidars, the model agrees well with the measurements at all heights and under different atmospheric stability conditions. For the ZephIR, the model results are improved when an additional low-pass filter for the 3-s scan is also modeled. It is concluded that with the current measurement configuration, these lidars cannot be used to measure turbulence precisely.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document