In Vivo Behavior of Bioactive Glass-Based Hybrids in Animal Models For Bone Regeneration

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shal N
Keyword(s):  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Hybrid Biomaterials

This review presents the recent advances and the current state-of-the-art of bioactive glass-based hybrid biomaterials for bone regeneration. Hybrid materials comprise two (or more) constituents at the nanometre scale, in which typically, one constituent is organic and functions as the matrix phase and the other constituent is inorganic and behaves as the filler phase. Such materials, thereby, more closely resemble natural bio-nanocomposites such as bone. Various glass compositions in combination with a wide range of natural and synthetic polymers have been evaluated in vivo under experimental conditions ranging from unloaded critical-sized defects to mechanically-loaded, weight-bearing sites with highly favourable outcomes. Additional possibilities include controlled release of anti-osteoporotic drugs, ions, antibiotics, pro-angiogenic substances and pro-osteogenic substances. Histological and morphological evaluations suggest the formation of new, highly vascularised bone that displays signs of remodelling over time. With the possibility to tailor the mechanical and chemical properties through careful selection of individual components, as well as the overall geometry (from mesoporous particles and micro-/nanospheres to 3D scaffolds and coatings) through innovative manufacturing processes, such biomaterials present exciting new avenues for bone repair and regeneration.

scholarly journals Nanocellulose/bioactive glass cryogels as scaffolds for bone regeneration

Nanoscale ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (42) ◽  
pp. 19842-19849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipe V. Ferreira ◽  
Lucas P. Souza ◽  
Thais M. M. Martins ◽  
João H. Lopes ◽  
Bruno D. Mattos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Material ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Cellulose Nanofibrils ◽  
Porous Network ◽  
Inorganic Composite

Cellulose nanofibrils and bioactive glass are assembled into a porous network and used as scaffold for bone regeneration. The obtained organic–inorganic composite material optimally combine the necessary features for in vivo bone repair.

Regeneration of Bone Defects Using Bioactive Glass Combined with Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. An experimental in vivo study

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1983-1987
Author(s):  
Cristian Trambitas ◽  
Anca Maria Pop ◽  
Alina Dia Trambitas Miron ◽  
Dorin Constantin Dorobantu ◽  
Flaviu Tabaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Calvarial Bone ◽  
Specific Protocol ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Male Wistar Rats

Large bone defects are a medical concern as these are often unable to heal spontaneously, based on the host bone repair mechanisms. In their treatment, bone tissue engineering techniques represent a promising approach by providing a guide for osseous regeneration. As bioactive glasses proved to have osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties, the aim of our study was to evaluate by histologic examination, the differences in the healing of critical-sized calvarial bone defects filled with bioactive glass combined with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, compared to negative controls. We used 16 male Wistar rats subjected to a specific protocol based on which 2 calvarial bone defects were created in each animal, one was filled with Bon Alive S53P4 bioactive glass and adipose-derived stem cells and the other one was considered control. At intervals of one week during the following month, the animals were euthanized and the specimens from bone defects were histologically examined and compared. The results showed that this biomaterial was biocompatible and the first signs of osseous healing appeared in the third week. Bone Alive S53P4 bioactive glass could be an excellent bone substitute, reducing the need of bone grafts.

scholarly journals Bone defect reconstruction via endochondral ossification: A developmental engineering strategy

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204173142110042
Author(s):  
Rao Fu ◽  
Chuanqi Liu ◽  
Yuxin Yan ◽  
Qingfeng Li ◽  
Ru-Lin Huang
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Defect ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Endochondral Ossification ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Endochondral Bone ◽  
Defect Reconstruction ◽  
Hypoxic Conditions ◽  
Bone Defect Reconstruction

Traditional bone tissue engineering (BTE) strategies induce direct bone-like matrix formation by mimicking the embryological process of intramembranous ossification. However, the clinical translation of these clinical strategies for bone repair is hampered by limited vascularization and poor bone regeneration after implantation in vivo. An alternative strategy for overcoming these drawbacks is engineering cartilaginous constructs by recapitulating the embryonic processes of endochondral ossification (ECO); these constructs have shown a unique ability to survive under hypoxic conditions as well as induce neovascularization and ossification. Such developmentally engineered constructs can act as transient biomimetic templates to facilitate bone regeneration in critical-sized defects. This review introduces the concept and mechanism of developmental BTE, explores the routes of endochondral bone graft engineering, highlights the current state of the art in large bone defect reconstruction via ECO-based strategies, and offers perspectives on the challenges and future directions of translating current knowledge from the bench to the bedside.

scholarly journals Zn-Containing Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration in Dentistry

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1797
Author(s):  
Manuel Toledano ◽  
Marta Vallecillo-Rivas ◽  
María T. Osorio ◽  
Esther Muñoz-Soto ◽  
Manuel Toledano-Osorio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Healing ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Complex Modulus ◽  
Bacterial Colonization ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
M2 Macrophage

Barrier membranes are employed in guided bone regeneration (GBR) to facilitate bone in-growth. A bioactive and biomimetic Zn-doped membrane with the ability to participate in bone healing and regeneration is necessary. The aim of the present study is to state the effect of doping the membranes for GBR with zinc compounds in the improvement of bone regeneration. A literature search was conducted using electronic databases, such as PubMed, MEDLINE, DIMDI, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. A narrative exploratory review was undertaken, focusing on the antibacterial effects, physicochemical and biological properties of Zn-loaded membranes. Bioactivity, bone formation and cytotoxicity were analyzed. Microstructure and mechanical properties of these membranes were also determined. Zn-doped membranes have inhibited in vivo and in vitro bacterial colonization. Zn-alloy and Zn-doped membranes attained good biocompatibility and were found to be non-toxic to cells. The Zn-doped matrices showed feasible mechanical properties, such as flexibility, strength, complex modulus and tan delta. Zn incorporation in polymeric membranes provided the highest regenerative efficiency for bone healing in experimental animals, potentiating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, biological activity and a balanced remodeling. Zn-loaded membranes doped with SiO2 nanoparticles have performed as bioactive modulators provoking an M2 macrophage increase and are a potential biomaterial for promoting bone repair. Zn-doped membranes have promoted pro-healing phenotypes.

scholarly journals Anabolic and antiresorptive actions of locally delivered bisphosphonates for bone repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 548-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Qayoom ◽  
D. B. Raina ◽  
A. Širka ◽  
Š. Tarasevičius ◽  
M. Tägil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Research Groups ◽  
Preclinical Models ◽  
Implant Fixation ◽  
Local Use

During the last decades, several research groups have used bisphosphonates for local application to counteract secondary bone resorption after bone grafting, to improve implant fixation or to control bone resorption caused by bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). We focused on zoledronate (a bisphosphonate) due to its greater antiresorptive potential over other bisphosphonates. Recently, it has become obvious that the carrier is of importance to modulate the concentration and elution profile of the zoledronic acid locally. Incorporating one fifth of the recommended systemic dose of zoledronate with different apatite matrices and types of bone defects has been shown to enhance bone regeneration significantly in vivo. We expect the local delivery of zoledronate to overcome the limitations and side effects associated with systemic usage; however, we need to know more about the bioavailability and the biological effects. The local use of BMP-2 and zoledronate as a combination has a proven additional effect on bone regeneration. This review focuses primarily on the local use of zoledronate alone, or in combination with bone anabolic factors, in various preclinical models mimicking different orthopaedic conditions. Cite this article: I. Qayoom, D. B. Raina, A. Širka, Š. Tarasevičius, M. Tägil, A. Kumar, L. Lidgren. Anabolic and antiresorptive actions of locally delivered bisphosphonates for bone repair: A review. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:548–560. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.710.BJR-2018-0015.R2.

scholarly journals In Vitro Physico-Chemical Characterization and Standardized In Vivo Evaluation of Biocompatibility of a New Synthetic Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1186
Author(s):  
Lívia da Costa Pereira ◽  
Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão ◽  
Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Alves ◽  
Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende ◽  
Marcelo José Pinheiro Guedes de Uzeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Chemical Characterization ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Tissue Reaction ◽  
In Vivo Evaluation ◽  
Physico Chemical ◽  
Tissue Reactions

This study’s aim was to evaluate the biocompatibility and bioabsorption of a new membrane for guided bone regeneration (polylactic-co-glycolic acid associated with hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate) with three thicknesses (200, 500, and 700 µm) implanted in mice subcutaneously. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and the quantification of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen were used to characterize the physico-chemical properties. One hundred Balb-C mice were divided into 5 experimental groups: Group 1—Sham (without implantation); Group 2—200 μm; Group 3—500 μm; Group 4—700 μm; and Group 5—Pratix®. Each group was subdivided into four experimental periods (7, 30, 60 and 90 days). Samples were collected and processed for histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. The membranes showed no moderate or severe tissue reactions during the experimental periods studied. The 500-μm membrane showed no tissue reaction during any experimental period. The 200-μm membrane began to exhibit fragmentation after 30 days, while the 500-μm and 700-µm membranes began fragmentation at 90 days. All membranes studied were biocompatible and the 500 µm membrane showed the best results for absorption and tissue reaction, indicating its potential for clinical guided bone regeneration.

scholarly journals Amyloid Beta: Multiple Mechanisms of Toxicity and Only Some Protective Effects?

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Carrillo-Mora ◽  
Rogelio Luna ◽  
Laura Colín-Barenque
Keyword(s):  
Amyloid Beta ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Protective Mechanisms ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Mechanisms Of Toxicity ◽  
Mitochondrial Alterations ◽  
Physiological Properties ◽  
Wide Range

Amyloid beta (Aβ) is a peptide of 39–43 amino acids found in large amounts and forming deposits in the brain tissue of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). For this reason, it has been implicated in the pathophysiology of damage observed in this type of dementia. However, the role of Aβin the pathophysiology of AD is not yet precisely understood. Aβhas been experimentally shown to have a wide range of toxic mechanismsin vivoandin vitro, such as excitotoxicity, mitochondrial alterations, synaptic dysfunction, altered calcium homeostasis, oxidative stress, and so forth. In contrast, Aβhas also shown some interesting neuroprotective and physiological properties under certain experimental conditions, suggesting that both physiological and pathological roles of Aβmay depend on several factors. In this paper, we reviewed both toxic and protective mechanisms of Aβto further explore what their potential roles could be in the pathophysiology of AD. The complete understanding of such apparently opposed effects will also be an important guide for the therapeutic efforts coming in the future.

scholarly journals Genetically Engineered-MSC Therapies for Non-unions, Delayed Unions and Critical-size Bone Defects

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 3430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Freitas ◽  
Susana Gomes Santos ◽  
Raquel Madeira Gonçalves ◽  
José Henrique Teixeira ◽  
Mário Adolfo Barbosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Critical Size ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Beneficial Effects

The normal bone regeneration process is a complex and coordinated series of events involving different cell types and molecules. However, this process is impaired in critical-size/large bone defects, with non-unions or delayed unions remaining a major clinical problem. Novel strategies are needed to aid the current therapeutic approaches. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are able to promote bone regeneration. Their beneficial effects can be improved by modulating the expression levels of specific genes with the purpose of stimulating MSC proliferation, osteogenic differentiation or their immunomodulatory capacity. In this context, the genetic engineering of MSCs is expected to further enhance their pro-regenerative properties and accelerate bone healing. Herein, we review the most promising molecular candidates (protein-coding and non-coding transcripts) and discuss the different methodologies to engineer and deliver MSCs, mainly focusing on in vivo animal studies. Considering the potential of the MSC secretome for bone repair, this topic has also been addressed. Furthermore, the promising results of clinical studies using MSC for bone regeneration are discussed. Finally, we debate the advantages and limitations of using MSCs, or genetically-engineered MSCs, and their potential as promoters of bone fracture regeneration/repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document