scholarly journals Visum et Repertum as Evidence for Criminal Acts in Domestic Violence

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Jatmiko Raharjo ◽  
Syamsuddin Muchtar ◽  
Audyna Mayasari Muin
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Law

The aim of the study is to determine the application of Visum et Repertum as evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence. This study was empirical legal research. The location of this study was conducted in Kejaksaan Negeri Klaten. The result of the research showed that as proof of domestic violence with evidence Visum et Repertum was one of the law enforcements oriented to realize for legal certainty and protection of victims in proving the occurrence of criminal acts in domestic violence. The lack of evidence bothers the process of law enforcement, regarding requirements to determine the victim provided at least two evidence and for the judges to decide on criminal cases with valid evidence at least can be avoided by using Visum et Repertum. The obstacles to prove the evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence with Visum et Repertum includes the differences of understanding among law enforcement officials about the use of Visum et Repertum for criminal acts in domestic violence.

KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Differences Of Opinion ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

Silencing Women's Voices: Nuisance Property Laws and Battered Women

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. 908-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen Arnold ◽  
Megan Slusser
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Battered Women ◽  
Gender Inequality ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Organizational Structures ◽  
Women's Voices ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law ◽  
Enforcement Policies

There is little documentation about how nuisance property laws, which fine people for excessive 911 calls, affect victims of domestic violence. In St. Louis, we found that police and prosecutors believe that the law benefits victims of domestic violence by providing them with additional services. By contrast, advocates for domestic violence victims believe that the law undermines battered women's access to housing and discourages them from calling 911. Using qualitative data, we analyze how the organizational structures and dynamics within which each group works give rise to different stocks of working knowledge. We conclude that law enforcement officials are unaware of these harms because women's voices and experiences are marginalized during the enforcement process. This research reveals mechanisms through which law enforcement policies reinforce gender inequality, and illustrates some ways in which gender relations and power come into play in what, on their surface, appear to be gender‐neutral laws.

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DENGAN KERUGIAN NEGARA YANG KECIL DALAM MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Muchlis
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Small Loss ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Proceedings

The Circulars letter of deputy attorney of general for special crimes number: B-113/F/ Fd.1/05/2010 can be used as a reference by prosecutors in doing law enforcement against corruption with small losses, but in practice law enforcement, this circular letter is making trouble in practice. The results of this research, namely: the law enforcement against corruption with a small loss of state must pay attention to the values of justice, expediency, and legal certainty. In enforcing the law against corruption with small losses only can be stopped during an investigation by utilizing the exchequer and redress demanded. the reason corruption cases with small losses were still continued by the prosecutor to the court proceedings after enactment of circulator letter because circulator letter contrary to corruption constitution and it has no the strength or binding in legal basis. The Suggestions are addressed for law enforcement officials (police, prosecutor, and judge) in order to do the law enforcement against corruption with small losses in order consider the value of a legal basis, namely: fairness, expediency and certainty. The circular letter of deputy attorney general for special crimes number: B-1113/F/Fd.1/05/2010 in order to be taken as government consideration in formulating the new rules (Ius constituendum). Key words: Corruption, Law Enforcement, Justice

scholarly journals ALTERNATIF MEDIASI PENAL DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Reyner . ◽  
Dian Andriawan Daeng Tawang
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Wide Society ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Special Rule ◽  
Investigation Process ◽  
Regulations And Guidelines

In general, penal mediation can be said as a concept that brings together the victims and criminals to discuss their interests and willingness in order to resolve criminal cases that have occurred between them, and are assisted by a mediator who is neutral and help to resolve criminal cases by giving advice and mediating as mediators. The results of the research conducted by normative research and through several literature such as legal books, regulations, and guidelines, show that in fact, reason mediation has been carried out in the community and carried out by several law enforcement officials in the framework of the settlement process criminal. What is done in the midst of Indonesian society is only a peace process that shows customary law as its branch and many are applied within the police in the investigation process to carry out procedures for resolving criminal acts. The importance and need for penal mediation to be applied in formal law that is developing and prevailing in society can be a special rule that is regulated and is part of criminal procedural law for the sake of legal certainty. Penal mediation can be applied at the level of investigation by the police in the process of resolving criminal cases and creating equal welfare and justice in the wide society for sure

scholarly journals The Interaction of the Investigator with the Body of Inquiry During the Investigation of Crimes in Criminal Cases of Extremism: The Problems and Ways of Their Solving

Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 65-73
Author(s):  
Vladimir Shinkaruk ◽  
Svyatoslav Biryukov ◽  
Alexander Rezvan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Body ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

Introduction: the issues of interaction of the investigator, as the central figure in the process of investigating crimes of extremism, continue to be the object of attention of scientists and practitioners. And this is not surprising, because the state of interaction of the investigator with the body of inquiry, the representatives of other services and departments, first of all, the law enforcement agencies directly depends on the speed of solving and the completeness of the investigation of each committed extremist crime, and this, in turn, affects the prestige of law enforcement agencies among the population and, as a result, the level of criminogenic situation. Despite the large number of recommendations available in the legal and specialized literature aimed at improving certain aspects of this type of activity of the person conducting the investigation, the dynamically developing criminal procedure legislation, as well as actively changing the operational-search and investigative practice, provide new food for analyzing the current state of interaction, in order to identify those newly emerging factors that negatively affect the organization and state of interaction of the main subjects of the investigation and which, ultimately, have a negative impact on the course and results of the investigation. In this regard, the authors aim to highlight some problematic issues that arise in the course of organizing and maintaining the proper level of interaction between the investigative body and other subjects of the investigation to ensure the prompt and comprehensive establishment of all the circumstances to be proved. Tasks: to describe the areas of interaction between the investigator and the body of inquiry during the investigation of crimes in cases of extremism; to give recommendations aimed at overcoming these problems. Methods: the methodological framework for the study is a set of methods of scientific knowledge, among which the main ones are the methods of information processing and logical analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction and generalization. Results: the authors’ point of view on the problems associated with the organization of interaction between the investigator and employees of other services and departments of the law enforcement agencies in order to uncover and investigate crimes of extremism, as well as the proposed ways to solve them, based on the analysis of modern operational and investigative practice, trends in the development of the current criminal procedure legislation make it possible to use them in the practical activities of the authorized law enforcement officials in their practical activities aimed at solving and investigating crimes. Conclusions: as a result of the study, the existing problems determined by the changes in the criminal procedure legislation and operational and investigative practice are identified, and the ways to overcome them are proposed in order to inform students in the field of training “Jurisprudence”, teachers of law schools, as well as practitioners in order to better understand the specifics of the investigation of crimes of this category.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan Begal atas Dasar Pembelaan Terpaksa

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Gede Agung ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law ◽  
Threatening Situation

A criminal act is an act that is prohibited by law and is subject to sanctions. Not all acts that violate the provisions of the law can be punished, as contained in article 49 of the Criminal Code, which has been sentenced to a criminal sentence. A person who is a victim of a criminal act of tampering in the proximity of a criminal act who commits an act of defense is not sentenced. The type of research used is normative legal research. An act of defense that cannot be subject to punishment, the law applicable to article 49 of the Criminal Code in which a criminal act is committed in a threatening situation or an attack at that time, such as a victim of tampering himself, a judge as a law enforcer who examining and deciding an action can see evidence of the perpetrator's actions of self-defense which meet the elements of defense, the judge also considers the reasons of the perpetrator which can mitigate especially the perpetrator who is defending himself To law enforcement officials, judges in defending offenders who pay more attention to someone who is doing it so that justice can be created.

scholarly journals HILANGNYA KEADILAN DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM MENURUT TEORI DISKRIMINASI

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Nurindria Naharista Vidyapramatya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Donald Black ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

<p><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The Indonesian nation is currently experiencing a crisis of justice in law enforcement. This </em> <em>happens because it is only concerned with the aspects of legal certainty and formal-legality rather than justice. The law cannot be enforced if there are no credible, competent and independent law enforcement officers. Legal discrimination is a way for law enforcement officials to differentiate in the imposition of sanctions against someone who is influenced by that person’s ability both in the economic and power fields. This study discusses how discriminatory law enforcement is when viewed from Donald Black’s theory. The author will compare two cases with the same type of crime but different decisions. Then studied through Donald Black’s theory of legal discrimination. The purpose of this study was to determine the existence of discrimination in law enforcement from two similar cases but with different decisions which were reviewed through Donald Black’s theory of legal discrimination. The research method used by the author in this study is a normative juridical research method. The preparation of this research is analytical descriptive with a conceptual approach. The conceptual approach needs to examine legal principles that can be found from the perspective of scholars or legal doctrine. The results of this research are indeed proven that there is legal discrimination that occurs, this can be seen from the study of Donald Black’s theory. The suggestion for law enforcers is to be fair in any case, do not favoritism and discriminate, because all citizens are the same, equally need justice.</em></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Bangsa Indonesia saat ini sedang mengalami krisis keadilan dalam penegakan hukum. Hal ini  terjadi karena semata-mata hanya mementingkan aspek kepastian hukum dan legalitas-formal daripada keadilan. Hukum tidak dapat ditegakkan apabila tidak ada aparat penegak hukum yang berkredibilitas, berkompeten dan independen. Diskriminasi hukum merupakan cara aparat penegak hukum yang membedakan dalam pemberian sanksi terhadap seseorang yang dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan orang tersebut baik dalam bidang ekonomi maupun kekuasaan. Penelitian ini membahas tentang bagaimana diskriminasi penegakan hukum jika ditinjau dari teori milik Donald Black. Penulis akan membandingkan dua kasus dengan jenis tindak pidana yang sama namun putusan yang berbeda. Lalu dikaji melalui teori diskriminasi hukum milik Donald Black. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui adanya diskriminsi dalam penegakan hukum dari dua kasus yang serupa tetapi memiliki putusan yang berbeda yang ditinjau melalui teori diskriminasi hukum milik Donald Black. Metode penelitian yang digunakan penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Penyusunan penelitian ini bersifat diskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan konseptual. Pendekatan konseptual perlu mengkaji prinsip-prinsip hukum yang dapat ditemukan dari pandangan sarjana ataupun doktrin hukum. Hasil dari penelitian ini memang terbukti adanya diskriminsinasi hukum yang terjadi, hal ini dapat dilihat dari kajian teori Donald Black. Saran bagi para penegak hukum adalah bersikap adil terhadap kasus apapun jangan pilih kasih dan membeda-bedakan, karena semua warga negara adalah sama, sama sama butuh keadilan.</p>

scholarly journals Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Setelah Berlakunya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen ◽  
Zainal Asikin ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

This research was conducted to find out how the concept of abuse of authority in criminal acts of corruption after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration; and How was law enforcement in handling criminal acts of corruption after the enactment of the Law Number 30 of 2014. This research was a normative legal research. The approach used in this research was the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative approach. From the results of the study it could be concluded that the concept of abuse of authority in criminal acts of corruption after the entry into force of Law Number 30 of 2024 concerning Government Administration was the Abuse of authority in accordance with Article 17 of Law No. 30 of 2014. Law No. 30 of 2014 focused on preventing abuse of authority. Aspects of criminal acts of corruption were first proven based on administrative law. In the process of law enforcement, if there was indeed an abuse of authority, then it became the basis by law enforcement officials to investigate or investigate allegations of corruption against the abusers of authority, whereas if in testing the abuse of authority by the State Administrative Court, the evidence was not proven, of course these actions could not be used as a basis for conducting investigations.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Melalui Restorative Justice di Polda Sumut

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 450-459
Author(s):  
Artha Sebayang ◽  
Utary Maharany Barus ◽  
M. Citra Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Good Relationship ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The North ◽  
The Law ◽  
North Sumatra

The purpose of this study was to determine the legal rules of restorative justice in the settlement of cases of Domestic Violence (KDRT) at the North Sumatra Regional Police. According to Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Police and the factors that cause restorative justice to not work. Research on the Settlement of Domestic Violence Cases through Restorative Justice the North Sumatra Police Case Study is a normative legal research. Normative legal research aims to examine library legal materials. In the Domestic Violence Law No. 23 of 2004 which is a criminal act of complaint and the reporter and victim are people who live within the scope of the household, but the law only confirms that there are no criminal provisions prioritizing the settlement of restorative justice for domestic violence which is minor and constitutes a criminal complaint. The concept of restorative justice is another method used to handle criminal cases. This concept prioritizes the integrity of perpetrators, victims and society as a unit to find solutions and return to a good relationship pattern between victims and perpetrators of criminal acts and one way that can be done in this concept is penal mediation.

The Law Enforcement Weakness of Songs and Musics Copyright Crimes

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Edi Tuahta Putra Saragih ◽  
Muhammad Citra Ramadhan ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Cultural Factor ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Law ◽  
Real Picture

This research aimed to: (a) obtain the forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); (b) understand the role of the police, in this case the Police Precinct, in the law enforcement; (c) identify the factors that influenced the law enforcement. The research method used the normative-empirical legal research, with the initial stages of specifying norms in order to get the proper picture, and then specifying empirical events in order to get the real picture. The research results showed several matters: 1) The forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics) found included: the distribution of the works or the copies, the performances of the works, and the announcements of the works; 2) Police Precinct did notultimately carry out their role as a law enforcer for the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); and 3) The factors that influenced the law enforcement on the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics), namely: legislation factor, in the matter of complaint offenses; law enforcement factor, in terms of the capacity of members; less supportive factor of facilities and infrastructure; legal awareness factor, in the problem of the lack of legal counseling; and cultural factor, related to the differences in norms in the copyright law between those in society and those in regulations. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document