IMPLEMENTASI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG HAK ATAS MEREK PAKAIAN DARI TINDAK PELANGGARAN MEREK (Studi Kasus Pemalsuan Merek Pakaian Kick Denim)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Achmad Rayhan Akbar , ◽  
Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto ,
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Legal Writing ◽  
Civil Suit ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Right

<p>Abstract<br />This paper discusses how the implementation of legal protection against rights holders of brands under <br />the Act No. 20 of 2016 on Brands and Geographical Indications. Legal Writing Method used is Empirical <br />Legal Writing Method with research location in D.I.Yogyakarta Regional Police, Regional Office of Ministry <br />of Law and Human Rights of West Java Province, and Office of Kick Denim clothes brand. The results of <br />this study explain that the holder of the right to the brand has the certainty of Legal Protection by Law No. <br />20 of 2016 since the registration of the mark is received by the Directorate of Intellectual Property of the <br />Ministry of Justice and Human Rights until a period of 10 (ten) years and can be extended for a period of <br />time the same. Legal Protection granted by Law No. 20 of 2016 includes the regulation of forms of breach <br />of the brand, criminal sanction for brand infringement, the granting of rights to the holder of the right to <br />the mark whose rights are violated to take a civil suit through the Commercial Court, making complaints <br />to the Police or selecting the Alternative Dispute Resolution pathway, as well as the Directorate General <br />of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights as the state authority in the field of <br />assisting the holder of the rights to the brand to prove his right by providing all necessary administrative <br />assistance for the proofing process of a brand.<br />Keywords: Legal Protection; Right Holder of Brand; Brand Infringement</p><p>Abstrak<br />Tulisan ini membahas tentang bagaimana implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak <br />atas merek berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. <br />Metode Penulisan Hukum yang digunakan adalah Metode Penulisan Hukum Empiris dengan lokasi <br />penelitian di Kepolisian Daerah D.I.Yogyakarta, Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Provinsi <br />Jawa Barat, dan Kantor merek pakaian Kick Denim. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Pemegang <br />hak atas merek mendapat kepastian Perlindungan Hukum oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 <br />sejak pendaftaran merek tersebut di terima oleh Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian <br />Hukum dan HAM hingga jangka waktu 10 (sepuluh) tahun dan dapat diperpanjang untuk jangka waktu <br />yang sama Perlindungan Hukum yang diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 mencakup <br />pengaturan  bentuk-bentuk  pelanggaran  terhadap  merek,  sanksi  pidana  atas  pelanggaran  terhadap <br />merek, pemberian hak kepada pemegang hak atas merek yang hak nya dilanggar untuk melakukan <br />gugatan perdata melalui Pengadilan Niaga, melakukan Tuntutan Pidana dengan membuat aduan kepada <br />Kepolisian ataupun memilih jalur Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, serta Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan <br />Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM sebagai otoritas Negara dibidang merek membantu pemegang <br />hak  atas  merek  membuktikan  haknya  dengan  cara  memberikan  segala  bantuan  administrasi  yang <br />diperlukan untuk proses pembuktian sebuah merek .<br />Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Pemegang Hak Atas Merek; Tindak Pelanggaran Merek</p>

scholarly journals Peran Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Erick Junata Sipayung
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Geographical Location ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Community Factors

Indonesia is a country rich in biological natural resources which is spread throughout the region, including the Riau Islands Province. Geographical location surrounded by almost 90% (ninety percent) of the sea area, it indirectly indicates the potential of Geographical Indications that are spread in 7 (seven) districts/ cities in Riau Islands. Directorate General of Intellectual Property through the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights has committed to continue to explore the IG potential in each region determined through the Annual Performance Target. IG legal protection can only be given if an item or product has been registered, for example "Sagu Lingga" which has just been declared as one of the IG products. The registration of “Sagu Lingga” is inseparable from the role of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Riau Islands in collaboration with the Lingga Regency Government and Indonesian Sagu Empowerment Association of Lingga. From the results of research in the field, in an effort to register potential IG Products in Riau Islands Province, the Role of the Kemenkumham Kepri Regional Office since the enactment of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications has not been running optimally, where the form of efforts carried out is still limited to inventory, coordination with local governments and supervision of IG products. This is caused by the existence of several constraints caused by several factors including Legal Factors, Law Enforcement Factors, Means and Infrastructure Factors, Community Factors and also Cultural Factors. Whereas the IG registration effort should aim to establish legal certainty and increase the economic value of a product that has an impact on the welfare of the community. This is what then makes researcher interested in pouring it in the form of research. All information was carried out by unstructured interviews, observations and document studies where sample selection was carried out using the purposive sampling method. The research method used is a sociological juridical research method.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hak atas Merek

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
I Gede Mahendra Juliana Adiputra ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Mutual Agreement

The existence of competition causes the original brand owner to feel disadvantaged because the sales result has decreased. It is permissible for someone to use another party's mark as long as they ask permission from the trademark owner first. The owner can give trademark rights to other people as agreed in an agreement. The formulation of the problem in this research is as follows: how is the legal protection of trademark rights and how to resolve violations of trademark rights. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the discussion in this study are as follows: Legal protection of the right to a trademark has been regulated by Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, in the provisions of the Law it is expressly stated that if it has been registered in the law that the right to a trademark has been protected. The sanction imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of trademark rights is a fine of Rp. 20,000,000, - (twenty million rupiah) on condition that if the fine is not paid, he will be subject to imprisonment for 6 (six) months. Settlement of trademark cases can be carried out through institutions that can be used to resolve trademark disputes, including: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration and Courts. Alternative dispute resolution wants the disputing parties to resolve their own dispute with the aim of obtaining a mutual agreement, if the agreement fails, can take arbitration, namely the disputing parties to be able to resolve the dispute to the arbitration institution based on the agreement, furthermore, if the arbitration is successful the last action is through the court, namely the commercial court which has the authority to adjudicate trademark disputes.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Rights Protection of Mandar Coconut Oil through Geographical Indications

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlika Sari ◽  
Hasbir Paserangi ◽  
Marwah ◽  
Achmad Zulfikar ◽  
Irmawati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Property Rights Protection ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government

Intellectual property rights support the economic development of a country.Indonesia, with its extraordinary natural resources, has not been able to optimize protection of intellectual property rights. Only 65 kinds of geographical indications were recorded registered on the Directorate General of Intellectual Property by hundreds or even thousands of products with Indonesian characteristics. This article uses a type of socio legal research with data sourced from literature review. This article concludes that Mandar coconut oil is one of the Indonesia resources as the biggest producer coconut oil in the world. This oil has some advantages so it is worth to get the legal geographical indications. The steps which can take of community and the government refers to Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademark and Geographical Indications. The writers recommend that the government of West Sulawesi Province, PolewaliMandar Regency and Majene Regency Government providesupporttowardsMandar coconut oil, so it can get legal protection through geographical indications.

scholarly journals PENDAFTARAN MEREK ASOSIASI SEBAGAI MEREK KOLEKTIF (KAJIAN TERHADAP ASOSIASI RAJUT INDONESIA WILAYAH JAWA TENGAH)

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Yudhitiya Dyah Sukmadewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Empirical Approach ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
Collective Marks

<p>This study examines the registration of collective marks owned by the<br />Association of Knitting Indonesia Central Java (Java ARI) on the knitting craft<br />products manufactured and marketed independently. In addition, the assessment<br />conducted on the mechanism of collective trademark registration in the relevant<br />institutions. The research method used juridical empirical approach. Juridical<br />aspect is based on Law No.20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications<br />and related legislation, while reviewing the empirical aspects of the business<br />activities carried on ARI Java. The results showed that ARI Java brand label have<br />met the brand element that can be registered as a collective trademark<br />registration with domicile at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of<br />the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in Central Java.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS HASIL PERTANIAN LAHAN BASAH SEBAGAI PRODUK KHAS PROPINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Tavinayati Tavinayati ◽  
Mohammad Effendy ◽  
Zakiyah Zakiyah ◽  
Muhammad Taufik Hidayat
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
The Right

This study aims to determine the legal protection to the right holder geographical indications of agricultural products. The new legal protection is obtained when the plants that meet the classification of the registered geographical indication by producers of agricultural products. The results showed that in the province of South Kalimantan many plants typical of wetlands that meet the classification of the geographical indication which siam rice pearl, saba siam rice, citrus and pineapple Tamban Banjar. But until now there has been registered as a geographical indication.Keywords: Geographical Indications, Trademark Law, Intellectual Property RightsPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak atas indikasi geografis hasil pertanian. Perlindungan hukum baru diperoleh apabila tanaman yang memenuhi klasifikasi indikasi geografis tersebut didaftarkan oleh produsen barang hasil pertanian.  Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa di Propinsi Kalimantan Selatan banyak tanaman khas lahan basah yang memenuhi klasifikasi indikasi geografis  yaitu padi siam mutiara, padi siam saba, jeruk siam Banjar dan nenas Tamban. Akan tetapi sampai saat ini belum terdaftar sebagai indikasi geografis.

scholarly journals KEEPING THE NATION'S ASSETS THROUGH THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHT WORKS OF CULTURE

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-71
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Makkawaru
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Literature And Science ◽  
Community Rights ◽  
Art And Culture ◽  
The Right

Indonesia positioned copyright art and culture based on its strength as a nation or community rights over an Alliance grouping of the society which can give the effect of distortions in its protection. Which institution can be megurus and oversee the interests between countriesCultivate ideas/ideas in the fields of art, literature and science in the context of intellectual property rights (HKI) categorized into areas of HKI named Copyright (Copyright). The scope of the rights provided for the protection of copyright in the context of this very broad following elements known in several countries. There is a different understanding about the copyright status of culture from both the substance of the right nor of the appreciation of the case which threatens foreign claims copyright over the culture of Indonesia

scholarly journals INFLUENCE OF THE RIGHT TO THE ENVIRONMENT ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akramosadat Kia
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Right

Nature is one of the most important pillars of human life, which is why the environment has been considered in all historical periods. At first, contemporary international law seeks to protect the environment as part of international environmental law, but the inadequacy of this protection and the need to protect the environment for Nowadays's human beings and future generations, the link between the environment and human rights It was considered because legal protection of human rights could be a means to protect the environment. Hence, in the context of the third generation of human rights, a new right called "the right to the environment" was created in international human rights instruments, in which the environment was raised as a human right. This right is not only a reminder of the solidarity rights that are categorized in the third generation of human rights, but also necessary for the realization of many human rights, civil, political or economic, social and cultural rights. However, the exercise of this right requires a level of development which in turn provides for a greater degree of environmental degradation. Hence, the international community since the nineties has promoted the idea of sustainable development at all levels of national, regional and the international has put it on its agenda.

Article 23—Common Provisions

2021 ◽  
pp. 408-408
Author(s):  
Eleonora Rosati
Keyword(s):  
Computer Program ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Member States ◽  
Adjustment Mechanism ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Right

This chapter covers the common provisions in Article 23 of the copyright order in Europe, Directive 2019/790. It refers to Member States that are required to ensure that any contractual provision that prevents compliance with the transparency obligation and contract adjustment mechanism will be unenforceable in relation to authors and performers. It also looks at the legislation that causes non-compliance with the alternative dispute resolution procedure. The chapter points out that the provisions on the right of revocation do not apply to authors of a computer program within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2009/24/EC on the legal protection of computer programs. It emphasizes that the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration in Article 18 of Directive 2019/790 do not affect individuals involved in computer programs.

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM PENGALIHAN HAK ATAS MEREK TERDAFTAR BERDASARKAN AKTA HIBAH WASIAT

NOTARIUS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Rifzki Dhiah Pramurti
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Original Owner ◽  
The Right

 Abstract The transfer of rights to a trademark is provided in Article 41 paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2016, in which case the right to a registered mark may be transferred or transferred because of a grant of a will, in which case after the transfer of title to the mark takes place, Submission. The transfer of rights to a mark by an authentic deed made by a Public Official or Notary has legal certainty with the anatomy of the deed in accordance with the provisions of Article 38 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Position. Insofar as the contents of the transfer agreement of the grant will not be denied by the parties, the deed shall have the perfect proof power to be used as evidence in the Court. The transfer of Right to Trademark to another person has the consequence that the recipient of the right of a mark shall be obligated to administer and finance the recording of the transfer of rights to the mark officially to the Directorate of Trademark, Directorate General of Intellectual Property, in the event of a transition through the grant, the original owner of the mark shall provide the original certificate Brands and power of attorney to regulate the application for the transfer of rights to the mark.   AbstrakPengalihan hak atas merek diatur di dalam Pasal 41 ayat (1) Undang- Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016, yang dalam hal ini hak atas merek terdaftar dapat beralih atau dialihkan karena hibah wasiat yang dalam hal ini setelah pengalihan hak atas merek terjadi, harus diikuti dengan penyerahan. Pengalihan hak atas merek dengan akta otentik yang dibuat oleh Pejabat umum atau Notaris memiliki kepastian hukum dengan anatomi akta yang sesuai dengan sebagaimana diatur didalam pasal 38 Undang-undang Nomor 2 tahun 2014 tentang tentang Jabatan Notaris. Sejauh isi perjanjian pengalihan hibah wasiat tersebut tidak dapat disangkal oleh para pihak, maka akta tersebut memperoleh kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna untuk dijadikan alat bukti di Pengadilan. Peralihan Hak atas Merek kepada orang lain memiliki konsekuensi bahwa penerima hak merek wajib untuk mengurus dan membiayai pencatatan pengalihan hak atas merek secara resmi ke Direktorat Merek, Direktorat Jendral Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, dengan adanya peralihan melalui hibah wasiat tersebut, maka pemilik awal merek memberikan sertifikat asli merek dan surat kuasa utuk mengatur permohonan penyerahan hak atas merek.  

scholarly journals Freedom of thought in Europe: do advances in ‘brain-reading’ technology call for revision?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sjors Ligthart
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Mental States ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Legal Context ◽  
Reading Technology ◽  
Freedom Of Thought ◽  
The Right

Abstract Since advances in brain-reading technology are changing traditional epistemic boundaries of the mind, yielding information from the brain that enables to draw inferences about particular mental states of individuals, the sustainability of the present framework of European human rights has been called into question. More specifically, it has been argued that in order to provide adequate human rights protection from non-consensual brain-reading, the right to freedom of thought should be revised, making it ‘fit for the future’ again. From the perspective of criminal justice, the present paper examines whether such a revision is necessary within the European legal context. It argues that under its current understanding, the right to freedom of thought would probably not cover the employment of most brain-reading applications in criminal justice. By contrast, the right to freedom of (non-)expression will provide legal protection in this regard and, at the same time, will also allow for certain exceptions. Hence, instead of revising the absolute right to freedom of thought, a legal approach tailored to non-consensual brain-reading could be developed under the already existing right not to convey information, ideas, and opinions as guaranteed under the freedom of (non-)expression. This might need to re-interpret the right to freedom of expression, rather than the right to freedom of thought.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document