scholarly journals PENDAFTARAN MEREK ASOSIASI SEBAGAI MEREK KOLEKTIF (KAJIAN TERHADAP ASOSIASI RAJUT INDONESIA WILAYAH JAWA TENGAH)

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Yudhitiya Dyah Sukmadewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Empirical Approach ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
Collective Marks

<p>This study examines the registration of collective marks owned by the<br />Association of Knitting Indonesia Central Java (Java ARI) on the knitting craft<br />products manufactured and marketed independently. In addition, the assessment<br />conducted on the mechanism of collective trademark registration in the relevant<br />institutions. The research method used juridical empirical approach. Juridical<br />aspect is based on Law No.20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications<br />and related legislation, while reviewing the empirical aspects of the business<br />activities carried on ARI Java. The results showed that ARI Java brand label have<br />met the brand element that can be registered as a collective trademark<br />registration with domicile at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of<br />the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in Central Java.</p><p> </p>

Optimalisasi Pengawasan pada Penerimaan Pendaftaran Merek dalam Rangka Perlindungan Merek

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Febri Noor Hediati
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Trademark Registration

The writing of this law examines the supervision of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in the process of receiving trademark registration which is still weak. So that until now there are still identical or counterfeit brands that have passed trademark registration in Indonesia. This paper uses a normative juridical research method that is descriptive-analytical. The result of this research is that there are still gaps that can be exploited by individuals in the process of trademark registration, especially in the process of announcing the official brand news. This paper concludes the need for tighter supervision by utilizing information technology, therefore creating a smartphone application is useful for the trademark registration process and as a medium of communication. The application can also provide notifications when brands validity period ends.

scholarly journals The Implementation of International Trademark Registration in Indonesia Post-Ratification of Madrid Protocol

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Andry Setiawan ◽  
Dewi Sulistyaningsih ◽  
Leo Bernado Aglesius
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Member Country ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Registration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
International Bureau ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
The Impact

In early October 2017, the Indonesian government, represented by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, has officially ratified the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks (Madrid Protocol). The ratification is contained in the Presidential Regulation No. 92 of 2017 on Ratification of Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, 1989. The Presidential Regulation shall be the legal basis of enforcement that regulates the international trademark registration in Indonesia. The concept offered through the international trademark registration system based on the Madrid Protocol is its practicality which passes only one examination, one Language, one currency and it is integrated by the International Bureau administered by WIPO without changing the sovereignty of each member country which ratifies the system. The objective of this paper is to find out how the trademark registration is implemented based on the Madrid Protocol after its ratification in Indonesia and how the system will impact. The results of this paper will be beneficial for the public so that they know the mechanism of the international trademark registration and the impact of this system

scholarly journals How Economic Rights for SMEs Protected? Analysis of National and International Property Rights Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-88
Author(s):  
Waspiah Waspiah ◽  
Rodiyah Rodiyah ◽  
Dian Latifiani ◽  
Ridwan Arifin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Central Java Province

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia are growing rapidly and continuing to grow. These developments had a significant impact on economic growth for various sectors in Indonesia. However, the dynamics of the development of SMEs are still overshadowed by the unclear protection of rights relating to intellectual property, including economic rights for SMEs. In fact, this right becomes an important part that is regulated both in national and international legal rules. The purpose of this study is to determine and compare the implementation of the protection of economic rights for SMEs in Central Java Province, Indonesia. This research method uses interview techniques and direct observation in several SMEs in Central Java. This study found that the protection of economic rights for SMEs had not been maximally carried out, even the number of SMEs did not yet obtain guaranteed recognition of the brand rights and copyrights of their products. This study concludes that in applying protection to economic rights for SMEs, collaboration between sectors and ministries is needed, not only the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, but also Industry, Trade and Economy.

IMPLEMENTASI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG HAK ATAS MEREK PAKAIAN DARI TINDAK PELANGGARAN MEREK (Studi Kasus Pemalsuan Merek Pakaian Kick Denim)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Achmad Rayhan Akbar , ◽  
Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto ,
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Legal Writing ◽  
Civil Suit ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Right

<p>Abstract<br />This paper discusses how the implementation of legal protection against rights holders of brands under <br />the Act No. 20 of 2016 on Brands and Geographical Indications. Legal Writing Method used is Empirical <br />Legal Writing Method with research location in D.I.Yogyakarta Regional Police, Regional Office of Ministry <br />of Law and Human Rights of West Java Province, and Office of Kick Denim clothes brand. The results of <br />this study explain that the holder of the right to the brand has the certainty of Legal Protection by Law No. <br />20 of 2016 since the registration of the mark is received by the Directorate of Intellectual Property of the <br />Ministry of Justice and Human Rights until a period of 10 (ten) years and can be extended for a period of <br />time the same. Legal Protection granted by Law No. 20 of 2016 includes the regulation of forms of breach <br />of the brand, criminal sanction for brand infringement, the granting of rights to the holder of the right to <br />the mark whose rights are violated to take a civil suit through the Commercial Court, making complaints <br />to the Police or selecting the Alternative Dispute Resolution pathway, as well as the Directorate General <br />of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights as the state authority in the field of <br />assisting the holder of the rights to the brand to prove his right by providing all necessary administrative <br />assistance for the proofing process of a brand.<br />Keywords: Legal Protection; Right Holder of Brand; Brand Infringement</p><p>Abstrak<br />Tulisan ini membahas tentang bagaimana implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak <br />atas merek berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. <br />Metode Penulisan Hukum yang digunakan adalah Metode Penulisan Hukum Empiris dengan lokasi <br />penelitian di Kepolisian Daerah D.I.Yogyakarta, Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Provinsi <br />Jawa Barat, dan Kantor merek pakaian Kick Denim. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Pemegang <br />hak atas merek mendapat kepastian Perlindungan Hukum oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 <br />sejak pendaftaran merek tersebut di terima oleh Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian <br />Hukum dan HAM hingga jangka waktu 10 (sepuluh) tahun dan dapat diperpanjang untuk jangka waktu <br />yang sama Perlindungan Hukum yang diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 mencakup <br />pengaturan  bentuk-bentuk  pelanggaran  terhadap  merek,  sanksi  pidana  atas  pelanggaran  terhadap <br />merek, pemberian hak kepada pemegang hak atas merek yang hak nya dilanggar untuk melakukan <br />gugatan perdata melalui Pengadilan Niaga, melakukan Tuntutan Pidana dengan membuat aduan kepada <br />Kepolisian ataupun memilih jalur Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, serta Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan <br />Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM sebagai otoritas Negara dibidang merek membantu pemegang <br />hak  atas  merek  membuktikan  haknya  dengan  cara  memberikan  segala  bantuan  administrasi  yang <br />diperlukan untuk proses pembuktian sebuah merek .<br />Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Pemegang Hak Atas Merek; Tindak Pelanggaran Merek</p>

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI DESTINATION BRANDING DALAM UNDANG–UNDANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Agus Adi Pranatha ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Distinctive Feature ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Destination Branding ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Specific Regulation

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan eksistensi destination branding dalam peraturan tentang merek di Indonesia. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menekankan pembahasan pada pendekatan undang – undang. Dalam artikel ini penulis menggunakan sumber – sumber berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Setelah melalui pembahasan dan analisis dapat dinyatakan bahwa, destination branding dapat diartikan sebagai upaya untuk memberikan sebuah ciri khas atau daya pembeda pada sebuah destinasi. Hingga saat ini memang belum ada pengaturan secara khusus yang menjelaskan tentang destination branding dalam undang – undang No. 20 tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, namun bukan berarti destination branding tidak dapat didaftarkan ke Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, karena pada prinsipnya destination branding telah memenuhi unsur – unsur sebagai sebuah merek. This article aims to demonstrate the existence of destination branding in the regulation of brands in Indonesia. This article uses a normative legal research method that emphasizes the discussion of the legal approach. In this article, the author uses sources in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. After going through the discussion and analysis it can be stated that, destination branding can be interpreted as an effort to provide a distinctive feature or distinctive power to a destination. Until now, there is no specific regulation that explains destination branding in Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, but that does not mean that destination branding cannot be registered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, because in principle, destination branding fulfills the elements as a brand.

scholarly journals Problematika Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Bidang Merek Bagi Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menegah

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-56
Author(s):  
Zulfikri Toguan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Protection Measures ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
The Government

Legal protection for a mark of a place or origin of MSMEs can be done by first registering the mark to obtain legal force. In this case the Office/Agency/Community Organization assists by facilitating MSMEs in terms of socialization and assistance for trademark registration. Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications provides improvements to previous laws, especially regarding preventive protection measures, namely registration procedures and registration fees. Brands produced by Indonesian MSMEs can help increase competitiveness in the development of new products. This research is normative or library research method, namely legal research carried out by reviewing and researching library materials in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. This study concludes: First, the problems in the protection of intellectual property rights in the field of branding for MSME products are due to the understanding of MSME actors on brand rights is still low/shallow so that MSME actors do not register the brand of MSME products. Second, efforts to provide brand protection to the MSME industry are by registering MSME brands and the government makes it easy for MSME industry players to register trademarks.

scholarly journals The Urgency of Trademark Registration for Business Actors (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No 575 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2020 Between Ruben Samuel Onsu vs PT Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-259
Author(s):  
Nurhani Fithriah
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Business People ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Trademark Registration

Brand registration is very important for business people. A brand is one of the distinguishing entities between the business activities of business actors. The problem occurs when business actors already have a trademark which is then well known in the community but in fact they have not registered the trademark, as experienced by Ruben Samuel Onsu with his Geprek chicken business. However, in its development, it turns out that there are other business actors using the same mark but have registered the mark. This research was conducted using a normative method through a statutory approach and concepts. This research examines the Supreme Court's decision rejecting the appeal from Ruben Samuel Onsu and analyzes the urgency and procedures for trademark registration. Based on the research results, trademark law in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The terms and procedures for application for registration of a mark are regulated in Article 4 - Article 8 and further regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. registration of a mark and being recognized as the legal owner of the mark and rights to the mark are obtainedafter the mark is registered. Ruben Onsu's Bensu mark was declared invalid because Ruben Onsu was not the first party to register the mark, and the Supreme Court decided to cancel all trademark applications made by Ruben Onsu.

scholarly journals Peran Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Erick Junata Sipayung
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Geographical Location ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
Community Factors

Indonesia is a country rich in biological natural resources which is spread throughout the region, including the Riau Islands Province. Geographical location surrounded by almost 90% (ninety percent) of the sea area, it indirectly indicates the potential of Geographical Indications that are spread in 7 (seven) districts/ cities in Riau Islands. Directorate General of Intellectual Property through the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights has committed to continue to explore the IG potential in each region determined through the Annual Performance Target. IG legal protection can only be given if an item or product has been registered, for example "Sagu Lingga" which has just been declared as one of the IG products. The registration of “Sagu Lingga” is inseparable from the role of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Riau Islands in collaboration with the Lingga Regency Government and Indonesian Sagu Empowerment Association of Lingga. From the results of research in the field, in an effort to register potential IG Products in Riau Islands Province, the Role of the Kemenkumham Kepri Regional Office since the enactment of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications has not been running optimally, where the form of efforts carried out is still limited to inventory, coordination with local governments and supervision of IG products. This is caused by the existence of several constraints caused by several factors including Legal Factors, Law Enforcement Factors, Means and Infrastructure Factors, Community Factors and also Cultural Factors. Whereas the IG registration effort should aim to establish legal certainty and increase the economic value of a product that has an impact on the welfare of the community. This is what then makes researcher interested in pouring it in the form of research. All information was carried out by unstructured interviews, observations and document studies where sample selection was carried out using the purposive sampling method. The research method used is a sociological juridical research method.

scholarly journals PERAN PEMERINTAH DALAM MENGANTISIPASI TERJADINYAPERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK JUJUR BERDASARKANUNDANG-UNDANGNOMOR20TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS

to-ra ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 628
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ferdian
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Sanctions ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Education Campaigns ◽  
The Government

Abstract Business competition is often found whose business competition is dishonest, especially towards trademarks. In terms of minimizing the occurrence of violations of unfair business competition, the government has a very im- portant role. The government needs to conduct socialization related to fair business competition on trademarks, by: conducting education, campaigns, providing understanding, providing training for of cers in the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, inviting the public in the ght against counterfeiting and imitation, and the exis- tence of monitoring, evaluation , and fostering by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property or the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) and conducting strict reprimands and legal sanctions for business actors who continue to violate their business activities and are proven, then Law Number 20 Year 2016 concern- ing Trademarks and Geographical Indications , speci cally regulates the provision of criminal sanctions that are included in the provisions of Articles 100 and 102.   Keywords: business competition; dishonest; KPPU; legal sanctions.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Produk Indikasi Geografis dari Tindakan Peniruan

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Ngurah Tresna Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Empirical Law

Legal protection of Geographical Indications is necessary to determine whether there are communal or collective people. The communal community character means to belong to the community in the registered Geographical Indication area. This study aims to analyze legal certainty as well as the legal protection of product geographical indications of imitation actions. This research uses empirical law research method. In this case, the authors find that the TRIPs Agreement (Trade-related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) and the act no 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications are terms used to register. Perlindungan hukum terhadap Indikasi Geografis sangat perlu di perhatikan karena karakter kepemilikannya yang kolektif atau komunal. Karakter kepemilikan yang komunal memiliki arti menjadi milik bersama semua masyarakat dalam wilayah Indikasi Geografis yang telah didaftarkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum produk indikasi geografis dari tindakan peniruan. Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menemukan bahwa TRIPs Agreement (Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) dan Undang-Undang 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis mengatur secara khusus perlindungan bagi produk indikasi geografis yang telah didaftarkan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document