scholarly journals Examining the Agreement Object as Good Deeds from the Consequentialism and Deontology Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
Taufiq El Rahman

<em>This study aimed to analyze the agreement object as good deeds from the legal philosophy perspective. Postulated to legal positivism, this rejects the deviation of the agreement on the good deed of transplanting organs or body tissues. The results compiled using normative legal research methods described the flow of consequentialism and deontology. These doctrines state that kidney transplant procedures conducted voluntarily based on humanity have benefited recipients and donors. Therefore, they increase the happiness level of both parties without leaving the concept of Kantian moral ethics.</em>

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Fokky Fuad

ABSTRACT This study aims to analyze how Hamka’s thinking about nationality, as well as moral values in accordance with the legal system of the philosophy of Pancasila. The method used in this research is a normative legal research methods to approach concepts (conceptual approach). Hamka’s idea about national values are still relevant in developing the love for the homeland. Hamka’s thinking about nationality, religious and rejected the concept of secularization. He said God is the center of human strength established the nation. The spirit of divinity embodied in the form of patriotism needs to be instilled in every person. According to Hamka, philosophy Pancasila indicates the religious character of the Indonesian nation. Therefore, the implementation of law should be sourced from the religious philosophy of Pancasila. Recognition ofthe existence of God in the Pancasila should be realized in the form of legal which has religious values. Keywords: Hamka, legal philosophy Pancasila, moral law


Yuridika ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Indah Cahyani ◽  
Tatiek Sri Djatmiati

The article titled “BUMN between Private Law and Public Law” aims to find the best solution for crossing the position of BUMN that meets in it two different legal regimes namely private law and public law in Indonesia. Until now it has not been found yet, the most appropriate measure to differentiate BUMN/BUMD is subject to state finance or whether it is subject to the private financial system. Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning state finance has a strong public law nuance representing Hobbes's thinking, while Law Number 19 of 2003 concerning BUMN is stronger in the spirit of private law which represents Grotius' ideas, the problem that arises, namely how to resolve the law dogmatically fairly between the two laws that contain the opposite spirit. The article uses normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach, a statutes approach and a legal case approach. This research resulted in recommendations for the use of legal philosophy as a meta theory for legal theory to be the settlement of the meeting point to find an equilibrium that fulfills a sense of justice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Karlina Perdana ◽  
Pujiyono ,

<p>Abstract<br />This legal research examines the weakness of Act No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications, as until now there is still a knockoff brands that passed trademark registration in Indonesia. This research uses  doctrinal  or  normative  prescriptive  research  methods.  Results  of  this  study  is  the  absence  of the requirements and there are multiple interpretations of the philosophy of the brand famous brand understanding and similarity in principle or in its entirety.</p><p>Keyword: Trademark registration, weakness of Act<br /> <br />Abstrak<br />Penulisan hukum ini mengkaji mengenai kelemahan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis sebagaimana sampai sekarang ini masih terdapat merek-merek tiruan yang lolos pendaftaran merek di Indonesia. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal atau normatif yang bersifat preskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah tidak adanya persyaratan filosofi merek dan terdapat multitafsir pemahaman merek terkenal dan persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya.</p><p>Kata kunci: pendaftaran merek, kelemahan UU</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Avina Rismadewi

The offer of making Nominee Agreement services by legal consulting companies has an impact on the rapid development of nominee practices in Indonesia, whereas based on the provisions of Article 33 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) prohibits Nominee Agreement in the ownership of shares in a company. This study aims to analyze the responsibilities of legal consulting companies that offer making Nominee Agarement online. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study show that companies that deliberately offer Nominee Agreements violate the provisions contained in Article 33 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Law No. 25 of 2007, also violates the provisions of Article 9, Article 28 paragraph (1), and Article 36 of Law No. 11 of 2008, and may be subject to sanctions as referred to in Article 23 of Law No. 11 of 2008 and has responsibility to fulfill compensation as in the suit filed under Article 23 of Law No. 11 of 2008. Penawaran jasa pembuatan Nominee Agreement oleh perusahaan legal consulting berimbas pada berkembang pesatnya praktik nominee di Indonesia, sedangkan berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) melarang Nominee Agreement dalam kepemilikan saham pada suatu perusahaan. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tanggungjawab perusahaan legal consulting yang menawarkan pembuatan Nominee Agarement secara online. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dari studi ini menunjukan bahwa perusahaan yang dengan sengaja menawarkan Nominee Agreement melanggar ketentuan sebagaimana tercantum dalam Pasal 33 ayat (1) dan ayat (2), UU No. 25 Tahun 2007, juga melanggar ketentuan Pasal 9, Pasal 28 ayat (1), dan Pasal 36 UU No. 11 tahun 2008, dan dapat dikenakan sanksi sebagaimana dalam Pasal 23 UU No 11 tahun 2008 dan bertanggungjawab mengganti kerugian sebagaimana gugatan yang diajukan berdasarkan Pasal 23 UU No 11 tahun 2008.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 45-58
Author(s):  
Toni Parlindungan S

Proses pemeriksaan saksi dimulai dari penyidikan sampai pada tingkat penuntutan di pengadilan. Di tingkat penyidikan maka terlebih dahulu saksi diperiksa oleh penyidik dengan memperhatikan perlindungan terhadap saksi yaitu tanpa ancaman atau tekanan.dari pihak manapun. Kemudian saksi dapat diperiksa di tempat kediaman saksi dan saksi diperiksa tanpa disumpah. Sedangkan pada tingkat penuntutan atau pesidangan maka terlebih dahulu saksi dipanggil untuk didengar keterangannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan terhadap objek penulisan atau suatu karya ilmiah guna mendapatkan data-data, pokok-pokok pikiran, serta pendapat lainnya dari pakar atau media apapun, yaitu terkait pemeriksaan saksi dalam perkara pidana berdasarkan ius contitum indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative.   Abstract The process of examining witnesses starts from the investigation to the level of prosecution in court. At the level of investigation, the investigator first examines witnesses by paying attention to the protection of witnesses, namely without threats or pressure from any party. Then the witness can be examined at the witness' residence and the witness can be examined without being sworn in. Meanwhile, at the level of prosecution or trial, witnesses are first called to be heard. This study aims to meet the need for the object of writing or a scientific work in order to obtain data, main ideas, and other opinions from experts or any media, which is related to the examination of witnesses in criminal cases based on ius contitum indonesia. This research the authors use normative legal research methods


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nadia Imanda

Abstract: The era of technology brings people to the development of sophisticated computers and smartphones in which the applications of various types and purposes are. Notary as a public official appointed by the state to take care of most countries and communities in the context of civil law, has legal provisions related to what may and may not be done by a Notary. In this case, the Notary Code of Ethics of the Indonesian Notary Association (INI) states that notaries are denied publication and self-promotion of their positions through writing media as well as electronic media, but the category of advertising on publicity and self-promotion does not provide clear interpretation on android application that indicates to violate the Article 4 paragraph (3) Notary Code of Ethics. This legal research uses normative research methods using the statute approach and conceptual approaches. The use of an android application by a notary who indicates committing violation must be studied and supervised from the Notary Honorary Board and Notary Supervisory Board  so that the inteniont and the purpose of the UUJN and the Notary Code of Ethics can be realized and the office of notary as a profession cannot be dishonored.  Abstrak: Era teknologi membawa manusia pada perkembangan komputer dan smartphone canggih yang di dalamnya terdapat fasilitas aplikasi berbagai macam jenis dan tujuan. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang diangkat oleh negara untuk mengurusi sebagian urusan negara dan masyarakat dalam lingkup hukum perdata, memiliki ketentuan hukum terkait apa yang boleh dan tidak boleh dilakukan oleh seorang Notaris. Dalam hal ini, Kode Etik Notaris Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I) menyatakan bahwa notaris dilarang melak         ukan publikasi dan promosi diri terhadap jabatannya melalui media tulis mau pun media elektronik, namun kategori batasan terhadap publikasi dan promosi diri dinilai kurang memberikan kejelasan hukum bahwasanya ditemukan aplikasi android yang berindikasi pelanggaran Pasal 4 ayat (3) Kode Etik Notaris. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan berdasarkan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Penggunaan aplikasi android oleh notaris yang berindikasi melakukan pelanggaran harus dilakukan pengkajian dan pengawasan dari Dewan Kehormatan Notaris dan Majelis Pengawas Notaris agar maksud dan tujuan UUJN serta Kode Etik Notaris dapat terwujud dan tidak mencederai jabatan notaris sebagai profesi yang mulia. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-186
Author(s):  
I Gusti Agung Gede Catra Artawan ◽  
I Nyoman Budiartha ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama

Underground water is water that is contained in a layer of soil or rock below the soil surface. This study aims to determine the government's authority in regulating groundwater permits and what are the legal consequences of violating unlicensed groundwater use. The research was conducted using empirical legal research methods, source of the data which was used are primary and secondary sources of legal materials, methods of collecting legal materials using documentation studies and field research, and analyzing legal materials using descriptive analysis methods. The results of this study indicate that the Government's authority in permitting groundwater is regulated in the Bali Governor Regulation Number 5 of 2016 concerning Groundwater Permits, particularly in Article 3 paragraph (1), it is explained that the Governor has the authority to manage groundwater in CAT in the province. In Article 3 paragraph (2), the authority of the Government (Governor) is reaffirmed, including several things, namely: granting permits for groundwater drilling; give permission to extract groundwater; grant permits for the use of groundwater; granting permits for groundwater exploitation; grant permits to groundwater drilling companies; provide guidance, supervise technical investigations and use of Groundwater. As a result of violations of the use of groundwater by violating the parties in accordance with Article 15 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 of 1974 concerning Irrigation, it is stated that anyone who deliberately runs water and / or water sources business without permission from the Government is punishable by imprisonment. 2 (two) years and or a maximum fine of Rp. 5,000,000 (five million rupiah).


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Constanze Semmelmann

General principles are en vogue in EU law – and in need of conceptual clarification. A closer look at several concepts of principle in legal philosophy and legal theory sheds light upon the concept of general principles in EU law. A distinction between an aprioristic model of principle and a model of principle informed by legal positivism may contribute to clarifying the genesis of a (general) principle in EU law, as well as its nature and functions. This paper demonstrates that an evolution has taken place from a reliance on seemingly natural law inspired reflections of general principles via the desperate search to ground general principles in various kinds of sources based on a more or less sound methodology  towards an increasing reliance on strictly positivistic approaches. Against this backdrop, general principles are likely to lose significance where there are other norms while retaining an important yet uncontrollable role where the traditional canon of sources is silent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document