scholarly journals AKTUALISASI PANCASILA SEBAGAI LANDASAN POLITIK HUKUM INDONESIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derita Prapti Rahayu ,
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The Other ◽  
National Integration ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Legislation

<h4>Abstract</h4> <p><strong><em> </em></strong></p> <p><em>Pancasila is a major cornerstone in the making of law (law and Legislation) with a new or replacement of laws (political law), so that the values of the Deity, Humanity and Society (nationalistic; democratic; social justice) must be actualized into the substance of the law, the legal structure and legal culture to be built, is expected to strengthen national integration, democratization of law, achieve prosperity and social justice by putting Pancasila, ranging from values, goals until the actualization of the various fields of existing law, whether criminal, civil, administrative and the other, as well as the internalization of the structures of law and legal culture of Pancasila.</em><em> </em></p> <p><strong>Keyword</strong><em>s : Actualization, Pancasila, Politics of Law</em><em> </em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <h3>Abstrak</h3> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p>Pancasila merupakan landasan utama dalam pembuatan hukum (Peraturan Perundang-Undangang) baru maupun dengan penggantian hukum lama (politik hukum), sehingga nilai-nilai Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan dan Kemasyarakatan (nasionalistik; demokratik; berkeadilan sosial) harus teraktualisasi kedalam substansi hukum, struktur hukum maupun kultur hukum yang akan dibangun, diharapkan dapat menguatkan integrasi bangsa, demokratisasi hukum, tercapainya kesejahteraan dan keadilan sosial dengan menempatkan Pancasila, mulai dari nilai, tujuan sampai dengan aktualisasi kepada berbagai bidang hukum yang ada, baik hukum pidana, perdata, tata usaha negara dan lain-lain, serta internalisasi pada struktur hukum dan budaya hukum Pancasila.</p> <p><strong>Kata Kunci : </strong>aktualisasi, Pancasila, Politik Hukum</p>

scholarly journals AKTUALISASI PANCASILA SEBAGAI LANDASAN POLITIK HUKUM INDONESIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derita Prapti Rahayu
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The Other ◽  
National Integration ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Legislation

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Pancasila is a major cornerstone in the making of law (law and Legislation) with a new or replacement of laws (political law), so that the values of the Deity, Humanity and Society (nationalistic; democratic; social justice) must be actualized into the substance of the law, the legal structure and legal culture to be built, is expected to strengthen national integration, democratization of law, achieve prosperity and social justice by putting Pancasila, ranging from values, goals until the actualization of the various fields of existing law, whether criminal, civil, administrative and the other, as well as the internalization of the structures of law and legal culture of Pancasila.</em></p><p><strong>Keyword</strong><em>s : Actualization, Pancasila, Politics of Law</em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Pancasila merupakan landasan utama dalam pembuatan hukum (Peraturan Perundang-Undangang) baru maupun dengan penggantian hukum lama (politik hukum), sehingga nilai-nilai Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan dan Kemasyarakatan (nasionalistik; demokratik; berkeadilan sosial) harus teraktualisasi kedalam substansi hukum, struktur hukum maupun kultur hukum yang akan dibangun, diharapkan dapat menguatkan integrasi bangsa, demokratisasi hukum, tercapainya kesejahteraan dan keadilan sosial dengan menempatkan Pancasila, mulai dari nilai, tujuan sampai dengan aktualisasi kepada berbagai bidang hukum yang ada, baik hukum pidana, perdata, tata usaha negara dan lain-lain, serta internalisasi pada struktur hukum dan budaya hukum Pancasila.</p><strong>Kata Kunci : </strong>aktualisasi, Pancasila, Politik Hukum

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi dalam Meminimalisir Kejahatan Anak Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

FENOMENA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abnan Pancasilawati ◽  
Muhamad Noor
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Integration ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law

The implementation of legislation either nationally or internationally linked to the implementation of restorative justice as one of the alterntif in the process of implementation of conviction against children in conflict with the law had been applied, but the case has not yet been thoroughly and still limited at the law enforcement officers and observers who are committed and integrity as well as having the attention to this problems. The implementation of restorative justice which is applied at each level of the process of criminal justice in the form of taking back the children to their parents, versioned by handing the children to Panti Sosial Marsudi Putra (PSMP), and the implementation of social integration through giving CB, CMB, and PB for children who are already serving imprisonment. Some obstacle factors the implementation of restorative justice as one of the alternatives in the implementation of conviction against children in conflict with the law, including physical building facilities and non-physical facilities and legal substance. It is because restorative justice has not been expressly regulated, even though in the law nomer 11, 2012 concerning about the Child Criminal System has been regulated but until now it has not been declared valid. The other factors are legal structure and legal culture.

Mediation Effectiveness in Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement: Phenomenology in Bukittinggi Religious Court

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Riska Fauziah Hayati ◽  
Busyro Busyro ◽  
Bustamar Bustamar
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Analysis Framework ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
The Law ◽  
Mediation Effectiveness

<p dir="ltr"><span>The main problem in this paper is how the effectiveness of mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution based on PERMA No. 1 of 2016 at the Bukittinggi Religious Court, and what are the inhibiting factors success of mediation. To answer this question, the author uses an inductive and deductive analysis framework regarding the law effectiveness theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This paper finds that mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Bukittinggi Religious Court from 2016 to 2019 has not been effective. The ineffectiveness is caused by several factors that influence it: First, in terms of legal substance, PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts still lacks in addressing the problems of the growing community. Second, in terms of legal structure, there are no judges who have mediator certificates. Third, the legal facilities and infrastructure at the Bukittinggi Religious Court have supported mediation. Fourth, in terms of legal culture, there are still many people who are not aware of the law and do not understand mediation well, so they consider mediation to be unimportant.</span> </p><p><em>Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang bagaimana efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah berdasarkan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dan apa saja yang menjadi faktor penghambat keberhasilan mediasi. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisa induktif dan deduktif dengan mengacu pada teori efektivitas hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. </em><em>Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa m</em><em>ediasi dalam p</em><em>enyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi </em><em>dari tahun 2016 sampai 2019 </em><em>belum efektif</em><em>. Hal ini karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. </em><em> </em><em>Pertama, dari segi substansi hukum, yaitu PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih memiliki kekurangan dalam menjawab persoalan masyarakat yang terus berkembang. Kedua, dari segi struktur hukum, belum adanya hakim yang memiliki sertifikat mediator. Ketiga, sarana dan prasarana hukum di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi sudah mendukung mediasi. Keempat, dari segi budaya hukum, masih banyaknya masyarakat yang tidak sadar hukum dan tidak mengerti persoalan mediasi dengan baik, sehingga menganggap mediasi tidak penting.</em><em></em></p>

scholarly journals DEBTOR PROTECTION IN PERSPECTIVE OF PANCASILA JUSTICE VALUE ON SEPARATIC CREDITOR EXECUTIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Widhi Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Human Values ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Ability To Pay ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Debtor Protection

The execution of the execution by separatist creditors without going through court adjudication as stipulated in Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 of 2004 is contrary to Pancasila justice. The method used in this research is a non-doctrinal method. Based on the data obtained, it can be seen that the implementation of bankruptcy executions as regulated in Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 of 2004 prioritizes the interests of separatist creditors, this is further complicated by the existence of a legal culture that shows that bankruptcy executions are guaranteed with mortgage rights. Without having to go through an amazing in court, the meaning of the debtor's insolvency should be an examination in court or through amazing regarding the debtor's ability to pay off his debt, not solely based on the analysis and views of the separatist creditors. This is implicitly based on Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and automatically contradicts the values of Pancasila social justice. This means that in the legal policy of bankruptcy execution, it must be able to create a balance of protection of rights between creditors and debtors, by the view of appreciation for human values or human rights awards in the form of equality before the law to be able to realize a just bankruptcy execution that can protect the interests of separatist creditors while protecting debtors from losses resulting from bankruptcy.

scholarly journals On an Interpreter’s Game with the Legal Text and Extratextual Factors in the Derivative Concept of Legal Interpretation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Jabłoński ◽  
Przemysław Kaczmarek
Keyword(s):  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Legal Text ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
Derivative Concept

The aim of this paper is to show the derivative concept of legal interpretation from the point of view of the structure of limits of the juridical power. This structure includes the politico-legal culture, the legal text, the juridical culture, and personal factors, such as ethical and aesthetic judgements. These days, the derivative concept is the most influential Polish theory of legal interpretation. According to this concept the process of interpreting the law is a kind of a game between the legal text and extratextual factors, which are treated as extratextual limits of juridical power. On the one hand, the legal text does not determine the full meaning of the law, although it has great importance for it. On the other hand, the derivative concept precisely identifies certain others factors that are relevant for the content of law.

scholarly journals Pembatalan Perkawinan dan Akibat Hukumnya: Studi Putusan Nomor 1384/Pdt.G/2013/PA Mks

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Husaima Husaima ◽  
Ma’ruf Hafidz ◽  
Hasbuddin Khalid
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Serta menganalisis faktor-faktor efektivitas yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum bagi perlindungan konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Hasil yang diperoleh penulis dalam melakukan penelitian ini adalah Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap perusahaan Leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum terbagi menjadi dua yakni bentuk preventif dan represif. Penegakan hukum sengketa konsumen tidak lepas dari tiga faktor yaitu Substansi Hukum, Struktur Hukum dan Kultur Hukumnya yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan prosesnya. Adapun diantaranya ialah ketentuan yang kontradiktif dan rumusannya tidak jelas serta tegas, terlalu banyak peranan lemabaga yang terlibat dalam penegakan hukum UUPK,  tidak adanya pedoman operasioanl, dan pelaku usaha tidak melaksanakan putusan BPSK dengan sukarela. This study aims to determine and analyze the form of legal protection for consumers against companies leasing that commit acts against the law. As well as analyzing the factors that influence law enforcement for consumer protection agains tcompanies leasing that commit acts against the law. The results obtained by the author in conducting this research are consumer protection against companies leasing that commit acts against the law is divided into two, namely preventive and repressive forms. Law enforcement of consumer disputes cannot be separated from three factors, namely Legal Substance, Legal Structure and Legal Culture which affect the success of the process. Among them are contradictory provisions and the formulation is not clear and firm, there are too many roles of institutions involved in UUPK law enforcement, there are no operational guidelines, and business actors do not voluntarily implement BPSK decisions.

scholarly journals KENDALA DALAM PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PRAKTIK PARANORMAL SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1908
Author(s):  
Yusi Permatasi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law

In Society, Paranormal practices is considered as common things. Paranormal Practices is used for any good and also for crime, so to cope with the activities, government had regulated the act to control the crime by using paranormal background. The paranormal practices have been included as criminal acts. It has regulated in article 545 and article 546 of the criminal law act and set on as supernatural powers activity. As time passes, there are constraint in the alleviation law it’s law enforcement. This research was done with empirical or law sociological point of view, where Lawrence M. Friedman state that the elements of the legal system consist of Legal Structure, Legal Substance, and Legal Culture. The result of this research is the paranormal practices are differentiate by it used which is good or bad. The bad paranormal practices cause loss for society. This gave rise to uncertainty of law enforcement on the paranormal practices, therefore it need a deep research which is not only from the law enforcement point of view, but also the religious and cultural represented by figure.

scholarly journals Law as Culture? Culturalist Perspectives in Legal Theory and Theory of Methods

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-270
Author(s):  
Franz Reimer
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Cultural Practice ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Law ◽  
Fact Finding ◽  
The Concept Of Law ◽  
Traditional Approaches

This Article questions in what sense law in the German tradition has been—and can still be—considered a form of culture. The Article offers an overview of traditional approaches to law and culture in German Legal Theory and the Theory of Methods, and argues that the law has shifted from being perceived as culture during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to being in contrast with culture, which is considered the “other” of the law. Mediated by “legal culture,” the discourse pendulum has swung back to the notion of “Law as Culture” during the last three decades. Thomas Gutmann, the German lawyer, has fiercely challenged equating law with culture, describing it as “murky” and irrelevant. Similarly, the concept of “Law as Culture” is questioned by the provocations of “Law and Affect.” This Article claims that, irrespective of conceptual framework trends, applying the law remains a highly challenging cultural practice in terms of both fact-finding and interpreting legal norms.

scholarly journals IMPIAN YANG TERABAIKAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (II) ◽  
pp. 181-204
Author(s):  
Amrunsyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

This paper is entitled "The Neglected Dream" (Implementation of the Purpose of Law and Criminal Law in Indonesia). Law and the purpose of law have interrelated and inseparable links. The law always plays an important role in a country even the law has a multifunction with the aim of the public good in order to achieve justice, legal certainty, order, expediency, and others. However, this is far from the fire. That is, the public is only given the wind of heaven and dreams that wash away while the state authorities use the law as a tool to suppress society, so that society can be positioned in accordance with the desires of the state authorities. The implementation of the law and the purpose of the law in force in Indonesia is clearly visible, so through a number of legal theories set forth in this paper will be a little stomping for anyone who understands it when compensating for the facts that occur in the midst of society. In fact, for people who want to get legal justice but in reality are entangled in the law. The government should be serious in responding to this because the people have given full mandate to manage this country, including in dealing with legal issues, both in terms of legal structure, legal substance and legal culture played by law enforcement.

7. Exemption Clauses and Unfair Terms

2021 ◽  
pp. 202-246
Author(s):  
André Naidoo
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
Unfair Term ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law ◽  
Unfair Terms ◽  
Law And Legislation

This chapter assesses exemption clauses and unfair terms. Exemption clauses are terms that either exclude or limit the liability of a party. The law relating to the use of such clauses is a mixture of rules found in both the common law and legislation; the common law rules apply to all contracts. In addition, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applies to the use of exemption clauses in contracts between two businesses. For consumers, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 provides wider protection from unfair terms including exemption clauses. The practical context of exemption clauses is simple. One party will be in breach and so the other will seek compensation for the loss caused by the breach. The party in breach will then defend the action by relying on an exemption clause. The dispute is then about whether or not the clause can be relied upon. The circumstances in which terms might be assessed for being ‘unfair’ can be wider than this. Typically, a business will take action against a consumer following the consumer’s failure to perform an obligation, which will then prompt the consumer to challenge the obligation as based on an unfair term.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document